Electrophysiological characteristics of primate spinothalamic neurons with renal and somatic inputs

1989 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 1121-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. S. Ammons
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
High Threshold ◽  
Spinothalamic Tract ◽  
Renal Nerve ◽  
C Fibers ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
Renal Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Somatic Receptive Fields ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Spinothalamic tract (STT) neurons in the T10-L3 segments were studied for responses to renal and somatic stimuli. A total of 90 neurons was studied in 25 alpha-chloralose anesthetized monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). All neurons were antidromically activated from the ventral posterior lateral nucleus of the thalamus. 2. Sixty-two cells were excited by renal nerve stimulation and six inhibited. Probability of locating cells with renal input was greatest in T11-L1. Cells were located in laminae I and IV-VII; however, most were located in laminae V-VII. Antidromic latencies averaged 4.61 +/- 0.32 (SE) ms, whereas antidromic conduction velocities averaged 43.23 +/- 9.03 m/s. 3. Cells with excitatory renal input received A delta input only (36 cells) or A delta- and C-fiber inputs (26 cells). Stimulation of A delta renal afferent fibers evoked bursts of 1-10 spikes/stimulus [mean 3.6 +/- 0.9 spikes/stimulus] with onset latencies of 10.7 +/- 0.5 ms. Stimulation of C-fibers evoked 1.3 +/- 0.5 spikes/stimulus with onset latencies of 61.7 +/- 11.1 ms. Magnitude of responses to A delta-fiber stimulation was greatest in T12 and decreased both rostrally and caudally. Inhibitory responses to renal nerve stimulation required activation of renal C-fibers. 4. All cells that responded to stimulation of renal afferent fibers received convergent inputs from somatic structures. Forty-four cells were classified as wide dynamic range, 10 were high threshold, 12 were high-threshold cells with inhibitory input from hair, 2 were deep, and 2 were low threshold. Somatic receptive fields were large and located on the flank and abdomen and/or the upper hindlimb. Fourteen cells had inhibitory receptive fields located on the contralateral hindlimb or one of the forearms. 5. It is concluded that T11-L1 STT cells in the monkey respond reliably to renal nerve stimulation. Thoracolumbar STT cells may thus play a role in pain that results from renal disease. The locations of the somatic receptive fields of the cells suggest that they are responsible for the referral of renal pain to the flank and abdomen.

Renal afferent input to the ventrolateral medulla of the cat

1992 ◽  
Vol 263 (2) ◽  
pp. R412-R422 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Vizzard ◽  
A. Standish ◽  
W. S. Ammons
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla ◽  
Ventrolateral Medulla ◽  
Renal Nerves ◽  
Renal Nerve ◽  
C Fibers ◽  
Renal Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

Experiments were performed to determine if information from the kidneys projects to the rostral ventrolateral medulla. Extracellular action potentials were recorded from 148 cells within the rostral ventrolateral medulla of alpha-chloralose-anesthetized cats. Cells within the rostral ventrolateral medulla were tested for responses to electrical stimulation of both left and right renal nerves. Electrical stimulation of renal nerves excited 144 cells (97.3%) and inhibited 4. The majority of cells received either bilateral or contralateral renal nerve input. Cells with bilateral renal nerve input responded to contralateral renal nerve stimulation with a significantly greater number of impulses compared with ipsilateral renal nerve stimulation (P less than 0.05). All cells but one responding to renal nerve stimulation had convergent somatic input. Comparisons between thresholds for cell responses and activation thresholds for the A and C volleys of the compound action potential recorded in the least splanchnic nerve revealed that 44 cells required activation of A delta-fibers, and 12 cells required activation of both A delta- and C-fibers. A conditioning stimulus applied to renal nerves on one side significantly decreased the response elicited by a test stimulus applied to the renal nerves on the opposite side for at least 300 ms (P less than 0.05). The demonstration that an afferent connection exists between the kidneys and the ventrolateral medulla suggests that the rostral ventrolateral medulla may play a role in mediating supraspinal reflexes of renal origin.

