Changes in the Temporal Pattern of Primary Motor Cortex Activity in a Directional Isometric Force Versus Limb Movement Task

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 1577-1583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren E. Sergio ◽  
John F. Kalaska
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Temporal Pattern ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Isometric Force ◽  
Limb Movement ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Limb Movements ◽  
Hand Motion ◽  
Burst Pattern ◽  
Spatial Coordinates

Sergio, Lauren E. and John F. Kalaska. Changes in the temporal pattern of primary motor cortex activity in a directional isometric force versus limb movement task. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 1577–1583, 1998. We recorded the activity of 75 proximal-arm-related cells in caudal primary motor cortex (MI) while a monkey generated either isometric forces or limb movements against an inertial load. The forces and movements were in eight directions in a horizontal plane. The isometric force generated at the hand increased monotonically in the direction of the target force level. The force exerted against the load in the movement task was more complex, including a transient decelerative phase during the movement as the hand approached the target. Electromyographic (EMG) activity of proximal-arm muscles reflected the task-dependent changes in dynamics, showing a ramp increase in activity during the isometric task and a reciprocal triphasic burst pattern in the movement task. A sliding 50-ms window analysis showed that the directionality of the EMG, when expressed in hand-centered spatial coordinates, remained stable throughout the isometric ramp but often showed a significant transient shift during the limb movements. Many cells in M1 showed corresponding significant changes in activity pattern and instantaneous directionality between the two tasks. This momentary dissociation of discharge from the directional kinematics of hand displacement is evidence that the activity of many single proximal-arm related M1 cells is not coupled only to the direction and velocity of hand motion.

scholarly journals Motor Cortex Neural Correlates of Output Kinematics and Kinetics During Isometric-Force and Arm-Reaching Tasks

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 2353-2378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren E. Sergio ◽  
Catherine Hamel-Pâquet ◽  
John F. Kalaska
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Isometric Force ◽  
Arm Movements ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Hand Motion ◽  
Arm Reaching ◽  
Direction Of Movement ◽  
Isometric Forces

We recorded the activity of 132 proximal-arm-related neurons in caudal primary motor cortex (M1) of two monkeys while they generated either isometric forces against a rigid handle or arm movements with a heavy movable handle, in the same eight directions in a horizontal plane. The isometric forces increased in monotonic fashion in the direction of the force target. The forces exerted against the handle in the movement task were more complex, including an initial accelerating force in the direction of movement followed by a transient decelerating force opposite to the direction of movement as the hand approached the target. EMG activity of proximal-arm muscles reflected the difference in task dynamics, showing directional ramplike activity changes in the isometric task and reciprocally tuned “triphasic” patterns in the movement task. The apparent instantaneous directionality of muscle activity, when expressed in hand-centered spatial coordinates, remained relatively stable during the isometric ramps but often showed a large transient shift during deceleration of the arm movements. Single-neuron and population-level activity in M1 showed similar task-dependent changes in temporal pattern and instantaneous directionality. The momentary dissociation of the directionality of neuronal discharge and movement kinematics during deceleration indicated that the activity of many arm-related M1 neurons is not coupled only to the direction and speed of hand motion. These results also demonstrate that population-level signals reflecting the dynamics of motor tasks and of interactions with objects in the environment are available in caudal M1. This task-dynamics signal could greatly enhance the performance capabilities of neuroprosthetic controllers.

scholarly journals Motor Cortical Activity During Drawing Movements: Population Representation During Spiral Tracing

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 2693-2704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel W. Moran ◽  
Andrew B. Schwartz
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Prediction Interval ◽  
Premotor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Activity ◽  
Simultaneous Action ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Radius Of Curvature ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Population Vector

Monkeys traced spirals on a planar surface as unitary activity was recorded from either premotor or primary motor cortex. Using the population vector algorithm, the hand's trajectory could be accurately visualized with the cortical activity throughout the task. The time interval between this prediction and the corresponding movement varied linearly with the instantaneous radius of curvature; the prediction interval was longer when the path of the finger was more curved (smaller radius). The intervals in the premotor cortex fell into two groups, whereas those in the primary motor cortex formed a single group. This suggests that the change in prediction interval is a property of a single population in primary motor cortex, with the possibility that this outcome is due to the different properties generated by the simultaneous action of separate subpopulations in premotor cortex. Electromyographic (EMG) activity and joint kinematics were also measured in this task. These parameters varied harmonically throughout the task with many of the same characteristics as those of single cortical cells. Neither the lags between joint-angular velocities and hand velocity nor the lags between EMG and hand velocity could explain the changes in prediction interval between cortical activity and hand velocity. The simple spatial and temporal relationship between cortical activity and finger trajectory suggests that the figural aspects of this task are major components of cortical activity.

