Spatial organization of catfish retinal neurons. I. Single- and random-bar stimulation

1980 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 807-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. W. Davis ◽  
K. Naka
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Ictalurus Punctatus ◽  
Spatial Organization ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Functional Characteristic ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Small Field ◽  
Retinal Neurons

1. Receptive-field profiles of catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) retinal neurons were produced by a moving single bar or a moving random grating, which was swept across the cell's receptive field at a constant speed. 2. Bipolar cells form either an on- or an off-center biphasic field and are approximately linear in time and space. 3. Type-C or transient cells form predominantly monotonic receptive fields. We find two subclasses, one slow and the other fast transient cells. They can be identified functionally as well as morphologically. 4. Type-N or sustained cells form a biphasic receptive field, which is revealed by a bar of light. The monotonic field found by a spot or an annulus of light represents activity of the cell's field center. 5. There are two ganglion-cell types, small-field cells and large-field cells. It appears as if small-field cells copy signals in the bipolar cells and large-field cells, signals in the type-N cells. We suggest, however, that this observation represents the limitation imposed by our stimuli rather than an overall functional characteristic of catfish ganglion cells.

Similarities and differences among inner retinal neurons revealed by the expression of reporter transgenes controlled by Brn-3a, Brn-3b, and Brn-3c promotor sequences

1996 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 955-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengqing Xiang ◽  
Lijuan Zhou ◽  
Jeremy Nathans
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Placental Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Retinal Neurons ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory ◽  
Human Placental Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Transgenic Lines ◽  
Multiple Cell

AbstractBrn-3a, Brn-3b, and Brn-3c are highly homologous POU-domain transcription factors that are expressed in subsets of retinal ganglion cells. From each of the mouse Brn-3 genes, a DNA segment ranging in size from 4.6 to 13.4 kb and located immediately upstream of the start site of translation was joined to a human placental alkaline phosphatase (AP) reporter cDNA. Following the introduction of each construct into the mouse germline, a total of 19 transgenic lines were obtained, of which 16 expressed the AP reporter in the retina. Unexpectedly, at least 14 of the 16 expressing lines showed AP activity in subsets of amacrine cells, and these subsets typically differed among mouse lines injected with the same construct. Transgene expression was also found in ganglion cells in four lines and bipolar cells in seven lines. In all cases AP activity was confined to cells in the inner nuclear layer and the ganglion cell layer. The expression of Brn-3 transgenes in multiple cell types in the inner retina is reminiscent of earlier experiments in which visual pigment transgenes were found to be expressed in multiple cell types in the outer retina. Taken together, these observations suggest that anatomically and/or functionally related retinal neurons contain partially overlapping transcriptional regulatory specificities.

Spatial organizations of catfish retinal neurons. II. Circular stimulus

1980 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 832-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Y. Chan ◽  
K. Naka
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Temporal Dynamics ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Horizontal Cell ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Time And Space ◽  
Considerable Difficulty ◽  
Thin Ring ◽  
Type C

1. Temporal dynamics of receptive-field components were identified by use of circular stimuli whose diameter was modulated in white-noise fashion. 2. A thin ring of light evoked a complex response from the horizontal-cell soma but not from its axon. 3. All bipolar cells had a biphasic receptive field whose incremental sensitivities were comparable for the field's center and surround. 4. Type-N cells had a biphasic field whose two components were segregated both in time and space. 5. Type-C cells showed nonlinearities, which did not depend on the types of light inputs and which were intrinsic to the cell. 6. Ganglion cells could be classified roughly into two classes: small- and large-field cells. Their main nonlinearity was rectification. 7. Our studies on the catfish retna have shown that the distal cells are essentially linear in time and space and can be identified functionally by any type of input. The proximal cells, however, have a complex functional repertoire whose identification poses considerable difficulty.

scholarly journals A retinal circuit for the suppressed-by-contrast receptive field of a polyaxonal amacrine cell

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (17) ◽  
pp. 9577-9583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Jia ◽  
Seunghoon Lee ◽  
Yehong Zhuo ◽  
Z. Jimmy Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Amacrine Cell ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Wide Field ◽  
Small Field

