Response properties of single units in the lateral terminal nucleus of the accessory optic system in the behaving primate

1989 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 1207-1220 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Mustari ◽  
A. F. Fuchs
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Optic System ◽  
Accessory Optic System ◽  
Stimulus Velocity ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements

1. To determine the potential role of the primate accessory optic system (AOS) in optokinetic and smooth-pursuit eye movements, we recorded the activity of 110 single units in a subdivision of the AOS, the lateral terminal nucleus (LTN), in five alert rhesus macaques. All monkeys were trained to fixate a stationary target spot during visual testing and to track a small spot moving in a variety of visual environments. 2. LTN units formed a continuum of types ranging from purely visual to purely oculomotor. Visual units (50%) responded best for large-field (70 x 50 degrees), moving visual stimuli and had no response associated with smooth-pursuit eye movement; some responded during smooth pursuit in the dark, but the response disappeared if the target was briefly extinguished, indicating that their smooth-pursuit-related response reflected activation of a parafoveal receptive field. Eye movement and visual units (36%) responded both for large, moving visual stimuli and during smooth-pursuit eye movements made in the dark. Eye movement units (14%) discharged during smooth-pursuit or other eye movements but showed no evidence of visual sensitivity. 3. Essentially all (98%) LTN units were direction selective, responding preferentially during vertical background and/or smooth-pursuit movement. The vast majority (88%) preferred upward background and/or eye movement. During periodic movement of the large-field visual background while the animal fixated, their firing rates were modulated above and below rather high resting rates. Although LTN units typically responded best to movement of large-field stimuli, some also responded well to small moving stimuli (0.25 degrees diam). 4. LTN units could be separated into two populations according to their dependence on visual stimulus velocity. For periodic triangle wave stimuli, both types had velocity thresholds less than 3 degrees/s. As stimulus velocity increased above threshold, the activity of one type reached peak firing rates over a very narrow velocity range and remained nearly at peak firing for velocities from approximately 4-80 degrees/s. The firing rates of the other type exhibited velocity tuning in which the firing rate peaked at an average preferred velocity of 13 degrees/s and decreased for higher velocities. 5. A close examination of firing rates to sinusoidal background stimuli revealed that both unit types exhibited unusual behaviors at the extremes of stimulus velocity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Response properties of dorsolateral pontine units during smooth pursuit in the rhesus macaque

1988 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 664-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Mustari ◽  
A. F. Fuchs ◽  
J. Wallman
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Visual Sensitivity ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Pontine Nucleus ◽  
Stimulus Velocity ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Motion Processing

1. The anatomical connections of the dorsolateral pontine nucleus (DLPN) implicate it in the production of smooth-pursuit eye movements. It receives inputs from cortical structures believed to be involved in visual motion processing (middle temporal cortex) or motion execution (posterior parietal cortex) and projects to the flocculus of the cerebellum, which is involved in smooth pursuit. To determine the role of the DLPN in smooth pursuit, we have studied the discharge patterns of 191 DLPN neurons in five monkeys trained to make smooth-pursuit eye movements of a spot moving either across a patterned background or in darkness. 2. Four unit types could be distinguished. Visual units (15%) discharged in response to movement of a large textured pattern, often in a direction-selective fashion but not during smooth pursuit of a spot in the dark. Eye movement neurons (31%) discharged during sinusoidal smooth pursuit in the dark with peak discharge rate either at peak eye position or peak eye velocity, but they showed no response during background movement or during other visual stimulation. These units continued to discharge when the target was extinguished (blanked) briefly, and the monkey continued to make smooth eye movements in the dark. The majority (54%) of our DLPN units discharged during both smooth pursuit in the dark and background movement while the monkey fixated. Blanking the target during smooth pursuit revealed that these units fell into two distinct classes. Visual pursuit units ceased discharging during a blank, suggesting that they had only a visual sensitivity. Pursuit and visual units continued to discharge during the blank, indicating that they had a combined oculomotor and visual sensitivity. 3. Ninety-five percent of the units that discharged during smooth pursuit were direction selective. These units had rather broad directional tuning curves with widths at half height ranging from 65 to 180 degrees. Many preferred directions for DLPN units were observed, although the vertical and near-vertical directions predominated. 4. Most units that responded to large-field background movement were direction selective. During sinusoidal movement of a large-field background, half of them also discharged in relation to stimulus velocity, whereas others did not.