scholarly journals Effective intracortical microstimulation parameters applied to primary motor cortex for evoking forelimb movements to stable spatial end points

2013 ◽  
Vol 110 (5) ◽  
pp. 1180-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustaf M. Van Acker ◽  
Sommer L. Amundsen ◽  
William G. Messamore ◽  
Hongyu Y. Zhang ◽  
Carl W. Luchies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Intracortical Microstimulation ◽  
End Points ◽  
End Point ◽  
Motor Effects ◽  
Forelimb Movements ◽  
Stimulation Of

High-frequency, long-duration intracortical microstimulation (HFLD-ICMS) applied to motor cortex is recognized as a useful and informative method for corticomotor mapping by evoking natural-appearing movements of the limb to consistent stable end-point positions. An important feature of these movements is that stimulation of a specific site in motor cortex evokes movement to the same spatial end point regardless of the starting position of the limb. The goal of this study was to delineate effective stimulus parameters for evoking forelimb movements to stable spatial end points from HFLD-ICMS applied to primary motor cortex (M1) in awake monkeys. We investigated stimulation of M1 as combinations of frequency (30–400 Hz), amplitude (30–200 μA), and duration (0.5–2 s) while concurrently recording electromyographic (EMG) activity from 24 forelimb muscles and movement kinematics with a motion capture system. Our results suggest a range of parameters (80–140 Hz, 80–140 μA, and 1,000-ms train duration) that are effective and safe for evoking forelimb translocation with subsequent stabilization at a spatial end point. The mean time for stimulation to elicit successful movement of the forelimb to a stable spatial end point was 475.8 ± 170.9 ms. Median successful frequency and amplitude were 110 Hz and 110 μA, respectively. Attenuated parameters resulted in inconsistent, truncated, or undetectable movements, while intensified parameters yielded no change to movement end points and increased potential for large-scale physiological spread and adverse focal motor effects. Establishing cortical stimulation parameters yielding consistent forelimb movements to stable spatial end points forms the basis for a systematic and comprehensive mapping of M1 in terms of evoked movements and associated muscle synergies. Additionally, the results increase our understanding of how the central nervous system may encode movement.

Organization of the primate face motor cortex as revealed by intracortical microstimulation and electrophysiological identification of afferent inputs and corticobulbar projections

1988 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 796-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. S. Huang ◽  
M. A. Sirisko ◽  
H. Hiraba ◽  
G. M. Murray ◽  
B. J. Sessle
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Single Neuron ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
General Pattern ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Projection Neurons ◽  
Intracortical Microstimulation ◽  
Facial Musculature ◽  
The Face ◽  
Afferent Inputs

1. The technique of intracortical microstimulation (ICMS), supplemented by single-neuron recording, was used to carry out an extensive mapping of the face primary motor cortex. The ICMS study involved a total of 969 microelectrode penetrations carried out in 10 unanesthetized monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). 2. Monitoring of ICMS-evoked movements and associated electromyographic (EMG) activity revealed a general pattern of motor cortical organization. This was characterized by a representation of the facial musculature, which partially enclosed and overlapped the rostral, medial, and caudal borders of the more laterally located cortical regions representing the jaw and tongue musculatures. Responses were evoked at ICMS thresholds as low as 1 microA, and the latency of the suprathreshold EMG responses ranged from 10 to 45 ms. 3. Although contralateral movements predominated, a representation of ipsilateral movements was found, which was much more extensive than previously reported and which was intermingled with the contralateral representations in the anterior face motor cortex. 4. In examining the fine organizational pattern of the representations, we found clear evidence for multiple representation of a particular muscle, thus supporting other investigations of the motor cortex, which indicate that multiple, yet discrete, efferent microzones represent an essential organizational principle of the motor cortex. 5. The close interrelationship of the representations of all three muscle groups, as well as the presence of a considerable ipsilateral representation, may allow for the necessary integration of unilateral or bilateral activities of the numerous face, jaw, and tongue muscles, which is a feature of many of the movement patterns in which these various muscles participate. 6. In six of these same animals, plus an additional two animals, single-neuron recordings were made in the motor and adjacent sensory cortices in the anesthetized state. These neurons were electrophysiologically identified as corticobulbar projection neurons or as nonprojection neurons responsive to superficial or deep orofacial afferent inputs. The rostral, medial, lateral, and caudal borders of the face motor cortex were delineated with greater definition by ICMS and these electrophysiological procedures than by cytoarchitectonic features alone. We noted that there was an approximate fit in area 4 between the extent of projection neurons and field potentials anti-dromically evoked from the brain stem and the extent of positive ICMS sites.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Effects on Muscle Activity From Microstimuli Applied to Somatosensory and Motor Cortex During Voluntary Movement in the Monkey

