scholarly journals HDR Brachytherapy in the Management of High-Risk Prostate Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Masson ◽  
Raj Persad ◽  
Amit Bahl

High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is used with increasing frequency for the treatment of prostate cancer. It is a technique which allows delivery of large individual fractions to the prostate without exposing adjacent normal tissues to unacceptable toxicity. This approach is particularly favourable in prostate cancer where tumours are highly sensitive to dose escalation and to increases in radiotherapy fraction size, due to the unique radiobiological behaviour of prostate cancers in contrast with other malignancies. In this paper we discuss the rationale and the increasing body of clinical evidence for the use of this technique in patients with high-risk prostate cancer, where it is combined with external beam radiotherapy. We highlight practical aspects of delivering treatment and discuss toxicity and limitations, with particular reference to current practice in the United Kingdom.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 91-91
Author(s):  
Toshihiro Yamamoto ◽  
Masahito Kido ◽  
Hiroshi Sasaki ◽  
Jun Miki ◽  
Takahiro Kimura ◽  
...  

91 Background: To present outcome and morbidity of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized high risk prostate cancer. Methods: Between May 2005 and April 2009, 122 patients underwent Ir-192 HDR brachytherapy with EBRT and passed after HDR bachytherapy more than one year. The median follow-up was 46 months (range 2-76 months). All patients were high risk and localized prostate cancer. Median PSA was 40.2ng/ml (range 4.1-366ng/ml). Median Gleason Score was 8 (range 6-10). All patients were treated over six months neo-adjuvant hormonal therapy and over twenty-four months adjuvant hormonal therapy. Results: Only one patient had died of lung small cell carcinoma. 14 patients had revealed biochemical failure(BCF) by Phoenix definition. 5-year biochemical free rate was 78%. Clinical T3 group is significant worse than clinical T1-T2 group(5-y BCF 73% vs 81%, p<0.05). Of the 122 patients, only one patient displayed Grade 3 late GI toxicity. There were no other acute nor late severe toxicity. Conclusions: HDR brachytherapy for localized high risk prostate cancer resulted in good outcomes and had comparatively minor toxicity. Clinical T3 patients was poor outcome than clinical T1-2.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 86-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Tharmalingam ◽  
Yatman Tsang ◽  
Ananya Choudhury ◽  
Peter Hoskin ◽  

86 Background: In high-risk prostate cancer, the risk of occult lymph node metastases in the pelvic lymph nodes can be as high as 40%. However, the use of whole pelvis radiotherapy (WPRT) in high-risk patients remains controversial with mixed retrospective evidence and two negative prospective trials. Data from a national UK database of patients treated with external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy was reviewed to evaluate the benefit of pelvic treatment. Methods: From 2009 to 2013, 755 patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (clinical stage ≥T2c, Gleason score ≥7 or presenting prostate-specific antigen (pPSA) ≥10) were treated with EBRT and HDR brachytherapy. The pelvic nodes to the level of the common iliac chain were treated in 370 patients with a dose of 46Gy in 23 fractions. The remaining 385 patients received radiotherapy to the prostate only (PORT) at a dose of 37.5Gy in 15 fractions. A single dose of 15Gy was delivered with HDR brachytherapy in each case. Corresponding biologic effective doses to the prostate were 107Gy and 100Gy respectively (α/β = 1.5). 96.5% of patients received ADT with a median duration of 24 months. Biochemical failure was defined as a PSA rise of ≥2ng/ml above nadir. Analysis used log-rank and Cox univariate and multivariate tests. Results: Median follow-up was 4.5 years; 5-year biochemical progression-free survival rates for the WPRT versus the PORT arms were 88% vs 80% (p < 0.05) for all patients and 89% vs 76% (p < 0.05) for high-risk patients. Differences in bPFS remained significant (p < 0.05) after accounting for Gleason score, pPSA, T stage and ADT duration as co-variates. There was no difference in overall survival. Conclusions: Whole pelvis EBRT with HDR brachytherapy appears to significantly improves 5-year biochemical progression-free survival in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer compared to prostate-only EBRT and HDR brachytherapy which persists after allowing for covariates including presenting tumour parameters and ADT use. The PIVOTAL boost trial in the UK will assess this further in a prospective randomised study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document