Targeting abnormal PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic review on potential drug targets and influences of signaling modulators on other neurological disorders

: PI3K/AKT/mTOR (phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin) signaling pathway is an important signal transduction pathway mediated by enzyme-linked receptors with many biological functions in mammals. This pathway modulates the epigenetic modification of DNA and target gene histones and plays a significant role in regulating biological activity, disease progression, oncogenesis, and cancer progression. PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway involves and mediates many cellular processes such as nutrient uptake, proliferation, anabolic reactions, and cell survival. Several studies have shown that PI3K/AKT/mTOR has been a promising therapeutic approach to intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). ICH is characterized by the progressive development of hematoma, which leads to the structural destabilization of the neurons and glial cells, leading to neuronal deformation, further contributing to mitochondrial dysfunction, membrane depolarization, oligaemia, and neurotransmitter imbalance. Partial suppression of cell metabolism and necrosis can occur, depending on the degree of mitochondrial dysfunction. Therefore in the following review, we discuss whether or not the activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway could minimize neuronal dysfunction following ICH. We further elaborate the review by discussing the updated pathophysiology of brain hemorrhage and the role of molecular targets in other neurodegenerative diseases. This review provides current approachable disease treatment in various disease states, single and dual PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway modulators.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety of Hydroxychloroquine in a randomized controlled trial and observational studies

Introduction: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has recently become the focus of attention in the current COVID-19 pandemic. With an increase in the off-label use of HCQ, concern for the safety of HCQ has been raised. We, therefore, performed this systematic review to analyze the safety data of HCQ against placebo and active treatment in various disease conditions. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for Randomized Controlled trials (RCTs) and Observational studies (OSs) that evaluated HCQ for the treatment of any disease other than COVID19 in adult patients up to May 2020. We assessed the quality of the included studies using Risk of Bias 2 (for RCTs) and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (for OSs). Data were analyzed with random-effect meta-analysis. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to identify heterogeneity. Results: A total of 6641 studies were screened, and 49 studies (40 RCTs and 9 OSs) with a total sample size of 35044 patients were included. The use of HCQ was associated with higher risks of TDAEs as compared to placebo/no active treatment [RR 1.47, 95%CI 1.03-2.08]. When HCQ was compared with active treatments, the risks of AEs [RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.86] and TDAEs were less in the HCQ arm [RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.81]. The outcomes did not differ in the sensitivity analysis. Conclusion: The results suggest that the use of HCQ was associated with a lower risk of AEs and TDAEs as compared to active treatment, whereas posing higher risk of TDAEs as compared to placebo.

Relationship between gentamicin administration and ductal patency in very low birth weight infants

Background: Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in very low birth weight (<1500g) infants. Objective: In our study, it was aimed to investigate the effect of gentamicin treatment, which is frequently used for early-onset sepsis on ductal patency. Method: We performed a single-center retrospective review of charts of preterm infants <32 weeks gestation with birth weight <1500 grams born between June 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, at the neonatal intensive care unit. All infants underwent an echocardiogram (ECHO) at 72 hours. To determine the effect of gentamicin treatment on hemodynamically significant PDA (hsPDA), we compared the frequency and duration of gentamicin administration between infants with hsPDA and without hsPDA. Results: During the study period, 792 patients were evaluated. Gentamicin was given to more infants with hsPDA than to those without hsPDA (89.2 % vs. 64.6 %, p<0.001), and the duration of therapy was longer in those infants with hsPDA (7 days vs. 9 days, p<0.001). The area under the curve for duration of gentamicin was 0.772 (%95 CI: 0.742-0.804, P=0.0001), sensitivity: 59 (%95 CI: 53-65), specificity: 82 (%95 CI: 78-88), with a cut-off day for duration of gentamicin >7 days. Conclusion: In our study, it was found that ductal contraction decreased and hsPDA rate increased as the rate and duration of gentamicin increased.

The Patient Motivation Pyramid and Patient-Centricity in Early Clinical Development

Background: It is increasingly recognized that patients should be involved in the design of clinical trials. However, there is a lack in agreement of what patient-centricity means. Methods: In this article a Patient Motivation Pyramid based on Maslow’s theory of human motivation is introduced as a tool to identify patient needs. This pyramid is used to make a comprehensive overview of options to implement patient-centric trial design. The Pyramid with the described options can help to identify patient-centric activities suitable for a given drug development. The current article further describes potential benefits of patient-centric trial designs with an emphasis on early clinical development. Especially in early clinical development during which trials have many assessments per patient, and the safety and clinical efficacy are uncertain, patient-centric trial design can improve feasibility. Finally, we present three case examples on patient-centric trial design. The first example is seeking patient input on the trial design for a First-in-Human trial which includes patients with Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura. The second example is the use of a video link for home dosing. The final example is the use of digital medicine in a trial in heart failure patients. Results: A comprehensive overview of patients’ needs can be accomplished by building a Patient Motivation Pyramid as a tool. Patient input can lead to improved endpoints, improved feasibility, better recruitment, less dropout, less protocol amendments, and higher patient satisfaction. The use of digital medicine can lead to a trial design with much less visits to the clinical research center in early clinical development, and in a later development phase even to a complete virtual trial. Conclusion: We recommend using the Patient Motivation Pyramid as structural approach for identifying elements of patient-centricity. Secondly we recommend to start using patient-centric approaches in an early phase of the medicine’s lifecycle.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of cancer

Background: Immunotherapy drugs, known as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), work by blocking checkpoint proteins from binding with their partner proteins. The two main pathways that are specifically targeted in clinical practice are cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) that showed potent immune-modulatory effects through their function as negative regulators of T cell activation. Methods: In view of the rapid and extensive development of this research field, we conducted a comprehensive review of the literature and update on the use of CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1 targeted therapy in the treatment of several types of cancer including melanoma, non-small-cell lung carcinoma, breast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, hodgkin lymphoma, cervical cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Results: Based on the last updated list released on March 2019, seven ICIs are approved by the FDA including ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, and cemiplimab. Conclusion: This review also highlighted the most common adverse effects caused by ICIs and which affect people in different ways.

