scholarly journals Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Cytology Quality in Thyroid Nodules with 22-, 23-, and 25-Gauge Needles

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
YiJie Dong ◽  
LiLi Gao ◽  
Yang Sui ◽  
MinJing Mao ◽  
WeiWei Zhan ◽  
...  

Objective. To compare the cytology quality of ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in thyroid nodules with 22-, 23-, and 25-gauge (G) needles prospectively. Methods. A total of 240 consecutive nodules underwent ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (USG-FNA) and 240 nodules underwent ultrasound-guided fine-needle capillary (USG-FNC) were included in this prospective study from October 2014 to February 2016. Each nodule was sampled using 22 G, 23 G, and 25 G needle according to designed orders, and 1240 smears were finally obtained. Cytology quality was scored by a cytologist blinded to needle selection. Results. In USG-FNA, the average scores and standard deviations were 5.50 ± 2.87 for 25 G needles, 4.82 ± 2.95 for 23 G needles, and 5.19 ± 2.81 for 22 G needles. In USG-FNC, the average scores and standard deviations of each group were 5.12 ± 2.69 for 25 G, 4.60 ± 2.90 for 23 G, and 4.90 ± 2.90 for 22 G needles. The specimen quality scores of 25 G group were significantly higher than that of 23 G group ( P < 0.017 ) in both USG-FNA and USG-FNC. However, the differences were not statistically significant in nondiagnostic rate using different gauge of needles ( P > 0.017 for all). Conclusions. 25 G needles obtained the highest scores of sample quality in thyroid FNA and FNC comparing with 22 G and 23 G needles. 25 G needle should be first choice of thyroid FNA and FNC in routine work.

2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Kavanagh ◽  
Niall McVeigh ◽  
Eoghan McCarthy ◽  
Kathleen Bennett ◽  
Peter Beddy

Background The incidence of thyroid cancer is increasing in men and women. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is an accepted technique to assess thyroid nodules but is associated with a high rate of non-diagnostic sampling. Purpose To assess the diagnostic performance of ultrasound-guided FNA of thyroid nodules and identify factors associated with non-diagnostic sampling. Material and Methods A retrospective review of thyroid FNAs was performed between 2006 and 2013. Patient demographics, nodule characteristics, procedural technique, cytology, and complications were recorded. Cytology was categorized THY1-5 based on the British Thyroid Association guidelines. Descriptive and multivariable analysis were conducted to identify factors associated with non-diagnostic sampling. Results A total of 724 procedures were identified with 597 (82.5%) in women, and an overall mean age of 40 years (age range, 17–87 years). Factors associated with a non-diagnostic outcome in the multivariable regression analysis included increasing lesion depth (OR, 1.05 per mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.007–1.10), age (OR, 1.012 per year; 95% CI, 1.0–1.025) and number of FNA passes (1 vs. 4+; OR, 6.07; 95% CI, 2.27–16.21). The complication rate was 1.1% related to perilesional hematomas and vaso-vagal episodes. Conclusion Thyroid FNA is a safe and reliable procedure for cytological assessment of thyroid nodules. Deeper nodules and older patients are more likely to have non-diagnostic samples.


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 626-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danni Jiang ◽  
Yichen Zang ◽  
Dandan Jiang ◽  
Xiaojuan Zhang ◽  
Cheng Zhao

Objective Application of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) for thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) is controversial. Therefore, ROSE has not been universally applied. This study aimed to evaluate the value of ROSE for ultrasound-guided thyroid FNA. Methods A total of 997 patients with 1103 suspicious thyroid nodules had ultrasound-guided FNA performed from January 2016 to February 2018. There were 513 nodules with ROSE and 590 nodules without ROSE. The cytological nondiagnostic rate, needle passes, and procedural times of thyroid FNA with or without ROSE were compared. The nondiagnostic rates of subsets of suspicious thyroid nodules were further compared. Results There was no significant effect of ROSE on the nondiagnostic rate of FNA. However, FNA with ROSE significantly reduced the numbers of sub-centimeter, mixed solid-cystic, macrocalcified, and hypervascular nodules. There was a significantly smaller number of needle passes and less procedural times with ROSE than without ROSE. There was no significant difference in the complication rate of FNA with and without ROSE. Conclusion ROSE for thyroid FNA reduces the number of needle passes and procedural times. ROSE has a higher clinical application value in subsets of thyroid nodules, which tend to be difficult to diagnose with FNA.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Aziz Ahari ◽  
Mohammad Ali Mohammadi Vajari ◽  
Navid Khatibi Moghadam ◽  
Hassan Hashemi ◽  
Mahmoud Parvin ◽  
...  

Background: Thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) is currently the most acceptable method for evaluating thyroid nodules. Non-satisfactory sample is the main limitation of FNA. It has been shown that spinal needles can reduce the number of non-diagnostic samples. Objectives: In this study, we decided to compare the results obtained using spinal (stylet) needle and simple needle in thyroid nodule FNA according to the agreement between them and with the pathology results as the gold standard. Patients and Methods: Sampling of thyroid nodules of 156 patients was performed by a simple non-stylet 23 gauge needle (A) and a spinal 22 gauge needle with stylet (B). The samples were provided to the pathologist for blind examination. All samples were obtained by an expert radiologist and the pathology examination was also performed by a pathologist expert in thyroid gland diseases. Blind analysis was done using SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill., USA). Results: The results of FNA with needles A and B were reported unsatisfactory in 11.51 (18 subjects) and 3.84 (six subjects), respectively (P = 0.01). The result in 63.46% (99 subjects) of the participants, in whom FNA was obtained by needle B was introduced as a better sample by the pathologist in comparison with 36.44% (57 subjects) (P < 0.001). Cancer was diagnosed in 9.56 and 7.66 of the samples yielded by needles B and A, respectively, which was not statistically significant (P = 0.54). There was also a significant relationship between thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) score and FNA result. Conclusion: A significant relationship between the adequate sampling results, the qualitative examination result, TI-RADS score and the needle type indicates the importance of needle type on the results of thyroid FNA. Using spinal (stylet) needles may reduce the number of non-diagnostic samples in fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules and therefore, can have a better effect on the results of this method.


Author(s):  
Andre Isaac ◽  
Caroline C Jeffery ◽  
Hadi Seikaly ◽  
Hani Al-Marzouki ◽  
Jeffrey R Harris ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document