Tissue Polypeptide-Specif ic Antigen and CA 125 as Serum Tumor Markers in Ovarian Carcinoma

Tumor Biology ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayman Shabana ◽  
Mathias Onsrud
2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Sun Kyung ◽  
Joong Sub Choi ◽  
Seung Hwa Hong ◽  
Hak Soon Kim

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of serum tumor markers in patients with ovarian mature cystic teratoma (MCT). We retrospectively evaluated 163 women who underwent surgery for MCT of the ovary between March 2003 and August 2007 and who provided preoperative blood samples for the measurement of CA 19-9 and CA 125. The rates of elevated serum CA 19-9 and CA 125 levels were 31.9% (52/163) and 13.5% (22/163), respectively. The rate of ovarian torsion was 12.9% (21/163). There were significant differences between the elevated CA 19-9 group and the normal CA 19-9 group in the diameters of the tumors and the rates of ovarian torsion. Elevated serum CA 19-9 levels correlated with larger tumor diameters and higher torsion rates. CA 19-9 may be a useful tool for the diagnosis of ovarian MCT. Elevated CA 19-9 levels appear to correlate with larger tumor diameters and higher rates of ovarian torsion.


2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (9) ◽  
pp. 723-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivica Pejcic ◽  
Svetislav Vrbic ◽  
Sladjana Filipovic ◽  
Mirjana Scekic ◽  
Ivan Petkovic ◽  
...  

Background/Aim. Unknown primary tumors represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies that are indicative of ominous prognosis. Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) is defined as the lack of any detectable primary site after full evaluation, and accounts for approximately 3-5% of all newly diagnosed patients with malignancies. The aim of this report was to present the prognostic and predictive value of 8 serum tumor markers in this group of patients. Methods. The study involved 63 patients. On histological examination, all the patients were presented with metastatic tumors whose primary site (origin) could not be detected with noninvasive diagnostic techniques. Following the routine light microscopy, all histological findings were classified into one of the following three groups: plano-cellular carcinoma - 8 patients; adenocarcinoma - 33 patients; unclassifiable (undifferentiated) carcinoma - 22 patients. In all the cases we evaluated 8 serum tumor markers: alpha-fetoproteins (AFP), chronic gonadotrophin beta submit, human (beta-HCG), neuron specific enolase (NSE), marker of malignant ovarian tumors (CA 125), prostate-specific antigene (PSA), marker of malignant brest tumor (CA 15-3), marker of malignant pancreas tumor and gastrointestinal tumor (Ca 19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) at the time of diagnosis. The patients on chemotherapy had the markers determined after the third and sixth chemocycle, i.e. at the time of illness progression observation, if present. The patients responding to chemotherapy with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) had the markers determined after three-month periods until the time of relapse or progression. Chemotherapy was applied in 32 patients (20 females and 12 males), aged 29-70 years, who met the inclusion criteria. The following chemotherapy regimen was used: doxorubicin 50mg/m2 (day 1), cisplatin 60mg/m2 (day 1), and etoposide 120 mg/m2 (days 1-3). The period between two chemotherapy cycles was three weeks, and maximum five weeks in the case of prolonged hematological toxicity. Results. Most commonly elevated were NSE values (82.54%), while AFP values were least commonly elevated (11.11%). Average survival time was 17.89 months (95%CI 12.96; 22.83). The probability of 24 months' survival was 0.228. The group of 32 patients treated with chemotherapy had 12 (37.5%) fatal outcomes in the observed period (72 months). Average survival time was 26.6 months (95% CI 19.5; 33.7). Average tumor marker values before and after the chemotherapy were significantly lower for NSE and CA 125. Survival was significantly better in cases of NSE and CA 125 decrease of more than 20%. Conclusion. Increased values of serum tumor markers are very often in CUP. The tumors show nonspecific overexpression of tumor markers. The NSE and CA 125 levels show good correlation with response to the given chemotherapy. However, a routine evaluation of commonly used serum tumor markers has not been proven of any prognostic and predictive assistance.


2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Massacesi ◽  
M.B.L. Rocchi ◽  
F. Marcucci ◽  
A. Pilone ◽  
M. Galeazzi ◽  
...  

Purpose Although serum tumor markers (STMs) are widely used in clinical practice, their predictive role for the response to anticancer treatment is still controversial. The correlation of CEA, CA 15.3, CA 19.9, CA 125 (only with peritoneal involvement) and NSE levels with imaging response and clinical benefit was investigated in 60 non-selected patients with metastatic epithelial cancers treated by single-agent docetaxel chemotherapy. Methods STM measurement was performed at baseline and subsequently every three to four weeks. We applied the WHO criteria to evaluate both STM and instrumental responses. Concordance analysis was performed by the Cohen Kw index, and the significance of the results was established using the Fleiss, Cohen & Everitt test. Qualitative interpretation of data was obtained with the Landis & Koch scale. Correlations of STM response with clinical benefit (PS or pain improvement) were evaluated by the chi-square test. Results The primary tumors included breast cancers (38 patients), gastrointestinal non-colorectal cancers (12 patients), and lung cancers (10 patients). An overall significant good degree of agreement was observed between STM and instrumental response (p<0.0005). The degree of agreement for each marker was as follows: excellent for CEA (p<0.0005) and CA 125 (p=0.006), good for CA 15.3 (p<0.0005) and CA 19.9 (p=0.011). Restricted analysis for the correlation of each marker with primary tumor origin showed good prediction of radiological response for CA 15.3 and CEA in breast cancer patients (p<0.0005 for both), for CEA and CA 19.9 in gastrointestinal cancer patients (p=0.01 and 0.04, respectively), and for CEA+NSE in lung cancer patients (p=0.01). Conversely, STM response did not correlate significantly with the clinical benefit for the patients, both in terms of PS and pain improvement (p=0.24 and p=0.42, respectively). Conclusion This study showed STMs to be good predictors of tumor response. Although STMs cannot replace diagnostic imaging, in metastatic cancer they might be useful to optimize the timing of radiological re-evaluation in the palliative setting.


