scholarly journals Optimizing the Management and Outcomes of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Proposal of a Standardized Multidisciplinary Team Care Pathway

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kliment Gatzinsky ◽  
Sam Eldabe ◽  
Jean-Philippe Deneuville ◽  
Wim Duyvendak ◽  
Nicolas Naiditch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Care Pathway ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
International Panel ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery ◽  
Uniform Manner ◽  
The Right ◽  
Standardized Care

Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a major, worldwide health problem that generates considerable expense for healthcare systems. A number of controversial issues concerning the management of FBSS are regularly debated, but no clear consensus has been reached. This pitfall is the result of lack of a standardized care pathway due to insufficient characterization of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, which are essential to identify in order to offer appropriate treatment, and the paucity of evidence of treatment outcomes. In an attempt to address the challenges and barriers in the clinical management of FBSS, an international panel of physicians with a special interest in FBSS established the Chronic Back and Leg Pain (CBLP) Network with the primary intention to provide recommendations through consensus on how to optimize outcomes. In the first of a series of two papers, a definition of FBSS was delineated with specification of criteria for patient assessment and identification of appropriate evaluation tools in order to choose the right treatment options. In this second paper, we present a proposal of a standardized care pathway aiming to guide clinicians in their decision-making on how to optimize their management of FBSS patients. The utilization of a multidisciplinary approach is emphasized to ensure that care is provided in a uniform manner to reduce variation in practice and improve patient outcomes.

scholarly journals Optimizing the Management and Outcomes of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Consensus Statement on Definition and Outlines for Patient Assessment

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Rigoard ◽  
Kliment Gatzinsky ◽  
Jean-Philippe Deneuville ◽  
Wim Duyvendak ◽  
Nicolas Naiditch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Care Pathway ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Outcome Evaluation ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Patient Assessment ◽  
International Panel ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a controversial term for identifying patients affected by new, recurrent, or persistent pain in the low back and/or legs following spinal surgery. The lack of a comprehensive standardized care pathway compromises the appropriate management of FBSS patients, which is associated with a heavy financial burden. An international panel of spine surgeons, neurosurgeons, and pain specialists with a particular interest in FBSS established the chronic back and leg pain (CBLP) network with the aim of addressing the challenges and barriers in the clinical management of FBSS patients by building a common transdisciplinary vision. Based on literature reviews, additional input from clinical expertise of multiple professional disciplines, and consensus among its members, the network attempted to provide recommendations on the management of patients with FBSS utilizing a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach. The presentation of this work has been divided in two separate parts to enhance its clarity. This first paper, in favour of selecting appropriate validated tools to improve the FBSS patient assessment, focuses on FBSS taxonomy and its clinical implications for evaluation. Concise recommendations for assessment, treatment, and outcome evaluation using a MDT approach would be an important resource for specialists and nonspecialist clinicians who manage patients with FBSS, to improve decision-making, reduce variation in practice, and optimize treatment outcomes in this difficult-to-treat population.

Treatment Options for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients With Refractory Chronic Pain

Spine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. S41-S52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasra Amirdelfan ◽  
Lynn Webster ◽  
Lawrence Poree ◽  
Vishad Sukul ◽  
Porter McRoberts
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

scholarly journals Long-Term Follow-Up of Inpatients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Who Received Integrative Korean Medicine Treatment: A Retrospective Analysis and Questionnaire Survey Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1703
Author(s):  
Ju-Hun Park ◽  
Kang-Eah Choi ◽  
Sang-Gyun Kim ◽  
Hui-Yeong Chu ◽  
Sang-Woon Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Questionnaire Survey ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Korean Medicine ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

Introduction: this study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical efficacy and satisfaction degree of integrative Korean medicine (KM) treatment for patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Methods: we performed a follow-up questionnaire survey and retrospective analysis of medical records for patients with FBSS who underwent inpatient treatment for ≥ 1 week. The primary evaluation indices were numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for low back pain (LBP) and leg pain at admission and discharge. Sub-evaluation indices included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) score. The follow-up questionnaire survey obtained information regarding previous surgeries; reasons for satisfaction/dissatisfaction with surgical and KM treatment; and current status. Results: compared with at admission, there was a significant post-treatment decrease in the NRS scores for LBP and leg pain, as well as the ODI score. Further, there was a significant post-treatment increase in the EQ-5D score. Regarding the patients’ global impression of change for KM treatment administered during admission and at the follow-up questionnaire survey, 101 (95.3%) patients selected “minimally improved” or better. Conclusion: integrative KM treatment could effectively reduce pain, as well as improve function and health-related quality of life, in patients with FBSS.

