scholarly journals The Vestibulo-Auricular Reflex

2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 1258-1266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Tollin ◽  
Janet L. Ruhland ◽  
Tom C. T. Yin
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Orienting Response ◽  
Head Position ◽  
Efference Copy ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Fixed Position ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex

The mammalian orienting response to sounds consists of a gaze shift that can be a combination of head and eye movements. In animals with mobile pinnae, the ears also move. During head movements, vision is stabilized by compensatory rotations of the eyeball within the head because of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). While studying the gaze shifts made by cats to sounds, a previously uncharacterized compensatory movement was discovered. The pinnae exhibited short-latency, goal-directed movements that reached their target while the head was still moving. The pinnae maintained a fixed position in space by counter-rotating on the head with an equal but opposite velocity to the head movement. We call these compensatory ear movements the vestibulo-auricular reflex (VAR) because they shared many kinematic characteristics with the VOR. Control experiments ruled out efference copy of head position signals and acoustic tracking (audiokinetic) of the source as the cause of the response. The VAR may serve to stabilize the auditory world during head movements.

Rapid horizontal gaze movement in the monkey

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 1632-1652 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. O. Phillips ◽  
L. Ling ◽  
A. F. Fuchs ◽  
C. Siebold ◽  
J. J. Plorde
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movement ◽  
Head Movement ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Head Position ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
Small Correction ◽  
Horizontal Gaze

1. We studied horizontal eye and head movements in three monkeys that were trained to direct their gaze (eye position in space) toward jumping targets while their heads were both fixed and free to rotate about a vertical axis. We considered all gaze movements that traveled > or = 80% of the distance to the new visual target. 2. The relative contributions and metrics of eye and head movements to the gaze shift varied considerably from animal to animal and even within animals. Head movements could be initiated early or late and could be large or small. The eye movements of some monkeys showed a consistent decrease in velocity as the head accelerated, whereas others did not. Although all gaze shifts were hypometric, they were more hypometric in some monkeys than in others. Nevertheless, certain features of the gaze shift were identifiable in all monkeys. To identify those we analyzed gaze, eye in head position, and head position, and their velocities at three points in time during the gaze shift: 1) when the eye had completed its initial rotation toward the target, 2) when the initial gaze shift had landed, and 3) when the head movement was finished. 3. For small gaze shifts (< 20 degrees) the initial gaze movement consisted entirely of an eye movement because the head did not move. As gaze shifts became larger, the eye movement contribution saturated at approximately 30 degrees and the head movement contributed increasingly to the initial gaze movement. For the largest gaze shifts, the eye usually began counterrolling or remained stable in the orbit before gaze landed. During the interval between eye and gaze end, the head alone carried gaze to completion. Finally, when the head movement landed, it was almost aimed at the target and the eye had returned to within 10 +/- 7 degrees, mean +/- SD, of straight ahead. Between the end of the gaze shift and the end of the head movement, gaze remained stable in space or a small correction saccade occurred. 4. Gaze movements < 20 degrees landed accurately on target whether the head was fixed or free. For larger target movements, both head-free and head-fixed gaze shifts became increasingly hypometric. Head-free gaze shifts were more accurate, on average, but also more variable. This suggests that gaze is controlled in a different way with the head free. For target amplitudes < 60 degrees, head position was hypometric but the error was rather constant at approximately 10 degrees.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Eye-Head Movement Coordination: Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Suppression with Head-Fixed Target Fixation1

1991 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-170
Author(s):  
Jean-Louis Vercher ◽  
Gabriel M. Gauthier
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Mental Arithmetic ◽  
Visual Space ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Total Darkness ◽  
Fixed Target ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Optokinetic Reflex ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex

To maintain clear vision, the images on the retina must remain reasonably stable. Head movements are generally dealt with successfully by counter-rotation of the eyes induced by the combined actions of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and the optokinetic reflex. A problem of importance relates to the value of the so-called intrinsic gain of the VOR (VORG) in man, and how this gain is modulated to provide appropriate eye movements. We have studied these problems in two situations: 1. fixation of a stationary object of the visual space while the head moves; 2. fixation of an object moving with the head. These two situations were compared to a basic condition in which no visual target was allowed in order to induce “pure” VOR. Eye movements were recorded in seated subjects during stationary sinusoidal and transient rotations around the vertical axis. Subjects were in total darkness (DARK condition) and involved in mental arithmetic. Alternatively, they were provided with a small foveal target, either fixed with respect to earth (earth-fixed target: EFT condition), or moving with them (chair-fixed-target: CFT condition). The stationary rotation experiment was used as baseline for the ensuing experiment and yielded control data in agreement with the literature. In all 3 visual conditions, typical responses to transient rotations were rigorously identical during the first 200 ms. They showed, sequentially, a 16-ms delay of the eye behind the head and a rapid increase in eye velocity during 75 to 80 ms, after which the average VORG was 0.9 ± 0.15. During the following 50 to 100 ms, the gain remained around 0.9 in all three conditions. Beyond 200 ms, the VORG remained around 0.9 in DARK and increased slowly towards 1 or decreased towards zero in the EFT and CFT conditions, respectively. The time-course of the later events suggests that visual tracking mechanisms came into play to reduce retinal slip through smooth pursuit, and position error through saccades. Our data also show that in total darkness VORG is set to 0.9 in man. Lower values reported in the literature essentially reflect predictive properties of the vestibulo-ocular mechanism, particularly evident when the input signal is a sinewave.

scholarly journals Enhancement of the Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex by Prior Eye Movements

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 2884-2892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vallabh E. Das ◽  
Louis F. Dell’Osso ◽  
R. John Leigh
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Initial Perturbation ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
Stationary Target ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex ◽  
Head Rotations ◽  
Horizontal Head

Enhancement of the vestibulo-ocular reflex by prior eye movements. We investigated the effect of visually mediated eye movements made before velocity-step horizontal head rotations in eleven normal human subjects. When subjects viewed a stationary target before and during head rotation, gaze velocity was initially perturbed by ∼20% of head velocity; gaze velocity subsequently declined to zero within ∼300 ms of the stimulus onset. We used a curve-fitting procedure to estimate the dynamic course of the gain throughout the compensatory response to head rotation. This analysis indicated that the median initial gain of compensatory eye movements (mainly because of the vestibulo-ocular reflex, VOR) was 0.8 and subsequently increased to 1.0 after a median interval of 320 ms. When subjects attempted to fixate the remembered location of the target in darkness, the initial perturbation of gaze was similar to during fixation of a visible target (median initial VOR gain 0.8); however, the period during which the gain increased toward 1.0 was >10 times longer than that during visual fixation. When subjects performed horizontal smooth-pursuit eye movements that ended (i.e., 0 gaze velocity) just before the head rotation, the gaze velocity perturbation at the onset of head rotation was absent or small. The initial gain of the VOR had been significantly increased by the prior pursuit movements for all subjects ( P < 0.05; mean increase of 11%). In four subjects, we determined that horizontal saccades and smooth tracking of a head-fixed target (VOR cancellation with eye stationary in the orbit) also increased the initial VOR gain (by a mean of 13%) during subsequent head rotations. However, after vertical saccades or smooth pursuit, the initial gaze perturbation caused by a horizontal head rotation was similar to that which occurred after fixation of a stationary target. We conclude that the initial gain of the VOR during a sudden horizontal head rotation is increased by prior horizontal, but not vertical, visually mediated gaze shifts. We postulate that this “priming” effect of a prior gaze shift on the gain of the VOR occurs at the level of the velocity inputs to the neural integrator subserving horizontal eye movements, where gaze-shifting commands and vestibular signals converge.

Predictive Mechanisms of Head-Eye Coordination and Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Suppression in Humans

1992 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.R. Barnes ◽  
M.A. Grealy
Keyword(s):  
Peak Velocity ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Sinusoidal Motion ◽  
Smooth Component ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex