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 2446-2465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail L. Widener ◽  
Paul D. Cheney
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Muscle Activity ◽  
Voluntary Movement ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Large Fraction ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Motor Output ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Spike Triggered Averaging ◽  
Area 3A

Widener, Gail L. and Paul D. Cheney. Effects on muscle activity from microstimuli applied to somatosensory and motor cortex during voluntary movement in the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 2446–2465, 1997. It is well known that electrical stimulation of primary somatosensory cortex (SI) evokes movements that resemble those evoked from primary motor cortex. These findings have led to the concept that SI may possess motor capabilities paralleling those of motor cortex and speculation that SI could function as a robust relay mediating motor responses from central and peripheral inputs. The purpose of this study was to rigorously examine the motor output capabilities of SI areas with the use of the techniques of spike- and stimulus-triggered averaging of electromyographic (EMG) activity in awake monkeys. Unit recordings were obtained from primary motor cortex and SI areas 3a, 3b, 1, and 2 in three rhesus monkeys. Spike-triggered averaging was used to assess the output linkage between individual cells and motoneurons of the recorded muscles. Cells in motor cortex producing postspike facilitation (PSpF) in spike-triggered averages of rectified EMG activity were designated corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells. Motor output efficacy was also assessed by applying stimuli through the microelectrode and computing stimulus-triggered averages of rectified EMG activity. One hundred seventy-one sites in motor cortex and 68 sites in SI were characterized functionally and tested for motor output effects on muscle activity. The incidence, character, and magnitude of motor output effects from SI areas were in sharp contrast to effects from CM cell sites in primary motor cortex. Of 68 SI cells tested with spike-triggered averaging, only one area 3a cell produced significant PSpF in spike-triggered averages of EMG activity. In comparison, 20 of 171 (12%) motor cortex cells tested produced significant postspike effects. Single-pulse intracortical microstimulation produced effects at all CM cell sites in motor cortex but at only 14% of SI sites. The large fraction of SI effects that was inhibitory represented yet another marked difference between CM cell sites in motor cortex and SI sites (25% vs 93%). The fact that motor output effects from SI were frequently absent or very weak and predominantly inhibitory emphasizes the differing motor capabilities of SI compared with primary motor cortex.

Effects of Anodal Tdcs Over Left Primary Motor Cortex on Bimanual Isometric Force Control

2017 ◽  
Vol 98 (12) ◽  
pp. e172
Author(s):  
Yan Jin ◽  
Sejun Oh ◽  
JaeHyuk Lee ◽  
Maria Celeste Flores Gimenez ◽  
BumChul Yoon
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Force Control ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Isometric Force ◽  
Anodal Tdcs

Partial Reconstruction of Muscle Activity From a Pruned Network of Diverse Motor Cortex Neurons

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc H. Schieber ◽  
Gil Rivlis
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Activity Patterns ◽  
Neuron Activity ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Weighted Sum ◽  
Partial Reconstruction ◽  
Average Similarity ◽  
Upper Motor Neurons

Primary motor cortex (M1) neurons traditionally have been viewed as “upper motor neurons” that directly drive spinal motoneuron pools, particularly during finger movements. We used spike-triggered averages (SpikeTAs) of electromyographic (EMG) activity to select M1 neurons whose spikes signaled the arrival of input in motoneuron pools, and examined the degree of similarity between the activity patterns of these M1 neurons and their target muscles during 12 individuated finger and wrist movements. Neuron–EMG similarity generally was low. Similarity was unrelated to the strength of the SpikeTA effect, to whether the effect was pure versus synchrony, or to the number of muscles influenced by the neuron. Nevertheless, the sum of M1 neuron activity patterns, each weighted by the sign and strength of its SpikeTA effect, could be more similar to the EMG than the average similarity of individual neurons. Significant correlations between the weighted sum of M1 neuron activity patterns and EMG were obtained in six of 17 muscles, but showed R2 values ranging from only 0.26 to 0.42. These observations suggest that additional factors—including inputs from sources other than M1 and nonlinear summation of inputs to motoneuron pools—also contributed substantially to EMG activity patterns. Furthermore, although each of these M1 neurons produced SpikeTA effects with a significant peak or trough 6–16 ms after the triggering spike, shifting the weighted sum of neuron activity to lead the EMG by 40–60 ms increased their similarity, suggesting that the influence of M1 neurons that produce SpikeTA effects includes substantial synaptic integration that in part may reach the motoneuron pools over less-direct pathways.

