scholarly journals Sipuleucel-T and Androgen Receptor-Directed Therapy for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Renliang Yi ◽  
Baoxin Chen ◽  
Peng Duan ◽  
Chanjiao Zheng ◽  
Huanyu Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Grade 3

New treatments, such as sipuleucel-T and androgen receptor- (AR-) directed therapies (enzalutamide (Enz) and abiraterone acetate (AA)), have emerged and been approved for the management of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). There are still debates over their efficacy and clinical benefits. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sipuleucel-T and AR-directed therapies in patients with CRPC. RevMan 5.1 was used for pooled analysis and analysis of publication bias. Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis, with three studies in sipuleucel-T (totally 737 patients, 488 patients in treatment group, and 249 patients in placebo group) and four in AR-directed therapies (totally 5,199 patients, 3,015 patients in treatment group, and 2,184 patients in placebo group). Treatment with sipuleucel-T significantly improved overall survival in patients with CRPC and was not associated with increased risk of adverse event of grade ≥3 (p>0.05). However, treatment with sipuleucel-T did not improve time-to-progression and reduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≥50% was not significantly different from that with placebo. AR-directed therapies significantly improved overall survival in patients with CRPC and improved time-to-progression and reduction of PSA level ≥50%. AR-directed therapies did not increase risk of adverse event of grade ≥3 (p>0.05).

scholarly journals Overall survival and adverse events after treatment with darolutamide vs. apalutamide vs. enzalutamide for high-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Wenzel ◽  
Luigi Nocera ◽  
Claudia Collà Ruvolo ◽  
Christoph Würnschimmel ◽  
Zhe Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Pubmed Search ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background The most recent overall survival (OS) and adverse event (AE) data have not been compared for the three guideline-recommended high-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) treatment alternatives. Methods We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis focusing on OS and AE according to the most recent apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide reports. We systematically examined and compared apalutamide vs. enzalutamide vs. darolutamide efficacy and toxicity, relative to ADT according to PRISMA. We relied on PubMed search for most recent reports addressing prospective randomized trials with proven predefined OS benefit, relative to ADT: SPARTAN, PROSPER, and ARAMIS. OS represented the primary outcome and AEs represented secondary outcomes. Results Overall, data originated from 4117 observations made within the three trials that were analyzed. Regarding OS benefit relative to ADT, darolutamide ranked first, followed by enzalutamide and apalutamide, in that order. In the subgroup of PSA-doubling time (PSA-DT) ≤ 6 months patients, enzalutamide ranked first, followed by darolutamide and apalutamide in that order. Conversely, in the subgroup of PSA-DT 6–10 months patients, darolutamide ranked first, followed by apalutamide and enzalutamide, in that order. Regarding grade 3+ AEs, darolutamide was most favorable, followed by enzalutamide and apalutamide, in that order. Conclusion The current network meta-analysis suggests the highest OS efficacy and lowest grade 3+ toxicity for darolutamide. However, in the PSA-DT ≤ 6 months subgroup, the highest efficacy was recorded for enzalutamide. It is noteworthy that study design, study population, and follow-up duration represent some of the potentially critical differences that distinguish between the three studies and remained statistically unaccounted for using the network meta-analysis methodology. Those differences should be strongly considered in the interpretation of the current and any network meta-analyses.

scholarly journals Abiraterone in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review of ‘real-life’ studies

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 305-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Marchioni ◽  
Petros Sountoulides ◽  
Maida Bada ◽  
Sebastiano Rapisarda ◽  
Cosimo De Nunzio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
The Real ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Real Life Setting ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Baseline Psa