Head and eye movements of human subjects have been recorded during head-free pursuit in the horizontal plane of a target executing sinusoidal motion at a frequency of 0.26 to 0.78 Hz and a peak velocity of ±96∘/s. The target was not presented continuously but was exposed for brief durations of 120 to 320 ms as it passed through the centre of the visual field at peak velocity. This technique allowed the timing of each response to be assessed in relation to the onset of target appearance. During the first 3 to 4 target presentations, there was a progressive buildup of both head velocity and the smooth component of gaze velocity, while, simultaneously, the responses became more phase-advanced with respect to target onset. In the steady state, similar temporal response trajectories were observed for head and gaze velocity, which were initiated approximately 500 ms prior to target on-set, rose to a peak that increased with the duration of target exposure, and then decayed with a time constant of 0.5 to 1 s. Whenever the target failed to appear as expected, the gaze and head velocity trajectories continued to be made, indicating that predictive suppression of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) was taking place in darkness. In a further experiment, subjects attempted to suppress the VOR during whole body oscillation at 0.2 or 0.4 Hz on a turntable by fixating, a head-fixed target that appeared for 10 to 160 ms at the time of peak head velocity. Again, VOR suppression was initiated prior to target appearance in the same manner as for natural head movements, and when the target suddenly disappeared but rotation continued, predictive VOR suppression was observed in darkness. The similarity of these predictive effects to those obtained previously for head-fixed pursuit provides further support for the hypothesis that both pursuit and visual suppression of the VOR are controlled primarily by identical visual feedback mechanisms.

Visual-Vestibular Interaction with Telescopic Spectacles

1991 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.L. Demer ◽  
J. Goldberg ◽  
F.I. Porter ◽  
H.A. Jenkins ◽  
K. Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Retinal Image ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Clear Vision ◽  
Visual Vestibular Interaction ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex

Vestibularly and visually driven eye movements interact to compensate for head movements to maintain the necessary retinal image stability for clear vision. The wearing of highly magnifying telescopic spectacles requires that such compensatory visual-vestibular interaction operate in a quantitative regime much more demanding than that normally encountered. We employed electro-oculography to investigate the effect of wearing of 2×, 4×, and 6× binocular telescopic spectacles on visual-vestibular interactions during sinusoidal head rotation in 43 normal subjects. All telescopic spectacle powers produced a large, immediate increase in the gain (eye velocity/head velocity) of compensatory eye movements, called the visual-vestibulo-ocular reflex (VVOR). However, the amount of VVOR gain augmentation became limited as spectacle magnification and the amplitude of head velocity increased. Optokinetic responses during wearing of telescopic spectacles exhibited a similar nonlinearity with respect to stimulus amplitude and spectacle magnification. Computer simulation was used to demonstrate that the nonlinear response of the VVOR with telescopic spectacles is a result of nonlinearities in visually guided tracking movements. Immediate augmentation of VVOR gain by telescopic spectacles declined significantly with increasing age in the subject pool studied. Presentation of unmagnified visual field peripheral to the telescopic spectacles reduced the immediate VVOR gain-enhancing effect of central magnified vision. These results imply that the VVOR may not be adequate to maintain retinal image stability during head movements when strongly magnifying telescopic spectacles are worn.

DYNAMICS OF COMPENSATORY EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL: AN OPTIMAL ESTIMATION ANALYSIS OF THE VESTIBULO-OCULAR REFLEX

1989 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 23-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Paulin ◽  
Mark E. Nelson ◽  
James M. Bower
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Phase Shift ◽  
Transfer Function ◽  
Movement Control ◽  
Optimal Estimation ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Visual Images ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex ◽  
Unity Gain

Head movements in vertebrates give rise to involuntary eye movements that stabilize visual images on the retina. Previous models of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), one of the neural mechanisms responsible for stabilizing the eyes during head movements, have assumed that the VOR transfer function should have unity gain and 180° phase shift. Experimental measurements of VOR gain and phase, however, exhibit frequency dependencies that are not easily interpreted within the framework of existing models. We reanalyze the problem of VOR control using stochastic optimal estimation theory and show that VOR dynamics, in general, should differ from the "ideal" unity-gain, 180° phase shift transfer function. We illustrate this approach by computing the optimal VOR transfer function for a simple, second-order dynamical model of a head–neck system. Despite its simplicity, this model is able to give some insight into the dynamical properties of the VOR. In particular, it qualitatively reproduces an experimentally observed gain peak in monkey VOR at high frequencies. The model also predicts that the gain and phase characteristics of the optimal VOR transfer function should depend on the spectrum of natural head movements, possibly giving rise to species-dependent and gait-dependent differences in the VOR transfer function. We suggest that the applicability of optimal estimation extends beyond the control of compensatory eye movements and that it is probably a universal component of movement control in the nervous system.

