Abstract 5380: Selective HDAC inhibition by ricolinostat (ACY-1215) or ACY-241 synergizes with IMiD® immunomodulatory drugs in Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) cells

Author(s):  
Steven N. Quayle ◽  
Ingrid Almeciga-Pinto ◽  
David Tamang ◽  
Min Yang ◽  
Simon S. Jones
Blood ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 674-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Chesi ◽  
PL Bergsagel ◽  
LA Brents ◽  
CM Smith ◽  
DS Gerhard ◽  
...  

Translocations involving the IgH locus at chromosomal locus 14q32.3 are a common event in many B-cell malignancies. The translocations, which generally occur into JH and switch regions, are mediated by errors in the two developmentally regulated, lymphocyte-specific pathways: VDJ- and switch-mediated recombination. Dysregulation of cyclin D1 by a t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocation occurs in most cases of mantle-cell lymphoma and in approximately 30% of multiple myeloma (MM) tumors in which a 14q32 translocation can be detected. We show here that in two of three myeloma lines that overexpress cyclin D1, there is an 11;14 translocation into a gamma switch region, suggesting an error in switch recombination. By contrast, 11;14 translocations in mantlecell lymphoma are invariably into or near a JH segment, suggesting an error in VDJ recombination. This is consistent with the fact that myeloma cells have undergone lgH switch recombination, whereas mantle-cell lymphoma cells generally have not.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2925-2925
Author(s):  
Michael E Williams ◽  
Sarah Rutherford ◽  
Yunjia Tang ◽  
John Cousar

Abstract Abstract 2925 Poster Board II-901 Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is characterized by nuclear cyclin D1 expression resulting from the t(11;14)(q13;q32). As cyclin D1 overexpression alone is insufficient for B-cell transformation, we have investigated other potentially contributing mutations. Sox11 is a member of a large family of transcription factors containing a DNA-binding high-mobility group (HMG) domain and shares homology with Sox4, which is involved in lymphopoiesis. Recent reports have identified Sox11 expression in the majority of MCL, suggesting it may contribute to pathogenesis (Ek et al, Blood 2008;111:800; Wang et al, Br J Haematol 2008;143:248). Methods: Patients with MCL diagnosed at the Univ. of Virginia from 1997-2008 and for whom nodal, marrow or spleen tissue blocks were available were identified from the Pathology database. Follicular lymphoma (FL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and multiple myeloma (MM) were also analyzed. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples were stained by immunohistochemistry for cyclinD1, Sox11 (rabbit a/Sox11, 1:100, Sigma) and Ki-67. Nuclear and/or cytoplasmic expression was determined by two of us (YT, JC). Results: All MCL samples revealed nuclear cyclin D1 expression. Nuclear but not cytoplasmic Sox11 expression was identified in all 24 non-blastoid and in 5/6 blastoid samples; 1 blastoid sample showed only cytoplasmic Sox11 staining (Table). Four of 5 HCL expressed cyclin D1 but were negative for Sox11; 4/5 MM also were cyclin D1-positive, with 3 positive for cytoplasmic Sox11 including 2 of the cyclin D1-positive cases. All 5 FL showed cytoplasmic Sox11 positivity, whereas all MZL and SLL were negative for cytoplasmic or nuclear staining. Conclusions: Nuclear Sox11 expression was uniformly identified in MCL, with the exception of cytoplasmic expression in a single blastoid case. No nuclear Sox11 was present in HCL or MM despite the expression of cyclin D1, although 3 MM showed cytoplasmic Sox11 staining. These findings suggest that nuclear Sox11 overexpression is not a direct result of dysregulated cyclin D1 signaling but instead occurs by alternative mechanisms. The significance of cytoplasmic staining remains uncertain. A potential pathogenetic role for Sox11 and possibly other Sox family transcription factors warrants further investigation in MCL and other lymphoproliferative neoplasms for diagnostic use and therapeutic targeting. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. e178-e180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantin A. Dasanu ◽  
Michael A. Reale ◽  
Frank Bauer

2015 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Maïga ◽  
Carole Brosseau ◽  
Géraldine Descamps ◽  
Christelle Dousset ◽  
Patricia Gomez-Bougie ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. CMT.S9308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Podar

The identification of the ubiquitin–proteasome system as a new therapeutic target has been one of the most recent successes in cancer treatment. The development and clinical approval of the first-in-class proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib has revolutionized the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In MM, bortezomib is now integrated in induction, conditioning, consolidation, maintenance, and salvage treatment protocols. Bortezomib-based regimens provide high remission rates and confer significant survival advantage compared to conventional chemotherapy in both the bone marrow transplant and non-transplant setting. In MCL, overall response rates in patients who have received at least one prior therapy range from 30 to 45%, even in chemotherapy resistant patients. Clinical trials to further improve the sequencing of bortezomib-containing combination therapies are ongoing. Until recently, intravenous injection was the standard route of bortezomib administration. However, severe adverse side effects, peripheral neuropathy in particular, were observed in up to 16% of MM patients and up to 54% of MCL patients treated with intravenous bortezomib, with grade 3 and 4 in 11 and 12% of patients, respectively. Moreover, complete remission rates, if at all, are low and duration of response is short both in MM and MCL. These limitations may be overcome by changing the method of bortezomib administration as well as by rationally combining bortezomib with other therapeutic agents. Indeed, recent data demonstrate that subcutaneous bortezomib administration is non-inferior to intravenous administration, with an improved systemic safety profile, good local tolerance, and a more convenient route of administration. Based on these data, subcutaneous bortezomib injection was approved as a supplemental new drug application for all approved indications in MM and MCL after at least one prior therapy. More than 30 clinical trials in MM and MCL are currently ongoing to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of subcutaneous bortezomib also in induction, maintenance, and salvage therapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 45-53.e1
Author(s):  
Yoshiaki Chinen ◽  
Taku Tsukamoto ◽  
Saori Maegawa-Matsui ◽  
Yayoi Matsumura-Kimoto ◽  
Tomoko Takimoto-Shimomura ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document