scholarly journals Atypical Perinuclear Antineutrophil Cytoplastmic Antibodies after Colectomy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh J Freeman ◽  
Brenda Roeck ◽  
Dana V Devine ◽  
Cedric J Carter

Atypical perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (p-ANCA) have been detected in most patients with ulcerative colitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Persistent atypical p-ANCA have been observed in ulcerative colitis patients with a prior proctocolectomy, especially with pouchitis, suggesting that this serological marker might be predictive of subsequent development of chronic or refractory pouchitis. This study prospectively evaluated this serological marker in 24 consecutive patients with inflammatory bowel disease and prior colectomies (12 with a clinical diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and 12 with a clinical diagnosis of Crohn's disease involving the colon). Of these, 14 were positive, including 11 with extensive ulcerative colitis and three with Crohn's disease. Although two of three ulcerative colitis patients with pouchitis were positive, eight of eight ulcerative colitis patients having a pelvic pouch with no pouchitis were also positive, as was a patient who elected to have an end-ileostomy (Brooke's ileostomy). Two patients had abnormal liver chemistry tests. Both had end-stage primary sclerosing cholangitis treated with liver transplantation and were positive for this serological marker. Although atypical p-ANCA may be a marker of persistent inflammation in pelvic pouch patients, a positive test result should not be used for prognosis or as a decision-making parameter for pelvic pouch procedures.

Gut ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 639-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
G V Papatheodoridis ◽  
M Hamilton ◽  
P K Mistry ◽  
B Davidson ◽  
K Rolles ◽  
...  

Background—The course of inflammatory bowel disease after liver transplantation has been reported as variable with usually no change or improvement, but there may be an increased risk of early colorectal neoplasms. In many centres steroids are often withdrawn early after transplantation and this may affect inflammatory bowel disease activity.Aims—To evaluate the course of inflammatory bowel disease in primary sclerosing cholangitis transplant patients who were treated without long term steroids.Methods—Between 1989 and 1996, there were 30 patients transplanted for primary sclerosing cholangitis who survived more than 12 months. Ulcerative colitis was diagnosed in 18 (60%) patients before transplantation; two had previous colectomy. All patients underwent colonoscopy before and after transplantation and were followed for 38 (12–92) months. All received cyclosporin or tacrolimus with or without azathioprine as maintenance immunosuppression.Results—Ulcerative colitis course after transplantation compared with that up to five years before transplantation was the same in eight (50%) and worse in eight (50%) patients. It remained quiescent in eight and worsened in four of the 12 patients with pretransplant quiescent course, whereas it worsened in all four patients with pretransplant active course (p=0.08). New onset ulcerative colitis developed in three (25%) of the 12 patients without inflammatory bowel disease before transplantation. No colorectal cancer has been diagnosed to date.Conclusions—Preexisting ulcerative colitis often has an aggressive course, while de novo ulcerative colitis may develop in patients transplanted for primary sclerosing cholangitis and treated without long term steroids.


1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh Freeman ◽  
Brenda Roeck ◽  
Dana Devine ◽  
Cedric Carter

Previous studies have shown antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ANCA) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A particular subclass, the so-called 'atypical' (perinuclear) p-ANCA type, occurs in the majority of patients with ulcerative colitis. The purpose of this prospective study was to assess, in a blinded fashion, this 'subclinical' serological marker in a consecutive series of IBD patients. Five hundred patients were evaluated, including 247 patients with ulcerative colitis and 253 with Crohn's disease involving the small and/or large intestine. Overall, 194 (38.8%) of all patients with IBD were positive, including 164 (66.3%) with ulcerative colitis and 30 (11.9%) with Crohn's disease. Except for coexistent sclerosing cholangitis, no other clinical or laboratory variable had an effect on the rate of ANCA detection. This is the largest single study of ANCA in patients with IBD and the only study to provide data solely from a single Canadian centre. Results emphasize the immunopathological differences between ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, and indicate that both disorders are heterogeneous inflammatory disease processes.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Piotr Pardak ◽  
Ewa Walczak ◽  
Rafał S. Filip

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a cholestatic condition with unknown etiology and long-standing, progressive course, leading to cirrhosis and requiring orthotropic liver transplant. In approximately 80%, primary sclerosing cholangitis is accompanied by inflammatory bowel disease, and in most cases the recognition of bowel disease precedes the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis. We describe a case of 22-year-old male diagnosed simultaneously with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis, with a medical history suggesting uncommon prior development of the liver disease. Five months after the initial diagnosis, we observed advanced lesions of bile tree due to progression of primary sclerosing cholangitis, which led to the unusually fast necessity for the orthotopic liver transplant.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maliha Naseer ◽  
Shiva Poola ◽  
Syed Ali ◽  
Sami Samiullah ◽  
Veysel Tahan

