Autologous Nonfrozen Bone Marrow Transplantation after Intensive Chemotherapy: A Pilot Study

1981 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Robinson ◽  
Diethelm W. Hartmann ◽  
Aroop Mangalik ◽  
Nancy Morton ◽  
Jai Hind Joshi
1989 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 1685-1692 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Neidhart ◽  
A Mangalik ◽  
W Kohler ◽  
C Stidley ◽  
J Saiki ◽  
...  

Bone marrow colony-stimulating factors (CSF) ameliorate hematologic toxicity of standard chemotherapy regimens and may allow relatively safe use of intensive and more efficacious doses of anticancer drugs. Twenty-four patients with cancers for which no standard regimens were likely to be effective received repeated courses of a combination of cisplatin (150 mg/m2), etoposide (1,500 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (5,000 mg/m2) at doses for which bone marrow transplantation is usually used. A total of 10 patients received escalating doses of recombinant human granulocyte CSF (rhG-CSF); 11 patients receiving identical chemotherapy and supportive therapy without rhG-CSF served as controls for the first cycle of therapy. Five of these patients and 3 additional patients also served as their own controls, receiving rhG-CSF for all cycles after the first. No patient received bone marrow transplantation. rhG-CSF shortened the median duration of severe granulocytopenia (less than or equal to 100/mm3) in a dose-related fashion (P less than .03; Kruskal-Wallis test). Patients not receiving rhG-CSF had a median of 8.5 days of granulocytopenia. Those receiving 40 micrograms/kg of rhG-CSF for approximately 20 days from the third day after chemotherapy had a median of 7.0 days (P less than .23) and those receiving 60 micrograms/kg had a median of 5.5 days (P less than .007) of granulocytopenia. An rhG-CSF dose of 20 micrograms/kg had no effect. Recovery to a granulocyte count of at least 500/mm3 took a median of 12 days in the control group and 8 days (P less than .03) in patients receiving rhG-CSF at a dose of 60 mg/kg. The duration of antibiotic therapy (a median, 9.0 days v 5.0 days) was shortened with the two higher and effective doses of rhG-CSF compared with control patients. The duration of hospitalization (median of 20 days v 19 days) was not shortened. These findings that rhG-CSF decreases the risk of granulocytopenia associated with this particular dose-intensive chemotherapy regimen therapy administered without bone marrow transplantation.


1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Archimbaud ◽  
X Thomas ◽  
M Michallet ◽  
J Jaubert ◽  
J Troncy ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To compare intensive chemotherapy and HLA-identical allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) as postinduction therapy in young adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-eight consecutive AML patients younger than 40 years of age were treated according to a prospective protocol in which every patient in complete remission (CR) with an HLA-identical sibling was scheduled to receive BMT rather than intensive chemotherapy consolidation. To minimize comparison biases, the availability or not of an HLA-identical sibling donor was considered to be the equivalent of genetic randomization to the BMT or chemotherapy arm, respectively. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients (74%) achieved a CR. A donor was found for 27 patients (BMT arm), and 20 of these patients were actually transplanted in first CR. The 31 patients without a donor were allocated to the chemotherapy arm. Patients in the two arms had similar disease characteristics at diagnosis and previous responses to induction therapy. The cumulative risk of relapse was 43% +/- 24% in the BMT arm and 67% +/- 19% in the chemotherapy arm (P = .01). The 7-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) rate was 41% +/- 20% in the BMT arm and 27% +/- 16% in the chemotherapy arm, a difference that is not statistically significant between the two arms. The overall survival rates were 41% +/- 20% and 46% +/- 19%, respectively. CONCLUSION In this study, the availability of an HLA-identical sibling donor was not associated with a better survival rate because of both the impossibility of some patients with a donor to receive BMT and the more efficient salvage treatment of patients who relapsed after intensive consolidation chemotherapy than of patients who relapsed after BMT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document