Pursuit—Vestibular Interactions in Brain Stem Neurons During Rotation and Translation

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 3418-3433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Meng ◽  
Andrea M. Green ◽  
J. David Dickman ◽  
Dora E. Angelaki
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Viewing Distance ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Neural Activities

Under natural conditions, the vestibular and pursuit systems work synergistically to stabilize the visual scene during movement. How translational vestibular signals [translational vestibuloocular reflex (TVOR)] are processed in the premotor pathways for slow eye movements continues to remain a challenging question. To further our understanding of how premotor neurons contribute to this processing, we recorded neural activities from the prepositus and rostral medial vestibular nuclei in macaque monkeys. Vestibular neurons were tested during 0.5-Hz rotation and lateral translation (both with gaze stable and during VOR cancellation tasks), as well as during smooth pursuit eye movements. Data were collected at two different viewing distances, 80 and 20 cm. Based on their responses to rotation and pursuit, eye-movement–sensitive neurons were classified into position–vestibular–pause (PVP) neurons, eye–head (EH) neurons, and burst–tonic (BT) cells. We found that approximately half of the type II PVP and EH neurons with ipsilateral eye movement preference were modulated during TVOR cancellation. In contrast, few of the EH and none of the type I PVP cells with contralateral eye movement preference modulated during translation in the absence of eye movements; nor did any of the BT neurons change their firing rates during TVOR cancellation. Of the type II PVP and EH neurons that modulated during TVOR cancellation, cell firing rates increased for either ipsilateral or contralateral displacement, a property that could not be predicted on the basis of their rotational or pursuit responses. In contrast, under stable gaze conditions, all neuron types, including EH cells, were modulated during translation according to their ipsilateral/contralateral preference for pursuit eye movements. Differences in translational response sensitivities for far versus near targets were seen only in type II PVP and EH cells. There was no effect of viewing distance on response phase for any cell type. When expressed relative to motor output, neural sensitivities during translation (although not during rotation) and pursuit were equivalent, particularly for the 20-cm viewing distance. These results suggest that neural activities during the TVOR were more motorlike compared with cell responses during the rotational vestibuloocular reflex (RVOR). We also found that neural responses under stable gaze conditions could not always be predicted by a linear vectorial addition of the cell activities during pursuit and VOR cancellation. The departure from linearity was more pronounced for the TVOR under near-viewing conditions. These results extend previous observations for the neural processing of otolith signals within the premotor circuitry that generates the RVOR and smooth pursuit eye movements.

Discharge patterns of neurons in the pretectal nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) in the behaving primate

1990 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Mustari ◽  
A. F. Fuchs
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Visual Stimuli ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Optic Tract ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Stimulus Velocity ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Pretectal Nucleus

1. To determine the possible role of the primate pretectal nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) in the generation of optokinetic and smooth-pursuit eye movements, we recorded the activity of 155 single units in four behaving rhesus macaques. The monkeys were trained to fixate a stationary target spot during visual testing and to track a small moving spot in a variety of visual environments. 2. The majority (82%) of NOT neurons responded only to visual stimuli. Most units responded vigorously for large-field (70 x 50 degrees) moving visual stimuli and responded less, if at all, during smooth-pursuit eye movements in the dark; many of these units had large receptive fields (greater than 10 x 10 degrees) that included the fovea. The remaining visual units responded more vigorously during smooth-pursuit eye movements in the dark than during movement of large-field visual stimuli; all but one had small receptive fields (less than 10 x 10 degrees) that included the fovea. For all visual units that responded during smooth pursuit, extinction of the small moving target so briefly that pursuit continued caused the firing rates to drop to resting levels, confirming that the discharge was due to visual stimulation of receptive fields with foveal and perifoveal movement sensitivity and not to smooth-pursuit eye movements per se. 3. Eighteen percent of all NOT units ceased their tonic discharge in association with all saccades including the quick phases accompanying optokinetic or vestibular nystagmus. The pause in firing began after saccade onset, was unrelated to saccade duration, and occurred even in complete darkness. 4. Most (90%) of the visual NOT units were direction selective. They exhibited an increase in firing above resting during horizontal (ipsilateral) background movement and/or during smooth pursuit of a moving spot and a decrease in firing during contralateral movement. 5. The firing rates of NOT units were highly dependent on stimulus velocity. All had velocity thresholds of less than 1 degree/s and exhibited a monotonic increase in firing rate with visual stimulus velocity over part (n = 90%) or all (n = 10%) of the tested range (i.e., 1–200 degrees/s). Most NOT units exhibited velocity tuning with an average preferred velocity of 64 degrees/s.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals Responses of Purkinje cells in the oculomotor vermis of monkeys during smooth pursuit eye movements and saccades: comparison with floccular complex

2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 986-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramanujan T. Raghavan ◽  
Stephen G. Lisberger
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Purkinje Cells ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Oculomotor Vermis

The midline oculomotor cerebellum plays a different role in smooth pursuit eye movements compared with the lateral, floccular complex and appears to be much less involved in direction learning in pursuit. The output from the oculomotor vermis during pursuit lies along a null-axis for saccades and vice versa. Thus the vermis can play independent roles in the two kinds of eye movement.