T2-T5 spinothalamic neurons projecting to medial thalamus with viscerosomatic input

1985 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. S. Ammons ◽  
M. N. Girardot ◽  
R. D. Foreman
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Cell Group ◽  
Spinothalamic Tract ◽  
Medial Thalamus ◽  
Dorsal Nucleus ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
C Fiber ◽  
Antidromic Responses ◽  
Alpha Chloralose ◽  
Stimulation Of

Spinothalamic tract neurons projecting to medial thalamus (M-STT cells), ventral posterior lateral nucleus (VPL) of the thalamus (L-STT cells), or both thalamic regions (LM-STT cells) were studied in 19 monkeys anesthetized with alpha-chloralose. Twenty-seven M-STT cells were antidromically activated from nucleus centralis lateralis, nucleus centrum medianum, or the medial dorsal nucleus. Stimulation of VPL elicited antidromic responses from 22 cells and 13 cells were activated from both VPL and medial thalamus. Antidromic conduction velocities of M-STT cells were significantly slower than those of L-STT or LM-STT cells. M-STT cells were located in laminae I, IV, V, and VII with greater numbers found in the deepest laminae. L-STT cells were located mostly in lamina IV, whereas most LM-STT cells were found in lamina V. Twenty-four of 27 M-STT cells, all L-STT cells, and all LM-STT cells received input from both cardiopulmonary sympathetic and somatic afferent fibers. WDR cells were most common among the L-STT and LM-STT groups, whereas HT cells were the most common class in the M-STT cell group. Excitatory receptive fields of M-STT cells were large, and often bilateral. Receptive fields of L-STT cells were simple and never bilateral. Receptive fields of LM-STT cells could be similar to M-STT or L-STT cells. Thirty-three percent of the M-STT cells, 37% of the L-STT cells, and 62% of the LM-STT cells had inhibitory receptive fields. Inhibition was elicited most often by a noxious pinch of the hindlimbs. Sixteen of 23 (70%) M-STT cells received C-fiber cardiopulmonary sympathetic input in addition to A-delta-fiber input. The other 7 cells received only A-delta-fiber input. Only 45% of the L-STT cells and 38% of the LM-STT cells received both A-delta- and C-fiber inputs. The maximum number of spikes elicited by A-delta-input was related to segmental locations for L-STT cells with greatest responses in T2 and lesser responses in more caudal segments; however, no such trend was apparent for M-STT cells or for responses to C-fiber input for either group. Electrical stimulation of the left thoracic vagus nerve inhibited 7 of 18 M-STT cells, 10 of 16 L-STT cells, and 6 of 12 LM-STT cells. These results are the first description of visceral input to cells projecting to medial thalamus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Primate nucleus gracilis neurons: responses to innocuous and noxious stimuli

1988 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 886-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Ferrington ◽  
J. W. Downie ◽  
W. D. Willis
Keyword(s):  
Conduction Velocity ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Subcutaneous Tissue ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
High Threshold ◽  
Spinothalamic Tract ◽  
Sinusoidal Vibration ◽  
Nucleus Gracilis ◽  
Pressure Sensitive ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Recordings were made from 67 neurons in the nucleus gracilis (NG) of anesthetized macaque monkeys. All of the cells were activated antidromically from the ventral posterior lateral (VPL) nucleus of the contralateral thalamus. Stimuli used to activate the cells orthodromically were graded innocuous and noxious mechanical stimuli, including sinusoidal vibration and thermal pulses. 2. The latencies of antidromic action potentials following stimulation in the VPL nucleus were significantly shorter for cells in the caudal compared with the rostral NG. The mean minimum afferent conduction velocity of the afferent conduction velocity of the afferent fibers exciting the NG cells was 52 m/s, as judged from the latencies of the cells to orthodromic volleys evoked by electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves. The overall conduction velocity of the pathway from peripheral nerve to thalamus was approximately 40 m/s. 3. Cutaneous receptive fields on the distal hindlimb usually occupied an area equivalent to much less than a single digit. However, a few cells had receptive fields up to or exceeding the area of the foot. 4. NG cells were classified by their responses to graded mechanical stimulation of the skin as low threshold (LT) or wide dynamic range (WDR). No high-threshold NG cells were found. A special subcategory of pressure-sensitive LT (SA) neurons was recognized. Many of these cells were maximally responsive to maintained indentation of the skin. The sample of NG cells differed from the population of primate spinothalamic and spinocervicothalamic pathways so far examined, in having a larger proportion of LT neurons and a smaller proportion of WDR cells. A few NG cells responded best to manipulation of subcutaneous tissue. 5. Discriminant analysis permitted the NG cells to be assigned to classes determined by a k-means cluster analysis of the responses of a reference set of 318 primate spinothalamic tract (STT) cells. There were four classes of cells based on normalized responses of individual neurons and another four classes based upon responses compared across the population of cells. The NG cells were allocated to the various categories in different proportions than either primate STT cells or spinocervicothalamic neurons, consistent with the view that the functional roles of these somatosensory pathways differ. 6. Some of the pressure-sensitive NG cells were excited when the skin was stretched, suggesting an input from type II slowly adapting (Ruffini) mechanoreceptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Spinoreticular cell responses to intrarenal injections of bradykinin