Amacrine cells are a diverse population of interneurons in the retina that play a critical role in extracting complex features of the visual world and shaping the receptive fields of retinal output neurons (ganglion cells). While much of the computational power of amacrine cells is believed to arise from the immense mutual interactions among amacrine cells themselves, the intricate circuitry and functions of amacrine–amacrine interactions are poorly understood in general. Here we report a specific interamacrine pathway from a small-field, glutamate–glycine dual-transmitter amacrine cell (vGluT3) to a wide-field polyaxonal amacrine cell (PAS4/5). Distal tips of vGluT3 cell dendrites made selective glycinergic (but not glutamatergic) synapses onto PAS4/5 dendrites to provide a center-inhibitory, surround-disinhibitory drive that helps PAS4/5 cells build a suppressed-by-contrast (sbc) receptive field, which is a unique and fundamental trigger feature previously found only in a small population of ganglion cells. The finding of this trigger feature in a circuit upstream to ganglion cells suggests that the sbc form of visual computation occurs more widely in the retina than previously believed and shapes visual processing in multiple downstream circuits in multiple ways. We also identified two different subpopulations of PAS4/5 cells based on their differential connectivity with vGluT3 cells and their distinct receptive-field and luminance-encoding characteristics. Moreover, our results revealed a form of crosstalk between small-field and large-field amacrine cell circuits, which provides a mechanism for feature-specific local (<150 µm) control of global (>1 mm) retinal activity.

scholarly journals Spatial receptive field properties of rat retinal ganglion cells

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 403-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
WALTER F. HEINE ◽  
CHRISTOPHER L. PASSAGLIA
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Ganglion Cell ◽  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Quantitative Information ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
X And Y Cells ◽  
Y Cells

AbstractThe rat is a popular animal model for vision research, yet there is little quantitative information about the physiological properties of the cells that provide its brain with visual input, the retinal ganglion cells. It is not clear whether rats even possess the full complement of ganglion cell types found in other mammals. Since such information is important for evaluating rodent models of visual disease and elucidating the function of homologous and heterologous cells in different animals, we recorded from rat ganglion cells in vivo and systematically measured their spatial receptive field (RF) properties using spot, annulus, and grating patterns. Most of the recorded cells bore likeness to cat X and Y cells, exhibiting brisk responses, center-surround RFs, and linear or nonlinear spatial summation. The others resembled various types of mammalian W cell, including local-edge-detector cells, suppressed-by-contrast cells, and an unusual type with an ON–OFF surround. They generally exhibited sluggish responses, larger RFs, and lower responsiveness. The peak responsivity of brisk-nonlinear (Y-type) cells was around twice that of brisk-linear (X-type) cells and several fold that of sluggish cells. The RF size of brisk-linear and brisk-nonlinear cells was indistinguishable, with average center and surround diameters of 5.6 ± 1.3 and 26.4 ± 11.3 deg, respectively. In contrast, the center diameter of recorded sluggish cells averaged 12.8 ± 7.9 deg. The homogeneous RF size of rat brisk cells is unlike that of cat X and Y cells, and its implication regarding the putative roles of these two ganglion cell types in visual signaling is discussed.

Immuocytochemical analysis of spatial organization of photoreceptors and amacrine and ganglion cells in the tiger salamander retina

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
JIAN ZHANG ◽  
ZHUO YANG ◽  
SAMUEL M. WU
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cell ◽  
Spatial Organization ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Electrophysiological Study ◽  
Outer Nuclear Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Spatial Arrangement ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Proximal Region ◽  
Dorsal Retina

In the present study, using double- or triple-label immunocytochemistry in conjunction with confocal microscopy, we aimed to examine the population and distribution of photoreceptors, GABAergic and glycinergic amacrine cells, and ganglion cells, which are basic but important parameters for studying the structure–function relationship of the salamander retina. We found that the outer nuclear layer (ONL) contained 82,019 ± 3203 photoreceptors, of which 52% were rods and 48% were cones. The density of photoreceptors peaked at ∼8000 cells/mm2 in the ventral and dropped to ∼4000 cells/mm2 in the dorsal retina. In addition, the rod/cone ratio was less than 1 in the central retina but larger than 1 in the periphery. Moreover, in the proximal region of the inner nuclear layer (INL3), the total number of cells was 50,576 ± 8400. GABAergic and glycinergic amacrine cells made up approximately 78% of all cells in this layer, including 43% GABAergic, 32% glycinergic, and 3% GABA/glycine colocalized amacrine cells. The density of these amacrine cells was ∼6500 cells/mm2 in the ventral and ∼3200 cells/mm2 in the dorsal area. The ratio of GABAergic to glycinergic amacrine cells was larger than 1. Furthermore, in the ganglion cell layer (GCL), among a total of 36,007 ± 2010 cells, ganglion cells accounted for 65.7 ± 1.5% of the total cells, whereas displaced GABAergic and glycinergic amacrine cells comprised about 4% of the cells in this layer. The ganglion cell density was ∼1800 cells/mm2 in the ventral and ∼600 cells/mm2 in the dorsal retina. Our data demonstrate that all three major cell types are not uniformly distributed across the salamander retina. Instead, they exhibit a higher density in the ventral than in the dorsal retina and their spatial arrangement is associated with the retinal topography. These findings provide a basic anatomical reference for the electrophysiological study of this species.