The effect of a moving distractor on the initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements

1997 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent P. Ferrera ◽  
Stephen G. Lisberger
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Response Preparation ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Motion Processing

AbstractAs a step toward understanding the mechanism by which targets are selected for smooth-pursuit eye movements, we examined the behavior of the pursuit system when monkeys were presented with two discrete moving visual targets. Two rhesus monkeys were trained to select a small moving target identified by its color in the presence of a moving distractor of another color. Smooth-pursuit eye movements were quantified in terms of the latency of the eye movement and the initial eye acceleration profile. We have previously shown that the latency of smooth pursuit, which is normally around 100 ms, can be extended to 150 ms or shortened to 85 ms depending on whether there is a distractor moving in the opposite or same direction, respectively, relative to the direction of the target. We have now measured this effect for a 360 deg range of distractor directions, and distractor speeds of 5–45 deg/s. We have also examined the effect of varying the spatial separation and temporal asynchrony between target and distractor. The results indicate that the effect of the distractor on the latency of pursuit depends on its direction of motion, and its spatial and temporal proximity to the target, but depends very little on the speed of the distractor. Furthermore, under the conditions of these experiments, the direction of the eye movement that is emitted in response to two competing moving stimuli is not a vectorial combination of the stimulus motions, but is solely determined by the direction of the target. The results are consistent with a competitive model for smooth-pursuit target selection and suggest that the competition takes place at a stage of the pursuit pathway that is between visual-motion processing and motor-response preparation.

Visual Stimulator for Eye Movement Studies Based on a Microcomputer System

1986 ◽  
Vol 25 (01) ◽  
pp. 31-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Juhola ◽  
K. Virtanen ◽  
M. Helin ◽  
V. Jäntti ◽  
P. Nurkkanen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Optokinetic Nystagmus ◽  
Clinical Work ◽  
Microcomputer System ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Stimulator

SummaryA visual stimulator system for studies of eye movements has been developed. The system is controlled by an inexpensive microcomputer. It is employed for otoneurological studies both in clinical work and in research, but can also be applied for studies of eye movements in other medical areas. Three types of eye movements are produced, viz. saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements and optokinetic nystagmus. The stimulator system can be connected to another computer for an analysis of eye movements.

scholarly journals Sensorimotor Integration Compensates for Visual Localization Errors During Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements

2001 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 1914-1922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. van Beers ◽  
Daniel M. Wolpert ◽  
Patrick Haggard
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Sensorimotor Integration ◽  
Visual Localization ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Visual World ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Static Object ◽  
Localization Errors

To localize a seen object, the CNS has to integrate the object's retinal location with the direction of gaze. Here we investigate this process by examining the localization of static objects during smooth pursuit eye movements. The normally experienced stability of the visual world during smooth pursuit suggests that the CNS essentially compensates for the eye movement when judging target locations. However, certain systematic localization errors are made, and we use these to study the process of sensorimotor integration. During an eye movement, a static object's image moves across the retina. Objects that produce retinal slip are known to be mislocalized: objects moving toward the fovea are seen too far on in their trajectory, whereas errors are much smaller for objects moving away from the fovea. These effects are usually studied by localizing the moving object relative to a briefly flashed one during fixation: moving objects are then mislocalized, but flashes are not. In our first experiment, we found that a similar differential mislocalization occurs for static objects relative to flashes during pursuit. This effect is not specific for horizontal pursuit but was also found in other directions. In a second experiment, we examined how this effect generalizes to positions outside the line of eye movement. We found that large localization errors were found in the entire hemifield ahead of the pursuit target and were predominantly aligned with the direction of eye movement. In a third experiment, we determined whether it is the flash or the static object that is mislocalized ahead of the pursuit target. In contrast to fixation conditions, we found that during pursuit it is the flash, not the static object, which is mislocalized. In a fourth experiment, we used egocentric localization to confirm this result. Our results suggest that the CNS compensates for the retinal localization errors to maintain position constancy for static objects during pursuit. This compensation is achieved in the process of sensorimotor integration of retinal and gaze signals: different retinal areas are integrated with different gaze signals to guarantee the stability of the visual world.

