scholarly journals A 10-Year Experience in Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Measurements for Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Prospective Study of 91 Previous Unexplored Patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. C. Neves ◽  
M. N. Ohe ◽  
M. Rosano ◽  
M. Abrahão ◽  
O. Cervantes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Primary Hyperparathyroidism ◽  
False Negative ◽  
True Positive ◽  
Tertiary Institution ◽  
True Negative ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Intraoperative Pth ◽  
Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
A Prospective Study

Introduction. Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP) is characteristically determined by high levels of calcium and high or inappropriate levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH). Technological advances have dramatically changed the surgical technique over the years once intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) assay had allowed for focused approaches.Objective. To evaluate our 10-year experience in employing a rapid intraoperative PTH assay for PHP.Methods. A prospective cohort of 91 PHP-operated patients in a tertiary institution in São Paulo, Brazil, from June 2000 to April 2011.Results. We had 85 (93.4%) successful parathyroidectomies, 6 (6.6%) failed parathyroidectomies in 91 previous unexplored patients, and 5 (100%) successful remedial surgeries. The IOPTH was true-positive in 88.5%, true-negative in 7.3%, false-positive in 2.1%, and false-negative in 2.1% of the procedures. IOPTH was able to obviate additional exploration or to ask for additional exploration in 92 (95.8%) procedures.Conclusion. The IOPTH revealed to be an important technological adjunct in the current parathyroid surgery for PHP.

scholarly journals Surgeon-Performed Ultrasound in Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Prospective Study of 204 Consecutive Patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Al-Askari ◽  
Jenny Gough ◽  
Kate M Stringer ◽  
Ian R Gough
Keyword(s):  
Primary Hyperparathyroidism ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
False Negative ◽  
True Positive ◽  
True Negative ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
A Prospective Study

ABSTRACT A prospective study was conducted to assess the value of surgeon-performed ultrasound (SUS) in primary hyperparathyroidism. A total of 204 consecutive patients were studied prospectively with surgeon performed neck ultrasound. The results were compared with sestamibi nuclear scintigraphy (SNS) and radiologist-performed ultrasound (RUS) and correlated with the operative findings. SUS was true positive in 173 of 204 (85%), false positive in two (1%), false negative in 23 (11%), and true negative in six (2.5%) in patients, where the gland was inaccessible by US (sensitivity 88%, PPV 98%). SNS was true positive in 126 of 188 (67%), false positive in 3%, and false negative in 30% (sensitivity 69%, PPV 95%). RUS was true positive in 57 of 139 (40%), false positive in 5%, false negative in 52% and true negative in 3% (sensitivity 43%, PPV 89%). Comparing correct localization with incorrect localization by the Fisher's exact test, SUS was superior to SNS (p < 0.0001) and to RUS (p < 0.0001). 116 patients had bilateral neck exploration and 88 had open focused minimally invasive surgery. Five percent had multigland disease and 97% were cured after one operation. SUS was the only imaging modality in 16 patients and was sufficiently convincing to allow minimally invasive parathyroidectomy in eight. Surgeons treating hyperparathyroidism should find SUS a valuable tool. In our experience, SUS was more accurate than RUS whose costeffectiveness is questionable. How to cite this article Al-Askari M, Gough J, Stringer KM, Gough IR. Surgeon-Performed Ultrasound in Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Prospective Study of 204 Consecutive Patients. World J Endocr Surg 2012;4(1):8-12.

scholarly journals A quick intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay in the surgical management of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: a study of 206 consecutive cases

2002 ◽  
pp. 783-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Vignali ◽  
A Picone ◽  
G Materazzi ◽  
S Steffe ◽  
P Berti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Primary Hyperparathyroidism ◽  
Serum Calcium ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Parathyroid Tissue ◽  
Normal Serum ◽  
Neck Exploration ◽  
True Negative ◽  
Normal Serum Calcium ◽  
Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone

OBJECTIVE: The traditional surgical approach for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) consists of the identification of at least four glands and in the removal of all hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue. DESIGN: To evaluate whether intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) monitoring will allow a more limited surgical procedure by confirming complete removal of all hyperfunctioning tissue. METHODS: Plasma samples were obtained from 206 consecutive patients with sporadic PHPT before skin incision, during manipulation of a suspected adenoma, and 5 min (T-5) and 10 min after removal of abnormal parathyroid tissue. PTH was measured by a quick immunochemiluminescent assay (QPTH). The operative success was defined by a decrease of PTH greater than 50% of the highest pre-excision value. RESULTS: A >50% decrease of PTH occurred in 203 patients and was evident at T-5 in the majority of cases. All but three had normal serum calcium the day after surgery and afterwards. PTH concentration did not show a >50% decrease in the remaining three cases after completion of surgery. One patients had negative neck exploration and remained hypercalcemic; the other two had normal serum calcium at follow-up. Thus, the intraoperative QPTH correctly predicted the outcome of surgery in 201 patients (97.5%) (200 true positive and 1 true negative), and provided three false positive and two false negative results. CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative QPTH measurement represents a useful tool to assist the surgeon during parathyroidectomy. It indicates whether all hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue has been removed, limiting the procedure to a unilateral neck exploration in most cases.

Does Rapid Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Analysis Predict Cure in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Primary Hyperparathyroidism?

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. S. Nilsen ◽  
E. Haug ◽  
M. Heidemann ◽  
S. J. Karlsen
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Parathyroid Tissue ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Anatomical Location ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Sestamibi Scintigraphy ◽  
False Negative Results ◽  
Intraoperative Pth ◽  
Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone

Background and Aims: Preoperative 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy is used by many surgeons to identify the anatomical location of pathological parathyroid glands in patients undergoing surgical treatment for hyperparathyroidism. However, false negative results do occur. It has been suggested that intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) analysis may enhance the possibility of performing successful focused, unilateral neck surgery in these patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether an adequate fall in intraoperative parathyroid hormone values predicts the removal of all hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue and postoperative normocalcemia. Material and Methods: One hundred consecutive patients undergoing surgery for hyperparathyroidism had preoperative 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy and intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) analysis. A fall in intraoperative PTH value by more than 50% of baseline value ended the procedure. This prospective study presents the clinical and biochemical results. Results: The overall sensitivity of the 99mTc-sestamib scintigraphy was 88% and for single adenomas 95%. The scintigraphy failed to detect the correct pathology in all cases with multiglandular disease (7 patients). A fall in intraoperative PTH value by more than 50% of baseline value was achieved in all patients. The combination of intraoperative PTH analysis and 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy enabled us to limit the operation to a focused, unilateral operation in 87 of the 100 patients. All patients were normocalcemic postoperatively. Conclusions: A fall in intraoperative PTH value more than 50 % of baseline value seems to predict postoperative normocalcemia and the removal of all hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue. Bilateral neck exploration is avoided in the majority of patients.

Effects of Parathyroidectomy on Normocalcemic Primary Hyperparathyroidism and the Role of Intraoperative PTH Measurement

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110488
Author(s):  
Ehab Alameer ◽  
Mahmoud Omar ◽  
Marcus Hoof ◽  
Hosam Shalaby ◽  
Mohamed Abdelgawad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Primary Hyperparathyroidism ◽  
Cure Rate ◽  
Tertiary Hyperparathyroidism ◽  
Intraoperative Pth ◽  
Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Cure Rates ◽  
Current Guidelines ◽  
Normocalcemic Hyperparathyroidism