The Linear Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex in Normal Subjects and Patients with Vestibular and Cerebellar Lesions

1995 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 349-361
Author(s):  
Robert W. Baloh ◽  
Qing Yue ◽  
Joseph L. Demer
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Cerebellar Atrophy ◽  
Linear Acceleration ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Normal Velocity ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex

We measured the horizontal linear vestibulo-ocular reflex (LVOR) in normal human subjects and patients with abnormal angular vestibulo-ocular reflexes (AVOR) and abnormal smooth pursuit. Eye movements were induced by sinusoidal linear acceleration along the interaural axis (0.8 Hz, 0.5 g peak acceleration) on a parallel swing. Horizontal movement of each eye was recorded with an infrared limbus tracking device. Normal subjects increased LVOR sensitivity as real or imagined targets moved closer. Perceived target distance was more important than the vergence angle since changing the vergence angle alone with prisms resulted in only a slight change in LVOR sensitivity. Subjects suppressed the LVOR with real or imagined head-fixed targets. Patients with decreased horizontal AVOR responses had decreased horizontal LVOR responses with imagined earth-fixed targets in the dark. They were able to generate normal velocity LVOR responses with real earth-fixed targets. Patients with increased AVOR responses and poor smooth pursuit due to cerebellar atrophy had low LVOR responses that were minimally affected by real or imagined earth-fixed or head-fixed targets. We conclude that the smooth pursuit system and the cerebellum are critical for generating the eye movements required as subjects fixate a near target during translational head movements.

Viewing Target Distance Influences the Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Gain when Assessed Using the Video Head Impulse Test

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 285-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Castro ◽  
Sara Sena Esteves ◽  
Florencia Lerchundi ◽  
David Buckwell ◽  
Michael A. Gresty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head Movements ◽  
Target Distance ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Video Head Impulse Test ◽  
Gaze Stabilization ◽  
Head Impulse ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex ◽  
Reflex Gain

Gaze stabilization during head movements is provided by the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). Clinical assessment of this reflex is performed using the video Head Impulse Test (vHIT). To date, the influence of different fixation distances on VOR gain using the vHIT has not been explored. We assessed the effect of target proximity on the horizontal VOR using the vHIT. Firstly, we assessed the VOR gain in 18 healthy subjects with 5 viewing target distances (150, 40, 30, 20, and 10 cm). The gain increased significantly as the viewing target distance decreased. A second experiment on 10 subjects was performed in darkness whilst the subjects were imagining targets at different distances. There were significant inverse relationships between gain and distance for both the real and the imaginary targets. There was a statistically significant difference between light and dark gains for the 20- and 40-cm distances, but not for the 150-cm distance. Theoretical VOR gains for different target distances were calculated and compared with those found in light and darkness. The increase in gain observed for near targets was lower than predicted by geometrical calculations, implying a physiological ceiling effect on the VOR. The VOR gain in the dark, as assessed with the vHIT, demonstrates an enhancement associated with a reduced target distance.

scholarly journals Saccades and smooth pursuit eye movements trigger equivalent gaze-cued orienting effects

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (9) ◽  
pp. 1860-1872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen RH Langton ◽  
Alex H McIntyre ◽  
Peter JB Hancock ◽  
Helmut Leder
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Target Location ◽  
Eye Gaze ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
Orienting Effect ◽  
Motion Speed ◽  
Uncued Target

Research has established that a perceived eye gaze produces a concomitant shift in a viewer’s spatial attention in the direction of that gaze. The two experiments reported here investigate the extent to which the nature of the eye movement made by the gazer contributes to this orienting effect. On each trial in these experiments, participants were asked to make a speeded response to a target that could appear in a location toward which a centrally presented face had just gazed (a cued target) or in a location that was not the recipient of a gaze (an uncued target). The gaze cues consisted of either fast saccadic eye movements or slower smooth pursuit movements. Cued targets were responded to faster than uncued targets, and this gaze-cued orienting effect was found to be equivalent for each type of gaze shift both when the gazes were un-predictive of target location (Experiment 1) and counterpredictive of target location (Experiment 2). The results offer no support for the hypothesis that motion speed modulates gaze-cued orienting. However, they do suggest that motion of the eyes per se, regardless of the type of movement, may be sufficient to trigger an orienting effect.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document