scholarly journals Deficits in Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements After Muscimol Inactivation Within the Primate's Frontal Eye Field

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 458-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dexiu Shi ◽  
Harriet R. Friedman ◽  
Charles J. Bruce
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Critical Factor ◽  
Movement Direction ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Motion Onset ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Field

Shi, Dexiu, Harriet R. Friedman, and Charles J. Bruce. Deficits in smooth-pursuit eye movements after muscimol inactivation within the primate's frontal eye field. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 458–464, 1998. To evaluate smooth-pursuit (SP) function in the primate frontal eye field (FEF), microinjections of muscimol, a γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) agonist, were used to reversibly deactivate physiologically characterized sites in FEF. SP was severely impaired by deactivation at sites in the FEF's smooth eye movement region (FEFsem) located in the fundus and posterior bank of the macaque monkey's arcuate sulcus. These SP deficits were apparent immediately after the muscimol injection and persisted for several hours but recovered by the next day. SP was most drastically and consistently impaired for directions similar to the injected site's elicited smooth eye movement direction or to the optimal SP direction for its neuronal responses. Targets moving in these directions, usually ipsilateral to the injected hemisphere, were tracked primarily with saccades after the muscimol injection, the peak SP velocity being only 10–30% of preinjection velocity. SP in other directions, including contralateral, was less strongly affected. Initial SP acceleration in response to target motion onset was also significantly diminished, generally by approximately the same proportion as peak SP velocity. In contrast, saccades were largely unaffected by muscimol injections in FEFsem; nor was there an immediate effect on SP when control sites in the saccadic region of FEF (FEFsac) were deactivated, although a SP deficit often appeared 30–60 min after FEFsac injections, possibly reflecting diffusion of muscimol into neighboring FEFsem. These reversible SP deficits produced by muscimol inactivation within FEFsem are similar to permanent deficits caused by large aspiration lesions of FEF and indicate that inclusion of FEFsem is the critical factor determining whether FEF lesions impair SP. The severity of the reversible deficits found here indicates how extremely critical FEFsem is for normal highgain SP.

Visual Tracking Neurons in Primate Area MST Are Activated by Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements of an “Imaginary” Target

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 1489-1502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe J. Ilg ◽  
Peter Thier
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Visual Tracking ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Rhesus Monkeys ◽  
Image Motion ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements

Because smooth-pursuit eye movements (SPEM) can be executed only in the presence of a moving target, it has been difficult to attribute the neuronal activity observed during the execution of these eye movements to either sensory processing or to motor preparation or execution. Previously, we showed that rhesus monkeys can be trained to perform SPEM directed toward an “imaginary” target defined by visual cues confined to the periphery of the visual field. The pursuit of an “imaginary” target provides the opportunity to elicit SPEM without stimulating visual receptive fields confined to the center of the visual field. Here, we report that a subset of neurons [85 “ imaginary” visual tracking (iVT)-neurons] in area MST of 3 rhesus monkeys were identically activated during pursuit of a conventional, foveal dot target and the “imaginary” target. Because iVT-neurons did not respond to the presentation of a moving “imaginary” target during fixation of a stationary dot, we are able to exclude that responses to pursuit of the “imaginary” target were artifacts of stimulation of the visual field periphery. Neurons recorded from the representation of the central parts of the visual field in neighboring area MT, usually vigorously discharging during pursuit of foveal targets, in no case responded to pursuit of the “imaginary” target. This dissociation between MT and MST neurons supports the view that pursuit responses of MT neurons are the result of target image motion, whereas those of iVT-neurons in area MST reflect an eye movement–related signal that is nonretinal in origin. iVT-neurons fell into two groups, depending on the properties of the eye movement–related signal. Whereas most of them (71%) encoded eye velocity, a minority showed responses determined by eye position, irrespective of whether eye position was changed by smooth pursuit or by saccades. Only the former group exhibited responses that led the eye movement, which is a prerequisite for a causal role in the generation of SPEM.

Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements, Schizophrenia, and Distraction

1980 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. Upton ◽  
Laurie A. Frost ◽  
Philip S. Holzman
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Large Percentage ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movement ◽  
Schizophrenic Patients

This study tested whether smooth pursuit eye-movement dysfunctions, prevalent in a large percentage of schizophrenic patients, are distinguishable from impaired pursuit induced in normals by a distracting task. Results showed clear qualitative and quantitative distinctions between records of 23 distracted normals and those of 13 schizophrenics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document