The Impact of Symptom Burden on Patient Quality of Life in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Oncology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Cella ◽  
Cindy J. Nowinski ◽  
Olga Frankfurt
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 104s-104s
Author(s):  
V.S. Mishra ◽  
S. Chandrakala ◽  
D. Saranath

Background: Studies have demonstrated poor quality of life (QOL) among cancer caregivers, but few studies have evaluated QOL and related psychosocial functioning among caregivers for people with hematologic cancer patients. The disease and its associated treatment can have overwhelming consequences for patients and their informal caregivers mostly close family members. Aim: The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of cancer diagnosis and its treatment in caregivers´ quality of life (QoL) and to observe the association with perceived social support. To compare the chronic myeloid leukemia patients to other leukemia patients caregiver to find differences and understand which aspects of QoL are more impacted. Methods: The current study is on-going study; sample is composed of caregivers of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia patients and acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia and other patient's caregiver from the Department of Hematology, KEM Hospital, Mumbai India. We are using Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) for measuring quality of life among caregivers of cancer patients and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) for social support. Results: With the small study sample of caregivers of patients mean age 34.78 ± 6.87 with the age range of 27-45 years, 25% of whom were men. Mean QOL score is 78.34 ± 15.53. In regression analysis caregivers education has shown significant t = 5.611, < 0.05. While marital status shown significant value with social support 3.931, 3.872, < 0.01. While CML caregivers had lower scores for the quality of life and less perceived social support. Conclusion: Caregivers of patients with cancer showed increased burden scores and financial issues and less perceived social support. This could be explained by their unique care situation. These caregivers need more attention and additional counseling session for coping with the situation.


Hematology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (1) ◽  
pp. 170-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Efficace ◽  
Laura Cannella

Abstract The development of the oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to treat chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is one of the great triumphs of cancer research. Although the efficacy of TKIs has dramatically improved the disease-specific overall survival rate, the prevalence of CML is increasing worldwide. Currently, CML patients receive prolonged (even lifelong) treatment, and over the last decade, clinical decision making has become challenging. Therefore, consideration of the effects of TKI therapies on patients’ quality of life (QoL) and symptom burden (ie, patient-reported outcomes [PROs]) is now critical to more robustly inform patient care and improve health care quality. Over the last 5 years, a number of studies have generated valuable PRO data, for example, on long-term QoL effects of imatinib therapy or symptom burden of patients switching from imatinib to second-generation TKIs. PRO findings are important, as they provide a unique patient perspective on the burden of the disease and treatments effects. We will review main evidence-based data on the use of PROs in clinical research and highlight the importance of methodological rigor of PRO assessment. Also, we will describe the potential value of using PRO assessment in routine clinical practice, for example, to facilitate timely management of side effects. Areas for future research will also be discussed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Efficace ◽  
G. Rosti ◽  
M. Breccia ◽  
F. Cottone ◽  
J. M. Giesinger ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 26-27
Author(s):  
Shiyu Zhang ◽  
Rodrigo Maegawa ◽  
Savita Nandal ◽  
Pallavi Patwardhan

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment of chronic CML in the last several years; however, the failure rates associated with TKIs still remain high in second line (50%) and later lines (75%-80%) treatment. Also, patients often experience adverse events associated with these TKIs, but are often left with no alternative treatment in real world practice which might result in TKI cycling. There is a need to understand the quality of life (QoL) and symptom burden among these patients, in order to better manage their disease and also to explore new treatments. The objectives of this study were to summarize the PROs among patients with CML receiving 2nd/3rd/4th line (2L/3L/4L) treatment, and the instruments used for QoL and symptom burden assessment in clinical trials and real world studies. Methods: Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were searched using pre-defined search terms to identify studies published from 1/1/2010 to 6/15/2020. Following the title/abstract and full-text screening based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria (see Table), one reviewer independently extracted all relevant data with random quality check (~20% of the sample) by a 2nd reviewer. Included studies reported QoL, symptom burden, or any PROs of adult CML patients who received 2L/3L/4L treatment. Only clinical trials and observational studies published in English were included, including conference abstracts. Results: Database search identified 1,377 records, which were screened to identify 20 studies (5 observational studies and 15 clinical trial-based studies) that met eligibility criteria (see Figure). Of the included studies, 16 targeted chronic phase CML patients only. More than half of the studies (n=14) focused on patients receiving 2L treatment (bosutinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib) only, and six reported QoL data on patients receiving 2L/3L/4L treatment, out of which four studies reported results by line of therapy. Out of 15 studies reporting a follow-up period, 13 observed patients ≥ 12 months with a maximum of 24 months. The duration between observations were usually 12 weeks for observational studies; while shorter duration was observed in clinical trials. Six clinical trial-based studies were associated with one trial (NCT00261846). Instruments used to assess QoL included four generic instruments [Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G), EuroQol 5 dimension (EQ-5D), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)], three disease specific instruments [Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Leukemia (FACT-Leu), MD Anderson Symptom Inventory chronic myeloid leukemia (MDASI-CML), Comprehensive Symptom Profile in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients (CSP Leuk-CML)], one Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire, and two additional general questions on QoL. Ten studies applied both generic and disease specific instruments altogether to evaluate patients' QoL and symptom burden. For 2L TKI treatment, studies have shown improvement in QoL following treatment; however, one study indicated that although patients were content with their QoL, they reported poor symptom scores on mobility, usual activities, and pain/discomfort. Among four studies examining PROs by line of therapy, only one study reported results on the 4L cohort individually, which showed lowest baseline FACT-G and FACT-Leu score in the 4L cohort compared to other cohorts, especially in terms of the physical and emotional well-being domain. Discrepancies existed in QoL between 2L- and 3L cohorts. Two studies found QoL to be similar between the 2L- and 3L cohorts, while the other two observed the QoL was lower in the 3L cohorts. In addition, three reported that QoL scores remained stable throughout observation period regardless of the line of therapy, but one study demonstrated the utility score got improved in the 2L but not the 3L cohort. Conclusions: Evidence on PROs in CML patients receiving 3L/4L treatment is very limited, especially real-world data. Existing research indicates patients with CML receiving later lines of treatment may have poor quality of life. Robust real-world studies with longer follow-up period are needed to provide evidence on later lines treatment management among CML patients. Disclosures Zhang: Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Current Employment. Maegawa:Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Patwardhan:Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4236-4236
Author(s):  
Fabio Efficace ◽  
Annarita Cardoni ◽  
Francesco Cottone ◽  
Marco Vignetti ◽  
Franco Mandelli