2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susana Cedrés ◽  
Isaac Nuñez ◽  
Marina Longo ◽  
Pablo Martinez ◽  
Eva Checa ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingjian Bai ◽  
Shaojun Pang ◽  
Yiyan Lu ◽  
Hongjiang Wei ◽  
Jing Feng ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Accurate assessment of preoperative tumor burden contribute to formulate a scientific surgical plan and improve the prognosis of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). Present study aimed to assess whether preoperative serum tumor markers could reflect tumor burden. Methods: A total of 198 PMP patients were included, the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was employed to reflect tumor burden for PMP patients. All participants were divided into low (PCI ≤ 19) and high (PCI ≥ 20) tumor burden subgroups according to PCI. All serum tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), CA 19-9, CA 724, and CA 242) were compared between the two subgroups. The correlation between tumor markers and PCI will be calculated and compared with each other. Two-sided P value less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant.Results: The level of CEA (ng/ml), CA125 (U/ml), CA 19-9 (U/ml), CA 724 (U/ml), and CA 242 (kU/L) between low and high tumor burden subgroup were [3.35 (1.64, 16.31) vs. 23.12 (8.80, 67.62), Z = -5.381, p<0.001], [19.10 (7.61, 56.95) vs. 72.75 (40.41, 130.55), Z = -5.978, p < 0.001], [6.17 (3.26, 16.22) vs. 45.50 (13.95, 123.61), Z = -5.413, p < 0.001], [7.89 (1.57, 45.10) vs. 84.61 (33.87, 236.93), Z = -5.898, p < 0.001], and [13.32 (3.39, 96.50) vs. 150.00 (102.13, 308.88), Z = -5.166, p < 0.001], respectively. The Spearman correlation between tumor markers and PCI were 0.415 for CEA (p < 0.001), 0.372 for CA 125 (p < 0.001), 0.466 for CA 19-9 (p < 0.001), 0.379 for CA 724 (p < 0.001), and 0.317 for CA 242 (p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: Preoperative serum tumor markers could moderately reflect tumor burden for PMP, which may contribute to develop a better surgical plan before operation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 931-936
Author(s):  
Kristina Petkova ◽  
Venci Chalkov

Undoubtedly, nowadays the number of patients suffering from benign or malignant tumors is increasing. Particularly affected is the female population with ovarian cancer, carcinomas of the uterine body and non-inflammatory diseases of the ovary, the oviduct and the broad ligament and other benign conditions. Carcinoma is one of the most common causes of mortality in our country, as well as in the Balkans. In our country malignant tumors occupy third place in terms of total patients treated, after diseases of the respiratory and circulatory system. Due to the rapid increase in the number of patients with the following diagnoses: ovarian carcinoma, uterine carcinoma, non-inflammatory ovarian disease, oviduct, broad ligament and other benign conditions, their timely diagnosis is of great importance for the possibility of their treatment and reducing the percentage of mortality. When setting the diagnosis, tumor markers have an important role, whose elevated blood concentrations indicate changes of benign or malignant origin. Tumor markers are substances (proteins, enzymes, hormones, etc.) secreted in the body as a consequence of its response in the presence of a benign or malignant change. Their measurement and identification is useful for establishing the diagnosis, as well as for monitoring the course of the disease and the success of the therapy. Tumor markers are usually determined in blood, urine or tissue samples using specific, immunochemical laboratory methods. In the medical practice, about 30 different tumor markers are used, but in the diseases that are subject of our research commonly are used the following: CA 125, CA 72-4 and CA 19-9. Besides these tumor markers, as a new tumor marker, in this research project is mentioned HE4 (human epididymis protein 4). HE4 in combination with CA 125 assists in determining the type of tumor mass (benign or malignant), through algorithm for estimating the risk of ovarian cancer (Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm - ROMA). The goals of this paper are: regular control of healthy women and women who have an increased risk of developing carcinoma (family history), diagnosing carcinomas, estimating the prognosis of the disease (prognostic factor), and monitoring the course of the disease and the success of applied therapy (postoperatively) by determining the concentration of tumor markers CA 125, CA 72-4 and CA 19-9 in blood serum, in combination with other examinations (echo, swab, PAP test, Power color doppler, etc.). For the realization of these goals as a method of work, the concentrations of tumor markers CA 125 and CA 19-9 in blood serum were determined using the apparatus - Immulite 2000 which works on the principle of chemiluminescent method, as well as the determination of the concentration of tumor marker CA 72-4 in blood serum using an ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay) method. On the basis of the results obtained, we came to the conclusion that the concentrations of tumor markers CA 125, CA 72-4 and CA 19-9 in the blood serum increase in the occurrence of ovarian carcinoma, uterine carcinoma, non-inflammatory ovarian disease, the oviduct and broad ligament and other benign conditions, and that they are reduced postoperatively and with applied therapy, with the exception of patients who have metastases also on other parts of the body, where their concentrations are still rising or remain unchanged. Due to the outcome of these types of diseases, regular controls are recommended for the female population.


2002 ◽  
Vol 387 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 281-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Bassi ◽  
Roberto Salvia ◽  
Andrew Gumbs ◽  
Giovanni Butturini ◽  
Massimo Falconi ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S245 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kadayifci ◽  
E. Ǒzyilkan ◽  
H. Siasek ◽  
B. Sivri ◽  
B. Kayhan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document