1988 ◽  
Vol 255 (6) ◽  
pp. R994-R1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. S. Ammons
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Isotonic Saline ◽  
Mechanical Pressure ◽  
Renal Nerve ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
Somatic Receptive Fields ◽  
Alpha Chloralose ◽  
Increased Activity ◽  
Saline Vehicle

Thirty cats were anesthetized with alpha-chloralose, paralyzed, and artificially ventilated. Extracellular unit activity was recorded from 63 spinoreticular tract (SRT) neurons in the T12-L2 segments. All cells were excited by renal nerve stimulation and had somatic receptive fields. Intrarenal injection of bradykinin (4 micrograms/kg) increased activity of 36 cells from 7 +/- 1 to 23 +/- 5 spikes/s. Latency to onset of responses averaged 11 +/- 2 s and latencies to peak were 26 +/- 5 s. Intrarenal injection of isotonic saline vehicle or intravenous injection of the same dose of bradykinin failed to alter activity. Responses increased as dosage increased from 2 to 12 micrograms/kg. Seventeen cells exhibited tachyphylaxis to repeated injections. Cells most likely to respond to bradykinin received both A delta- and C-fiber renal inputs and/or were located in lamina V of the spinal gray matter. Mechanical pressure applied to the renal capsule excited eight of the cells that responded to bradykinin. These results show that activation of renal afferent fibers with bradykinin leads to activation of T12-L2 SRT neurons. These cells may participate in the ascending limb of supraspinal reflexes initiated by renal receptors.

Neural stimulation of gluconeogenesis in isolated pyruvate-perfused rat kidneys

1988 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew DeWitt Baines ◽  
Rosa Drangova ◽  
Patrick Ho
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Neural Stimulation ◽  
Renal Nerve ◽  
Electrical Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Norepinephrine Infusion ◽  
Norepinephrine Concentration ◽  
Renal Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Electrical Stimuli ◽  
Stimulation Of ◽  
Rat Kidneys

To estimate peritubular norepinephrine concentration during renal nerve stimulation, we compared gluconeogenic responses in isolated pyruvate-perfused rat kidneys with electrical nerve stimulation and exogenous norepinephrine. During 2 and 4 Hz stimulation, venous norepinephrine was 1.7 ± 0.4 and 2.7 ± 0.9 nmol/L, respectively. Intra-arterial norepinephrine infusion of 60 pmol/min for 20 min (an amount corresponding to that released during 4 Hz stimulation) resulted in venous norepinephrine levels of 3.6 ± 0.6 nmol/L. Electrical stimuli (1, 2, and 4 Hz) sustained increases in vascular resistance of 2, 5, and 11% during 20 min of stimulation, while the norepinephrine infusion increased resistance gradually by 8% and a bolus (12.5 nmol/L) transiently increased resistance by 2%. All electrical and norepinephrine interventions, except 1 Hz, decreased fractional Cl excretion. Decreased glomerular filtration rate was observed only during 4 Hz stimulation. Gluconeogenesis transiently increased during stimulation at 2 or 4 Hz (12% (p = 0.056) and 15% (p = 0.028)). The 5% increase in gluconeogenesis during norepinephrine infusion did not differ from the increase during 4 Hz stimulation (p = 0.45). An exogenous norepinephrine bolus (12.5 nmol/L) increased gluconeogenesis 60% for 15 min, four times more than the response to 4 Hz nerve stimulation (p = 0.012). Therefore, we conclude that nerve stimulation sufficient to produce sustained vasoconstriction and antinatriuresis raised norepinephrine concentration less than 12 nmol/L on the peritubular surface of the S1 proximal tubule, thus accounting for the small gluconeogenic response.

