Support of New Triage Protocol among Acute Stroke Care Providers

Objective: We conducted an online survey to gauge the acceptance of sending acute stroke patients with suspected large vessel occlusion (LVO) directly to an endovascular-capable hospital (ECH) even if that means bypassing a closer alteplase-capable hospital (ACH) without endovascular capability. Methods: The survey was composed of two cases of acute stroke, one with cortical symptoms suggestive of LVO and the other without. In each case, responders were asked to choose between triaging to a closer ACH or an ECH that is further away and to provide an opinion regarding the maximum extra travel time they would tolerate if they chose the ECH. The survey was sent electronically to national groups of neurologists, emergency department (ED) physicians, emergency medical service (EMS) directors, and stroke coordinators. Results: There were 320 responders from 44 states, most of them with 10 years or more of experience. Most of the responders, 72.5%, chose ECH for the LVO case, while 56% chose ACH for the non-LVO case. There were marked differences in responses by specialty: neurology strongly supported ECH for LVO and strongly supported ACH for non-LVO, most ED and EMS chose ECH for both cases, and stroke coordinators were the least supportive of bypassing ACH. Almost all groups agreed on 30 min as the acceptable extra transfer time to ECH. Conclusion: Among the survey responders, there is a broad acceptance of the idea of bypassing ACH and going straight to ECH when LVO is suspected; however, there is less agreement on triaging patients with non-LVO stroke.

Download Full-text

Abstract TMP8: Predictors of Large Vessel Occlusion in Kaiser Stroke EXPRESS Program

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.tmp8 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Jeffrey G Klingman ◽

Anne C Kim ◽

Meghan Hatfield ◽

Benjamin Wilson ◽

Lauren Klingman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Kaiser Permanente ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Stroke Treatment ◽

Improved Outcomes

Background: In 2015, trials showed that rapid endovascular stroke treatment (EST) of qualified patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) resulted in improved outcomes over treatment with IV tPA alone. In 2015, Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) redesigned its acute stroke care work flow for its 21 stroke centers, which included expedited IV t-pa treatment, rapid CTA investigation, expedited transfer of appropriate patients for EST. We assessed for predictors of LVO post-implementation. Methods: The KPNC Stroke EXPRESS program was live in all centers by January 2016. Using clinical data for 1/1/16 - 7/10/16, we evaluated the frequency and locations of LVO, and patient characteristics of those with LVO. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine whether age, gender, race, or an NIHSS ≥ 8 are predictors of LVO. Results: There were 2,204 tele-stroke alert cases from the ED. Among 993 (39.3%) that proceeded as likely acute stroke, 812 (81.8%) were evaluated with CTA. Out of those who had a CTA, 152 (18.7%) were found to have LVO as followed: 27 (17.8%) ICA, 87 (57.2%) M1, 24 (15.8%) M2, 6 (4.0%) basilar, 5 (3.3%) PCA, and 3 (2.0%) vertebral. Of those with LVO, 97 (63.8%) were treated with EST. Patients with LVO had a higher median NIHSS (15 vs. 5 in those without LVO). Neglect (27% vs. 7%) and gaze deviation (16% vs. 1%) were more likely to be seen among those with LVO and treated with EST compared to those without LVO. In multivariate analysis, age (OR=1.02, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.03, p=0.01) and NIHSS ≥8 (OR = 4.99, 95% CI 3.32- 7.49, p < 0.001) were associated with LVO. PPV for NIHSS ≥8 was 75.7%. Conclusions: In our large multi-ethnic population of acute stroke patients, a relatively small percentage (19%) was found to have LVO and only a subset qualified for EST. Predictors of LVO included NIHSS ≥8, increasing age, and presence of neglect and gaze preference. Given the low numbers of patients brought in for acute stroke treatment who ended up with a LVO requiring EST, further research is needed to assess a given system’s ability to rapidly evaluate and transfer as appropriate for EST rather than paramedic based diversion.