Abstract Abstract 4236 BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients and quality of life (QoL) data can be of crucial importance in the current CML arena to make more informed treatment decisions. To date, a number of biomedical and laboratory data have been accumulated on clinical efficacy and toxicity of various TKIs; however, there is paucity of data on the impact of TKIs on patient outcomes. AIMS: The main objective of this systematic review is thus to quantify and to summarize all studies that have included QoL, or any other type of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with CML treated with TKIs. METHODS: A systematic review was performed, following the Cochrane methodology on all studies conducted in CML that have assessed QoL or any other type of PRO (e.g., symptom burden). The search was conducted on all full length manuscripts published up to November 2012. Candidate articles were identified mainly by PubMed, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and PsyArticles. Criteria for selection of studies were as follow. Types of participants: Patients diagnosed with CML, regardless of patients' age and the stage of the disease. Types of intervention: All treatments with TKIs, either used alone or in combination with other drugs. Types of outcome measures examined: Any studies including PROs were considered. Studies addressing adherence to therapy were not included. Types of studies: All type of studies were considered regardless of the design (e.g., prospective or cross-sectional study). No restriction in the number of enrolled patients or type of analysis (e.g. qualitative or quantitative) was applied. Two reviewers independently evaluated all candidate abstracts retrieved from electronic databases based on the above selection criteria. Extracted data from full length manuscripts were crosschecked and discrepancies resolved by consensus. The reviewers abstracted a number of basic features of the studies, including the type of treatment, the measures used to assess QoL and clinical characteristics of patients enrolled. Also, a summary of main PROs findings was provided. RESULTS: Six studies, enrolling overall 2171 CML patients, were identified up to November 2012. None of these studies were published before 2003. Out of six studies, two were conducted on a national level and four recruited patients in an international setting. Four studies reported QoL data of patients treated with imatinib, one on bosutinib and the other one included patients receiving various TKIs. QoL of patients younger than 60 years, who are in treatment with long-term imatinib therapy is greatly impaired when compared with that of their peers in the general population. This study suggests that although the less toxic profile of TKIs therapies is unquestionable, still much has to be done to further improve patient's QoL and reduce symptom burden. Also, another study suggested that fatigue is the main factor influencing QoL regardless of the type of TKIs. Some data also indicates that physicians might underestimate the importance of symptoms. Another study, conducted in patients treated with bosutinib, showed that QoL profile of patients who have failed first line Imatinib therapy, due to either resistance or intolerance, is not different. Second line therapy with bosutinb provide clinically meaningful QoL improvements in imatinib-intolerant patients (but not in imatinib-resistant patients). Remarkably, no study was identified measuring QoL, or any other type of PROs, in patients treated with dasatinib or nilotinib. Two studies reported a gender effect, showing that male tend to report better QoL outcomes than female patients. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review revealed the paucity of evidence base data in this area. However, QoL assessments in these CML studies emphasize the unique information provided by the patient's perspective on the burden of the disease and treatment. Investigators are encouraged to include PROs in future CML studies to obtain additional meaningful data to make more informed treatment decisions. Disclosures: Efficace: Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Malagola ◽  
Alessandra Iurlo ◽  
Elisabetta Abruzzese ◽  
Massimiliano Bonifacio ◽  
Fabio Stagno ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document