scholarly journals Characterization of a novel large-field cone bipolar cell type in the primate retina: Evidence for selective cone connections

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
HANNAH R. JOO ◽  
BETH B. PETERSON ◽  
TONI J. HAUN ◽  
DENNIS M. DACEY
Keyword(s):  
Giant Cell ◽  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Dendritic Tree ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Giant Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Dendritic Field

AbstractParallel processing of visual information begins at the first synapse in the retina between the photoreceptors and bipolar cells. Ten bipolar cell types have been previously described in the primate retina: one rod and nine cone bipolar types. In this paper, we describe an 11th type of bipolar cell identified in Golgi-stained macaque retinal whole mount and vertical section. Axonal stratification depth, in addition to dendritic and axonal morphology, distinguished the “giant” cell from all previously well-recognized bipolar cell types. The giant bipolar cell had a very large and sparsely branched dendritic tree and a relatively large axonal arbor that costratified with the DB4 bipolar cell near the center of the inner plexiform layer. The sparseness of the giant bipolar’s dendritic arbor indicates that, like the blue cone bipolar, it does not contact all the cones in its dendritic field. Giant cells contacting the same cones as midget bipolar cells, which are known to contact single long-wavelength (L) or medium-wavelength (M) cones, demonstrate that the giant cell does not exclusively contact short-wavelength (S) cones and, therefore, is not a variant of the previously described blue cone bipolar. This conclusion is further supported by measurement of the cone contact spacing for the giant bipolar. The giant cell contacts an average of about half the cones in its dendritic field (mean ± s.d. = 52 ± 17.6%; n = 6), with a range of 27–82%. The dendrites from single or neighboring giant cells that converge onto the same cones suggest that the giant cell may selectively target a subset of cones with a highly variable local density, such as the L or M cones.

Expression profiling of GABAA receptor β-subunits in the rat retina

1994 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena V. Grigorenko ◽  
Hermes H. Yeh
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Photoreceptor Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Retinal Cell ◽  
Rod Photoreceptor ◽  
Β Subunit ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Retinal Neuron ◽  
Rat Retina

AbstractThis study profiled the expression of the family of GABAA receptor β-subunits in the adult rat retina. Using a combination of reverse transcriptase reaction followed by polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with gene-specific primers, the expression of mRNAs encoding the β1, β2, and β3 subunits was first examined in the intact retina and then in separated retinal nuclear layers. However, it was found that a critical analysis. had to be carried out at the level of the single cell in order to resolve the differential patterns of expression among the retinal cell types. When cells were isolated and identified following acute dissociation, RT-PCR revealed that individual rod photoreceptor cells expressed consistently the β1 and β2 messages while the bipolar cells expressed the β1 and β3 messages. Ganglion cells displayed considerable variability in β-subunit expression, perhaps reflecting their functional and morphological heterogeneity in the retina. In contrast, the nonneuronal Mueller cells did not express any of the β-subunit messages. These results indicate that the expression of GABAA receptor subunits is cell-type dependent. Furthermore, as the expression of other families of GABAA receptor subunits are profiled and the patterns of subunit assembly are better understood, our results raise the possibility that GABAA receptors with different subunit compositions can be expected to be coexpressed within a single retinal neuron.

scholarly journals Dendro-somatic synaptic inputs to ganglion cells violate receptive field and connectivity rules in the mammalian retina

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miloslav Sedlacek ◽  
William Grimes ◽  
Morgan Musgrove ◽  
Amurta Nath ◽  
Hua Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Excitatory Input ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Dendritic Arbors

