scholarly journals Taller-Than-Wide Shape: A New Definition Improves the Specificity of TIRADS Systems

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Grani ◽  
Livia Lamartina ◽  
Valeria Ramundo ◽  
Rosa Falcone ◽  
Cristiano Lomonaco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Intraobserver Variability ◽  
Transverse Diameter ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Alternative Definition ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: A taller-than-wide (TTW) shape is a suspicious feature of thyroid nodules commonly defined as an anteroposterior/transverse diameter (AP/T) ratio >1. An intraobserver variability of up to 18% in AP diameter evaluations has been described, which may lead to overreporting of this feature. To potentially improve the reliability of the TTW definition, we propose an arbitrary ratio of ≥1.2. Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the impact of this definition on diagnostic performance. Methods: We prospectively analyzed 553 thyroid nodules referred for cytology evaluation at an academic center. Before fine-needle aspiration, two examiners jointly defined all sonographic features considered in risk stratification systems developed by the American Thyroid Association (ATA), the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), the American College of Radiology (ACR TIRADS), the European Thyroid Association (EU-TIRADS), and the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (K-TIRADS). TTW was defined according to the current definition (AP/T diameter ratio >1) and an arbitrary alternative definition (AP/T ratio >1.2). Results: The alternative definition classified fewer nodules as TTW (28, 5.1% vs. 94, 17%). The current and proposed definitions have a sensitivity of 26.2 and 11.9% (p = 0.03) and a specificity of 83.8 and 95.5% (p < 0.001). Thus, as a single feature, the arbitrary definition has a lower sensitivity and a higher specificity. When applied to sonographic risk stratification systems, however, the proposed definition would increase the number of avoided biopsies (up to 58.2% for ACR TIRADS) and the specificity of all systems, without negative impact on sensitivity or diagnostic odds ratio. Conclusions: Re-defining TTW nodules as those with an AP/T ratio ≥1.2 improves this marker’s specificity for malignancy. Using this definition in risk stratification systems will increase their specificity, reducing the number of suggested biopsies without significantly diminishing their overall diagnostic performance.

Impact of the ultrasonography assessment method on the malignancy risk and diagnostic performance of five risk stratification systems in thyroid nodules

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Go Eun Yang ◽  
Dong Gyu Na
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Malignant Tumours ◽  
Malignancy Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Estimated Risk ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose Ultrasonographic (US) assessment methods may affect the estimated malignancy risk of thyroid nodules. This study aimed to investigate the impact of retrospective and prospective US assessments on the estimated malignancy risk of US features, classified categories, and diagnostic performance of five risk stratification systems (RSSs) in thyroid nodules. Methods A total of 3685 consecutive thyroid nodules (≥ 1 cm) with final diagnoses (retrospective dataset, n = 2180; prospective dataset, n = 1505) were included in this study. We compared the estimated malignancy risk of US features, classified categories, and diagnostic performances of the five common RSSs between retrospective (static US images without cine clips) and prospective datasets of real-time US assessment. Results There was no significant difference in the prevalence and histological type of malignant tumours between the two datasets (p ≥ 0.216). The malignancy risk of solid composition and nonparallel orientation was higher and that of microcalcification was lower in the prospective dataset than in the retrospective dataset (p < 0.001, p = 0.018, p = 0.007, respectively). The retrospective US assessment overestimated the malignancy risk of intermediate-or high-risk nodules according to the RSSs. Prospective US assessment showed lower specificities and higher unnecessary biopsy rates by all RSSs compared to the retrospective US assessment (p ≤ 0.006, p ≤ 0.045, respectively). Conclusions The overestimated malignancy risk of microcalcification by retrospective US assessment mainly affected the estimated risk of classified categories by RSSs. The retrospective US assessment overestimated the specificities and underestimated the unnecessary biopsy rates by all RSSs.

scholarly journals Establishment of an Ultrasound Malignancy Risk Stratification Model for Thyroid Nodules Larger Than 4 cm

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuehua Xi ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Luying Gao ◽  
Yuxin Jiang ◽  
Zhiyong Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Validation Dataset ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Solid Mass ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
Risk Stratification Model