Continuous measurement of renal blood flow changes to renal nerve stimulation and intra-arterial drug administration in the rat

1978 ◽  
Vol 234 (2) ◽  
pp. H219-H222 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. D. Fink ◽  
M. J. Brody
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Renal Artery ◽  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Continuous Measurement ◽  
Renal Nerve ◽  
Renal Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Renal Vascular ◽  
Flow Circuit ◽  
Stimulation Of

A method is described for continuous measurement of renal blood flow in the anesthetized rat without dissection of the renal artery. Blood flow and arterial pressure were measured in an extracorporeal flow circuit between the carotid artery and an aortic pouch from which the left renal artery was the only outlet. Injection into the flow circuit allowed delivery of drugs directly into the arterial blood supply of the kidney. Electrical stimulation of undamaged periarterial renal kidney. Electrical stimulation of undamaged periarterial renal nerves was possible since the renal artery remained undisturbed. Extracorporeal autoperfusion of the rat kidney produced renal flow and resistance measurements that did not differ from those obtained with a flow probe placed directly on the renal artery. Renal nerve stimulation was found to cause renal vasoconstriction due to activation of alpha-adrenergic receptors by norepinephrine released from postganglionic sympathetic neurons. Renal vascular responses to a variety of intra-arterial vasoactive agents were also determined. The method described here allows the evaluation of renal vascular control in the variety of disease states for which suitable rat models have been developed.

Sensory receptors with unmyelinated (C) fibers innervating the skin of the rabbit's ear

1985 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 491-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. K. Shea ◽  
E. R. Perl
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
High Threshold ◽  
Cutaneous Stimulation ◽  
Great Auricular Nerve ◽  
C Fibers ◽  
C Fiber ◽  
Back Ground ◽  
Low Threshold ◽  
Stimulation Of

The cutaneous receptive properties of unmyelinated (C) fibers of the rabbit's great auricular nerve were determined by single-unit recordings. The majority of C-fiber units could be excited by cutaneous stimulation, and such sensory units fell into three major categories on the basis of responses to mechanical and thermal stimulation of their cutaneous receptive fields: low-threshold mechanoreceptors, nociceptors, or specific thermoreceptors. The majority of afferent elements were nociceptive, and all nociceptors responded to strong mechanical stimulation. Three types of nociceptors could be distinguished by their responses to thermal stimuli. Polymodal nociceptors responded to heat with thresholds of 40-55 degrees C and typically displayed enhanced responses or sensitization after noxious heating of their receptive fields. High-threshold mechanoreceptors failed to respond promptly to heat before noxious cutaneous stimulation which, however, elicited subsequent back-ground activity or sensitivity to heat. A third type of nociceptor responded to cold but not to heat. Low-threshold mechanoreceptors were identified by their brisk responses to very gentle, slowly moving mechanical stimulation of their receptive fields, and were readily distinguished from any element classified as nociceptive by their lower mechanical thresholds. Rapid innocuous warming or cooling excited some of the low-threshold mechanoreceptors. Specific thermoreceptors, both warming and cooling types, were rare, insensitive to mechanical stimulation, and responded to very slight changes in temperature. In contrast to the sensitization to heat, which was characteristic of most nociceptors, specific warming receptors displayed depressed thermal responses after noxious heating of their receptive fields. These results provide further evidence of the similarity of C-fiber receptors innervating hairy skin of different species. Some differences from past reports and additional features are described.