Background: To assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with abiraterone acetate (AA) in chemotherapy-naïve men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the ‘real-life’ setting. Methods: Data acquisition on the outcomes of the use of AA in chemotherapy-naive patients with mCRPC was performed by a MEDLINE comprehensive systematic literature search using combinations of the following key words: ‘prostate cancer’, ‘metastatic’, ‘castration resistant’, ‘abiraterone’, ‘real life’, and excluding controlled clinical trials (phase II and III studies). Identification and selection of the studies was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) criteria. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), 12-week 50% reduction in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and grade 3 and higher adverse events. Data were narratively synthesized in light of methodological and clinical heterogeneity. Results: Within the eight identified studies that fulfilled the criteria, a total of 801 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Baseline PSA ranged between 9.5 and 212.0 ng/ml. Most of the patients had bone metastases. Duration of treatment with AA was longer in the studies with lower baseline PSA levels. The median OS ranged between 14 and 36.4 months. The PFS, assessed according to different definitions, ranged from 3.9 to 18.5 months. A 50% PSA reduction at 12 weeks was reached by a variable percentage of patients ranging from 36.0% to 62.1%. Finally, the rate of grade 3 and higher adverse events was reported in three studies and ranged from 4.4% to 15.5%. Conclusions: Despite the high grade of heterogeneity among studies, treatment with AA seems to ensure good survival outcomes in the ‘real-life’ setting. However, prospective studies based on patients’ characteristics being more similar to ‘real-life’ patients are necessary.

scholarly journals Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab, Thalidomide, Docetaxel, and Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 2070-2076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang-Min Ning ◽  
James L. Gulley ◽  
Philip M. Arlen ◽  
Sukyung Woo ◽  
Seth M. Steinberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Phase Ii Studies

Purpose We previously demonstrated that thalidomide appears to add to the activity of docetaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Phase II studies combining docetaxel with bevacizumab have had substantial antitumor activity. We hypothesized that the combination of docetaxel plus these antiangiogenic drugs with different targets would have substantial clinical activity. To explore safety and efficacy, this was tested in mice and in human patients. Patients and Methods Preclinical efficacy of the combination therapy was evaluated in PC3 xenograft mice. Sixty patients with progressive metastatic CRPC received intravenous docetaxel and bevacizumab plus oral thalidomide and prednisone. The primary end point was a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline of ≥ 50%. Secondary end points included time to progression, overall survival, and safety. Results In the mouse model, combination therapy of docetaxel, bevacizumab, and thalidomide inhibited tumor growth most effectively. In the clinical trial, 90% of patients receiving the combination therapy had PSA declines of ≥ 50%, and 88% achieved a PSA decline of ≥ 30% within the first 3 months of treatment. The median time to progression was 18.3 months, and the median overall survival was 28.2 months in this group with a Halabi-predicted survival of 14 months. While toxicities were manageable, all patients developed grade 3/4 neutropenia. Conclusion The addition of bevacizumab and thalidomide to docetaxel is a highly active combination with manageable toxicities. The estimated median survival is encouraging, given the generally poor prognosis of this patient population. These results suggest that definitive clinical trials combining antiangiogenic agent combinations with docetaxel are warranted to improve treatment outcomes for patients with metastatic CRPC.

Cabazitaxel multiple rechallenge in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A therapeutic option to increase overall survival?

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 97-97
Author(s):  
Cedric Pobel ◽  
Edouard Auclin ◽  
Diego Teyssonneau ◽  
Brigitte Laguerre ◽  
Mathilde Cancel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Grade 3

97 Background: Cabazitaxel rechallenge could be a more efficient therapy with an acceptable toxicity than docetaxel in the treatment of patients with a metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of cabazitaxel multiple rechallenge. Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study including patients from 9 centers in France who received 3 lines or more of cabazitaxel from February 2012 to July 2020. Cabazitaxel schedule differed between patients: 25 mg/m2 q3w, 20 mg/m2 q3w, 16 mg/m2 q2w or 10 mg/m2 weekly. Efficacy was assessed by overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from each cabazitaxel line start. Only toxicities grade ≥ 3 were reported. Results: Twenty-two patients were included. The median follow-up from mCRPC was 94.7 months, median age at initial diagnosis was 59.5 years old, median ISUP score at diagnosis was 4 and median PSA at diagnosis was 55 ng/ml. Median number of cabazitaxel cycles was 7 at first-line, 6 at first rechallenge, and 5 for subsequent rechallenges. Median OS from mCRPC diagnosis was 105 months. Median PFS from cabazitaxel line start was 11.8 months at first use, 9.6 for first rechallenge and 5.6 in second rechallenge (table). Only one case of febrile neutropenia and 6 events of grade ≥ 3 toxicity were reported. Conclusions: Cabazitaxel multiple rechallenge could efficiently extend OS with manageable toxicities for patients. Even if anti-PARP therapy and immunotherapy are promising treatments, cabazitaxel rechallenge could be also a relevant therapeutic option for long responder patients. Specific biomarkers should be explored to predict the efficacy of cabazitaxel rechallenge. [Table: see text]

