scholarly journals Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery - a prospective study of short-term outcomes of consecutive cases over 3 years

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-31
Author(s):  
Nitin Patel ◽  
Vipul D. Yagnik
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Early Recovery ◽  
Postoperative Stay

This study was carried out with the objectives to study the feasibility of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection, to observe short term outcome such as recovery parameters, oncologic safety, morbidity and mortality, and to analyze the experience of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in a teaching hospital. Between January 2007 and July 2009, all consecutive adult cases admitted to our department for colorectal cancer were assessed for eligibility. The ethical committee approved the protocol at the Sterling Hospital. Out of 31 patients,17 were males and 14 females. The mean age was 59 years. The most common clinical presentation was weight loss and altered bowel habits. Rectum (51.61%) was the most commonly involved organ followed by cecum (22.58%). - median time to liquid diet was two days (range 1-22), and a solid diet was three days (range 3-30). The median time to first flatus was two days (range 1-5), and the first stool was five days (range 3-7). The postoperative stay was eight days (range 6-30) median time to mobilization was 2.5 days. The postoperative stay is cumulative and includes patients who underwent reoperation for the anastomotic leak. The median operating time was 240 mins (range 116 – 520). The median length of incision was 6 cm (range 4 – 10 cm). The median blood loss was 170 ml. Blood loss was higher in patients with hemorrhage and tumor adhesions, and both of them were converted to open. These patients incidentally had a more extended hospital stay. The laparoscopic technique for colorectal cancer is feasible and safe. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) is associated with short term benefits like the earlier return of gastrointestinal function and shorter length of hospital stay. From the oncologic point of view, tumor resections are adequate, taking into context numbers of lymph nodes retrieved and resectional margins in context to oncologic safety. The decreased postoperative wound infections and early recovery facilitate appropriate adjuvant therapy. Advanced laparoscopic surgery requires a team approach with proper case selection. Transvaginal delivery of specimens can give scar-less surgery and the option for assisted natural orifice surgery.

scholarly journals Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Long Zhu ◽  
Pei-Jing Yan ◽  
Liang Yao ◽  
Rong Liu ◽  
De-Wang Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Bowel Function ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Robotic Colorectal Surgery

Aim. The robotic technique has been established as an alternative approach to laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer. Methods. The cases of robot-assisted or laparoscopic colorectal resection were collected retrospectively between July 2015 and October 2017. We evaluated patient demographics, perioperative characteristics, and pathologic examination. A multivariable linear regression model was used to assess short-term outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery. Short-term outcomes included time to passage of flatus and postoperative hospital stay. Results. A total of 284 patients were included in the study. There were 104 patients in the robotic colorectal surgery (RCS) group and 180 in the laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) group. The mean age was 60.5 ± 10.8 years, and 62.0% of the patients were male. We controlled for confounding factors, and then the multiple linear model regression indicated that the time to passage of flatus in the RCS group was 3.45 days shorter than the LCS group (coefficient = −3.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −5.19 to −1.71; P < .001). Additionally, the drainage of tube duration (coefficient = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.3 to 0.87; P < .001) and transfers to the intensive care unit (coefficient = 7.34, 95% CI = 3.17 to 11.5; P = .001) influenced the postoperative hospital stay. The total costs increased by 15501.48 CNY in the RCS group compared with the LCS group ( P = .008). Conclusions. The present study suggests that colorectal cancer robotic surgery was more beneficial to patients because of shorter postoperative recovery time of bowel function and shorter hospital stays.

scholarly journals Effective implementation and adaptation of structured robotic colorectal programme in a busy tertiary unit

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Thomas ◽  
K. Altaf ◽  
D. Sochorova ◽  
U. Gur ◽  
A. Parvaiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Training Programme ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Oncological Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Tertiary Center