Differentiated sympathetic neural control of the kidney

1996 ◽  
Vol 271 (1) ◽  
pp. R84-R90 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. F. DiBona ◽  
L. L. Sawin ◽  
S. Y. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Urinary Flow ◽  
Renal Nerve ◽  
Renal Vasoconstriction ◽  
Central Chemoreceptors ◽  
Renal Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

Anatomic and neurophysiological methods were used to identify functionally specific subgroups of renal sympathetic nerve fibers. The distribution of diameters of the predominating unmyelinated fibers showed a major mode at 1.1 microns and a minor mode at 1.6 microns. The conduction velocity was 2.10 +/- 0.10 m/s, consistent with unmyelinated C fibers. Analysis of strength-duration relationships during renal nerve stimulation showed that both rheobase and chronaxie values for renal blood flow were greater than those for urinary flow rate and were independent of stimulation frequency. This difference suggests a higher stimulation threshold (smaller diameter) for those renal nerve fibers involved in the renal blood flow response (renal vasoconstriction) compared with those for the urinary flow rate response (antidiuresis) to renal nerve stimulation. Single renal units that responded to preganglionic splanchnic nerve stimulation were studied. Those with spontaneous activity (88%) responded to stimulation of arterial baroreceptors, arterial and central chemoreceptors, and peripheral thermoreceptors, whereas those that lacked spontaneous activity (12%) responded only to stimulation of peripheral thermoreceptors (known to produce renal vasoconstriction). A minority population of single renal units has been identified that, although renal vasoconstrictor, does not exhibit other characteristic features of vasoconstrictor neurons (i.e., responsiveness to stimulation of arterial baroreceptors and arterial and central chemoreceptors). These findings suggest the existence of functionally specific subgroups of renal nerve fibers.

Cardiopulmonary Sympathetic Input Excites Primate Cuneothalamic Neurons: Comparison With Spinothalamic Tract Neurons

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 628-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret J. Chandler ◽  
Jianhua Zhang ◽  
Robert D. Foreman
Keyword(s):  
Discharge Rate ◽  
Stellate Ganglion ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Dorsal Column ◽  
Upper Body ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
Spinothalamic Tract ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
Increased Activity ◽  
Stimulation Of

Chandler, Margaret J., Jianhua Zhang, and Robert D. Foreman. Cardiopulmonary sympathetic input excites primate cuneothalamic neurons: comparison with spinothalamic tract neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 628–637, 1998. Stimulation of cardiopulmonary sympathetic afferent fibers excites thoracic and cervical spinothalamic tract (STT) cells that respond primarily to noxious somatic stimuli. Neurons in dorsal column nuclei respond primarily to innocuous somatic inputs, but noxious stimulation of pelvic viscera activates gracile neurons. The purpose of this study was to compare effects of thoracic visceral input on cuneothalamic and STT neurons. Stellate ganglia of 17 anesthetized monkeys ( Macaca fascicularis) were stimulated electrically to activate cardiopulmonary sympathetic afferent fibers. Somatic receptive fields were manipulated with brush, tap, and pinch stimuli. Extracellular discharge rate was recorded for neurons antidromically activated from ventroposterolateral (VPL) thalamus. Stimulation of the ipsilateral stellate ganglion increased activity of 17 of 38 cuneothalamic neurons and of 1 gracilothalamic neuron with an upper body somatic field. Spinal cord transections showed that cardiopulmonary input to cuneothalamic neurons traveled in ipsilateral dorsal column and probably in dorsolateral funiculus. One of eight gracilothalamic neurons with lower body fields was inhibited by cardiopulmonary input, and none were excited. Stimulation of the ipsilateral stellate ganglion increased activity in 10 of 10 T3–T4 STT neurons. Evoked discharge rates, latencies to activation and durations of peristimulus histogram peaks were significantly less for cuneothalamic neurons compared with STT neurons. Furthermore, additional long latency peaks of activity developed in histograms for 6 of 10 STT neurons but never for cuneothalamic neurons. Contralateral cardiopulmonary sympathetic input did not excite cuneothalamic neurons but increased activity of 7 of 10 T3–T4 STT neurons. Most cuneothalamic neurons (24 of 31 cells tested) responded primarily to innocuous somatic stimuli, whereas STT neurons responded primarily or solely to noxious pinch of somatic fields. Neurons that responded to cardiopulmonary input most often had somatic fields located on proximal arm and chest. Results of this study showed that cardiopulmonary input was transmitted in dorsal pathways to cuneate nucleus and then to VPL thalamus and confirmed that STT neurons transmit nociceptive cardiopulmonary input to VPL thalamus. Differences in neuronal responses to noxious stimulation of cardiopulmonary sympathetic afferent fibers suggest that dorsal and ventrolateral pathways to VPL thalamus play different roles in the transmission and integration of nociceptive cardiac information.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document