BackgroundThe incidence and mortality of thyroid cancer, including thyroid nodules &gt; 4 cm, have been increasing in recent years. The current evaluation methods are based mostly on studies of patients with thyroid nodules &lt; 4 cm. The aim of the current study was to establish a risk stratification model to predict risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules &gt; 4 cm.MethodsA total of 279 thyroid nodules &gt; 4 cm in 267 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Nodules were randomly assigned to a training dataset (n = 140) and a validation dataset (n = 139). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to establish a nomogram. The risk stratification of thyroid nodules &gt; 4 cm was established according to the nomogram. The diagnostic performance of the model was evaluated and compared with the American College Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS), Kwak TI-RADS and 2015 ATA guidelines using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsThe analysis included 279 nodules (267 patients, 50.6 ± 13.2 years): 229 were benign and 50 were malignant. Multivariate regression revealed microcalcification, solid mass, ill-defined border and hypoechogenicity as independent risk factors. Based on the four factors, a risk stratified clinical model was developed for evaluating nodules &gt; 4 cm, which includes three categories: high risk (risk value = 0.8-0.9, with more than 3 factors), intermediate risk (risk value = 0.3-0.7, with 2 factors or microcalcification) and low risk (risk value = 0.1-0.2, with 1 factor except microcalcification). In the validation dataset, the malignancy rate of thyroid nodules &gt; 4 cm that were classified as high risk was 88.9%; as intermediate risk, 35.7%; and as low risk, 6.9%. The new model showed greater AUC than ACR TI-RADS (0.897 vs. 0.855, p = 0.040), but similar sensitivity (61.9% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.480) and specificity (91.5% vs. 93.2%, p = 0.680).ConclusionMicrocalcification, solid mass, ill-defined border and hypoechogenicity on ultrasound may be signs of malignancy in thyroid nodules &gt; 4 cm. A risk stratification model for nodules &gt; 4 cm may show better diagnostic performance than ACR TI-RADS, which may lead to better preoperative decision-making.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Performance of Different Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (Kwak-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS and ACR TI-RADS) for Risk Stratification of Small Thyroid Nodules (≤10 mm)

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Schenke ◽  
Rigobert Klett ◽  
Philipp Seifert ◽  
Michael C. Kreissl ◽  
Rainer Görges ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Medullary Carcinoma ◽  
Data Systems ◽  
Thyroid Imaging ◽  
Promising Tool ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy

Due to the widespread use of ultrasound, small thyroid nodules (TNs) ≤ 10 mm are common findings. Standardized approaches for the risk stratification of TNs with Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADS) were evaluated for the clinical routine. With TIRADS, the risk of malignancy in TNs is calculated by scoring the number or combination of suspicious ultrasound features, leading to recommendations for further diagnostic steps. However, there are only scarce data on the performance of TIRADS for small TNs. The aim was to compare three different TIRADS for risk stratification of small TNs in routine clinical practice. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of TNs ≤ 10 mm and their available histology. Nodules were classified according to three different TIRADS. In the study, 140 patients (n = 113 female) with 145 thyroid nodules (n = 76 malignant) were included. Most of the malignant nodules were papillary carcinoma (97%), and the remaining 3% were medullary carcinoma. For all tested TIRADS, the prevalence of malignancy rose with increasing category levels. The highest negative predictive value was found for ACR TI-RADS and the highest positive predictive value for Kwak-TIRADS. All tested variants of TIRADS showed comparable diagnostic performance for the risk stratification of small TNs. TIRADS seems to be a promising tool to reliably assess the risk of malignancy of small TNs.

scholarly journals Reducing the Number of Unnecessary Thyroid Biopsies While Improving Diagnostic Accuracy: Toward the “Right” TIRADS

2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Grani ◽  
Livia Lamartina ◽  
Valeria Ascoli ◽  
Daniela Bosco ◽  
Marco Biffoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
False Negative ◽  
False Negative Rate ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Classification Systems ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Korean Society ◽  
The Right

Abstract Context The prevalence of thyroid nodules in the general population is increasingly high, and at least half of those biopsied prove to be benign. Sonographic risk-stratification systems are being proposed as “rule-out” tests that can identify nodules that do not require fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. Objective To comparatively assess the performances of five internationally endorsed sonographic classification systems [those of the American Thyroid Association, the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the American College of Radiology (ACR), the European Thyroid Association, and the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology] in identifying nodules whose FNAs can be safely deferred and to estimate their negative predictive values (NPVs). Design Prospective study of thyroid nodules referred for FNA. Setting Single academic referral center. Patients Four hundred seventy-seven patients (358 females, 75.2%); mean (SD) age, 55.9 (13.9) years. Main Outcome Measures Number of biopsies classified as unnecessary, false-negative rate (FNR), sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and diagnostic ORs for each system. Results Application of the systems’ FNA criteria would have reduced the number of biopsies performed by 17.1% to 53.4%. The ACR Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) allowed the largest reduction (268 of 502) with the lowest FNR (NPV, 97.8%; 95% CI, 95.2% to 99.2%). Except for the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology TIRADS, all other systems exhibited significant discriminatory performance but produced significantly smaller reductions in the number of procedures. Conclusions Internationally endorsed sonographic risk stratification systems vary widely in their ability to reduce the number of unnecessary thyroid nodule FNAs. The ACR TIRADS outperformed the others, classifying more than half the biopsies as unnecessary with a FNR of 2.2%.

