Serum Glycoprotein: Glycosyl Transferase Activity in Patients with Renal Disease

Nephron ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry B. Kirschbaum
1998 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 2612-2619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Gourmelen ◽  
Marie-Hélène Blondelet-Rouault ◽  
Jean-Luc Pernodet

ABSTRACT In Streptomyces ambofaciens, the producer of the macrolide antibiotic spiramycin, an open reading frame (ORF) was found downstream of srmA, a gene conferring resistance to spiramycin. The deduced product of this ORF had high degrees of similarity to Streptomyces lividans glycosyl transferase, which inactivates macrolides, and this ORF was called gimA. The cloned gimA gene was expressed in a susceptible host mutant of S. lividans devoid of any background macrolide-inactivating glycosyl transferase activity. In the presence of UDP-glucose, cell extracts from this strain could inactivate various macrolides by glycosylation. Spiramycin was not inactivated but forocidin, a spiramycin precursor, was modified. In vivo studies showed that gimA could confer low levels of resistance to some macrolides. The spectrum of this resistance differs from the one conferred by a rRNA monomethylase, such as SrmA. InS. ambofaciens, gimA was inactivated by gene replacement, without any deleterious effect on the survival of the strain, even under spiramycin-producing conditions. But the overexpression of gimA led to a marked decrease in spiramycin production. Studies with extracts from wild-type and gimA-null mutant strains revealed the existence of another macrolide-inactivating glycosyl transferase activity with a different substrate specificity. This activity might compensate for the effect of gimA inactivation.


1982 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C.W. Comley ◽  
Julian J. Jaffe ◽  
Lynn R. Chrin

1975 ◽  
Vol 53 (8) ◽  
pp. 895-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Irwin ◽  
T. P. Anastassiades

1. The in vivo incorporation of radioactivity from [3H]glucosamine into a trypsin labile, cell surface sialoglycopeptide fraction (SGP) of Ehrlich ascites cells was studied in the presence and absence of puromycin pretreatment. The results indicated a much more complete inhibition of incorporation into the surface SGP than in the average intracellular acid insoluble glycoproteins. No evidence of turnover of the carbohydrate portion of the surface SGP independent of protein synthesis could be obtained.2. However, when intact cells were incubated with labelled uridine 5′-diphosphate – N-acetyl glucosamine or cytidine 5′-monophosphate (CMP) – sialic acid there was some incorporation largely into acid insoluble material, suggesting the presence of glycosyl transferase activity at the surface. Further evidence for surface activity was obtained when neuraminidase pretreatment of intact cells stimulated incorporation of labelled CMP – sialic acid sixfold and almost all of the incorporated counts could be released by subsequent neuraminidase treatment. Furthermore, a much greater proportion of the incorporated counts could be released by papain than by trypsin treatment of the intact cells. These results suggest that the surface acceptor for exogenously added CMP – sialic acid is not identical to the endogenously synthesized trypsin labile surface SGP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document