scholarly journals Cross-Stratification and Differential Risk by Breast Cancer Index and Recurrence Score in Women with Hormone Receptor–Positive Lymph Node–Negative Early-Stage Breast Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (20) ◽  
pp. 5043-5048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Sestak ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Brock E. Schroeder ◽  
Catherine A. Schnabel ◽  
Mitch Dowsett ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 201-201
Author(s):  
N. W. D. Lamond ◽  
C. Skedgel ◽  
D. Rayson ◽  
L. Lethbridge ◽  
T. Younis

201 Background: The 21-gene recurrence score (Oncotype DX: RS) appears to augment clinical-pathological prognostication and predicts adjuvant chemotherapy (chemo) benefits in patients with node-negative (N-) and node-positive (N+) hormone-receptor positive early-stage breast cancer. Economic analyses suggest that RS-guided chemo is a cost-effective strategy in N- breast cancer, but no evaluations were reported for N+ disease based on pre RS chemo utilization in clinical practice. We examined the cost-utility (CU) of a RS-guided chemo strategy, compared to current practice without RS in a population based cohort, in N- and N+ early-stage breast cancer. Methods: A generic state-transition model was developed to compute cumulative costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) over a 25-year horizon for patients with hormone-receptor positive early-stage breast cancer considered for chemo. We examined outcomes with and without chemo in RS-untested cohorts and in those with low, intermediate and high RS based on the reported prognostic and predictive impact of the RS. Chemo utilizations (current vs RS-guided), costs and utilities were derived from a Nova Scotia population based cohort, local resources and the literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for key model assumptions/parameters. Results: RS-guided chemo strategy is associated with incremental costs and QALY gains compared to chemo with no RS testing in both N- and N+ patients. The resultant CU ratios are $17,141/QALY and $5,772/QALY for N- and N+ disease, respectively. These CU ratios are well below commonly quoted thresholds and were most sensitive to RS-distribution, upfront chemo costs, chemo utilization rates and relative benefits of chemo in various RS-strata. Conclusions: RS-guided chemo in a population based cohort appears to be a cost-effective strategy, compared to chemo with no RS testing, in N- and N+ early-stage breast cancer.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 27-27
Author(s):  
Franz Omar Smith ◽  
Marie Catherine Lee ◽  
Geza Acs ◽  
William J. Fulp ◽  
Ji-Hyun Lee ◽  
...  

27 Background: Treatment planning for early-stage estrogen receptor (ER) positive, lymph node negative breast cancer was based on prognostic factors with limited predictive power such as age. The Recurrence Score (RS) from the Oncotype DX assay (ODX) provides predictive power transcending age but is rarely applied to the elderly or young patients (pts). We examined our experience with RS along the age continuum. Methods: Retrospective review was conducted of prospectively gathered breast cancer pts having a RS obtained as part of their cancer care. Eligibility for performance of the ODX was based on NCCN guidelines or physician discretion. Comparisons on RS were made by age groups (young: <45yrs; middle: >45yrs -<70yrs: elderly: >70yrs) using general linear regression model and the exact Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test. Results: 677pts had 681 tumors with RS available (89 young, 476 middle and 112 elderly pts). Median RS for the study pts was 17 (range 0-85) and 16, 17, and 15 for the young, middle, and elderly respectively. Median age was 58yrs (range: 27-95); young, middle, and elderly was 42, 58, and 74yrs respectively. Age as a continuous or categorical variable was not predictive of RS (p value = 0.38, 0.58 respectively). No significant differences were seen between age cohorts for histology, mitotic rate, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), grade, nodal status, stage, or strength of ER positivity. Mastectomy rates were higher in the young (57.5%), compared to the middle (42.5%) and elderly (39.6%) (p=0.02). Median invasive tumor size was 1.6, 1.5, and 1.5cm for young, middle, and elderly. Larger tumor size, as a continuous variable, equaled higher RS (p=0.046). Other significant factors predicting higher RS were increased mitosis (p<0.001), LVI (p=0.013), high grade (p<0.001), and weak (<10%) ER positivity (p<0.001). Nodal status, stage, and histology did not affect RS. Conclusions: Age has limited predictive power for treatment planning for breast cancer. Age alone should not preclude recommendations for performance of ODX in estrogen receptor positive lymph node negative early stage breast cancer as the RS distribution across the spectrum of age is well matched.


2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 984-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Schmid ◽  
Raimund Jakesz ◽  
Hellmut Samonigg ◽  
Ernst Kubista ◽  
Michael Gnant ◽  
...  

Purpose: To determine whether the addition of aminoglutethimide to tamoxifen is able to improve the outcome in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive, early-stage breast cancer. Patients and Methods: A total of 2,021 postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to receive either tamoxifen for 5 years alone or tamoxifen in combination with aminoglutethimide (500 mg/d) for the first 2 years of treatment. Tamoxifen was administered at 40 mg/d for the first 2 years and at 20 mg/d for 3 years. Results: All randomized and eligible patients were included in the analysis according to the intention-to-treat principle. After a median follow-up of 5.3 years, the 5-year disease-free survival in the aminoglutethimide plus tamoxifen group was 83.6% versus 83.7% in the monotherapy group (P = .89). The corresponding data for overall survival at 5 years were 91.4% and 91.2%, respectively (P = .74). More patients failed to complete combination treatment (13.7%) because of side effects as compared to tamoxifen alone (5.2%; P = .0001). Conclusion: Aminoglutethimide given for 2 years in addition to tamoxifen for 5 years does not improve the prognosis of postmenopausal patients with receptor-positive, lymph node-negative or lymph node-positive breast cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document