scholarly journals Abstract 5864: Targeting brain cancer stem cells by potentiating radiation-induced ER stress

Author(s):  
Regina M. Graham ◽  
Sumedh S. Shah ◽  
Alexis J. Musick ◽  
Winston Walters ◽  
Ricardo J. Komotar ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 372-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara J. Abou-Antoun ◽  
James S. Hale ◽  
Justin D. Lathia ◽  
Stephen M. Dombrowski

Author(s):  
Xin Wang ◽  
Chitra Venugopal ◽  
Sheila K. Singh

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Konířová ◽  
Lukáš Cupal ◽  
Šárka Jarošová ◽  
Anna Michaelidesová ◽  
Jana Vachelová ◽  
...  

Radiotherapy plays a significant role in brain cancer treatment; however, the use of this therapy is often accompanied by neurocognitive decline that is, at least partially, a consequence of radiation-induced damage to neural stem cell populations. Our findings describe features that define the response of neural stem cells (NSCs) to ionizing radiation. We investigated the effects of irradiation on neural stem cells isolated from the ventricular-subventricular zone of mouse brain and cultivated in vitro. Our findings describe the increased transcriptional activity of p53 targets and proliferative arrest after irradiation. Moreover, we show that most cells do not undergo apoptosis after irradiation but rather cease proliferation and start a differentiation program. Induction of differentiation and the demonstrated potential of irradiated cells to differentiate into neurons may represent a mechanism whereby damaged NSCs eliminate potentially hazardous cells and circumvent the debilitating consequences of cumulative DNA damage.


Author(s):  
Chann Lagadec ◽  
Erina Vlashi ◽  
Yazeed Alhiyari ◽  
Tiffany M. Phillips ◽  
Milana Bochkur Dratver ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13543-e13543
Author(s):  
Monal Mehta ◽  
Atif J. Khan ◽  
Hatem E. Sabaawy ◽  
Bruce George Haffty

e13543 Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent and deadly brain cancer. Despite tolerance doses of radiation, control of tumor growth within the brain remains a formidable failure. Since the identification of brain cancer stem cells (BCSCs), efforts are underway to target the pathways regulating these cells. The role of Bmi-1 (B-cell specific MMLV insertion site-1), a polycomb member of chromatin-remodeling complex, in BCSCs self-renewal was elucidated. Here we utilize shRNA targeting or pharmacological inhibition of Bmi-1 in GBM cell lines and primary cells as a radiosensitizer to examine the effects of combination therapy on cell death and BCSCs differentiation. Methods: Cells were pre-treated with a Bmi-1 inhibitor before being irradiated. Serial neurosphere assay, a measure of self-renewal potential, was employed to study the effects of radiation, Bmi-1 inhibition, or the combination on BCSCs. The efficacy of this combination on cell death was assessed with MTT and clonogenic assays. Next, the abilities of the inhibitor and radiation to induce differentiation in GBM cell lines and primary cells were quantified. Further, by utilizing a novel zebrafish orthotropic xenograft model, small molecules targeting Bmi-1 and other BCSC pathways can be identified, and used to predict response to combination therapies. Results: Targeting of Bmi-1 in combination with radiation, specifically as a radiosensitizer, induced significant cell death in GBM cells, and was five-fold more effective than radiation only. Importantly, the neurosphere forming ability of BCSCs was severely compromised when the cells were treated with the combination, indicating a potent effect on the stem cell constituency. These effects may be due to loss of BCSC self-renewal potential, increased differentiation, and/or apoptosis as cells treated with the combination exhibited decreased expression of neural stem cell markers and abnormal phenotypes compared to single treatment. Conclusions: Targeting of Bmi-1 may eliminate the subpopulation of radioresistant BCSCs. Bmi-1 inhibition when combined with radiotherapy might provide an effective therapy for GBM patients specifically through its effect on BCSCs by affecting their survival, proliferation, and stem cell features.


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 1102-1107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sina Haftchenary ◽  
H. Artee Luchman ◽  
Andriana O. Jouk ◽  
Anthony J. Veloso ◽  
Brent D. G. Page ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 4849-4852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Qi ◽  
Kuang Ren ◽  
Fang Fang ◽  
Dong-Hai Zhao ◽  
Ning-Jiang Yang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Ching Chen ◽  
Minh D. To ◽  
Peter M. K. Westcott ◽  
Reyno Delrosario ◽  
Il-Jin Kim ◽  
...  

AbstractThe commonly mutated human KRAS oncogene encodes two distinct KRAS4A and KRAS4B proteins generated by differential splicing. We demonstrate here that coordinated regulation of both isoforms through control of splicing is essential for development of Kras mutant tumors. The minor KRAS4A isoform is enriched in cancer stem-like cells, where it responds to hypoxia, while the major KRAS4B is induced by ER stress. KRAS4A splicing is controlled by the DCAF15/RBM39 pathway, and deletion of KRAS4A or pharmacological inhibition of RBM39 using Indisulam leads to inhibition of cancer stem cells. Our data identify existing clinical drugs that target KRAS4A splicing, and suggest that levels of the minor KRAS4A isoform in human tumors can be a biomarker of sensitivity to some existing cancer therapeutics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document