Stereotypical changes in the pattern and duration of long-term potentiation expressed at postnatal days 11 and 15 in the rat hippocampus

1993 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 1412-1419 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. S. Jackson ◽  
T. Suppes ◽  
K. M. Harris

1. Extracellular recordings from hippocampal area CA1 lasting 2-8 h posttetanus were used to evaluate the duration of long-term potentiation (LTP) at two key developmental ages. 2. At day 11 LTP consistently endured for approximately 1 h before declining to baseline by 2.5 h posttetanus. The response could then be repotentiated, and in some cases, the repotentiation lasted longer than the original potentiation. 3. At day 15 two patterns of potentiation were observed. The first pattern was similar to that observed at day 11 in that the potentiation did not persist; however, it did endure for approximately 2-2.5 h before declining to baseline by 4 h posttetanus. In the second pattern the potentiation persisted indefinitely; these responses were monitored for 6-8 h posttetanus. 4. These patterns are similar to the temporal phases of LTP that have been revealed in adult rat hippocampus through pharmacological manipulations. They may reflect developmental changes during which the different cellular mechanisms underlying LTP become sequentially activated. 5. These findings are important for several reasons. First, because the different temporal phases of LTP seem to be added stepwise during development, animals of different ages could be used explicitly to elucidate the underlying cellular mechanisms of these phases in LTP. Second, because LTP is a candidate mechanism for some forms of learning and memory, these results have implications for sequential steps in the ontogeny of learning and memory. Finally, because studies of LTP have used animals of widely varying ages, including these two ages, it is important to consider whether differences in the developmental properties of LTP could influence experimental observations.

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Chirillo ◽  
Mikayla S. Waters ◽  
Laurence F. Lindsey ◽  
Jennifer N. Bourne ◽  
Kristen M. Harris

The Neuron ◽  
2015 ◽  
pp. 489-528
Author(s):  
Irwin B. Levitan ◽  
Leonard K. Kaczmarek

Psychologists have described different kinds of learning and memory, and there is an ongoing search for the physical basis of these distinctions and for the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible. Because of the complexity of most nervous systems, the search has focused to a large extent on animals with relatively simple nervous systems and on reduced preparations. Common themes have emerged, such as the requirement for signaling pathways linked to calcium and cyclic AMP, and the fact that pathways used in normal development continue to be used for plasticity in adults. At the same time, it is clear that there is an enormous diversity of cellular mechanisms that contribute to short-term and long-term phases of memory formation. These include long-term potentiation (LTP), long-term depression (LTD), spike-timing dependent plasticity, synaptic tagging, and synaptic scaling. Each type of synaptic connection has its own personality such that, in response to a particular pattern of stimulation, one synapse may increase its postsynaptic receptors while another may expand its presynaptic terminals.


2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 3547-3554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binyamin Hochner ◽  
Euan R. Brown ◽  
Marina Langella ◽  
Tal Shomrat ◽  
Graziano Fiorito

Cellular mechanisms underlying learning and memory were investigated in the octopus using a brain slice preparation of the vertical lobe, an area of the octopus brain involved in learning and memory. Field potential recordings revealed long-term potentiation (LTP) of glutamatergic synaptic field potentials similar to that in vertebrates. These findings suggest that convergent evolution has led to the selection of similar activity-dependent synaptic processes that mediate complex forms of learning and memory in vertebrates and invertebrates.


2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 431-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Sun ◽  
Jian-dong Sun ◽  
Ning Han ◽  
Chuang-jun Li ◽  
Yu-he Yuan ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 622-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Maren

Shors & Matzel provide compelling arguments against a role for hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) in mammalian learning and memory. As an alternative, they suggest that LTP is an arousal mechanism. I will argue that this view is not a satisfactory alternative to current conceptions of LTP function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document