scholarly journals Seismic Earth Pressures of Retaining Wall from Large Shaking Table Tests

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changwei Yang ◽  
Jian Jing Zhang ◽  
Qu Honglue ◽  
Bi Junwei ◽  
Liu Feicheng

To ascertain seismic response of retaining wall in the Wenchuan earthquake, large shaking table tests are performed and an acceleration record is acted in 3 directions. In the tests, acceleration time history recorded at Wolong station in the Wenchuan earthquake is used to excite the model wall. Results from the tests show that the location of dynamic resultant earth pressure is 0.35–0.49 H from toe of the wall for road shoulder retaining wall on rock foundation, 0.33–0.42 H for embankment retaining wall on rock foundation, and 0.46–0.77 H for road shoulder retaining wall on soil foundation. Besides, dynamic earth pressure increases with the increase of ground shaking from 0.1 g to 0.9 g and the relationship is nonlinear. The distribution is closed to for PGA less than 0.4 g but larger for PGA larger than and equal to 0.4 g, especially on the soil foundation. After the comparison of measured earth pressures and theoretical results by pseudodynamic method and pseudostatic method, results of the former are consistent with those of the shaking table test, but results of the latter method are smaller than measured.

2011 ◽  
Vol 90-93 ◽  
pp. 1942-1949
Author(s):  
Hong Sheng Ma ◽  
Chang Wei Yang

In order to get the seismic active earth pressure with the mode of translation, adopting some related assumptions of the M-O theory, this paper establishes the first-order differential equation of the Seismic active earth pressure by horizontal slices analysis method and gets the solution of the seismic active earth pressure by boundary conditions. This formula can solve the distribution of the seismic active earth pressure is nonlinear along the wall, the point of application of the dynamic active thrust which is the advantage of this formula and announces the decreasing process of the filling’s rupture angle with the increase of the horizontal peak ground acceleration (PGA) , as well. The rationality and validity of the formula is confirmed by the comparison between the results of the shaking table tests and the formula, respectively. If the retaining wall takes place the mode of translation, the point of application of the seismic active thrust ranges between 0.4 and 0.5 times wall’s height at the horizontal seismic peak ground acceleration (PGA)<0.4g.At the same time, the computational accuracy of the dynamic active thrust, their points of application and the angle of rupture increases with the increase of the horizontal peak ground acceleration at the horizontal PGA<1.0g, as the astigmatic of the retaining wall in highly seismic intensity region supplying the valuable reference.


2013 ◽  
Vol 639-640 ◽  
pp. 682-687
Author(s):  
Qing Guang Yang ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Jie He ◽  
Shan Huang Luo

Considering the movement effect of translation mode,friction angle reduction coefficient and method of bevel-layer analysis,estimation of active earth pressures is deduced for cohesiveless soil retaining wall with translation mode.In order to validate the feasibility of the proposed approach,a model test for active earth pressures was conducted in laboratory;and the proposed method was used to analyze this model. Experimental and theoretical results indicate that the curve of active earth pressure increases firstly and decreases then along the depth of retaining wall with different values of s/sc,and it has a point of intersection with the curve of Coulomb active earth pressure at the depth of 0.6H,where H is the wall height. Further study indicates that the action point position of the active earth pressure is higher than 1/3 times wall height.


2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 87-98
Author(s):  
Jin-Tae Han ◽  
Jung-In Choi ◽  
Sung-Hwan Kim ◽  
Min-Taek Yoo ◽  
Myoung-Mo Kim

2010 ◽  
Vol 163-167 ◽  
pp. 4336-4341
Author(s):  
Tao Wang ◽  
Jing Jiang Sun ◽  
Li Yan Meng

In this paper, to verify the effectiveness and reliability of nonlinear numerical simulation based fiber model, two computer programs (CANNY 99 and IDARC-2D), in which shear wall elements were respectively simplified by fiber model and equivalent beam model, were adopted to perform the numerical simulations of 10 times shaking table tests of a nine story 1:6 scale frame-shear wall building model in this paper. Analysis model including beam, column and wall element in CANNY 99 is elaborated in detail. Test results are compared with simulation results in some aspects such as natural frequency, time history responses, and peak value responses. Results demonstrate that fiber model and Equivalent beam model can simulate the elastic-plastic earthquake response of R.C. wall structures very well.


2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-109
Author(s):  
B. Munwar Basha ◽  
G. L. Sivakumar

Using additional dynamic parameters in the pseudo-static method like shear wave and primary wave velocities of soil, phase change in the shear and primary waves, and soil amplification for seismic accelerations, one can benefit from another useful tool called pseudo-dynamic method to solve the problem of earth pressures. In this study, the pseudo-dynamic method is used to compute the seismic passive earth pressures on a rigid gravity retaining wall by considering both the planar failure and composite failure (log-spiral and planar) mechanisms. To validate the present formulation, passive earth pressure computed by the present method are compared with those given by other authors. Seismic passive earth pressure coefficients are provided in tabular form for different parameters. The sliding and rotational displacements are also computed and results of the comparative study showed that the assumption of planar failure mechanism for rough soil-wall interfaces significantly overestimates passive earth pressure and underestimate the sliding and rotational displacements.


Retaining walls are structures used not only to retain earth but also water and other materials such as coal, ore, etc. where conditions do not permit the mass to assume its natural slope. In this chapter, after considering the types of retaining wall, earth pressure theories are developed in estimating the lateral pressure exerted by the soil on a retaining structure for at-rest, active, and passive cases. The effect of sloping backfill, wall friction, surcharge load, point loads, line loads, and strip loads are analyzed. Karl Culmann's graphical method can be used for determining both active and passive earth pressures. The analysis of braced excavations, sheet piles, and anchored sheet pile walls are considered and practical considerations in the design of retaining walls are treated. They include saturated backfill, wall friction, stability both external and internal, bearing capacity, and proportioning the dimensions of the retaining wall. Finally, a brief treatment of earth pressure on underground structures is included.


2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 547-571
Author(s):  
Masato Saitoh ◽  
Tomoya Saito ◽  
Toshifumi Hikima ◽  
Makoto Ozawa ◽  
Keiichi Imanishi

Experimental studies on the dynamic response of structures comprising soil-foundation systems require an appropriately constructed soil-foundation model below the superstructures in order to properly estimate structural responses. In most studies, applying a small scaling is necessary for constructing the entire structural system, since there is limited space on shaking tables. This constraint has been a hindrance in experimental studies. Thus this study proposes a mechanical interface (MI) that represents the impedance characteristics of a 3 × 5 pile group embedded in a layered soil medium. The MI is constructed on the basis of lumped parameter models with gyro-mass elements. This element is mechanically realized in the MI using a rotational mass in combination with coupling gears. The results show that the MI properly simulates the impedance functions with frequency-dependent oscillations, and shaking table tests using the MI for an inelastic structure are demonstrated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document