A Brief Informant Screening Instrument for Dementia in the ICU: The Diagnostic Accuracy of the AD8 in Critically Ill Adults Suspected of Having Pre-Existing Dementia

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 241-249
Author(s):  
Maria C. Duggan ◽  
Madeline E. Morrell ◽  
Rameela Chandrasekhar ◽  
Annachiara Marra ◽  
Kwame Frimpong ◽  
...  

Background/Aim: The diagnostic accuracy of brief informant screening instruments to detect dementia in critically ill adults is unknown. We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the 2- to 3-min Ascertain Dementia 8 (AD8) completed by surrogates in detecting dementia among critically ill adults suspected of having pre-existing dementia by comparing it to the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR). Methods: This substudy of BRAIN-ICU included a subgroup of 75 critically ill medical/surgical patients determined to be at medium risk of having pre-existing dementia (Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly [IQCODE] score ≥3.3). We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), and AUC for the standard AD8 cutoff of ≥2 versus the reference standard CDR score of ≥1 for mild dementia. Results: By the CDR, 38 patients had very mild or no dementia and 37 had mild dementia or greater. For diagnosing mild dementia, the AD8 had a sensitivity of 97% (95% CI 86–100), a specificity of 16% (6–31), a PPV of 53% (40–65), an NPV of 86% (42–100), and an AUC of 0.738 (0.626–0.850). Conclusions: Among critically ill patients judged at risk for pre-existing dementia, the 2- to 3-min AD8 is highly sensitive and has a high NPV. These data indicate that the brief tool can serve to rule out dementia in a specific patient population.

Author(s):  
Shawn J. Kram ◽  
Bridgette L. Kram ◽  
Jennifer M. Schultheis ◽  
Michelle M. Kuhrt ◽  
Andrew S. McRae ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To evaluate whether vanA rectal screening for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) predicts vancomycin resistance for patients with enterococcal bloodstream infection (BSI). Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: Large academic medical center. Methods: The predictive performance of a vanA rectal swab was evaluated in 161 critically ill adults with an enterococcal BSI from January 1, 2007, to September 1, 2014, and who had a vanA rectal swab screening obtained within 14 days prior to blood culture. Results: Of the patients meeting inclusion criteria, 83 (51.6%) were vanA swab positive. Rectal-swab–positive patients were more likely to be younger, to be immunocompromised, to have an indwelling central vascular catheter, and to have a history of MDR bacteria. The vanA rectal swab had sensitivity and negative predictive values of 83.6% and 85.9%, respectively, and specificity and positive predictive values of 71.3% and 67.5%, respectively, for predicting a vancomycin-resistant enterococcal BSI in critically ill adults. Conclusions: VanA rectal swabs may be useful for antimicrobial stewardship at institutions with VRE screening already in place for infection control purposes. A higher PPV would be warranted to implement a universal vanA screen on all ICU patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 1599-1608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torben K. Becker ◽  
Chelsea A. Tafoya ◽  
Maxwell Osei-Ampofo ◽  
Matthew J. Tafoya ◽  
Ross A. Kessler ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Tu ◽  
G. Bryan Young ◽  
Agnieszka Kokoszka ◽  
Andres Rodriguez-Ruiz ◽  
Jay Varma ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terri Voepel-Lewis ◽  
Jennifer Zanotti ◽  
Jennifer A. Dammeyer ◽  
Sandra Merkel

Background Few investigators have evaluated pain assessment tools in the critical care setting.Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale in assessing pain in critically ill adults and children unable to self-report pain.Methods Three nurses simultaneously, but independently, observed and scored pain behaviors twice in 29 critically ill adults and 8 children: before administration of an analgesic or during a painful procedure, and 15 to 30 minutes after the administration or procedure. Two nurses used the FLACC scale, the third used either the Checklist of Nonverbal Pain Indicators (for adults) or the COMFORT scale (for children).Results For 73 observations, FLACC scores correlated highly with the other 2 scores (ρ = 0.963 and 0.849, respectively), supporting criterion validity. Significant decreases in FLACC scores after analgesia (or at rest) supported construct validity of the tool (mean, 5.27; SD, 2.3 vs mean, 0.52; SD, 1.1; P < .001). Exact agreement and κ statistics, as well as intraclass correlation coefficients (0.67–0.95), support excellent interrater reliability of the tool. Internal consistency was excellent; the Cronbach α was 0.882 when all items were included.Conclusions Although similar in content to other behavioral pain scales, the FLACC can be used across populations of patients and settings, and the scores are comparable to those of the commonly used 0-to-10 number rating scale.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document