Renal Outcomes of Pregnant Patients with Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Wang ◽  
Jian-Da Lu ◽  
Ying Zhu ◽  
Ting-Ting Wang ◽  
Jun Xue

Background: Is the prognosis of immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) influenced by pregnancy and delivery? The answer to this question still remains to be a controversial topic. Here, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to obtain the overall estimate of potential effect of IgAN and pregnancy on each other. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Chinese Biological Medicine and Cochrane for cohort and case-control studies; a total of 1,378 articles were reviewed and 9 studies were included in the end. OR and mean difference (MD) were calculated with a random-effects model, kidney events and pregnancy outcomes were analyzed respectively. Results: The key finding of the meta-analysis of 145 renal events in 1,198 participants was that there was no difference in renal outcomes (defined as doubling of serum creatinine (SCr), 50% decline in glomerular filtration rate [GFR] and end-stage kidney disease) of pregnant women compared with non-pregnant women who had IgAN (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.59–1.37; p = 0.63). Subgroup analysis indicated that there was no significant difference between the 2 groups according to sample size, follow-up year, age, level of SCr and proteinuria at baseline. There was no difference in the change of the eGFR/creatinine clearance rate (mL/min/1.73 m2 per year) in IgAN patients with pregnancy compared with non-pregnancy (MD –0.11 mL/min; 95% CI –0.50–0.27; p = 0.57) as well. Women with IgAN had a higher likelihood of pregnancy outcomes compared with the Chinese general population, while they had a lower risk of preterm delivery, preeclampsia and low birth weight compared with those who had lupus nephritis or diabetic nephropathy. Conclusions: Pregnancy did not accelerate kidney disease deterioration in women with IgAN in stages of chronic kidney disease 1–3. Moreover, patients with IgAN had a relatively low risk of adverse pregnancy events compared with those with lupus nephritis or diabetic nephropathy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Cabrera ◽  
Ruben Torres ◽  
Leticia Elgueta ◽  
Erico Segovia ◽  
Maria Eugenia Sanhueza ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Diabetic nephropathy is one of the main causes of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the world. In the past years new studies using SGLT-2 inhibitors in diabetic patients have shown benefit in both mortality and progression of CKD. However, these works show heterogeneity between studies regarding the severity of CKD of patients included. All above complicates the interpretation of the benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors. Method We did a systematic search of the literature in PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL trials database and in references of the selected studies. Terms used for the search were Canaglifozin, Dapaglifozin, Ertuglifozin, Empaglifozin, diabetes, mortality and CKD. Search included studies in all languages. We selected only randomized and controlled studies that reported mortality and relevant renal outcomes (doubling serum creatinine or decrease in eGFR> 40%, need for renal replacement or renal death). We included studies until September 30, 2019. For the meta-analysis, a Mantel-Haenszel model of random effects was used. The software Review Manager, Version 5.3 The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014 was used. Results We obtained results from 142 studies, fifteen studies met the selected criteria, but only four reported mortality and renal outcomes (EMPA-REG, CANVAS, CREDENCE AND DECLARE-TIMI 58). A total of 38,721 patients (SGTL2 inhibitors n = 21,264 and control n = 17,457) were included for the analysis. The EMPA-REG study used Empaglifozin, the CANVAS and CREDENCE studies used Canaglifozin and the DECLARE-TIMI 58 used Dapaglifozin. All studies were funded by pharmaceutical laboratories.The average age range of the studies was between 62 to 67 years. The percentage of patients with eGFR <60ml/min were 26%, 20%, 60% and 7% for the EMPA-REG, CANVAS, CREDENCE and DECLARE-TIMI 58 studies respectively.Mortality was lower in patients who used SGTL2 inhibitors OR 0.86 (CI 0.80-0.94) Figure 1. Renal outcomes were also lower in patients who used SGTL-2 inhibitors OR 0.69 (CI 0.60-0.78) Figure 2. We assessed whether the effect was related to the severity of the CKD taking out the work with patients with more severe CKD (CREDENCE study), the effect on mortality did not change OR 0.87 (CI 0.80-0.95) as well as renal outcome OR 0.66 (CI 0.52- 0.83). Conclusion The SGTL-2 inhibitors decrease mortality and improve renal outcomes in patients with diabetic nephropathy. These benefits remain in patients with less severe CKD.


2016 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 315-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Leporini ◽  
Anna Pisano ◽  
Emilio Russo ◽  
Graziella D⿿Arrigo ◽  
Giovambattista de Sarro ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (24) ◽  
pp. 1807-1817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanyin Hou ◽  
Jicheng Lv ◽  
Vlado Perkovic ◽  
Lihong Yang ◽  
Na Zhao ◽  
...  

Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (28) ◽  
pp. 46436-46448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Shao ◽  
Bingjue Li ◽  
Luxi Cao ◽  
Ludan Liang ◽  
Jingjuan Yang ◽  
...  

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. e1003856
Author(s):  
Sophie Relph ◽  
Trusha Patel ◽  
Louisa Delaney ◽  
Soha Sobhy ◽  
Shakila Thangaratinam

Background The rise in the global prevalence of diabetes, particularly among younger people, has led to an increase in the number of pregnant women with preexisting diabetes, many of whom have diabetes-related microvascular complications. We aimed to estimate the magnitude of the risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes or disease progression in this population. Methods and findings We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis on maternal and perinatal complications in women with type 1 or 2 diabetic microvascular disease and the risk factors for worsening of microvascular disease in pregnancy using a prospective protocol (PROSPERO CRD42017076647). We searched major databases (January 1990 to July 2021) for relevant cohort studies. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. We summarized the findings as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random effects meta-analysis. We included 56 cohort studies involving 12,819 pregnant women with diabetes; 40 from Europe and 9 from North America. Pregnant women with diabetic nephropathy were at greater risk of preeclampsia (OR 10.76, CI 6.43 to 17.99, p < 0.001), early (<34 weeks) (OR 6.90, 95% CI 3.38 to 14.06, p < 0.001) and any preterm birth (OR 4.48, CI 3.40 to 5.92, p < 0.001), and cesarean section (OR 3.04, CI 1.24 to 7.47, p = 0.015); their babies were at increased risk of perinatal death (OR 2.26, CI 1.07 to 4.75, p = 0.032), congenital abnormality (OR 2.71, CI 1.58 to 4.66, p < 0.001), small for gestational age (OR 16.89, CI 7.07 to 40.37, p < 0.001), and admission to neonatal unit (OR 2.59, CI 1.72 to 3.90, p < 0.001) than those without nephropathy. Diabetic retinopathy was associated with any preterm birth (OR 1.67, CI 1.27 to 2.20, p < 0.001) and preeclampsia (OR 2.20, CI 1.57 to 3.10, p < 0.001) but not other complications. The risks of onset or worsening of retinopathy were increased in women who were nulliparous (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.40, p < 0.001), smokers (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.25 to 4.27, p = 0.008), with existing proliferative disease (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.11 to 4.04, p = 0.022), and longer duration of diabetes (weighted mean difference: 4.51 years, 95% CI 2.26 to 6.76, p < 0.001) than those without the risk factors. The main limitations of this analysis are the heterogeneity of definition of retinopathy and nephropathy and the inclusion of women both with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Conclusions In pregnant women with diabetes, presence of nephropathy and/or retinopathy appear to further increase the risks of maternal complications.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel N Onwusulu ◽  
Helen Chioma Okoye ◽  
Emmanuel O Nna ◽  
Samuel Onuka ◽  
Amaka Obiageli Nnamani ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundAsymptomatic bacteriuria can be a cause of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes if undetected and untreated. Pregnant women are usually routinely screened with urine cultures at antenatal booking. However, the exact burden of asymptomatic bacteriuria in Nigeria is unknown. Our protocol is aimed at determining the pooled prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria amongst Nigerian pregnant women as well as the associated risk factors and pregnancy outcomes.MethodsNine databases: PubMed, African Journal Online, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, ResearchGate, Scopus, and Web of Science will be searched using a search strategy that is developed by combinations of MeSH terms, keywords, text words, and entry terms. Only observational studies published or retrievable in the English Language will be included. Studies must be conducted in Nigeria. The primary measurable outcome of this study is the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women. Identified studies will be screened, selected, and deduplicated in DistillerSR. Data items will be extracted into predefined forms in the DistillerSR. Reports including Prisma flow chart, quality scores, risk of bias, and study outcomes will be generated in DistillerSR. Extracted data items will be exported into the Comprehensive Meta-analysis Software version 3 for quantitative analysis. Methodological, clinical, and statistical heterogeneity will be assessed for all the studies. Publication bias will be assessed using Funnel plots. There will be a subgroup analysis of pooled prevalence using categorical variables. The primary outcome will be expressed in pooled prevalence, standard error, variance, and 95% CI of variance. Quantitative risk factors and pregnancy outcomes will be used used for meta-regression. The reporting of the systematic review and meta-analysis will be according to PRISMA 2015 Statement.DiscussionThe pooled prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria in Nigeria will be examined in relation to associated risk factors and pregnancy outcomes. The study will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.Trial Registration NumberThis protocol is registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with registration number CRD42020213810


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document