On the role of Brain Imaging in drug development for psychiatry

Background: Over the last decades many brain imaging studies have contributed to new insights in the pathogenesis of psychiatric disease. However, in spite of these developments, progress in the development of novel therapeutic drugs for prevalent psychiatric health conditions has been limited. Objective: In this review we discuss translational, diagnostic and methodological issues that have hampered drug development in CNS disorders with a particular focus on psychiatry. The role of preclinical models is critically reviewed and opportunities for brain imaging in early stages of drug development using PET and fMRI are discussed. The role of PET and fMRI in drug development is reviewed emphasizing the need to engage in collaborations between industry, academia and phase I unitsIn this review we discuss translational, diagnostic and methodological issues that have hampered drug development in CNS disorders with a particular focus on psychiatry. The role of preclinical models is critically reviewed and opportunities for brain imaging in early stages of drug development using PET and fMRI are discussed. The role of PET and fMRI in drug development is reviewed emphasizing the need to engage in collaborations between industry, academia and phase I units. Conclusion: Brain imaging technology has revolutionized the study of psychiatric illnesses and during the last decade neuroimaging has provided valuable insights at different levels of analysis and brain organization, such as effective connectivity (anatomical), functional connectivity patterns and neurochemical information that may support both preclinical and clinical drug development. Since there is no unifying pathophysiological theory of individual psychiatric syndromes and since many symptoms cut across diagnostic boundaries, a new theoretical framework has been proposed that may help in defining new targets for treatment and thus enhance drug development in CNS diseases. In addition, it is argued that new proposals for data-mining and mathematical modelling as well as freely available databanks for neural network and neurochemical models of rodents combined with revised psychiatric classification will lead to validated new targets for drug development.

Current Advances in Clinical Trials for Rare Disease Populations: Spotlight on the Patient

: Characterized by small, highly heterogeneous patient populations, rare disease trials magnify the challenges often encountered in traditional clinical trials. In recent years, there have been increased efforts by stakeholders to improve drug development in rare diseases through novel approaches to clinical trial designs and statistical analyses. We highlight and discuss some of the current and emerging approaches aimed at overcoming challenges in rare disease clinical trials, with a focus on the ultimate stakeholder, the patient.

Novel Study Designs in Precision Medicine – Basket, Umbrella and Platform Trials

: The concept of ‘one size fits all’ – one treatment for patients with a particular disease, seems to be outdated. The advent of precision medicine has prompted profound changes in clinical research and it allows researchers to predict, more accurately, the prevention and treatment strategies for a specific disease population. Novel study designs are, therefore, essential to establish safe and effective personalized medicine. Basket, umbrella and platform trial designs (collectively referred to as master protocols) are biomarker enrichment designs that allow for testing more than one hypothesis within a protocol, thus accelerating drug development. These trial designs tailor intervention strategies based on patient’s risk factor(s) that can help predict whether they will respond to a specific treatment. Basket trials evaluate therapy for various diseases that share a common molecular alteration while umbrella trials evaluate multiple targeted therapies for a single disease that is stratified into subgroups based on different molecular alterations/ risk factors. These designs are complex and their major limitations stem from the fact that it would be inappropriate to completely replace histological typing with molecular profiling alone. However, in the upcoming decades, these trial designs are likely to gain popularity and improve the efficiency of clinical research. This article briefly overviews the characteristics of master protocol designs with examples of completed and ongoing clinical trials utilizing these study designs.

Predictability of Elimination and Excretion of Small Molecules from Animals to Humans, and Impact on Dosimetry for human ADME Studies with Radiolabeled Drugs

Background: We assessed the extent to which urinary and fecal excretion of 14C-labeled drug material in animal ADME studies was predictive of human ADME studies. We compared observed plasma elimination half lives for total drug related radioactivity in humans to pre-study predictions, and we estimated the impact of any major differences on human dosimetry calculations. Methods: We included 34 human ADME studies with doses of 14C above 0.1 MBq. We calculated ratios of dosimetry input parameters (percentage fecal excretion in humans versus animals; observed half life in humans versus predicted pre-study) and output parameters (effective dose post-study versus pre study) and assessed their relationship. Results: A quantitative correlation assessment did not show a statistically significant correlation between the ratios of percentages of 14C excreted in feces and the ratios of dosimetry outcomes in the entire dataset, but a statistically significant correlation was found when assessing the studies that were based on ICRP 60/62 (n=19 studies; P=0.0028). There also appeared to be a correlation between the plasma half-life ratios and the ratios of dosimetry results. A quantitative correlation assessment showed that there was a statistically significant correlation between these ratios (P<0.0001). Conclusion: In all cases where the plasma elimination half-life for 14C in humans was found to be longer than the predicted value, the radiation burden was still within ICRP Category IIa. Containment of the actual radiation burden below the limit of 1.00 mSv appeared to be determined partly also by our choice to limit 14C doses to 3.7 MBq.

Is it possible to estimate the bioequivalence between parenteral and enteral formulations of escin?

: We suggest that enteral formulation of escin could be used instead of enteral formulation, if it is not available.