Abstract Background Safety and feasibility of robotic colorectal surgery has been reported as increasing over the last decade. However safe implementation and adaptation of such a programme with comparable morbidities and acceptable oncological outcomes remains a challenge in a busy tertiary unit. We present our experience of implementation and adaptation of a structured robotic colorectal programme in a high-volume center in the United Kingdom. Methods Two colorectal surgeons underwent a structured robotic colorectal training programme consisting of time on simulation console, dry and wet laboratory courses, case observation, and initial mentoring. Data were collected on consecutive robotic colorectal cancer resections over a period of 12 months and compared with colorectal cancer resections data of the same surgeons’ record prior to the adaptation of the new technique. Patient demographics including age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologist score (ASA), Clavien–Dindo grading, previous abdominal surgeries, and BMI were included. Short-term outcomes including conversion to open, length of stay, return to theatre, 30- and 90-days mortality, blood loss, and post-operative analgesia were recorded. Tumour site, TNM staging, diverting stoma, neo-adjuvant therapy, total mesorectal excision (TME) grading and positive resection margins (R1) were compared. p values less than or equal to 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Ninety colorectal cancer resections were performed with curative intent from June 2018 to June 2020. Thirty robotic colorectal cancer resections (RCcR) were performed after adaption of programme and were compared with 60 non-robotic colorectal cancer resections (N-RCcR) prior to implementation of technique. There was no conversion in the RCcR group; however, in N-RCcR group, five had open resection from start and the rest had laparoscopic surgery. In laparoscopic group, there were six (10.9%) conversions to open (two adhesions, three multi-visceral involvements, one intra-operative bleed). Male-to-female ratio was 20:09 in RCcR group and 33:20 in N-RCcR groups. No significant differences in gender (p = 0.5), median age (p = 0.47), BMI (p = 0.64) and ASA scores (p = 0.72) were present in either groups. Patient characteristics between the two groups were comparable aside from an increased proportion of rectal and sigmoid cancers in RCcR group. Mean operating time, and returns to theaters were comparable in both groups. Complications were fewer in RCcR group as compared to N-RCcR (16.6% vs 25%). RCcR group patients have reduced length of stay (5 days vs 7 days) but this is not statistically significant. Estimated blood loss and conversion to open surgery was significantly lesser in the robotic group (p < 0.01). The oncological outcomes from surgery including TNM, resection margin status, lymph node yield and circumferential resection margin (for rectal cancers) were all comparable. There was no 30-day mortality in either group. Conclusion Implementation and integration of robotic colorectal surgery is safe and effective in a busy tertiary center through a structured training programme with comparable short-term survival and oncological outcomes during learning curve.

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery after insertion of self-expandable metallic stent as a “bridge to surgery” for left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 643-643
Author(s):  
Yuhei Waki ◽  
Kazunori Tokuda ◽  
Masayoshi Obatake ◽  
Miya Nagahashi ◽  
Masanori Hotchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Bridge To Surgery ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Obstructive Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Expandable Metallic Stent ◽  
Significant Difference

643 Background: Safety and validity of performing laparoscopic surgery after preoperative lavege using the self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) for left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer were examined. We evaluated the short-term outcome of SEMS insertion compared with laparoscopic surgery without SEMS. Methods: Patients with left-sided colorectal cancer treated by either laparoscopic surgery with stent placement (n = 8) or laparoscopic surgery only (n = 42) in our hospital between April, 2012 and January, 2013 were registered. Short-term outcomes were compared with the two groups about patient characteristics (sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, body mass index, prior abdominal surgery), pathological data of patients (tumor location, size of tumor , tumor differentiation, number of harvested lymph nodes, pTNM classification, UICC pathological stage), and operative and post operative results (procedures, conversion, operative time, blood loss, morbidity, solid food intake, postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay). Results: Except for tumor size in the patient characteristic parameters, there were no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conversion rate to laparotomy was higher in the stent group (2 versus 1, p = 0.013). There was no difference in operation time, blood loss and postoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusions: Although the long-term oncological result requires further investigation, laparoscopic surgery after self-expandable metallic stent is a safe and feasible treatment as a “brige to surgery” for left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer.

scholarly journals One-Stage Total Laparoscopic Treatment for Colorectal Cancer With Synchronous Metastasis. Is It Safe and Feasible?

