EMG Activities of Two Heads of the Human Lateral Pterygoid Muscle in Relation to Mandibular Condyle Movement and Biting Force

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 2120-2137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsunari Hiraba ◽  
Kazuto Hibino ◽  
Kenji Hiranuma ◽  
Takefumi Negoro

Electromyographic (EMG) activities of the superior (SUP) and inferior heads (INF) of the lateral pterygoid muscle (LPT) were recorded in humans during voluntary stepwise changes in biting force and jaw position that were adopted to exclude the effects of acceleration and velocity of jaw movements on the muscle activity. The SUP behaved like a jaw-closing muscle and showed characteristic activity in relation to the biting force. It showed a considerable amount of background activity (5–32% of the maximum) even in the intercuspal position without teeth clenching and reached a nearly maximum activity at relatively lower biting-force levels than the jaw-closing muscles during increment of the biting force. Stretch reflexes were found in the SUP, the function of which could be to stabilize the condyle against the biting force that pulls the condyle posteriorly. This notion was verified by examining the biomechanics on the temporomandibular joint. The complex movements of the mandibular condyle in a sagittal plane were decomposed into displacement in the anteroposterior direction (Ac) and angle of rotation (RAc) around a kinesiological specific point on the condyle. In relation to Ac, each head of the LPT showed quite a similar behavior to each other in all types of jaw movements across all subjects. Working ranges of the muscle activities were almost constant (Ac <3 mm for the SUP and Ac >3 mm for the INF). The amount of EMG activity of the SUP changed in inverse proportion to Ac showing a hyperbola-like relation, whereas that of the INF changed rather linearly. The EMG amplitude of the SUP showed a quasilinear inverse relation with RAc in the hinge movement during which the condyle rotated with no movement in the anteroposterior direction. This finding suggests that the SUP controls the angular relationship between the articular disk and the condyle. On the other hand, the position of the disk in relation to the maxilla, not to the condyle, is controlled indirectly by the INF because the disk is attached to the condyle by tendinous ligaments.

1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 1528-1545 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Ostry ◽  
K. G. Munhall

1. The kinematics of sagittal-plane jaw motion were assessed in mastication and speech. The movement paths were described in joint coordinates, in terms of the component rotations and translations. The analysis focused on the relationship between rotation and horizontal translation. Evidence was presented that these can be separately controlled. 2. In speech, jaw movements were studied during consonant-vowel utterances produced at different rates and volumes. In mastication, bolus placement, compliance, and size as well as chewing rate were manipulated. Jaw movements were recorded using the University of Wisconsin X-ray microbeam system. Jaw rotation and translation were calculated on the basis of the motion of X-ray tracking pellets on the jaw. 3. The average magnitudes of jaw rotation and translation were greater in mastication than in speech. In addition, in speech, it was shown that the average rotation magnitude may vary independent of the horizontal translation magnitude. In mastication, the average magnitude of vertical jaw translation was not dependent on the magnitudes of jaw rotation or horizontal jaw translation. 4. The magnitude of rotation and horizontal jaw translation tended to be correlated when examined on a trial by trial basis. Some subjects also showed a correlation between jaw rotation and vertical jaw translation. However, the proportion of variance accounted for was greater for all subjects in the case of rotation and horizontal translation. 5. Joint space paths in both mastication and speech were found to be straight. The pattern was observed at normal and fast rates of speech and mastication and for loud speech as well. Straight line paths were also observed when subjects produced utterances that had both the syllabic structure and the intonation pattern of speech. The findings suggest that control may be organized in terms of an equilibrium jaw orientation and an equilibrium jaw position. 6. Departures from linearity were also observed. These were typically associated with differences during jaw closing in the end time of rotation and translation. Start time differences were not observed in jaw closing and the movement paths were typically linear within this region.


1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1341-1351 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Ostry ◽  
Eric Vatikiotis-Bateson ◽  
Paul L. Gribble

The kinematics of human jaw movements were assessed in terms of the three orientation angles and three positions that characterize the motion of the jaw as a rigid body. The analysis focused on the identification of the jaw’s independent movement dimensions, and was based on an examination of jaw motion paths that were plotted in various combinations of linear and angular coordinate frames. Overall, both behaviors were characterized by independent motion in four degrees of freedom. In general, when jaw movements were plotted to show orientation in the sagittal plane as a function of horizontal position, relatively straight paths were observed. In speech, the slopes and intercepts of these paths varied depending on the phonetic material. The vertical position of the jaw was observed to shift up or down so as to displace the overall form of the sagittal plane motion path of the jaw. Yaw movements were small but independent of pitch, and vertical and horizontal position. In mastication, the slope and intercept of the relationship between pitch and horizontal position were affected by the type of food and its size. However, the range of variation was less than that observed in speech. When vertical jaw position was plotted as a function of horizontal position, the basic form of the path of the jaw was maintained but could be shifted vertically. In general, larger bolus diameters were associated with lower jaw positions throughout the movement. The timing of pitch and yaw motion differed. The most common pattern involved changes in pitch angle during jaw opening followed by a phase predominated by lateral motion (yaw). Thus, in both behaviors there was evidence of independent motion in pitch, yaw, horizontal position, and vertical position. This is consistent with the idea that motions in these degrees of freedom are independently controlled.


