scholarly journals Magnetic Targeted Delivery of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Promotes Articular Cartilage Repair

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinji Kotaka ◽  
Shigeyuki Wakitani ◽  
Akira Shimamoto ◽  
Naosuke Kamei ◽  
Mikiya Sawa ◽  
...  

Cartilage regeneration treatments using stem cells are associated with problems due to the cell source and the difficulty of delivering the cells to the cartilage defect. We consider labeled induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells to be an ideal source of cells for tissue regeneration, and if iPS cells could be delivered only into cartilage defects, it would be possible to repair articular cartilage. Consequently, we investigated the effect of magnetically labeled iPS (m-iPS) cells delivered into an osteochondral defect by magnetic field on the repair of articular cartilage. iPS cells were labeled magnetically and assessed for maintenance of pluripotency by their ability to form embryoid bodies in vitro and to form teratomas when injected subcutaneously into nude rats. These cells were delivered specifically into cartilage defects in nude rats using a magnetic field. The samples were graded according to the histologic grading score for cartilage regeneration. m-iPS cells differentiated into three embryonic germ layers and formed teratomas in the subcutaneous tissue. The histologic grading score was significantly better in the treatment group compared to the control group. m-iPS cells maintained pluripotency, and the magnetic delivery system proved useful and safe for cartilage repair using iPS cells.

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umile Giuseppe Longo ◽  
Stefano Petrillo ◽  
Edoardo Franceschetti ◽  
Alessandra Berton ◽  
Nicola Maffulli ◽  
...  

Cartilage defects represent a common problem in orthopaedic practice. Predisposing factors include traumas, inflammatory conditions, and biomechanics alterations. Conservative management of cartilage defects often fails, and patients with this lesions may need surgical intervention. Several treatment strategies have been proposed, although only surgery has been proved to be predictably effective. Usually, in focal cartilage defects without a stable fibrocartilaginous repair tissue formed, surgeons try to promote a natural fibrocartilaginous response by using marrow stimulating techniques, such as microfracture, abrasion arthroplasty, and Pridie drilling, with the aim of reducing swelling and pain and improving joint function of the patients. These procedures have demonstrated to be clinically useful and are usually considered as first-line treatment for focal cartilage defects. However, fibrocartilage presents inferior mechanical and biochemical properties compared to normal hyaline articular cartilage, characterized by poor organization, significant amounts of collagen type I, and an increased susceptibility to injury, which ultimately leads to premature osteoarthritis (OA). Therefore, the aim of future therapeutic strategies for articular cartilage regeneration is to obtain a hyaline-like cartilage repair tissue by transplantation of tissues or cells. Further studies are required to clarify the role of gene therapy and mesenchimal stem cells for management of cartilage lesions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 1735-1747
Author(s):  
Yingnan Wu ◽  
Zheng Yang ◽  
Vinitha Denslin ◽  
XiaFei Ren ◽  
Chang Sheng Lee ◽  
...  