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Sena ◽  
Arcangelo Picciariello ◽  
Fabio Marino ◽  
Marta Goglia ◽  
Aldo Rocca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
One Stage

Liver is the main target organ for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. It is estimated that ~25% of CRC patients have synchronous metastases at diagnosis, and about 60% of CRC patients will develop metastases during the follow up. Although several teams have performed simultaneous laparoscopic resections (SLR) of liver and colorectal lesions, the feasibility and safety of this approach is still widely debated and few studies on this topic are present in the literature. The purpose of this literature review is to understand the state of the art of SLR and to clarify the potential benefits and limitations of this approach. Several studies have shown that SLR can be performed safely and with short-term outcomes similarly to the separated procedures. Simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal and hepatic resections combine the advantages of one stage surgery with those of laparoscopic surgery. Several reports compared the short-term outcomes of one stage laparoscopic resection with open resections and showed a similar or inferior amount of blood loss, a similar or lower complication rate, and a significant reduction of hospital stay for laparoscopic surgery respect to open surgery but much longer operating times for the laparoscopic technique. Few retrospective studies compared long term outcomes of laparoscopic one stage surgery with the outcomes of open one stage surgery and did not identify any differences about disease free survival and the overall survival. In conclusion, hepatic and colorectal SLR are a safe and effective approach characterized by less intraoperative blood loss, faster recovery of intestinal function, and shorter length of postoperative hospital stay. Moreover, laparoscopic approach is associated to lower rates of surgical complications without significant differences in the long-term outcomes compared to the open surgery.

scholarly journals Short-Term Efficacy of Laparoscopic Treatment for Colorectal Cancer in Patients with Schistosomiasis Japonica

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Zhu Yi ◽  
Jiang Hong-Gang ◽  
Chen Zhi-Heng ◽  
Lu Bo-Hao
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Schistosomiasis Japonica ◽  
Laparoscopic Treatment ◽  
Short Term ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Postoperative Feeding

Introduction. Schistosomiasis is associated with numerous complications such as thrombocytopenia, liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and colitis. To the best of our knowledge, the feasibility and outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients with schistosomiasis have not yet been studied.Methods. In this study, the data of 280 patients with colorectal carcinoma along with schistosomiasis japonica infection who underwent laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative data, operative data, pathological outcomes, postoperative complications, and recovery were compared between patients in the laparoscopic (LAC) and open (OC) groups.Results. There were no significant differences in the preoperative data between the groups. However, fewer postoperative complications, especially severe hypoproteinemia, early postoperative feeding, and shorter postoperative hospital stay, were observed in patients in the LAC group (P<0.001). The mean operative time was higher in the LAC group (180 min versus 158 min;P<0.001), while the mean blood loss was similar (95 mL versus 108 mL;P=0.196) between groups. The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was also similar in both groups (15 versus 16;P=0.133).Conclusion. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is safe in patients with schistosomiasis japonica and has better short-term outcomes than open surgery.

scholarly journals Short-term clinical outcomes of a European training programme for robotic colorectal surgery

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofoklis Panteleimonitis ◽  
◽  
Danilo Miskovic ◽  
Rachelle Bissett-Amess ◽  
Nuno Figueiredo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Training Programme ◽  
Short Term ◽  
R1 Resection ◽  
Robotic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Background Despite there being a considerable amount of published studies on robotic colorectal surgery (RCS) over the last few years, there is a lack of evidence regarding RCS training pathways. This study examines the short-term clinical outcomes of an international RCS training programme (the European Academy of Robotic Colorectal Surgery—EARCS). Methods Consecutive cases from 26 European colorectal units who conducted RCS between 2014 and 2018 were included in this study. The baseline characteristics and short-term outcomes of cases performed by EARCS delegates during training were analysed and compared with cases performed by EARCS graduates and proctors. Results Data from 1130 RCS procedures were collected and classified into three cohort groups (323 training, 626 graduates and 181 proctors). The training cases conversion rate was 2.2% and R1 resection rate was 1.5%. The three groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics with the exception of malignant cases and rectal resections performed. With the exception of operative time, blood loss and hospital stay (training vs. graduate vs. proctor: operative time 302, 265, 255 min, p < 0.001; blood loss 50, 50, 30 ml, p < 0.001; hospital stay 7, 6, 6 days, p = 0.003), all remaining short-term outcomes (conversion, 30-day reoperation, 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, clinical anastomotic leak, complications, R1 resection and lymph node yield) were comparable between the three groups. Conclusions Colorectal surgeons learning how to perform RCS under the EARCS-structured training pathway can safely achieve short-term clinical outcomes comparable to their trainers and overcome the learning process in a way that minimises patient harm.

