Salvage External Beam Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Adenocarcinoma after High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound as Primary Treatment

2013 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Munoz ◽  
Alessia Guarneri ◽  
Angela Botticella ◽  
Pietro Gabriele ◽  
Francesco Moretto ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Venu Chalasani ◽  
Carlos H. Martinez ◽  
Andrew K. Williams ◽  
Kevin Kwan ◽  
Joseph L. Chin

The histological changes (both macroscopic and microscopic) in theprostate following the combination of external beam radiotherapyand salvage high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) have notbeen previously described. This article describes the case of a65-year-old male who presented with recurrent localized prostatecancer after undergoing external beam radiotherapy for low-riskprostate cancer. He was treated with salvage HIFU, and 4 weekslater presented with symptoms and signs consistent with a prostatorectalfistula. During a period of conservative management, hisserum prostate-specific antigen levels started rising after havingreached a nadir. A radical cystoprostatectomy and repair of fistulawere performed after conservative management failed. Histologicalchanges of dense fibrosis were noted in the region where theprostate should have been located. A literature review of thehistological findings in the prostate after HIFU is discussed in thisarticle, as well as the available evidence for the management ofpatients with local failure after the combination of external beamradiotherapy and salvage HIFU.


2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 215
Author(s):  
C.J.L. D'Hont ◽  
P. Van Erps ◽  
M. Sorber ◽  
J. Cortvriend ◽  
T. De Backer

Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (41) ◽  
pp. e22610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue He ◽  
Ping Tan ◽  
Mingjing He ◽  
Liang Hu ◽  
Jianzhong Ai ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (22) ◽  
pp. 5696
Author(s):  
David Cranston ◽  
Tom Leslie ◽  
Gail ter Haar

This review provides an introduction to high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and reviews its historical and current use in urological surgery. Current and historical literature (1927–2020), including that describing trials and review articles in the medical and ultrasonic literature, has been reviewed, using Pub Med and Cochrane search engines. HIFU is currently one of a number of treatments for prostate cancer, both as a primary treatment that can be repeated, and as a salvage treatment post-radiotherapy. HIFU is not yet sufficiently mature to be a standard treatment for renal cancer or other urological diseases, although there has been some success in early clinical trials. As the technology improves, this situation is likely to change. HIFU has been understood as a concept for a century, and has been applied in experimental use for half that time. It is now an accepted treatment with low morbidity in many diseases outside the scope of this review. In urological surgery, prostate HIFU is accepted as a localised treatment in selected cases, with potentially fewer side effects than other localised therapies. Currently the treatment for renal cancer is hindered by the perinephric fat and the position of the kidneys behind the ribs; however, as the technology improves with image fusion, faster treatments, and the ability with phased array transducers and motion compensation to overcome the problems caused by the ribs and breathing, successful treatment of kidney tumours will become more of a reality. In due course, there will be a new generation of machines for treating prostate cancer. These devices will further minimise the side effects of radical treatment of prostate cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document