In retinal neurons, morphology strongly influences visual response features. Ganglion cell (GC) dendrites ramify in distinct strata of the inner plexiform layer (IPL) so that GCs responding to light increments (ON) or decrements (OFF) receive appropriate excitatory inputs. This vertical stratification prescribes response polarity and ensures consistent connectivity between cell types, whereas the lateral extent of GC dendritic arbors typically dictates receptive field (RF) size. Here, we identify circuitry in mouse retina that contradicts these conventions. A2 amacrine cells are interneurons understood to mediate 'cross-over' inhibition by relaying excitatory input from the ON layer to inhibitory outputs in the OFF layer. Ultrastructural and physiological analyses show, however, that some A2s deliver powerful inhibition to OFF GC somas and proximal dendrites in the ON layer, rendering their inhibitory RFs smaller than their dendritic arbors. This OFF pathway, avoiding entirely the OFF region of the IPL, challenges several tenets of retinal circuitry.

Kainate receptor-mediated synaptic currents in mudpuppy inner retinal neurons reduced by D-O-phosphoserine

1989 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 495-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Coleman ◽  
R. F. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Excitatory Amino Acid ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Kainate Receptor ◽  
Retinal Neurons ◽  
Synaptic Currents ◽  
Excitatory Amino Acid Receptor ◽  
Acid Receptor ◽  
Glutamate Agonists

1. The effects of D-O-phosphoserine (DOS) were examined on proximal neurons in the superfused mudpuppy retinal-eyecup preparation by measuring their synaptically evoked whole-cell currents with the use of patch-clamp electrodes. 2. DOS reduced the light-evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) of amacrine and ganglion cells. This suppression was present even though the center responses of both ON- and OFF-bipolar cells were unaffected by DOS. 3. When recordings were done under voltage-clamp conditions. DOS diminished the magnitude of light-evoked synaptic currents associated with a reduction in synaptic conductance. 4. To determine which acidic amino acid receptor mediated the network-selective action of DOS, various glutamate agonists were tested against this excitatory amino acid receptor (EAAR) antagonist. DOS blocked the depolarizing effects of kainate (KA), but not those of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) or quisqualate (QQ). Thus DOS was a selective KA antagonist, and KA receptors appear to be the dominant EAAR subtype that mediates synaptic inputs into the inner retina of the mudpuppy.

Morphological and functional identifications of catfish retinal neurons. I. Classical morphology

1975 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Naka ◽  
N. R. Garraway
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Horizontal Cell ◽  
Dendritic Tree ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Inner Nuclear Layer ◽  
Horizontal Cells ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Definition Of

The morphology of the catfish horizontal cells is comparable to that in other fish retinas. The external horizontal cells contact cone receptors and are stellate in shape; the intermediate horizontal cells are even more so and contact rod receptors. The internal horizontal cells constitute the most proximal layer of the inner nuclear layer and may possibly be, in reality, extended processes from the other two horizontal cell types. Bipolar cells resemble those in other teleost retinas: the size and shape of their dendritic tree encompass a continuous spectrum ranging from what is known as the small to the large bipolar cells. The accepted definition of amacrine cells is sufficiently vague to justify our originating a more descriptive and less inferential name for the (axonless) neurons in the inner nuclear layer which radiate processes throughout the inner synaptic layer. These starbust and spaghetti cells vary considerably in the character and extent of their dendritic spread, but correlates exist in other vertebrate retinas. Ganglion cells are found not only in the classical ganglion layer but displaced into the inner nuclear layer as well. Several types can be distinguished on the basis of cell geometry and by the properties of their dendritic tree. Not all of the categorization corresponds with previous descriptions; our findings suggest that some reorganization may be necessary in the accepted classification of cells in the proximal areas of the vertebrate retina. A subtle yet remarkable pattern underlies the entire structure of the catfish retina; there exists a definite gradient of size within a particular class of cells, and of configuration among the subclasses of a specific cell type. It remains to be seen if these morphological spectra bear any functional consequences. The fact that the structure of the catfish retina most closely resembles those of other phylogenetically ancient animals, such as the skate and the dogfish shark, testifies to its primitive organization; morphological and functional mechanisms discernible in this simple system may, therefore, be applicable to the retinas of higher ordered vertebrates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document