THE FEASIBILITY OF FAST TRACK PROTOCOL FOR ELDERELY PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL CANCER

2016 ◽  
pp. 26-29
Author(s):  
D. . Zitta ◽  
V. . Subbotin ◽  
Y. . Busirev
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Conventional Group ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Complications Rate

Fast track protocol is widely used in major colorectal surgery. It decreases operative stress, shortens hospital stay and reduces complications rate. However feasibility and safety of this approach is still controversial in patients older than 70 years. The AIM of the study was to estimate the safety and effectiveness of fast track protocol in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Prospective randomized study included 138 elective colorectal resectionfor cancer during period from 1.01.10 till 1.06.15. The main criteria for the patients selection were age over 70 years and diagnosis of colorectal cancer. 82 of these patients received perioperative treatment according to fast track protocol, other 56 had conventional perioperative care. Patients underwent following procedures: right hemicolectomy (n=7), left hemicolectomy (n=12), transverse colectomy (n=1), sigmoidectomy (n=23), abdomeno-perineal excision (n=19) and low anterior resection of rectum (n=76). Following data were analized: duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, time offirst flatus and defecation, complications rates. RESULTS. Mean age was 77,4 ± 8 years. There were no differences in gender, co morbidities, body mass index, types of operations between groups. Duration of operations didn't differ significantly between 2 groups. Intraoperative blood loss was higher in conventional group. The time of first flatus and defecation were better in FT-group. There was no mortality in FT-group vs 1,8 %o mortality in conventional group. Complications rate was lower in FT-group: wound infections 3,6% vs 9 %, anastomotic leakage 4,8 %o vs 9 %o, ileus 1,2 vs 5,4 %o, peritonitis 2,4 %o vs 3,6%o, bowel obstruction caused by the adhesions 6 % vs 5,3 %. Reoperation rate was similar 4,8 % vs 3,6 %. CONCLUSION. Fast track protocol in major elective colorectal surgery can be safely applied in elderly patients. The application of fast track protocol in elderly patients improves the restoration of bowel function and reduces the risk of postoperative complication.

Supervised surgical training and its effect on the short-term outcome in laparoscopic colorectal surgery

2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. e483-e487 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Krishna ◽  
M. Russell ◽  
G. L. Richardson ◽  
M. J. F. X. Rickard ◽  
A. Keshava
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Surgical Training ◽  
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Short Term Outcome

scholarly journals Our experience with laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A case series

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manash Ranjan Sahoo ◽  
Satyajit Samal ◽  
Jyotirmay Nayak
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Oral Feeding ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss

Background: Though laparoscopic distal gastrectomy has become a standard procedure for treatment of gastric cancer, laparoscopic total gastrectomy has not been widely accepted as it requires more dexterity and lack of evidence about its feasibility and safety. Methods: Here retrospectively we review a series of 12 cases of gastric cancer undergone laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D1 or D2 lymphadenectomy over a period of 7 years at a tertiary care hospital. The patient demographic characteristics were reviewed and the outcomes after surgery was analyzed in terms of extent of lymphadenectomy, mean operative time, mean intraoperative blood loss median number of lymph nodes harvested, median time for postoperative ambulation, median time for postoperative oral feeding, median time of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications and mortality. Results: All patients had total gastrectomy entirely through laparoscopic method. Mean operative time was 282 minutes, mean intraoperative blood loss was 120 ml, median time for ambulation and oral feeding was 3 days and 6 days respectively. Median time of hospital stay was 16 days and 2 patients had complications as pancreatic fistula and port site abscess. No mortality was observed. Conclusion: With zero mortality and accepted rate of complications, laparoscopic total gastrectomy appears to be technically feasible and safe for management of gastric cancer. But more studies have to be conducted with comparison to other standard gastrectomies and long term follow up to be done to establish its standardized application.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document