Download Full-text

Stroke Intervention: Geographic Disparities in Acute Stroke Care and the Role of Interventional Cardiology

EMJ Interventional Cardiology ◽

10.33590/emjintcardiol/20-00009 ◽

2020 ◽

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Case Series ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Interventional Cardiology ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Geographic Disparities

Stroke is the second-leading cause of death and a major cause of disability worldwide. The majority of strokes are ischaemic, and effective therapy to achieve reperfusion includes intravenous thrombolysis and, for proximal large vessel occlusion strokes, endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (MT). There has been a paradigm shift in acute stroke care, driven by a series of randomised controlled trials demonstrating that timely reperfusion with MT results in superior outcomes compared to intravenous thrombolysis in patients with large vessel occlusion strokes. There are significant geographic disparities in delivering acute stroke care because of the maldistribution of neurointerventional specialists. There are now several case series demonstrating the feasibility and safety of first medical contact MT by carotid stent-capable interventional cardiologists and noninvasive neurologists working on stroke teams, which is a solution to the uneven distribution of neurointerventionalists and allows stroke interventions to be delivered in local communities.

Download Full-text

Bottlenecks in the Acute Stroke Care System during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Catalonia

Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽

10.1159/000516309 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Anna Ramos-Pachón ◽

Álvaro García-Tornel ◽

Mònica Millán ◽

Marc Ribó ◽

Sergi Amaro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Functional Outcome ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Care Quality ◽

Point Of View ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Prehospital Delays ◽

The Impact

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant healthcare reorganizations, potentially striking standard medical care. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care quality and clinical outcomes to detect healthcare system’s bottlenecks from a territorial point of view. Methods: Crossed-data analysis between a prospective nation-based mandatory registry of acute stroke, Emergency Medical System (EMS) records, and daily incidence of COVID-19 in Catalonia (Spain). We included all stroke code activations during the pandemic (March 15–May 2, 2020) and an immediate prepandemic period (January 26–March 14, 2020). Primary outcomes were stroke code activations and reperfusion therapies in both periods. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics, workflow metrics, differences across types of stroke centers, correlation analysis between weekly EMS alerts, COVID-19 cases, and workflow metrics, and impact on mortality and clinical outcome at 90 days. Results: Stroke code activations decreased by 22% and reperfusion therapies dropped by 29% during the pandemic period, with no differences in age, stroke severity, or large vessel occlusion. Calls to EMS were handled 42 min later, and time from onset to hospital arrival increased by 53 min, with significant correlations between weekly COVID-19 cases and more EMS calls (rho = 0.81), less stroke code activations (rho = −0.37), and longer prehospital delays (rho = 0.25). Telestroke centers were afflicted with higher reductions in stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, referrals to endovascular centers, and increased delays to thrombolytics. The independent odds of death increased (OR 1.6 [1.05–2.4], p 0.03) and good functional outcome decreased (mRS ≤2 at 90 days: OR 0.6 [0.4–0.9], p 0.015) during the pandemic period. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Catalonia’s stroke system’s weakest points were the delay to EMS alert and a decline of stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, and interhospital transfers, mostly at local centers. Patients suffering an acute stroke during the pandemic period had higher odds of poor functional outcome and death. The complete stroke care system’s analysis is crucial to allocate resources appropriately.

Download Full-text

Abstract 2197: Telestroke: Optimizing Access to Emergency Interventions in Acute Stroke Care

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a2197 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Rayetta Johnson

Keyword(s):

Quality Improvement ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Health Care Providers ◽

Positive Impact ◽

Medical Center ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Nurse Specialist ◽

Care Providers ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Evidenced Based