2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 2204-2218 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Phanachet ◽  
T. Whittle ◽  
K. Wanigaratne ◽  
G. M. Murray

The aim of this study was to clarify the normal function of the inferior head of the human lateral pterygoid muscle (IHLP). The hypothesis was that an important function of the IHLP is in the fine control of horizontal jaw movements. The activities of 99 single motor units (SMUs) were recorded from IHLP (22 recordings from 16 subjects). Most recording sites were identified by computer tomography (CT). All 99 SMUs were active during contralateral jaw movements with the teeth apart, and protrusive jaw movements with the teeth apart, and 81% (48 of 59 units studied during all 3 tasks) were active during submaximal jaw-opening movements. None were active on maximal ipsilateral or retrusive jaw movements with the teeth apart nor on jaw closing/clenching in intercuspal position; nor were they spontaneously active when the jaw was at the clinically determined postural jaw position. Thresholds of SMUs ranged from <0.2 mm of contralateral or protrusive horizontal displacements to 61–89% of the maximum contralateral or protrusive displacement, respectively. For the 35 units continuously active during the contralateral task, 23 (66%) were recruited within 2 mm of contralateral displacement [25 (63% of 40 units) for protrusion]. Recruitment thresholds (mm) of some of the units were rate dependent with thresholds significantly decreasing with increasing rate of horizontal jaw movement in protrusion and contralateral movements. At eight recording sites where up to six SMUs were able to be discriminated, the average thresholds of successively recruited SMUs were within a 1-mm increment of horizontal jaw displacement. After dividing IHLP into four regions, the SMUs recorded in the superior-medial zone exhibited significantly lower mean threshold values than for the SMUs recorded in the other zones (no units were recorded in the inferior-lateral zone). This provides suggestive evidence supporting previously proposed notions of functional heterogeneity within IHLP. Taken together, the data suggest that specific regions of the IHLP are capable of selective activation in a finely controlled manner to allow the application of the appropriate force vector (magnitude and direction) to effect the required condylar movement needed for the generation and control of horizontal jaw movements.


2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 751-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Phanachet ◽  
T. Whittle ◽  
K. Wanigaratne ◽  
G. M. Murray

The precise function of the inferior head of the human lateral pterygoid muscle (IHLP) is unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the normal function of the IHLP. The hypothesis was that an important function of the IHLP is the generation and fine control of horizontal (i.e., anteroposterior and mediolateral) jaw movements. The activities of 50 single motor units (SMUs) were recorded from IHLP (14 subjects) during two- or three-step contralateral movement ( n = 36) and/or protrusion ( n = 33). Most recording sites were identified by computer tomography. There was a statistically significant overall increase in firing rate as the magnitude of jaw displacement increased between the holding phases (range of increments: 0.3–1.6 mm). The firing rates during the dynamic phases for each unit were significantly greater than those during the previous holding phases but less than those during the subsequent holding phases. For the contralateral step task at the intermediate rate, the cross-correlation coefficients between jaw displacement in the mediolateral axis and the mean firing rate of each unit ranged from r = 0.29 to 0.77; mean ± SD; r = 0.49 ± 0.13 (protrusive step task: r = 0.12–0.74, r = 0.44 ± 0.14 for correlation with anterior–posterior axis). The correlation coefficients at the fast rate during the contralateral step task and the protrusive step task were significantly higher than those at the slow rate. The firing rate change of the SMUs per unit displacement between holding phases was significantly greater for the lower-threshold than for the higher-threshold units during contralateral movement and protrusion. After dividing IHLP into four regions, the SMUs recorded in the superior part exhibited significantly greater mean firing rate changes per unit displacement during protrusion than for the SMUs recorded in the inferior part. Significantly fewer units were related to the protrusive task in the superior–medial part. These data support previously proposed notions of functional heterogeneity within IHLP. The present findings provide further evidence for an involvement of the IHLP in the generation and fine control of horizontal jaw movements.


Author(s):  
Martin E. Atkinson

It is essential that dental students and practitioners understand the structure and function of the temporomandibular joints and the muscles of mastication and other muscle groups that move them. The infratemporal fossa and pterygopalatine fossa are deep to the mandible and its related muscles; many of the nerves and blood vessels supplying the structures of the mouth run through or close to these areas, therefore, knowledge of the anatomy of these regions and their contents is essential for understanding the dental region. The temporomandibular joints (TMJ) are the only freely movable articulations in the skull together with the joints between the ossicles of the middle ear; they are all synovial joints. The muscles of mastication move the TMJ and the suprahyoid and infrahyoid muscles also play a significant role in jaw movements. The articular surfaces of the squamous temporal bone and of the condylar head (condyle) of the mandible form each temporomandibular joint. These surfaces have been briefly described in Chapter 22 on the skull and Figure 24.1A indicates their shape. The concave mandibular fossa is the posterior articulating surface of each squamous temporal bone and houses the mandibular condyle at rest. The condyle is translated forwards on to the convex articular eminence anterior to the mandibular fossa during jaw movements. The articular surfaces of temporomandibular joints are atypical; they covered by fibrocartilage (mostly collagen with some chondrocytes) instead of hyaline cartilage found in most other synovial joints. Figures 24.1B and 24.1C show the capsule and ligaments associated with the TMJ. The tough, fibrous capsule is attached above to the anterior lip of the squamotympanic fissure and to the squamous bone around the margin of the upper articular surface and below to the neck of the mandible a short distance below the limit of the lower articular surface. The capsule is slack between the articular disc and the squamous bone, but much tighter between the disc and the neck of the mandible. Part of the lateral pterygoid muscle is inserted into the anterior surface of the capsule. As in other synovial joints, the non-load-bearing internal surfaces of the joint are covered with synovial membrane.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document