Background Normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism (NCpHPT) and normohormonal primary hyperparathyroidism (NHpHPT) are recently recognized variants of primary hyperparathyroidism. Current guidelines for the management hyperparathyroidism recognize NCpHPT as one of the areas that are recommended for more research due to limited available data. Methods A retrospective review of patients who had parathyroidectomy between 2014 and 2019. We excluded patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes and secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism. Included patients were classified based on the biochemical profile into classic or normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism group. Collected data included demographics, preoperative localizing imaging, intraoperative parathyroid hormone levels, and postoperative cure rates. Results 261 patients were included: 160 patients in the classic and 101 patients in the normocalcemic group. Patients in the normocalcemic group had significantly more negative sestamibi scans (n = 58 [8.2%] vs 78 [51.3%], P = <.01), smaller parathyroid glands (mean weight 436.0 ± 593.0 vs 742.4 ± 1109.0 mg, P = .02), higher parathyroid hyperplasia rates (n = 51 [50.5%] vs 69 [43.1%]), and significantly higher intraoperative parathyroid hormone at 10 minutes (78.1 ± 194.6 vs 43.9 ± 62.4 1, P = .04). Positive predictive value of both intraoperative parathyroid hormone and cure rate was lower in the normocalcemic group (84.2% vs 95.7%) and (80.5% vs 95%), respectively. Conclusion Normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism is a challenging disease. Surgeons should be aware of the lower cure rate in this group, interpret intraoperative parathyroid hormone with caution, and have a lower threshold for bilateral neck exploration and 4 glands visualization.

scholarly journals Clinical impact of two different intraoperative parathyroid hormone assays in primary and renal hyperparathyroidism

2009 ◽  
Vol 160 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja-Kerstin Meyer ◽  
Markus Zorn ◽  
Karin Frank-Raue ◽  
Markus W Büchler ◽  
Peter Nawroth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Primary Hyperparathyroidism ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Renal Hyperparathyroidism ◽  
Normal Range ◽  
Persistent Disease ◽  
Intraoperative Pth ◽  
Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone

BackgroundIntraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) monitoring predicts successful surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). In renal HPT, intraoperative PTH assays can define whether parathyroid resection is adequate.MethodsIntraoperative PTH was measured with two different immunometric assays (Immulite Turbo DPC and ADVIA Centaur assay) in 91 patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary (n=57) and renal (n=34) hyperparathyroidism. PTH was monitored preoperatively, 10, 20, and 30 min after parathyroidectomy and 24 h postoperatively.ResultsTen minutes after parathyroidectomy, intraoperative PTH dropped into the normal range (<7.6 pmol/l) in 84% of patients with pHPT and tertiary HPT as measured with the ADVIA Centaur assay (PTH-A), compared with 100% of the samples measured with the Immulite Turbo DPC assay (PTH-I; P=0.0082). Twenty minutes after parathyroidectomy for secondary HPT, intraoperative PTH decreased to the normal range in 100% measured with PTH-I compared with 50% measured with PTH-A (P=0.009). Then, 24 h postoperatively, PTH-I and PTH-A levels were within the normal range in all of the successfully treated patients. Both assays correctly identified six patients with persistent disease and another patient with a double adenoma in pHPT.ConclusionsIn patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary or renal HPT, PTH levels decreasing to the normal range indicated successful surgery in all of the patients as measured with the PTH-I assay. Comparing the two assays, PTH-I was able to quantify the intraoperative PTH decay more quickly than PTH-A.

scholarly journals Surgery for Primary Hyperparathyroidism in Patients with Preoperatively Negative Sestamibi Scan and Discordant Imaging Studies: The Usefulness of Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Monitoring

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. CMED.S13114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Giorgio Caló ◽  
Giuseppe Pisano ◽  
Giulia Loi ◽  
Fabio Medas ◽  
Alberto Tatti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Primary Hyperparathyroidism ◽  
Preoperative Imaging ◽  
Imaging Studies ◽  
Parathyroid Hormone Monitoring ◽  
Intraoperative Pth ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
The Impact