Background: Articular cartilage has a zonal architecture and biphasic mechanical properties. The recapitulation of surface lubrication properties with high compressibility of the deeper layers of articular cartilage during regeneration is essential in achieving long-term cartilage integrity. Current clinical approaches for cartilage repair, especially with the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), have yet to restore the hierarchically organized architecture of articular cartilage. Hypothesis: MSCs predifferentiated on surfaces with specific nanotopographic patterns can provide phenotypically stable and defined chondrogenic cells and, when delivered as a bilayered stratified construct at the cartilage defect site, will facilitate the formation of functionally superior cartilage tissue in vivo. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: MSCs were subjected to chondrogenic differentiation on specific nanopatterned surfaces. The phenotype of the differentiated cells was assessed by the expression of cartilage markers. The ability of the 2-dimensional nanopattern-generated chondrogenic cells to retain their phenotypic characteristics after removal from the patterned surface was tested by subjecting the enzymatically harvested cells to 3-dimensional fibrin hydrogel culture. The in vivo efficacy in cartilage repair was demonstrated in an osteochondral rabbit defect model. Repair by bilayered construct with specific nanopattern predifferentiated cells was compared with implantation with cell-free fibrin hydrogel, undifferentiated MSCs, and mixed-phenotype nanopattern predifferentiated MSCs. Cartilage repair was evaluated at 12 weeks after implantation. Results: Three weeks of predifferentiation on 2-dimensional nanotopographic patterns was able to generate phenotypically stable chondrogenic cells. Implantation of nanopatterned differentiated MSCs as stratified bilayered hydrogel constructs improved the repair quality of cartilage defects, as indicated by histological scoring, mechanical properties, and polarized microscopy analysis. Conclusion: Our results indicate that with an appropriate period of differentiation, 2-dimensional nanotopographic patterns can be employed to generate phenotypically stable chondrogenic cells, which, when implanted as stratified bilayered hydrogel constructs, were able to form functionally superior cartilage tissue. Clinical Relevance: Our approach provides a relatively straightforward method of obtaining large quantities of zone-specific chondrocytes from MSCs to engineer a stratified cartilage construct that could recapitulate the zonal architecture of hyaline cartilage, and it represents a significant improvement in current MSC-based cartilage regeneration.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Song Lee ◽  
Matthew J. Stebbins ◽  
Hongli Jiao ◽  
Hui-Ching Huang ◽  
Brian E. Walzack ◽  
...  

AbstractGenerating phenotypic chondrocytes from human pluripotent stem cells through driving developmental lineage-specific differentiation remains to be of great interest in the field of cartilage regeneration. In this study, we derived chondrocytes from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) along the mesodermal or ectomesodermal lineages to prepare isogenic mesodermal cell-derived chondrocytes (MC-Chs) or neural crest cell-derived chondrocytes (NCC-Chs), respectively, and further evaluated differences in their cellular and molecular characteristics and cartilage repair capabilities. Our results showed that both lineage-derived chondrocytes expressed hyaline cartilage-associated markers and were capable of forming hyaline cartilage-like tissue ectopically and at joint defects. Moreover, NCC-Chs showed the absence of markers of hypertrophic chondrocytes and revealed a closer morphological resemblance to articular chondrocytes and a greater capability of producing glycosaminoglycans and collagen type 2 at cartilage defects compared to MC-Chs. It was found that the profile of global transcript expression of NCC-Chs more closely resembled that of native chondrocytes (NCs) than that of MC-Chs. Induced by additional growth factors identified through the analysis of transcriptome comparison to NCs, both MC-Chs and NCC-Chs showed a further increase in the phenotype of hyaline cartilage chondrocytes. Results of this study reveal differences in cellular and molecular characteristics and cartilage repair capabilities between isogenic hiPSC-derived MC-Chs and NCC-Chs and demonstrate that chondrocytes derived from hiPSCs along the ectomesodermal lineage are a potential cell source for articular cartilage regeneration.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kangkang Zha ◽  
Xu Li ◽  
Zhen Yang ◽  
Guangzhao Tian ◽  
Zhiqiang Sun ◽  
...  

AbstractArticular cartilage is susceptible to damage but hard to self-repair due to its avascular nature. Traditional treatment methods are not able to produce satisfactory effects. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have shown great promise in cartilage repair. However, the therapeutic effect of MSCs is often unstable partly due to their heterogeneity. Understanding the heterogeneity of MSCs and the potential of different types of MSCs for cartilage regeneration will facilitate the selection of superior MSCs for treating cartilage damage. This review provides an overview of the heterogeneity of MSCs at the donor, tissue source and cell immunophenotype levels, including their cytological properties, such as their ability for proliferation, chondrogenic differentiation and immunoregulation, as well as their current applications in cartilage regeneration. This information will improve the precision of MSC-based therapeutic strategies, thus maximizing the efficiency of articular cartilage repair.


