scholarly journals Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio as Prognostic Predictors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Various Treatments: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 967-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Zheng ◽  
Jianye Cai ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Kaining Zeng ◽  
Liying He ◽  
...  

Background/Aims: Systemic inflammatory response (SIR) is widely considered as a preoperative risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) outcomes. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), two of the prognostic indices, have been investigated in post-therapeutic recurrence and survival of HCC. Here, we quantify the prognostic value of these two biomarkers and evaluate their consistency in different HCC therapies. Methods: A systematic review of electronic database of the Web of Science, Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane Library was conducted to search for associations between the NLR and PLR in the blood and clinical outcomes of HCC. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were the primary outcomes, and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were explored as effect measures. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the heterogeneity of different therapies. Results: A total of 24 articles comprising 6318 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the pooled outcomes revealed that a high NLR before treatment predicted a poor OS (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.34 to 1.76, p<0.001) and poor RFS (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.82, p=0.001). Moreover, an increased PLR predicted a poor OS (HR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.34 to 1.98, p<0.001) and earlier HCC recurrence (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.21 to 1.91, p<0.001). In addition, both the NLR and PLR were identified as independent risk factors for predicting OS and RFS in HCC patients in a subgroup analysis of different treatment types, including curative or palliative therapy; however, these results were not found in the sorafenib subgroup due to limited clinical research. Conclusion: An increased NLR or PLR indicated poor outcomes for patients with HCC. The NLR and PLR may be considered as reliable and inexpensive biomarkers for making clinical decisions regarding HCC treatment.

Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (14) ◽  
pp. 22854-22862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongzhao Zhao ◽  
Guangyan Si ◽  
Fengshang Zhu ◽  
Jialiang Hui ◽  
Shangli Cai ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan-fu Lin ◽  
Mao-feng Zhong ◽  
Yu-ren Zhang ◽  
Huan Wang ◽  
He-tong Zhao ◽  
...  

The role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with different Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy of PLR on HCC prognosis. Five electronic databases were searched for clinical trials focusing on the role of PLR in the prognosis of HCC. A total of 297 potential studies were initially identified, and 9 studies comprising 2449 patients were finally enrolled to evaluate the association between the pretreatment PLR and clinical outcomes of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and event occurrence in patients with HCC in different BCLC stages. An elevated pretreatment PLR indicated unfavorable worse OS (HR = 1.73; 95% CI: (1.46, 2.04); P<0.00001) and DFS (HR = 1.30; 95% CI: (1.06, 1.60); P=0.01). Subgroup analysis indicated that high PLR indicated poor OS among BCLC-B/C patients without heterogeneity, while PLR in BCLC-A patients indicated high statistical heterogeneity with I2 value of 78%. As for the correlation between PLR and event occurrence, high PLR was related to poor clinical event occurrence only among BCLC-C patients, though obvious heterogeneity was observed in all different BCLC stages. In conclusion, PLR may be a significant biomarker in the prognosis of HCC in different BCLC stages.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Martin Simadibrata ◽  
Bashar Adi Wahyu Pandhita ◽  
Muammar Emir Ananta ◽  
Tamara Tango

Background Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), a novel inflammatory marker, has been suggested to be able to predict the severity of COVID-19 patients. This systematic review aims to evaluate the association between PLR levels on admission and the severity of COVID-19 patients. Methods A systematic literature search was done on 23 July 2020 to identify peer-reviewed studies across four different databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library), preprints from two databases (MedRxiv and SSRN), and grey literature from two databases (WHO COVID-19 Global Research Database and Center for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Research Article). Research articles comparing the PLR value on admission in adult patients with COVID-19 with varying degrees of severity were included in the analysis. The following keywords were used for the search: 'COVID-19', 'PLR', 'severity', and 'mortality'. The inverse variance method was used to calculate the pooled effect standardized mean difference (SMD) along with its 95% confidence interval (CI). Results A total of seven studies were included in the meta-analysis, six of which were conducted in China. From a total of 998 participants included, 316 (31.7%) had severe diseases; and those in the severe group were generally older and had underlying diseases compared to the non-severe group. In comparison to non-severe patients, the meta-analysis showed that severe COVID-19 patients had higher PLR levels on admission (SMD 0.68; 95%CI 0.43-0.93; I2 =58%). Conclusion High PLR levels on admission were associated with severe COVID-19 cases. Therefore, on-admission PLR level is a novel, cost-effective, and readily available biomarker with a promising prognostic role for determining the severity of COVID-19 patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Shi ◽  
Chao Yang ◽  
Qing-wen Tang ◽  
Ling-fei Xiao ◽  
Zu-han Chen ◽  
...  

The neutrophil–to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), as an essential systemic inflammation factor, has been widely used as a prognostic indicator in various diseases, such as malignant tumors, cardiovascular disease, and intracranial hemorrhage. An increasing number of studies have believed that NLR is a valuable predictor of prognosis for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, these results remain controversial. In the current study, we planned to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association between NLR and poor outcome, and the occurrence of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). We carried out a comprehensive search for published literatures on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to April 1, 2021. We conducted an assessment of all included studies based on the principles proposed in the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). Poor outcome and the occurrence of DCI were considered as the main outcome measure. We calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) to examine the strength of the association of NLR with poor outcome or the occurrence of DCI. We strictly selected a total of 10 studies comprising 4,989 patients. Nine studies reported the association between NLR and poor outcome, and five studies reported the association between NLR and the occurrence of DCI. The pooled results indicated higher NLR was significantly associated with both poorer outcomes (OR = 1.32, 95%CI 1.11–1.57; P = 0.002, I2 = 87%), and the occurrence of DCI (OR = 1.72, 95%CI 1.22–2.41; P = 0.002, I2 = 82%) in aSAH patients. The NLR is a valuable indicator of inflammation to independently predict poor outcome and occurrence of DCI after aSAH, where a higher NLR is significantly associated with poor outcomes and occurrence of DCI. These findings suggest that the NLR can help clinicians evaluate the prognosis and identify potentially severe patients early, which may contribute to better management and improve poor prognosis of aSAH patients.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tristan Tham ◽  
Yonatan Bardash ◽  
Saori Wendy Herman ◽  
Peter D. Costantino

AbstractBackgroundThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the relationship between the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and prognosis in HNC.MethodsStudies were identified from Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to generate the pooled hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), and progression free survival (PFS).ResultsOur analysis combined the results of over 6770 patients in 26 cohorts (25 studies). The pooled data demonstrated that an elevated NLR significantly predicted poorer OS, DFS, and PFS. Heterogeneity was found for OS, PFS, and marginally for DFS. Subgroup analysis in OS demonstrated that elevated NLR remained an indicator of poor prognosis.ConclusionsElevated pretreatment NLR is a prognostic marker for HNC. It represents a simple and easily obtained marker that could be used to stratify groups of high-risk patients that might benefit from adjuvant therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document