scholarly journals Representation of individual forelimb muscles in primary motor cortex

2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather M. Hudson ◽  
Michael C. Park ◽  
Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf ◽  
Paul D. Cheney
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Medial Branch ◽  
Precentral Gyrus ◽  
Body Parts ◽  
Reach To Grasp ◽  
Somatotopic Organization ◽  
Forelimb Muscles ◽  
First Time

Stimulus-triggered averaging (StTA) of forelimb muscle electromyographic (EMG) activity was used to investigate individual forelimb muscle representation within the primary motor cortex (M1) of rhesus macaques with the objective of determining the extent of intra-areal somatotopic organization. Two monkeys were trained to perform a reach-to-grasp task requiring multijoint coordination of the forelimb. EMG activity was simultaneously recorded from 24 forelimb muscles including 5 shoulder, 7 elbow, 5 wrist, 5 digit, and 2 intrinsic hand muscles. Microstimulation (15 µA at 15 Hz) was delivered throughout the movement task and individual stimuli were used as triggers for generating StTAs of EMG activity. StTAs were used to map the cortical representations of individual forelimb muscles. As reported previously (Park et al. 2001), cortical maps revealed a central core of distal muscle (wrist, digit, and intrinsic hand) representation surrounded by a horseshoe-shaped proximal (shoulder and elbow) muscle representation. In the present study, we found that shoulder and elbow flexor muscles were predominantly represented in the lateral branch of the horseshoe whereas extensors were predominantly represented in the medial branch. Distal muscles were represented within the core distal forelimb representation and showed extensive overlap. For the first time, we also show maps of inhibitory output from motor cortex, which follow many of the same organizational features as the maps of excitatory output. NEW & NOTEWORTHY While the orderly representation of major body parts along the precentral gyrus has been known for decades, questions have been raised about the possible existence of additional more detailed aspects of somatotopy. In this study, we have investigated this question with respect to muscles of the arm and show consistent features of within-arm (intra-areal) somatotopic organization. For the first time we also show maps of how inhibitory output from motor cortex is organized.

Properties of Primary Motor Cortex Output to Forelimb Muscles in Rhesus Macaques

2004 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 2968-2984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Park ◽  
Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf ◽  
Paul D. Cheney
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Rhesus Macaques ◽  
Red Nucleus ◽  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Reach To Grasp ◽  
Distal Muscle ◽  
Forelimb Muscles ◽  
Multijoint Movements

Stimulus-triggered averaging (StTA) of electromyographic (EMG) activity from 24 simultaneously recorded forelimb muscles was used to investigate properties of primary motor cortex (M1) output in the macaque monkey. Two monkeys were trained to perform a reach-to-grasp task requiring multijoint coordination of the forelimb. EMG activity was recorded from 24 forelimb muscles including 5 shoulder, 7 elbow, 5 wrist, 5 digit, and 2 intrinsic hand muscles. Microstimulation (15 μA at 15 Hz) was delivered throughout the movement task. From 297 stimulation sites in M1, a total of 2,079 poststimulus effects (PStE) were obtained including 1,398 poststimulus facilitation (PStF) effects and 681 poststimulus suppression (PStS) effects. Of the PStF effects, 60% were in distal and 40% in proximal muscles; 43% were of extensors and 47% flexors. For PStS, the corresponding numbers were 55 and 45% and 36 and 55%, respectively. M1 output effects showed extensive cofacilitation of proximal and distal muscles (96 sites, 42%) including 47 sites that facilitated at least one shoulder, elbow, and distal muscle, 45 sites that facilitated an elbow muscle and a distal muscle, and 22 sites that facilitated at least one muscle at all joints. The muscle synergies represented by outputs from these sites may serve an important role in the production of coordinated, multijoint movements. M1 output effects showed many similarities with red nucleus output although red nucleus effects were generally weaker and showed a strong bias toward facilitation of extensor muscles and a greater tendency to facilitate synergies involving muscles at noncontiguous joints.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document