Background and Issues: The burden of stroke in North Carolina is one of the highest in the nation (approximately 28,000 stroke hospitalizations from 2003-2007). The number and high costs of stroke have made it incumbent to improve the numbers of patients receiving effective treatment. There are two major barriers for treatment of acute stroke: time and access. The utilization of telestroke in community hospitals aids in decreasing these barriers by providing immediate access to a stroke neurologist. In order for telestroke to be successful, awareness and education regarding acute stroke care must be provided for health care providers as well as the communities. Thus, the development of a telestroke system requires nursing and medical expertise. The Primary Stroke Center Team at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, N.C. implemented a telestroke network system (Intouch's Health's RP-7 Robotic system) in January of 2010 to provide 24/7 access to the medical center's acute stroke experts and the latest advancements in stroke interventions. There are eight hospitals in the network at the present time. Methods: Our team identified that many of the network hospital's staff are not experienced in taking care of a stroke patient and that a “roadmap” is useful to guide them in these steps.The stroke nurse specialist developed a quality improvement plan for the network hospitals which included: an evidence-based algorithm for patient care; stroke education, in particular, neurological assessment and tPA administration classes for the ED staff; quarterly meetings to provide outcome and feedback data with each network hospital; stroke awareness events for the community. Mock telestroke consults were also performed prior to “going live” with telestroke for each of the network hospitals. Of utmost importance is the early involvement and education of the EMS system in the respective county of the network hospital. The buy-in of EMS was found to be a key component in the success of the network. Finally, attention to customized quality improvement efforts for each of the facilities are required to accomplish integration into the telestroke network. Results: The data has been analyzed, and thus far, a 24% rate of tPA administration has been seen with our network hospitals (an increase from the 3.6% national average). Comparisons between each of the eight network hospitals' rates of administration of tPA prior to and after joining the network show a trend of increase (10%-40%). The effectiveness of the algorithm has also been explored by analysis of feedback and initial results have shown a positive impact. Conclusion: A combination of improving access to stroke neurologists in conjunction with a focus on improving the level of care via evidenced based stroke care teaching and implementation of algorithms at a network hospital is required for implementing and building a successful telestroke network.

Download Full-text

Epidemiological Surveillance of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Stroke Care Using Artificial Intelligence

Stroke ◽

10.1161/strokeaha.120.031960 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Raul G. Nogueira ◽

Jason M. Davies ◽

Rishi Gupta ◽

Ameer E. Hassan ◽

Thomas Devlin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Artificial Intelligence ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Systems Of Care ◽

Ct Perfusion ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

The Impact

Background and Purpose: The degree to which the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected systems of care, in particular, those for time-sensitive conditions such as stroke, remains poorly quantified. We sought to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 in the overall screening for acute stroke utilizing a commercial clinical artificial intelligence platform. Methods: Data were derived from the Viz Platform, an artificial intelligence application designed to optimize the workflow of patients with acute stroke. Neuroimaging data on suspected patients with stroke across 97 hospitals in 20 US states were collected in real time and retrospectively analyzed with the number of patients undergoing imaging screening serving as a surrogate for the amount of stroke care. The main outcome measures were the number of computed tomography (CT) angiography, CT perfusion, large vessel occlusions (defined according to the automated software detection), and severe strokes on CT perfusion (defined as those with hypoperfusion volumes >70 mL) normalized as number of patients per day per hospital. Data from the prepandemic (November 4, 2019 to February 29, 2020) and pandemic (March 1 to May 10, 2020) periods were compared at national and state levels. Correlations were made between the inter-period changes in imaging screening, stroke hospitalizations, and thrombectomy procedures using state-specific sampling. Results: A total of 23 223 patients were included. The incidence of large vessel occlusion on CT angiography and severe strokes on CT perfusion were 11.2% (n=2602) and 14.7% (n=1229/8328), respectively. There were significant declines in the overall number of CT angiographies (−22.8%; 1.39–1.07 patients/day per hospital, P <0.001) and CT perfusion (−26.1%; 0.50–0.37 patients/day per hospital, P <0.001) as well as in the incidence of large vessel occlusion (−17.1%; 0.15–0.13 patients/day per hospital, P <0.001) and severe strokes on CT perfusion (−16.7%; 0.12–0.10 patients/day per hospital, P <0.005). The sampled cohort showed similar declines in the rates of large vessel occlusions versus thrombectomy (18.8% versus 19.5%, P =0.9) and comprehensive stroke center hospitalizations (18.8% versus 11.0%, P =0.4). Conclusions: A significant decline in stroke imaging screening has occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. This analysis underscores the broader application of artificial intelligence neuroimaging platforms for the real-time monitoring of stroke systems of care.