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) monitoring on surgical strategy, intraoperative findings, and outcome in patients with negative sestamibi scintigraphy and with discordant imaging studies. We divided our 175 patients into 3 groups: group A was methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI)-positive and ultrasonography positive and was concordant (114 patients), group B was MIBI-positive and ultrasonography-negative (50 patients), and group C was MIBI–-and ultrasonography-negative (11 patients). The overall operative success was 99.12% in group A, 98% in group B, and 90.91% in group C, with an incidence of multiglandular disease of 3.5% in group A, 12% in group B, and 9.09% in group C. Intraoperative PTH monitoring changed the operative management in 2.63% of patients in group A and 14% in group B. The use of intraoperative PTH achieves to obtain excellent results in the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism in high-volume centers, even in the most difficult cases, during MIBI-negative and discordant preoperative imaging studies.

scholarly journals Disparity between Preoperative and Pre-Excisional Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone in Parathyroid Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (04) ◽  
pp. 382-386
Author(s):  
Maheer Masood ◽  
Trevor Hackman
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Clinic Visit ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Parathyroid Surgery ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Intraoperative Pth ◽  
Gland Function ◽  
Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Clinic Visits

Introduction Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (ioPTH) testing is a widely accepted standard for assessing the parathyroid gland function. A decline of preoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels by more than 50% is one accepted measure of parathyroid surgery adequacy. However, there may be a variation between preoperative PTH levels obtained at a clinic visit and pre-excisional ioPTH. Objective Our study explores the differences between preoperative PTH and pre-excisional ioPTH levels, and the potential impact this difference has on determining the adequacy of parathyroid surgery. Methods A retrospective study that consisted of 33 patients that had undergone parathyroid resection between September 2009 and March 2016 at a tertiary academic center was performed. Each subject's preoperative PTH levels were obtained from clinic visits and pre-excisional ioPTH levels were recorded along with the time interval between the measurements. Results There was a significant difference between the mean preoperative PTH and the pre-excisional ioPTH levels of 147 pg/mL (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.43 to 284.47; p = 0.0396). The exclusion of four outliers revealed a further significant difference with a mean of 35.09 pg/mL (95% CI 20.27 to 49.92; p < 0.0001). The average time interval between blood draws was 48 days + 32 days. A weak correlation between the change in PTH values and the time interval between preoperative and pre-excision blood draws was noted (r2 = 0.15). Conclusion Our study reveals a significant difference between the preoperative PTH levels obtained at clinic visits and the pre-excisional intraoperative PTH levels. We recommend routine pre-excisional intraoperative PTH levels, despite evidence of elevated preoperative PTH levels, in order to more accurately assess the adequacy of surgical resection.

scholarly journals Coupling Uncertainties with Accuracy Assessment in Object-based Slum Detections, Case Study: Jakarta, Indonesia

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jati Pratomo ◽  
Monika Kuffer ◽  
Javier Martinez ◽  
Divyani Kohli
Keyword(s):  
Land Tenure ◽  
Classification Accuracy ◽  
Accuracy Assessment ◽  
False Negative ◽  
National Policy ◽  
True Positive ◽  
True Negative ◽  
Object Based ◽  
The Impact

Object-Based Image Analysis (OBIA) has been successfully used to map slums. In general, the occurrence of uncertainties in producing geographic data is inevitable. However, most studies concentrated solely on assessing the classification accuracy and neglecting the inherent uncertainties. Our research analyses the impact of uncertainties in measuring the accuracy of OBIA-based slum detection. We selected Jakarta as our case study area, because of a national policy of slum eradication, which is causing rapid changes in slum areas. Our research comprises of four parts: slum conceptualization, ruleset development, implementation, and accuracy and uncertainty measurements. Existential and extensional uncertainty arise when producing reference data. The comparison of a manual expert delineations of slums with OBIA slum classification results into four combinations: True Positive, False Positive, True Negative and False Negative. However, the higher the True Positive (which lead to a better accuracy), the lower the certainty of the results. This demonstrates the impact of extensional uncertainties. Our study also demonstrates the role of non-observable indicators (i.e., land tenure), to assist slum detection, particularly in areas where uncertainties exist. In conclusion, uncertainties are increasing when aiming to achieve a higher classification accuracy by matching manual delineation and OBIA classification.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document