scholarly journals Short Hospital Stay after Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery without Fast Track

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan K. Burgdorf ◽  
Jacob Rosenberg
2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 156-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.K. Christensen ◽  
H.V. Thaysen ◽  
S.Å. Rodt ◽  
P. Carlsson ◽  
S. Laurberg

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Borzellino ◽  
Nader Kamal Francis ◽  
Olivier Chapuis ◽  
Evguenia Krastinova ◽  
Valérie Dyevre ◽  
...  

Introduction.Epidural analgesia has been a cornerstone of any ERAS program for open colorectal surgery. With the improvements in anesthetic and analgesic techniques as well as the introduction of the laparoscopy for colorectal resection, the role of epidural analgesia has been questioned. The aim of the review was to assess through a meta-analysis the impact of epidural analgesia compared to other analgesic techniques for colorectal laparoscopic surgery within an ERAS program.Methods.Literature research was performed on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. All randomised clinical trials that reported data on hospital stay, postoperative complications, and readmissions rates within an ERAS program with and without an epidural analgesia after a colorectal laparoscopic resection were included.Results.Five randomised clinical trials were selected and a total of 168 patients submitted to epidural analgesia were compared to 163 patients treated by an alternative analgesic technique. Pooled data show a longer hospital stay in the epidural group with a mean difference of 1.07 (95% CI 0.06–2.08) without any significant differences in postoperative complications and readmissions rates.Conclusion.Epidural analgesia does not seem to offer any additional clinical benefits to patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an ERAS program.


Surgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 147 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Scatizzi ◽  
Katrin C. Kröning ◽  
Vieri Boddi ◽  
Marco De Prizio ◽  
Francesco Feroci

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-31
Author(s):  
Nitin Patel ◽  
Vipul D. Yagnik

This study was carried out with the objectives to study the feasibility of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection, to observe short term outcome such as recovery parameters, oncologic safety, morbidity and mortality, and to analyze the experience of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in a teaching hospital. Between January 2007 and July 2009, all consecutive adult cases admitted to our department for colorectal cancer were assessed for eligibility. The ethical committee approved the protocol at the Sterling Hospital. Out of 31 patients,17 were males and 14 females. The mean age was 59 years. The most common clinical presentation was weight loss and altered bowel habits. Rectum (51.61%) was the most commonly involved organ followed by cecum (22.58%). - median time to liquid diet was two days (range 1-22), and a solid diet was three days (range 3-30). The median time to first flatus was two days (range 1-5), and the first stool was five days (range 3-7). The postoperative stay was eight days (range 6-30) median time to mobilization was 2.5 days. The postoperative stay is cumulative and includes patients who underwent reoperation for the anastomotic leak. The median operating time was 240 mins (range 116 – 520). The median length of incision was 6 cm (range 4 – 10 cm). The median blood loss was 170 ml. Blood loss was higher in patients with hemorrhage and tumor adhesions, and both of them were converted to open. These patients incidentally had a more extended hospital stay. The laparoscopic technique for colorectal cancer is feasible and safe. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) is associated with short term benefits like the earlier return of gastrointestinal function and shorter length of hospital stay. From the oncologic point of view, tumor resections are adequate, taking into context numbers of lymph nodes retrieved and resectional margins in context to oncologic safety. The decreased postoperative wound infections and early recovery facilitate appropriate adjuvant therapy. Advanced laparoscopic surgery requires a team approach with proper case selection. Transvaginal delivery of specimens can give scar-less surgery and the option for assisted natural orifice surgery.


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 1225-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se-Jin Baek ◽  
Seon-Hahn Kim ◽  
Se-Young Kim ◽  
Jae-Won Shin ◽  
Jung-Myun Kwak ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document