Apalutamide, darolutamide and enzalutamide in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu Roumiguié ◽  
Xavier Paoletti ◽  
Yann Neuzillet ◽  
Romain Mathieu ◽  
Sebastien Vincendeau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Aim: Comparison of the efficacy/safety/health-related quality of life of apalutamide, enzalutamide and darolutamide in Phase III clinical trials involving patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer was performed. Materials & methods: Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed as well as conference abstracts reporting updated overall survival. Three pivotal trials were identified, SPARTAN (apalutamide), PROSPER (enzalutamide) and ARAMIS (darolutamide), and form the basis of this analysis. Results: All three drugs significantly prolonged metastasis-free survival, prostate-specific antigen response and overall survival versus placebo, and were generally well tolerated. Conclusion: Drug selection will likely be influenced by tolerability/safety and other factors, such as the propensity for drug–drug interactions and the presence of comorbidities, that affect the risk–benefit balance in individual patients.

Relative risk of HTN and major cardiovascular events associated with use of androgen receptor antagonists for nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17605-e17605
Author(s):  
Nusrat Jahan ◽  
Francis Mogollon-Duffo ◽  
Shabnam Rehman ◽  
Sakshi Singal ◽  
Fred L. Hardwicke
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Myocardial Infraction ◽  
Grade 3

e17605 Background: Metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a lethal disease, often preceded by nonmetastatic, castration-resistant phase. Recently, three androgen receptor (AR) antagonists — apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide — have been approved for nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). AR-antagonists have been associated with increased risk of hypertension (HTN) and major cardiovascular (CV) events. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the relative risk of HTN and major CV events associated with use of AR-antagonists for nmCRPC. Methods: We conducted a systematic search at PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and meeting abstracts from inception until November 2019. Published phase 3 RCTs using AR-antagonists in the study arm for nmCRPC and reporting the number of events of HTN and major CV events were included in the analyses. We used Mantel-Haenszel (MH) method and random effects model to calculate the estimated pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was tested with I2 value and Cochran’s Q-test. Results: Three phase 3 RCTs (ARAMIS, PROSPER, and SPARTAN) randomizing 2687 patients in the AR-antagonist arms and 1417 patients in the control arms were included in the final analysis for HTN. SPARTAN did not include data for major CV events; hence, other two studies comprising 2903 patients were analyzed for major CV events. Major CV events included myocardial infraction/coronary artery disease, ischemic/hemorrhagic cerebrovascular events, and heart failure. AR-antagonists used in the study arms were — ARAMIS: darolutamide, PROSPER: enzalutamide, and SPARTAN: apalutamide. Placebo was used in the control arms. All patients continued androgen deprivation therapy. Randomization was 2:1 in all studies. The pooled RR of any-grade HTN is 1.5 (95% CI: 1.03 – 2.18, p = 0.03, I2 = 70%); and, the pooled RR of grade ≥3 HTN is 1.39 (95% CI: 1.03 – 1.88, p = 0.03, I2 = 13%). The pooled RR of any-grade major CV events is 1.49 (95% CI: 1.05 – 2.13, p = 0.03, I2 = 0%); and, the pooled RR of grade ≥3 major CV events is 1.80 (95% CI: 1.11 – 2.92, p = 0.02, I2 = 0%). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis demonstrated use of AR-antagonists for nmCRPC is associated with increased risk of HTN and major CV events. A careful selection of patients and aggressive management of the CV risk factors are crucial to enhance safety and proper utilization of these promising drugs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document