The incidence, prevalence, and cost of care associated with diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease are on the rise. The role of gut microbiota in the causation of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis has not been established yet. Nevertheless, several animal models and human studies point towards the association. Targeting intestinal dysbiosis for remission induction, maintenance, and relapse prevention is an attractive treatment approach with minimal adverse effects. However, the data is still conflicting. The purpose of this article is to provide the most comprehensive and updated review on the utility of prebiotics and probiotics in the management of active Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis/pouchitis and their role in the remission induction, maintenance, and relapse prevention. A thorough literature review was performed on PubMed, Ovid Medline, and EMBASE using the terms “prebiotics AND ulcerative colitis”, “probiotics AND ulcerative colitis”, “prebiotics AND Crohn's disease”, “probiotics AND Crohn's disease”, “probiotics AND acute pouchitis”, “probiotics AND chronic pouchitis” and “prebiotics AND pouchitis”. Observational studies and clinical trials conducted on humans and published in the English language were included. A total of 71 clinical trials evaluating the utility of prebiotics and probiotics in the management of inflammatory bowel disease were reviewed and the findings were summarized. Most of these studies on probiotics evaluated lactobacillus, De Simone Formulation or Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 and there is some evidence supporting these agents for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis and prevention of pouchitis relapse with minimal adverse effects. The efficacy of prebiotics such as fructooligosaccharides and Plantago ovata seeds in ulcerative colitis are inconclusive and the data regarding the utility of prebiotics in pouchitis is limited. The results of the clinical trials for remission induction and maintenance in active Crohn's disease or post-operative relapse with probiotics and prebiotics are inadequate and not very convincing. Prebiotics and probiotics are safe, effective and have great therapeutic potential. However, better designed clinical trials in the multicenter setting with a large sample and long duration of intervention are needed to identify the specific strain or combination of probiotics and prebiotics which will be more beneficial and effective in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burton I Korelitz ◽  
Judy Schneider

Abstract We present a bird’s eye view of the prognosis for both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease as contained in the database of an Inflammatory Bowel Disease gastroenterologist covering the period from 1950 until the present utilizing the variables of medical therapy, surgical intervention, complications and deaths by decades.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Pinto ◽  
Erica Loddo ◽  
Salvatore Paba ◽  
Agnese Favale ◽  
Fabio Chicco ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and aims The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a deep reorganization of hospital services including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) units. In this situation, conversion of in-person routine follow-up visits into phone consultations might be necessary. Here we explored the feasibility of using the validated Crohn’s Disease (CD) or Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Patient-Reported Outcomes Signs and Symptoms (CD- and UC-PRO/SS) to collect data about abdominal symptoms (abdominal/S) and bowel signs and symptoms (bowel/SS) remotely. Methods CD- and UC-PRO/SS were collected during phone consultations and compared among patients with active and inactive disease. The effectiveness of therapeutic intervention in patients with active disease was assessed by PRO/SS variation. Results Twenty-one CD and 56 UC patients were evaluated by phone. Six (28.6%) CD and 15 (26.8%) UC patients were considered to have active disease. In CD the bowel/SS but not the abdominal/S module was significantly higher in active patients (mean bowel/SS 2.50 [SE ± 0.44] active vs 0.76 [SE ± 0.18] remission, p = 0.008, AUC 0.87; mean abdominal/S 1.11 [SE ± 0.38] active vs 0.24 [SE ± 0.13] remission, p = 0.066). UC-PRO/SS measures were significantly higher in active patients as compared to patients in remission (median bowel/SS 1.63 [SE ± 0.24] active vs 0.33 [SE ± 0.04] remission; p < 0.0001, AUC 0.91; mean abdominal/S 1.03 [SE ± 0.24] vs 0.37 [SE ± 0.12]; p = 0.009, AUC 0.71). Therapy was escalated in 12 patients (3 CD and 9 UC) due to disease relapse. Therapy escalation resulted in the reduction of PRO/SS as evaluated at the subsequent phone consultation. Conclusions PRO/SS might represent a feasible tool to evaluate disease activity and therapy outcome in IBD patients during periods of limited access to outpatient clinics.


2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-732-S-733
Author(s):  
Camilla A. Martins ◽  
Ana Elisa R. Caon ◽  
Marilia G. Cruz ◽  
Luísa L. Barros ◽  
Alexandre Carlos ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document