scholarly journals 1 g Shaking table model tests on seismic active earth pressure acting on retaining wall with cohesive backfill soil

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susumu Nakajima ◽  
Takumi Ozaki ◽  
Taisuke Sanagawa
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Model Tests ◽  
Shaking Table ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Seismic Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Backfill Soil ◽  
Table Model

The Research of Seismic Active Earth Pressure with Mode of Translation by Horizontal Slices Analysis Method and Shaking Table Tests

2011 ◽  
Vol 90-93 ◽  
pp. 1942-1949
Author(s):  
Hong Sheng Ma ◽  
Chang Wei Yang
Keyword(s):  
Peak Ground Acceleration ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Shaking Table ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Shaking Table Tests ◽  
Computational Accuracy ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Seismic Active Earth Pressure

In order to get the seismic active earth pressure with the mode of translation, adopting some related assumptions of the M-O theory, this paper establishes the first-order differential equation of the Seismic active earth pressure by horizontal slices analysis method and gets the solution of the seismic active earth pressure by boundary conditions. This formula can solve the distribution of the seismic active earth pressure is nonlinear along the wall, the point of application of the dynamic active thrust which is the advantage of this formula and announces the decreasing process of the filling’s rupture angle with the increase of the horizontal peak ground acceleration (PGA) , as well. The rationality and validity of the formula is confirmed by the comparison between the results of the shaking table tests and the formula, respectively. If the retaining wall takes place the mode of translation, the point of application of the seismic active thrust ranges between 0.4 and 0.5 times wall’s height at the horizontal seismic peak ground acceleration (PGA)<0.4g.At the same time, the computational accuracy of the dynamic active thrust, their points of application and the angle of rupture increases with the increase of the horizontal peak ground acceleration at the horizontal PGA<1.0g, as the astigmatic of the retaining wall in highly seismic intensity region supplying the valuable reference.

scholarly journals Stability Assessment of Earth Retaining Structures under Static and Seismic Conditions

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Nimbalkar ◽  
Pain ◽  
Ahmad ◽  
Chen
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Accurate Estimation ◽  
Engineering Practice ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Stability Assessment ◽  
Linear Distribution ◽  
Backfill Soil ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Seismic Earth Pressure

An accurate estimation of static and seismic earth pressures is extremely important in geotechnical design. The conventional Coulomb’s approach and Mononobe-Okabe’s approach have been widely used in engineering practice. However, the latter approach provides the linear distribution of seismic earth pressure behind a retaining wall in an approximate way. Therefore, the pseudo-dynamic method can be used to compute the distribution of seismic active earth pressure in a more realistic manner. The effect of wall and soil inertia must be considered for the design of a retaining wall under seismic conditions. The method proposed considers the propagation of shear and primary waves through the backfill soil and the retaining wall due to seismic excitation. The crude estimate of finding the approximate seismic acceleration makes the pseudo-static approach often unreliable to adopt in the stability assessment of retaining walls. The predictions of the active earth pressure using Coulomb theory are not consistent with the laboratory results to the development of arching in the backfill soil. A new method is proposed to compute the active earth pressure acting on the backface of a rigid retaining wall undergoing horizontal translation. The predictions of the proposed method are verified against results of laboratory tests as well as the results from other methods proposed in the past.

Calculating Method of Active Earth Pressure behind Rigid Retaining Wall Based on Pseudo-Dynamic Theory

2011 ◽  
Vol 368-373 ◽  
pp. 2932-2938
Author(s):  
Kui Hua Wang ◽  
Deng Hui Wu ◽  
Shao Jun Ma ◽  
Wen Bing Wu
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Analysis ◽  
Dynamic Theory ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Active Force ◽  
Calculating Method ◽  
Seismic Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Action Point ◽  
Seismic Force

By means of pseudo-dynamic theory, a new calculating method is presented to calculate the pseudo-dynamic seismic active earth pressure behind rigid retaining wall. Considering time and phase difference within the backfills, the horizontal slices is used to analyze the distribution of seismic active force behind retaining wall in more realistic manner. Under the assumption that the soil backfills are rigid body, the equations derived in this paper can be degenerated to Mononobe-Okabe equations. Through numerical analysis, it is shown that the values of seismic active force obtained from present study are smaller than those obtained from Mononobe-Okabe theory and the distribution of seismic force along the depth of the wall is nonlinear. It is also found that the action point of the total seismic active earth pressure is higher than one third of the wall height, which is corresponding to previous experimental results.

scholarly journals Effect of Wall Inclination on Dynamic Active Thrust for Cohesive Soil Backfill

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gupta ◽  
V. Yadav ◽  
V. A. Sawant ◽  
R. Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Cohesive Soil ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Wall Friction ◽  
Cohesionless Soil ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Seismic Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Design Charts ◽  
Seismic Loadings

Design of retaining walls under seismic conditions is based on the calculation of seismic earth pressurebehind the wall. To calculate the seismic active earth pressure behind the vertical retaining wall, many researchers reportanalytical solutions using the pseudo-static approach for both cohesionless and cohesive soil backfill. Design charts havebeen presented for the calculation of seismic active earth pressure behind vertical retaining walls in the non-dimensionalform. For inclined retaining walls, the analytical solutions for the calculation of seismic active earth pressure as well as thedesign charts (in non-dimensional form) have been reported in few studies for c-ϕ soil backfill. One analytical solution forthe calculation of seismic active earth pressure behind inclined retaining walls by Shukla (2015) is used in the present studyto obtain the design charts in non-dimensional form. Different field parameters related with wall geometry, seismic loadings,tension cracks, soil backfill properties, surcharge and wall friction are used in the present analysis. The present study hasquantified the effect of negative and positive wall inclination as well as the effect of soil cohesion (c), angle of shearingresistance (ϕ), surcharge loading (q) and the horizontal and vertical seismic coefficient (kh and kv) on seismic active earthpressure with the help of design charts for c-ϕ soil backfill. The design charts presented here in non-dimensional form aresimple to use and can be implemented by field engineers for design of inclined retaining walls under seismic conditions. Theactive earth pressure coefficients for cohesionless soil backfill achieved from the present study are validated with studiesreported in the literature.

scholarly journals SHAKING TABLE MODEL TESTS ON REINFORCE SOIL RETAINING WALL WITH A NEW-TYPE OF GEOCELL AND GEOGRIDS EMBEDDED IN SANDY AND GRAVELLY BACKFILLS

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (0) ◽  
pp. 23-30
Author(s):  
Tomoharu MERA ◽  
Takashi KIYOTA ◽  
Xinye HAN ◽  
Toshihiko KATAGIRI ◽  
Christian HAUSSNER ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Model Tests ◽  
Shaking Table ◽  
Table Model ◽  
New Type
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document