scholarly journals Thyroid Nodules with Indeterminate Cytology: Utility of the American Thyroid Association Sonographic Patterns for Cancer Risk Stratification

Thyroid ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1004-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Valderrabano ◽  
Melissa J. McGettigan ◽  
Cesar A. Lam ◽  
Laila Khazai ◽  
Zachary J. Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Sonographic Patterns ◽  
Indeterminate Cytology

Diagnostic performances and interobserver agreement according to observer experience: a comparison study using three guidelines for management of thyroid nodules

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (8) ◽  
pp. 917-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jieun Koh ◽  
Soo-Yeon Kim ◽  
Hye Sun Lee ◽  
Eun-Kyung Kim ◽  
Jin Young Kwak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interobserver Agreement ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Comparison Study ◽  
The Us ◽  
Observer Experience ◽  
Level Of Experience ◽  
Group Agreement ◽  
Higher Sensitivity

Background The differences regarding categorization of thyroid nodules among different guidelines may affect the diagnostic performances and agreement among observers. Purpose To compare the diagnostic performances and agreements between observers with various degree of experience when applying different guidelines for stratifying thyroid nodules using suspicious ultrasonography (US) features. Material and Methods This retrospective study included 370 thyroid nodules (≥10 mm). Four observers, grouped as experienced and inexperienced, evaluated the US features and made final assessments according to the Kim criteria, Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) by Kwak et al., and the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guideline. Diagnostic performances and agreements among the two groups were compared. Results The Kim criteria shows higher specificity with significantly lower sensitivity when compared to TIRADS and the 2015 ATA guideline (all P < 0.001), regardless of the level of experience. The experienced group showed significantly higher specificity with the Kim criteria and the 2015 ATA guideline compared to the inexperienced group ( P < 0.001), and the inexperienced group showed significantly higher sensitivity using the Kim criteria ( P = 0.002). The experienced group showed significantly higher agreement than the inexperienced group when using TIRADS while higher agreement was seen when using the 2015 ATA guideline for the inexperienced group. Agreement was not significantly different for the Kim criteria according to observer experience. Conclusion The diagnostic performances and agreements show significant differences in risk stratification of thyroid nodules according to the three guidelines using suspicious US features and the level of experience of the observer.

scholarly journals Risk Stratification in Patients With Follicular Neoplasm on Cytology: Use of Quantitative Characteristics and Sonographic Patterns

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Hsun Wu ◽  
Kuen-Yuan Chen ◽  
Min-Shu Hsieh ◽  
Argon Chen ◽  
Chiung-Nien Chen
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Region Of Interest ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Follicular Neoplasm ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Cad System ◽  
Hospital Patients ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Us Findings

ObjectivesDifferentiating thyroid nodules with a cytological diagnosis of follicular neoplasm remains an issue. The goal of this study was to determine whether ultrasonographic (US) findings obtained preoperatively from the computer-aided detection (CAD) system are sufficient to further stratify the risk of malignancy for this diagnostic cytological category.MethodsFrom September 2016 to September 2018 in our hospital, patients diagnosed with Bethesda category IV (follicular neoplasm or suspicion of follicular neoplasm) thyroid nodules and underwent surgical excisions were include in the study. Quantification and analysis of tumor features were performed using CAD software. The US findings of the region of interest, including index of composition, margin, echogenicity, texture, echogenic dots indicative of calcifications, tall and wide orientation, and margin were calculated into computerized values. The nodules were further classified into American Thyroid Association (ATA) and American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting &amp; Data System (TI-RADS) categories.Results92 (10.1%) of 913 patients were diagnosed with Bethesda category IV thyroid nodules. In 65 patients, the histological type of the nodule was identified. The quantitative features between patients with benign and malignant conditions differed significantly. The presence of heterogeneous echotexture, blurred margins, or irregular margins was shown to have the highest diagnostic value. The risks of malignancy for nodules classified as having very low to intermediate suspicion ATA, non-ATA, and high suspicion ATA patterns were 9%, 35.7%, and 51.7%, respectively. Meanwhile, the risks of malignancy were 12.5%, 26.1%, and 53.8% for nodules classified as TIRADS 3, 4, and 5, respectively. When compared to human observers, among whom poor agreement was noticeable, the CAD software has shown a higher average accuracy.ConclusionsFor patients with nodules diagnosed as Bethesda category IV, the software-based characterizations of US features, along with the associated ATA patterns and TIRADS system, were shown helpful in the risk stratification of malignancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document