2013 ◽  
Vol 815 ◽  
pp. 345-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching Wen Hsu ◽  
Ping Liu ◽  
Song Song Zhu ◽  
Feng Deng ◽  
Bi Zhang

Here we reported a combined technique for articular cartilage repair, consisting of bone arrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) and poly (dl-lactide-co-glycolide-b-ethylene glycol-b-dl-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA-PEG-PLGA) triblock copolymers carried with tissue growth factor (TGF-belat1). In the present study, BMMSCs seeded on PLGA-PEG-PLGA with were incubated in vitro, carried or not TGF-belta1, Then the effects of the composite on repair of cartilage defect were evaluated in rabbit knee joints in vivo. Full-thickness cartilage defects (diameter: 5 mm; depth: 3 mm) in the patellar groove were either left empty (n=18), implanted with BMMSCs/PLGA (n=18), TGF-belta1 modified BMMSCs/PLGA-PEG-PLGA. The defect area was examined grossly, histologically at 6, 24 weeks postoperatively. After implantation, the BMMSCs /PLGA-PEG-PLGA with TGF-belta1 group showed successful hyaline-like cartilage regeneration similar to normal cartilage, which was superior to the other groups using gross examination, qualitative and quantitative histology. These findings suggested that a combination of BMMSCs/PLGA-PEG-PLGA carried with tissue growth factor (TGF-belat1) may be an alternative treatment for large osteochondral defects in high loading sites.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Zayed ◽  
Steven Newby ◽  
Nabil Misk ◽  
Robert Donnell ◽  
Madhu Dhar

Horses are widely used as large animal preclinical models for cartilage repair studies, and hence, there is an interest in using equine synovial fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells (SFMSCs) in research and clinical applications. Since, we have previously reported that similar to bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMMSCs), SFMSCs may also exhibit donor-to-donor variations in their stem cell properties; the current study was carried out as a proof-of-concept study, to compare the in vivo potential of equine BMMSCs and SFMSCs in articular cartilage repair. MSCs from these two sources were isolated from the same equine donor. In vitro analyses confirmed a significant increase in COMP expression in SFMSCs at day 14. The cells were then encapsulated in neutral agarose scaffold constructs and were implanted into two mm diameter full-thickness articular cartilage defect in trochlear grooves of the rat femur. MSCs were fluorescently labeled, and one week after treatment, the knee joints were evaluated for the presence of MSCs to the injured site and at 12 weeks were evaluated macroscopically, histologically, and then by immunofluorescence for healing of the defect. The macroscopic and histological evaluations showed better healing of the articular cartilage in the MSCs’ treated knee than in the control. Interestingly, SFMSC-treated knees showed a significantly higher Col II expression, suggesting the presence of hyaline cartilage in the healed defect. Data suggests that equine SFMSCs may be a viable option for treating osteochondral defects; however, their stem cell properties require prior testing before application.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 232596712094531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Kraeutler ◽  
Gianna M. Aliberti ◽  
Anthony J. Scillia ◽  
Eric C. McCarty ◽  
Mary K. Mulcahey

