Combination of constant-flow and continuous positive-pressure ventilation in canine pulmonary edema

1989 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 817-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. I. Sznajder ◽  
C. J. Becker ◽  
G. P. Crawford ◽  
L. D. Wood
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Edema ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Alveolar Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Constant Flow ◽  
Positive End Expiratory Pressure ◽  
Ventilatory Mode ◽  
Continuous Positive Pressure ◽  
Bronchoscopic Guidance ◽  
Normal Lungs

Constant-flow ventilation (CFV) maintains alveolar ventilation without tidal excursion in dogs with normal lungs, but this ventilatory mode requires high CFV and bronchoscopic guidance for effective subcarinal placement of two inflow catheters. We designed a circuit that combines CFV with continuous positive-pressure ventilation (CPPV; CFV-CPPV), which negates the need for bronchoscopic positioning of CFV cannula, and tested this system in seven dogs having oleic acid-induced pulmonary edema. Addition of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP, 10 cmH2O) reduced venous admixture from 44 +/- 17 to 10.4 +/- 5.4% and kept arterial CO2 tension (PaCO2) normal. With the innovative CFV-CPPV circuit at the same PEEP and respiratory rate (RR), we were able to reduce tidal volume (VT) from 437 +/- 28 to 184 +/- 18 ml (P less than 0.001) and elastic end-inspiratory pressures (PEI) from 25.6 +/- 4.6 to 17.7 +/- 2.8 cmH2O (P less than 0.001) without adverse effects on cardiac output or pulmonary exchange of O2 or CO2; indeed, PaCO2 remained at 35 +/- 4 Torr even though CFV was delivered above the carina and at lower (1.6 l.kg-1.min-1) flows than usually required to maintain eucapnia during CFV alone. At the same PEEP and RR, reduction of VT in the CPPV mode without CFV resulted in CO2 retention (PaCO2 59 +/- 8 Torr). We conclude that CFV-CPPV allows CFV to effectively mix alveolar and dead spaces by a small bulk flow bypassing the zone of increased resistance to gas mixing, thereby allowing reduction of the CFV rate, VT, and PEI for adequate gas exchange.

Effects of continuous positive-pressure ventilation in experimental pulmonary edema

1976 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 568-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. C. Hopewell ◽  
J. F. Murray
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Edema ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Colloid Osmotic Pressure ◽  
Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Water Volume ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Positive End Expiratory Pressure ◽  
Continuous Positive Pressure ◽  
Double Isotope

We compared the effects of continuous positive-pressure ventilation (CPPV), using 10 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), with intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV), on pulmonary extravascular water volume (PEWV) and lung function in dogs with pulmonary edema caused by elevated left atrial pressure and decreased colloid osmotic pressure. The PEWV was measured by gravimetric and double-isotope indicator dilution methods. Animals with high (22–33 mmHg), moderately elevated (12–20 mmHg), and normal (3–11 mmHg) left atrial pressures (Pla) were studied. The PEWV by both methods was significantly increased in the high and moderate Pla groups, the former greater than the latter (P less than 0.05). There was no difference in the PEWV between animals receiving CPPV and those receiving IPPV in both the high and moderately elevated Pla groups. However, in animals with high Pla, the Pao2 was significantly better maintained and the inflation pressure required to deliver a tidal volume of 12 ml/kg was significantly less with the use of CPPV than with IPPV. We conclude that in pulmonary edema associated with high Pla, PEEP does not reduce PEWV but does improve pulmonary function.

Effect of negative-pressure ventilation on lung water in permeability pulmonary edema

1989 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 2223-2230 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Skaburskis ◽  
R. P. Michel ◽  
A. Gatensby ◽  
A. Zidulka
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Pulmonary Edema ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Lung Water ◽  
Anesthetized Dogs ◽  
Water Accumulation ◽  
Permeability Pulmonary Edema ◽  
Continuous Positive Pressure

We have previously shown (Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 136: 886–891, 1987) improved cardiac output in dogs with pulmonary edema ventilated with external continuous negative chest pressure ventilation (CNPV) using negative end-expiratory pressure (NEEP), compared with continuous positive-pressure ventilation (CPPV) using equivalent positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The present study examined the effect on lung water of CNPV compared with CPPV to determine whether the increased venous return created by NEEP worsened pulmonary edema in dogs with acute lung injury. Oleic acid (0.06 ml/kg) was administered to 27 anesthetized dogs. Supine animals were then divided into three groups and ventilated for 6 h. The first group (n = 10) was treated with intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) alone; the second (n = 9) received CNPV with 10 cmH2O NEEP; the third (n = 8) received CPPV with 10 cmH2O PEEP. CNPV and CPPV produced similar improvements in oxygenation over IPPV. However, cardiac output was significantly depressed by CPPV, but not by CNPV, when compared with IPPV. Although there were no differences in extravascular lung water (Qwl/dQl) between CNPV and CPPV, both significantly increased Qwl/dQl compared with IPPV (7.81 +/- 0.21 and 7.87 +/- 0.31 vs. 6.71 +/- 0.25, respectively, P less than 0.01 in both instances). CNPV and CPPV, but not IPPV, enhanced lung water accumulation in the perihilar areas where interstitial pressures may be most negative at higher lung volumes.

Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on the right ventricle

1986 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 819-826 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Henning
Keyword(s):  
Stroke Volume ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Ventricular Volume ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Right Ventricular Volume ◽  
Positive End Expiratory Pressure ◽  
Lung Water ◽  
Fluid Infusion ◽  
Lung Water Content

Transmural cardiac pressures, stroke volume, right ventricular volume, and lung water content were measured in normal dogs and in dogs with oleic acid-induced pulmonary edema (PE) maintained on positive-pressure ventilation. Measurements were performed prior to and following application of 20 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Colloid fluid was given during PEEP for ventricular volume expansion before and after the oleic acid administration. PEEP significantly increased pleural pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance but decreased right ventricular volume, stroke volume, and mean arterial pressure in both normal and PE dogs. Although the fluid infusion during PEEP raised right ventricular diastolic volumes to the pre-PEEP level, the stroke volumes did not significantly increase in either normal dogs or the PE dogs. The fluid infusion, however, significantly increased the lung water content in the PE dogs. Following discontinuation of PEEP, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and stroke volume significantly increased, and heart rate did not change. The failure of the stroke volume to increase despite significant right ventricular volume augmentation during PEEP indicates that positive-pressure ventilation with 20 cmH2O PEEP decreases right ventricular function.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document