scholarly journals Production and Financing Strategies of a Distribution Channel under Random Yield and Random Demand

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Li Shen ◽  
Liying Li ◽  
Xiaobing Li
Keyword(s):  
Stackelberg Game ◽  
Distribution Channel ◽  
Revenue Sharing ◽  
Bank Credit ◽  
Channel Coordination ◽  
Random Yield ◽  
Random Demand ◽  
Equilibrium Strategies ◽  
Advance Payment ◽  
Credit Financing

This study considers a distribution channel consisting of a manufacturer with capital constraint and uncertain yield and a retailer that faces random demand. To maintain production, the manufacturer can either (1) avail bank credit financing from a perfectly competitive market or (2) request advance payment from the retailer. First, we establish two Stackelberg game models under bank credit financing (BCF) and advance payment mechanism (APM). By comparing the equilibrium strategies of the two financing models and the optimal profits of channel members, we conclude that APM is more advantageous than BCF in terms of improving channel performance. Second, we design a revenue sharing (RS) contract based on APM to achieve channel coordination. Finally, numerical analysis is presented to verify the conclusions obtained in this study.

scholarly journals Joint financing and ordering decisions in a capital-constrained supply chain with risk preference

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyuan Zhen ◽  
Jing Ru Wang
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Trade Credit ◽  
Stackelberg Game ◽  
Wholesale Price ◽  
Risk Preference ◽  
Bank Credit ◽  
Risk Averse ◽  
Initial Capital ◽  
Preference Behavior ◽  
Credit Financing

We consider a two-echelon supply chain consisting of one dominant supplier and one capital-constrained retailer. The retailer needs to solve the shortage of working capital either from a bank or from its core supplier, which offers trade credit when it is also beneficial to itself. We assume the retailer is risk-averse behavior and the supplier has different risk preference behaviors that jointly model risk-averse, risk-neutral, and risk-taking. With a wholesale price contract, we incorporate each member’s risk preference behavior into its objective function. Then we derive the optimal decisions in a Stackelberg game under bank credit financing and trade credit financing, respectively. We find that there exists a supplier’s risk preference threshold that distinguishes financing scheme. When the supplier is a relatively higher risk preference, trade credit financing makes both the retailer and the supplier better off and is a unique financing equilibrium. Otherwise, the members prefer bank credit financing . Besides, the supplier with relatively higher risk preference behavior prefers the retailer with a low initial capital as a partner; the supplier with relatively lower risk preference behavior prefers the retailer with a higher initial capital level. The above theoretical results are verified by numerical analysis.

Remanufacturing and pricing decisions with random yield and random demand

2015 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 195-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Li ◽  
Yongjian Li ◽  
Xiaoqiang Cai
Keyword(s):  
Random Yield ◽  
Random Demand ◽  
Pricing Decisions

Revenue Sharing Contract of Green Supply Chain under Manufacturer Risk-Aversion

2014 ◽  
Vol 697 ◽  
pp. 482-487
Author(s):  
Shi Ying Jiang ◽  
Chun Yan Ma
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Supply Chain ◽  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Stackelberg Game ◽  
Wholesale Price ◽  
Revenue Sharing ◽  
Green Supply Chain ◽  
Game Model ◽  
Product Price ◽  
Revenue Sharing Contract

Background on two stages green supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer, considering the degree of risk aversion and product greenness, consumer preferences and other factors, the centralized decision-making game model and manufacturer-leading Stackelberg game model are established.Then two game models are compared. The interaction of product greenness, wholesale price, product price,and risk aversion utility for manufacturers and retailers are also disscussed. Finally, the revenue sharing contract is applied to coordinate the green supply chain . The results show that:(1) In the centralized decision-making model, there is a critical value of the product green degree; (2)In manufacturer-leading Stackelberg game model, the higher the green degree of the product, the higher the manufacturer's wholesale price,and the wholesale price increases as risk aversion degree of manufacturers improves;(3)The revenue sharing contract can coordinate this type of green supply chain under manufacturers risk-averse.

Optimal decisions and coordination strategy of a capital-constrained supply chain under customer return and supplier subsidy

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gongbing Bi ◽  
Ping Chen ◽  
Yalei Fei
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Trade Credit ◽  
Stackelberg Game ◽  
Modeling Framework ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Initial Capital ◽  
Joint Operations ◽  
Fixed Proportion ◽  
Customer Returns ◽  
Credit Financing

Purpose The purpose of the paper is to explore impacts of financing and supplier subsidy on capital-constrained retailer and the value of returns subsidy contract under a situation where the retailer makes joint operations and finance decisions. Design/methodology/approach This paper considers a two-level supply chain, including a retailer and a supplier. Facing problems of capital constraints and even customer returns, the newsvendor-like retailer orders from a well-capitalized supplier. The supplier allows the retailer a delay in payment and provides a subsidy contract to alleviate its problems if it is profitable. Considering their difference of initial capital status, the retailer is assumed to be Follower of Stackelberg Game and the supplier is the Leader. Findings The supplier return subsidy contract has some merits for both of partners in the chain. And it does not coordinate the supply chain when the retailer has enough initial capital; however, when the retailer is capital constrained, it does. In addition, the retailer’s initial capital level significantly affects the supplier’s subsidy decision. Research limitations/implications Return rate is simplified to a fixed proportion of completed demand. In addition, trade credit is only financing source in this paper, and other types of financing methods, such as bank credit, can be taken too. Originality/value This paper first incorporates trade credit financing and customer returns into a modeling framework to investigate the capital-constrained retailer’s joint operations and finance decisions and the value of supplier’s subsidy contract.

Supply Chain Coordination Under Ramp-Type Price and Effort Induced Demand Considering Revenue Sharing Contract

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (02) ◽  
pp. 1550004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subrata Saha ◽  
S. P. Sarmah
Keyword(s):  
Marginal Cost ◽  
Supply Chain Coordination ◽  
Wholesale Price ◽  
Distribution Channel ◽  
Revenue Sharing ◽  
Programming Technique ◽  
Numerical Examples ◽  
Induced Demand ◽  
Revenue Sharing Contract ◽  
Fuzzy Goal

In this paper, a revenue sharing contract is designed to coordinate a distribution channel where the demand of the product is ramp-type price and effort sensitive. It is shown that traditional revenue sharing contract does not coordinate the system. As an alternative, two new mechanisms are proposed (i) revenue sharing with coordinated effort of the retailer alone and (ii) both revenue and effort sharing contract. In addition, a crucial modification of revenue sharing fraction is also proposed. To enhance the applicability of revenue sharing contract, the contract parameters are determined by using bi-level multi-objective fuzzy goal programming technique where manufacturer sets the wholesale price greater than the marginal cost. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate all the models.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document