Abstract P4-09-01: The DCIS score predicts risk of local recurrence risk after breast-conserving surgery more accurately than ER plus HER2

Author(s):  
E Rakovitch ◽  
R Sutradhar ◽  
L Zhou ◽  
S Nofech-Mozes ◽  
W Hanna ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 3282-3288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly J. Van Zee ◽  
Emily C. Zabor ◽  
Rosemarie Di Donato ◽  
Bryan Harmon ◽  
Jana Fox ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 531-531
Author(s):  
U. Rudloff ◽  
E. Brogi ◽  
B. McCormick ◽  
J. P. Brockway ◽  
J. I. Goldberg ◽  
...  

531 Background: There remains variation in the use of radiation (RT) in women with DCIS, despite prospective randomized trials documenting its benefit in reducing the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). Methods: Patients with DCIS treated with excision alone or excision plus radiation at our institution from 1991–1995 were identified. A dedicated breast pathologist assessed margin width, number of involved ducts at closest margin, nuclear grade, and presence of necrosis and lobular neoplasia. Pathological variables, age, and presence of palpable mass were tested in uni- and multivariate analysis for association with risk of IBTR and added value of RT. Results: 294 patients with a median follow-up of 11 years had actuarial 10- and 15-year overall IBTR rates of 22 and 29%. For lesions excised with margins of <1mm, 1–9mm, and ≥10mm, the actuarial 10-year IBTR rates were 28, 21, and 19%, respectively. RT reduced adjusted IBTR rates by 62% (12 vs. 28%; p=0.002) for all patients; 83% for lesions with <1mm margins (p=0.002), 70% for 1–9mm (p=0.05), and 27% (p=0.55) for ≥10mm. Following adjustment for other variables, higher volume of disease near the margin was associated with risk of IBTR in the no RT group (HR=3.37, p=0.002) and greater benefit of RT (HR 0.14; p=0.004). Conclusions: Effect of RT on local recurrence risk is influenced by both margin width and number of involved ducts at nearest margin. Patients with higher volume of disease near the margin derive a greater benefit from the addition of RT. Despite margins of ≥10mm, the risk of local recurrence remains substantial in patients with DCIS. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 519-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Dale Collins ◽  
Caroline P. Moore ◽  
Kate F. Clay ◽  
Stephen A. Kearing ◽  
Annette M. O'Connor ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of this study was to measure the degree to which informed women chose mastectomy, and to reveal their reasons for this choice. Patients and Methods This was a prospective cohort study of patients radiographically and pathologically eligible for either mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery (BCS; n = 125). Participants completed questionnaires at three time points: baseline, after viewing a decision aid, and after a surgical consultation. Questionnaires assessed clinical history, preference for participation in decision making, information comprehension, values, decisional conflict, and preferred treatment. Results Of 125 participants, 44 (35%) chose mastectomy. Most understood that BCS and mastectomy offer an equivalent survival benefit (98%) and that BCS has a slightly higher local recurrence risk (63%); most accurately identified the magnitude of ipsilateral local recurrence risk (91%). Values assigned to three treatment attributes/outcomes (“remove breast for peace of mind,” “avoid radiation,” and “keep breast”) clearly discriminated between patients choosing mastectomy or BCS. High decisional conflict scores improved after both the decision aid and surgical consultation. Conclusion Although conventional wisdom may view BCS as the preferred treatment, a notable proportion of well informed women choose mastectomy. Whereas prior studies have linked objective factors to treatment choice, this study reveals subjective preferences that underlie decision making. The systematic use of a decision aid before the surgical consultation may help women make informed, values-based decisions, while clearly reducing decisional conflict.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document