scholarly journals High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at T9/10 in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoki Higashiyama ◽  
Takuro Endo ◽  
Taku Sugawara
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

Abstract INTRODUCTION Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective treatment option for low back pain and radicular leg pain of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). In a recent study, high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (HFSCS) was found to be more effective in treating chronic pain than traditional paresthesia-based low-frequency SCS (paresthesia SCS). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of paresthesia SCS and HFSCS in improving outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of patients who underwent paresthesia SCS or HFSCS between September 2016 and January 2019. Paresthesia SCS is generally characterized by programming stimulation parameters such that the patient experiences paresthesia, and the paresthesia topography overlaps the pain topography as much as possible. The patient in HFSCS had a placement of cylindrical lead at levels T9-10. Patients were programmed with the electrode overlying the inferior endplate of T9 (+) and the electrode overlying the superior endplate of T10 (–). RESULTS A total of 14 patients (4 males, 10 females) underwent paresthesia SCS implantation. Mean age was 77.2 ± 9.6 yr. A total of 5 patients (2 males, 3 females) underwent HFSCS implantation. Mean age was 78.2 ± 7.5 yr. Operative time was shorter for the HFSCS group compared to the paresthesia SCS group (53.4 ± 4.8 min vs 82.9 ± 20.3 min, respectively; P < .001). A total of 5 out of 5 patients in the HFSCS group (100%) and 10 out of 14 patients in the paresthesia SCS group (71.4%) achieved the outcome of 50% pain relief (P = .25) CONCLUSION To confirm paresthesia during the procedure in the elderly may be complicated by hearing/language difficulties or by sedative-related confusion. Compared to paresthesia SCS, HFSCS allows for lower operative times and a more efficient and accurate positioning of the electrodes.

scholarly journals Analysis of Subdural Injection During Lumbar Interlaminar Epidural Injection in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 3132
Author(s):  
Jin Young Lee ◽  
Woo Seog Sim ◽  
Ji Yeong Kim ◽  
Yu Ri Ko ◽  
So Young Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Surgery ◽  
Epidural Injection ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Daily Life Activities ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Interlaminar Epidural Injection

Persistent or recurrent back and leg pain following spinal surgery, known as failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), significantly limits daily life activities. A lumbar epidural injection can reduce adhesions, inflammation, and nerve compression, although the epidural space can be distorted due to dura mater and epidural tissues changes after spinal surgery. This study analyzed subdural injection during lumbar epidural injection in FBSS patients. We retrospectively analyzed data from 155 patients who received a lumbar interlaminar epidural injection to manage FBSS. We grouped the patients based on the injected contrast medium appearance in the subdural (group S) or epidural spaces (group E) in fluoroscopic contrast images. Demographic, clinical, surgical and fluoroscopic data were recorded and evaluated, as were the pain scores before and after injection. There were 59 patients (38.1%) in the subdural group. Injection distance from the surgery level differed between the groups. Risk of subdural injection at level 1 distance from the surgery level had an odds ratio of 0.374, and at level ≥2, it was 0.172, when compared to level 0. Subdural incidence differed with the distance from surgical site. Physicians should strive to reduce subdural incidence when the injection is planned at surgery site in FBSS.

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: An Outcome Analysis

Neurosurgery ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 636-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Duggal ◽  
Ignacio Mendiondo ◽  
Heraldo R. Pares ◽  
Balraj S. Jhawar ◽  
Kaushik Das ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

Abstract OBJECTIVE Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has gained popularity for the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. In this report, we present our experience with the ALIF procedure for treatment of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) in a noncontrolled prospective cohort. METHODS In a 2-year period, we treated patients diagnosed with FBSS with ALIF. Clinical and radiological outcomes were recorded in a prospective, nonrandomized, longitudinal manner. Neurological, pain, and functional outcomes were measured preoperatively and 12 months after surgery. Operative data, perioperative complications, and radiological and clinical outcomes were recorded. RESULTS Thirty-three patients with a preoperative diagnosis of FBSS, with degenerative disc disease (n = 17), postsurgical spondylolisthesis (n = 13), or pseudarthrosis (n = 3), underwent ALIF. Back pain, leg pain, and functional status improved significantly, by 76% (P &lt; 0.01), 80% (P &lt; 0.01), and 67% (P &lt; 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION On the basis of our results, we found ALIF to be a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of FBSS for selected patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document