Ocular Side-effects of Long-term Immunosuppressive Therapy in Recipients of Cadaver Kidney Transplants

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Kern ◽  
K. Záruba ◽  
W. Scheitlin
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Parrozzani ◽  
Giuseppe Lombardi ◽  
Edoardo Midena ◽  
Davide Londei ◽  
Marta Padovan ◽  
...  

1974 ◽  
Vol 290 (18) ◽  
pp. 979-984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Dausset ◽  
Jacques Hors ◽  
Marc Busson ◽  
Hilliard Festenstein ◽  
Roderick T. D. Oliver ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRANCESCA POLI ◽  
MARIO SCALAMOGNA ◽  
LUCA MASCARETTI ◽  
ANTONIO TARANTINO ◽  
MARCO PAPPALETTERA ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
SS Pandav ◽  
Savleen Kaur ◽  
Sushmita Kaushik ◽  
Sonia Phulke

ABSTRACT Steroids are a group of anti-inflammatory drugs, commonly used to treat ocular and systemic conditions. Unmonitored use of steroids especially in eye drop formulations is common in situations when it is easily available over-the-counter, resulting in undesirable side effects. Among the ocular side effects, cataract and glaucoma are common. Steroid-induced ocular hypertension was reported in 1950, when long-term use of systemic steroid was shown to increase the intraocular pressure (IOP). Chronic administration of steroids in any form with raised IOP can cause optic neuropathy resulting in steroid-induced glaucoma. This review describes the pathophysiology and epidemio­logy of steroid-induced glaucoma, recognition of side effects, and principles of management. The purpose is to familiarize all clinicians with the potential dangers of administering steroids without monitoring the eye and the dangers of irreversible blindness in some instances of habitual self-prescription by patients. How to cite this article Phulke S, Kaushik S, Kaur S, Pandav SS. Steroid-induced Glaucoma: An Avoidable Irreversible Blindness. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2017;11(2):67-72.


2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212095832
Author(s):  
Isabel Fambuena-Muedra ◽  
Marta Jiménez-García ◽  
Sarah Hershko ◽  
Irene Altemir-Gómez ◽  
Ana Tobarra-López

Within the COVID-19 pandemic context, the WHO has proposed a list of medicines to treat patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2). An analysis of their ocular side effects was performed. Only chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine were found to have an ocular impact in the medium and long-term. Detailed search strategies were performed in EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS and WOS Core Collection. Additionally, the worldwide ongoing clinical trials including chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine were evaluated, and their proposals of drug administration and exclusion criteria analyzed. In general, high maximum cumulative doses of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine are being used for a short period in 135 currently underway clinical trials (to 21st April 2020). Typically, the doses were 2 to 5 times greater than the AAO recommendation (adjusted to weight) to avoid toxic retinopathy, the most undesirable ocular side effect. Maximum cumulative doses up to 12,000 mg for chloroquine and 18,000 mg for hydroxychloroquine were found. In prophylaxis clinical trials, 72,000 mg and 22,500 mg were the maximum cumulative doses for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine respectively. Only 48% of the clinical trials considered retinal impairment as an exclusion criterion, and just one referred to an ophthalmic examination previous to study inclusion. How chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine treatment affect patients with a previous retinal condition is still poorly understood. A comprehensive ophthalmological examination 6 months after treatment is recommended in this subgroup. This review provides an overview of this topic and sheds light on the challenges visual caregivers may face regarding these repurposed drugs.


2001 ◽  
Vol 33 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 3764-3768 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ohshima ◽  
Y. Ono ◽  
R. Hattori ◽  
N. Fukuhara ◽  
T. Kinukawa ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 421-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuji Ichikawa ◽  
Mitsuo Hashimoto ◽  
Touru Hanafusa ◽  
Masahiro Kyo ◽  
Nobumasa Fujimoto ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2059-2059
Author(s):  
Howard H.W. Chan ◽  
Nancy M. Heddle ◽  
John G. Kelton

Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by destruction of opsonized platelets. The first-line therapy for adult patients with chronic ITP includes steroid, IVIG and anti-D. Splenectomy is reserved for patients not responding to the first-line therapy. However, approximately 20–30% of patients are resistant or relapsed after splenectomy. In this subgroup of patients, more aggressive immunosuppressive therapy is indicated. Methods: This is a case series of patients with chronic resistant ITP receiving multiple immunosuppressive treatments in a tertiary medical referral center. The diagnosis of ITP was established by excluding other thrombocytopenic diseases. Adult patients with chronic resistant ITP presenting with life threatening thrombocytopenia were selected for a therapeutic trial of immunosuppressive therapy. The therapy included azathioprine 100–200 mg daily; cyclosporine 100–200 mg daily; and mycophenolate 1–2 gm daily (triple immunosuppressive therapy). All of these patients failed 1st line therapy; splenectomy; and other immunosuppressive treatments. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension; impaired liver functions; impaired renal functions; and those who have not completed family were excluded from triple immunosuppressive therapy. A response to the therapy was defined as persistent platelet count above 30 without other concurrent treatments. When patients responded to the triple immunosuppressive therapy, the doses of the medications were gradually tapered to minimize the long-term side effects. Results: Since July of 2000, 11 patients with chronic resistant ITP have received triple immunosuppressive therapy for a variable duration (table 1). Five out of these 11 patients (45.5%) achieved a response within 4 to 6 weeks after the initiation of the treatments. One of the five patients eventually had a break-through during the tapering of triple immunosuppressive therapy. This patient was stabilized by further doses of IVIG and prednisone. The treatments were well tolerated. The most common side effects were mildly elevated blood pressure; and mildly impaired liver function tests. None of the patients suffered from serious side effects that resulted in termination of the treatments. Conclusion: Combining low-dose azathioprine, cyclosporin and mycophenolate can induce long-term remission in patients with chronic ITP resistant to steroid, IVIG, splenectomy and other immunosuppressive agents. This combination regimen is safe and well-tolerated. In adult patients with chronic resistant ITP, the immune dysfunction may need multiple immune blockades. Summary of Treatments ID Rx Prior to Triple Rx Concurrent Rx with Triple Rx Mean (mg OD) Mean (mg OD) Mean (gm OD) Response Duration of Triple Rx Triple Rx:Triple Immunosuppressive Therapy; PRD:Prednisone; DAN:Danazol; AnD:Anti-D; SPN:Splenectomy; VCR:Vincristine; CTX:Cyclophosphamide; LUF:Luflunomide 1 PRD, IVIG, DAN, SPN PRD, IVIG 66.7 63.8 1 No 77 2 PRD, IVIG, DAN, SPN, VCR 75 25 0.8 No 20 3 PRD, AnD, SPN, CTX PRD (taper) 75 50 0.9 Yes 91 4 PRD, SPN, DAN, CTX, LUF 100 100 2 No 106 5 PRD, IVIG, SPN, DAN PRD, IVIG 144.2 236.1 1.9 No 217 6 PRD, IVIG, SPN, DAN, VCR IVIG 91.7 120.5 1.4 No 406 7 PRD, IVIG, DAN, SPN, VCR PRD (taper) 140.9 156.6 1.6 Yes 296 8 PRD, IVIG, SPN, DAN, VCR DAN (taper) 150 100 2 Yes 1351 9 PRD, DAN, SPN, AnD, CTX IVIG 100 150 2 No 130 10 PRD, IVIG, SPN, VCR, CTX PRD (taper) 85.6 121.1 1.4 Yes 1456 11 PRD, DAN, IVIG, SPN, AnD IVIG, PRD (taper) 125.6 225 1.9 Yes 875


Author(s):  
O. S. Nykonenko

Immunosuppressive therapy is the most important component of drug treatment after organ transplantation. The goal of immunosuppression is to prevent acute and chronic rejection while maximizing patient survival, and long-term graft survival remains a major therapeutic challenge before and after organ transplantation. However, the benefits of immunosuppressive therapy must be balanced against the side effects and underlying toxicity of the drugs used.Immunosuppressants can be classified as induction agents, maintenance therapy, treatment of acute rejection and chronic rejection, and antibody directed therapy. Although induction therapy remains a subject of debate in the field of organ transplantation, it is still used in most transplant centers. Protocols for maintenance immunosuppressive therapy are more or less standardized and include, as a rule, three drugs, a calcineurin inhibitor, an antimetabolite, and a glucocorticoid. The presence of HLA antibodies in transplantation candidates and the development of de novo antibodies after transplantation remain a serious therapeutic problem before and after organ transplantation. In this lecture, we will look at the drugs used to induce and maintain immunosuppression, as well as their effectiveness in preventing side effects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document