Download Full-text

Abstract TP259: Accuracy of EMS Identification of Acute Strokes Eligible for tPA Treatment in Kaiser Stroke EXPRESS Program

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.tp259 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Jeffrey G Klingman ◽

Sunil Bhopale ◽

Meghan Hatfield ◽

Benjamin Wilson ◽

Lauren Klingman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Work Flow ◽

Initial Assessment ◽

Stroke Therapy ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Kaiser Permanente ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Stroke Mimic

Background: Field-based diversion for potential stroke patients who may qualify for endovascular stroke therapy (EST) has been proposed more widely in 2015. In 2015, Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) redesigned its acute stroke care work flow for all its 21 stroke centers, which included rapid evaluation of all stroke alerts by a stroke neurologist via teleneurology. We investigated the accuracy of EMS-activated stroke alerts. Methods: From 1/1/16 to 7/10/16, all acute strokes presenting to an ED between 7 AM and midnight were assessed upon arrival by a teleneurologist. We reviewed all telestroke cases to determine the frequency of tPA given, cancelled stroke alerts, and the reasons for not treating with IV t-PA, particularly among ambulance arrivals. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess age, gender, race, Kaiser membership, and mode of ED arrival as predictors of stroke alert cancellation. Results: There were 2192 stroke alerts activated. Of these, 1332 (60.7%) arrived by EMS and 860 (39.2%) by non-EMS transport. Of patients arriving by EMS, 651 (48.9%) were cancelled and deemed ineligible for IV t-PA. Most common reasons for cancellation were: last time known well (LTKW) out of range (23%), stroke mimic (33%), symptom resolution (19%), new data regarding goals of care (2%), and other (22.5%). The remaining 681 (51.1%) ambulance arrivals were potential candidates for IV tPA. Subsequently, 334 (50.4%) of them received tPA. Reasons for tPA not given included subsequent resolution of symptoms, concerning CT findings (such as bleed), INR>1.7 in patients on warfarin, further information clarifying time of onset. Among those who arrived by EMS and received IV t-PA, all had CTA and 103 (30.8%) were found to have a large vessel occlusion and 74 (71.8%) underwent EST. In multivariate analysis for all cancelled stroke alerts, arrival by non-EMS transport (OR=1.74, 95% CI 1.44-2.10, p<0.001) was more likely to be cancelled. Conclusions: Close to half of EMS-activated stroke alerts were cancelled upon initial assessment. Only 5% of patients initially identified by EMS as having a potential acute stroke ultimately underwent EST. Better determination of LTKW and stroke symptoms would improve the accuracy of EMS-initiated stroke alerts.

Download Full-text

Abstract 90: Nursing Education: A Critical Need in the Delivery of High Quality Stroke Care

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.90 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Virginia Daggett ◽

Linda Williams ◽

Nicholas Burrus ◽

Jennifer Myers ◽

Laura Plue ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Quality Indicators ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Training Needs ◽

Release Time ◽

Multidisciplinary Teams ◽

Care Providers ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

High Quality ◽

And Training

Objectives: High quality stroke care is complex, and requires strong multidisciplinary teams, including nurses, to ensure care processes are timely and appropriate. The purpose of this study was to identify training needs of nurses who deliver care to patients who present with acute stroke and are admitted to inpatient units. Methodology: Using semi-structured interviews, we conducted a qualitative study for a formative evaluation in 12 Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) that had ≥ 50 acute ischemic stroke admissions a year and were diverse in the structure of stroke care. The interviews focused on current context and structure of stroke care, including educational practices and training needs. Secondary analyses were conducted, targeting frontline nurse and physician respondents (N = 113) in emergency, acute care and rehabilitation units. Results: Respondents across the sites reported insufficient nurse education and training for acute stroke care as an overarching theme. Moreover, themes related to the acute stroke care quality indicators emerged as areas of competencies that nurses needed training on a continuum: a) timely recognition of acute stroke and transient ischemic attacks, b) NIH Stroke Scale and neurological exams, c) dysphagia screening, d) administration of tissue plasminogen activator and management post treatment, and e) deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis. Themes that were related to structure of stroke care and/or context also emerged and attributed to training challenges across the sites, listed in order of prevalence: a) centralized care versus decentralized care, b) low volume of acute strokes, c) nurse engagement, d) structured acute stroke care education, and e) release time. Conclusions: VA stroke care providers identify educational needs around specific stroke quality indicators, but also describe key barriers including lower volume, time for training and engagement of nursing staff in acute stroke care. Future programs to improve VA stroke care need to address these barriers to optimally support high quality multidisciplinary stroke care.