Background: Microfracture (MFx) is one of the most common techniques used for the treatment of articular cartilage defects, although recently there has been a trend toward the use of drilling rather than MFx for the treatment of these defects. Purpose: To perform a systematic review of basic science studies to determine the effect of microfracture versus drilling for articular cartilage repair. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE to identify basic science studies comparing outcomes of MFx versus drilling. The search phrase used was microfracture AND (drilling OR microdrilling). Inclusion criteria were basic science studies that directly compared the effect of MFx versus drilling on subchondral bone, bone marrow stimulation, and cartilage regeneration. Results: A total of 7 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Of these, 4 studies were performed in rabbits, 1 study in sheep, and 2 studies in humans. All of the included studies investigated cartilage repair in the knee. In the animal studies, microfracture produced fractured and compacted bone and led to increased osteocyte necrosis compared with drilling. Deep drilling (6 mm) was superior to both shallow drilling (2 mm) and MFx in terms of increased subchondral hematoma with greater access to marrow stroma, improved cartilage repair, and increased mineralized bone. However, the overall quality of cartilage repair tissue was poor regardless of marrow stimulation technique. In 2 studies that investigated repair tissue after MFx and/or drilling in human patients with osteoarthritis and cartilage defects, the investigators found that cartilage repair tissue did not achieve the quality of normal hyaline articular cartilage. Conclusion: In the limited basic science studies that are available, deep drilling of cartilage defects in the knee resulted in improved biological features compared with MFx, including less damage to the subchondral bone and greater access to marrow stroma. Regardless of marrow stimulation technique, the overall quality of cartilage regeneration was poor and did not achieve the characteristics of native hyaline cartilage. Overall, there is a general lack of basic science literature comparing microfracture versus drilling for focal chondral defects.


Biology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 230
Author(s):  
Girish Pattappa ◽  
Jonas Krueckel ◽  
Ruth Schewior ◽  
Dustin Franke ◽  
Alexander Mench ◽  
...  

Focal early osteoarthritis (OA) or degenerative lesions account for 60% of treated cartilage defects each year. The current cell-based regenerative treatments have an increased failure rate for treating degenerative lesions compared to traumatic defects. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are an alternative cell source for treating early OA defects, due to their greater chondrogenic potential, compared to early OA chondrocytes. Low oxygen tension or physioxia has been shown to enhance MSC chondrogenic matrix content and could improve functional outcomes of regenerative therapies. The present investigation sought to develop a focal early OA animal model to evaluate cartilage regeneration and hypothesized that physioxic MSCs improve in vivo cartilage repair in both, post-trauma and focal early OA defects. Using a rabbit model, a focal defect was created, that developed signs of focal early OA after six weeks. MSCs cultured under physioxia had significantly enhanced in vitro MSC chondrogenic GAG content under hyperoxia with or without the presence of interleukin-1β (IL-1β). In both post-traumatic and focal early OA defect models, physioxic MSC treatment demonstrated a significant improvement in cartilage repair score, compared to hyperoxic MSCs and respective control defects. Future investigations will seek to understand whether these results are replicated in large animal models and the underlying mechanisms involved in in vivo cartilage regeneration.


Author(s):  
Hadeer A. Abbassy ◽  
Laila M. Montaser ◽  
Sherin M. Fawzy

<p class="abstract">Musculoskeletal medicine targets both cartilage regeneration and healing of soft tissues. Articular cartilage repair and regeneration is primarily considered to be due to its poor regenerative properties. Cartilage defects due to joint injury, aging, or osteoarthritis have low self-repair ability thus they are most often irreversible as well as being a major cause of joint pain and chronic disability. Unfortunately, current methods do not seamlessly restore hyaline cartilage and may lead to the formation of fibro- or continue hypertrophic cartilage. Deficiency of efficient modalities of therapy has invited research to combine stem cells, scaffold materials and environmental factors through tissue engineering. Articular cartilage tissue engineering aims to repair, regenerate, and hence improve the function of injured or diseased cartilage. This holds great potential and has evoked intense interest in improving cartilage therapy. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and/or stem cells may be influential for tissue repair as well as cartilage regenerative processes.  A great promise to advance current cartilage therapies toward achieving a consistently successful modality has been held for addressing cartilage afflictions. The use of stem cells, novel biologically inspired scaffolds and, emerging nanotechnology may be the best way to reach this objective via tissue engineering. A current and emergent approach in the field of cartilage tissue engineering is explained in this review for specific application. In the future, the development of new strategies using stem cells seeded in scaffolds and the culture medium supplemented with growth factors could improve the quality of the newly formed cartilage<span lang="EN-IN">.</span></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document