Download Full-text

Global Epidemiology of Stroke and Access to Acute Ischemic Stroke Interventions

Neurology ◽

10.1212/wnl.0000000000012781 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 97 (20 Supplement 2) ◽

pp. S6-S16

Author(s):

Vasu Saini ◽

Luis Guada ◽

Dileep R. Yavagal

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Randomized Clinical Trials ◽

Time Window ◽

Systems Of Care ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Global Epidemiology

Purpose of the ReviewTo provide an up-to-date review of the incidence of stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) around the globe, as well as the eligibility and access to IV thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) worldwide.Recent FindingsRandomized clinical trials have established MT with or without IVT as the usual care for patients with LVO stroke for up to 24 hours from symptom onset. Eligibility for IVT has extended beyond 4.5 hours based on permissible imaging criteria. With these advances in the last 5 years, there has been a notable increase in the population of patients eligible for acute stroke interventions. However, access to acute stroke care and utilization of MT or IVT is lagging in these patients.SummaryStroke is the second leading cause of both disability and death worldwide, with the highest burden of the disease shared by low- and middle-income countries. In 2016, there were 13.7 million new incident strokes globally; ≈87% of these were ischemic strokes and by conservative estimation about 10%–20% of these account for LVO. Fewer than 5% of patients with acute ischemic stroke received IVT globally in the eligible therapeutic time window and fewer than 100,000 MTs were performed worldwide in 2016. This highlights the large gap among eligible patients and the low utilization rates of these advances across the globe. Multiple global initiatives are underway to investigate interventions to improve systems of care and bridge this gap.

Download Full-text

Abstract WP273: Evolution of a U.S. County System for Acute Comprehensive Stroke Care

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.wp273 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Radoslav I Raychev ◽

Dana Stradling ◽

David M Brown ◽

Joey R Gee ◽

David L Lombardi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Systems Of Care ◽

Early Recognition ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Reperfusion Therapy ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Transfer Rates ◽

Over Time ◽

Iv Tpa

Introduction: In an effort to maximize provision of acute stroke therapies, the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in Orange County, CA (6 th most populous U.S. county) established a system of care whereby patients with suspected acute stroke are taken to hub sites with endovascular treatment (EVT) capability or to spoke hospitals. Patients at spokes with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and suspected large vessel occlusion (LVO) are transferred by EMS to hubs. Here we examined the relationship between stroke features, hospital transfers, and mortality; and their change over time. Methods: All patients during 2013-2015 were included for whom 911 was called within 7 hours of onset, and EMS personnel declared “acute stroke" at end of initial evaluation. Results: A total of 6,188 patients (mean age 72) had suspected stroke, of which 54.9% were AIS and 19.4% hemorrhagic stroke. Across all patients, transfer rates into hub sites increased over time (OR 1.12 per 3-months, p<0.0001) and differed by diagnosis (p<0.0001), with transfer in 12.0% of hemorrhages (n=122) but only 3.5% of AIS (n=101). Among patients with AIS only, transfer rates into a hub site increased over time (OR 1.08, p<0.0001), spiking mid-2015. Acute reperfusion therapy was given to 28.3% (20.9% IV tPA only, 3.6% IA therapy only, 3.8% IV tPA+IA), but its usage was unrelated to transfer status, and only 11% of all transferred AIS patients received EVT. Across all patients, mortality during acute hospitalization was 8.2% and did not differ by transfer status, but did differ by diagnosis (p<0.0001): 23.6% of hemorrhages vs. 5.4% of AIS. Over time, mortality decreased only among patients with AIS (OR 0.95, p=0.03). Conclusions: There were several favorable features of this acute stroke care system, including that 28.3% of AIS patients received reperfusion therapy and that mortality decreased over time. However, while transfer to EVT-ready sites increased, rates of IA therapy were low. Continued efforts to optimize acute stroke systems of care should be tailored toward increasing EVT by early recognition of LVO and timely triage to hub facilities.

Download Full-text