Irinotecan and Gemcitabine as Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma following Platinum plus Pemetrexed Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study

Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yuichi Koda ◽  
Kozo Kuribayashi ◽  
Hiroshi Doi ◽  
Kazuhiro Kitajima ◽  
Yasuhiro Nakajima ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Cisplatin-pemetrexed combination chemotherapy is the current standard primary treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). It was first approved for untreated and unresectable MPM in the 2003 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. However, to date, standard treatments for patients with MPM who previously underwent chemotherapy, as recommended by the NCCN Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma guidelines, have been inadequate. To explore treatment options for such patients, we performed this retrospective study of patients who received irinotecan plus gemcitabine as second-line therapy for MPM. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We investigated 62 patients diagnosed with unresectable MPM between January 2008 and October 2017 who experienced recurrence following cisplatin treatment (or carboplatin) plus pemetrexed or pemetrexed monotherapy as first-line treatment, and who underwent irinotecan plus gemcitabine combination therapy as second-line treatment. Irinotecan (60 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) and gemcitabine (800 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) were administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, including a 1-week washout period. Our endpoints were efficacy, survival period, and toxicity. <b><i>Results:</i></b> patients’ median age was 65 years (range 50–79), and the histological MPM types were epithelioid (<i>n</i> = 48), sarcomatoid (<i>n</i> = 6), biphasic (<i>n</i> = 6), and desmoplastic (<i>n</i> = 2). One patient experienced a partial response, 40 had stable disease, and 21 had progressive disease. The disease control rate was 66.1% and the response rate 2.1%. Additionally, the median progression-free and overall survival time were 5.7 and 11.3 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were neutropenia (32.2%), loss of appetite (16.1%), nausea/diarrhea (11.3%), and thrombocytopenia/phlebitis (9.7%). Grade 3 adverse events included neutropenia (12.9%) and thrombocytopenia/phlebitis (2.1%); however, all adverse events were managed with symptomatic therapy. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Despite the fact that second-line irinotecan plus gemcitabine combination therapy did not produce marked tumor shrinkage, it achieved a relatively high disease control rate of &#x3e;65% with an acceptable toxicity profile. Hence, the combination of irinotecan plus gemcitabine may be considered for MPM treatment, with consideration of combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a potential next step.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7584-7584
Author(s):  
Vanesa Gregorc ◽  
Alessandra Bulotta ◽  
Maria Grazia Viganò ◽  
Domenico Ghio ◽  
Gilda Rossoni ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 371-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Elizabeth Rogers ◽  
Lindsey Law ◽  
D. Van Nguyen ◽  
Wei Qiao ◽  
Milind M. Javle ◽  
...  

371 Background: Five-year survival for advanced cholangiocarcinoma (aCC) is reported at 5-10%. For advanced, unresectable patients, gemcitabine plus platinum (GEM-P) combination chemotherapy is common practice as first-line treatment with progression free survival (PFS) of 8 months and overall survival (OS) of 11.7 months. Data regarding chemotherapy treatment after first-line progression is limited. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with aCC from 1/1/2009 to 12/31/2012 who received second-line chemotherapy at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). Median PFS was the primary endpoint. Secondary objectives included disease control rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease) and OS. Inclusion criteria: aCC diagnosis, progression on first-line therapy, and reimaging studies at MDACC. Exclusion criteria: patients who received localized treatment for aCC prior to second-line therapy or consolidative chemoradiation, mixed histology tumors, and those with a history of another malignancy. Results: 56 patients were identified, with the majority having intrahepatic aCC (95%). 80% of patients received gemcitabine based first-line treatment (GEM-P +/- erlotinib, GEM monotherapy). Second-line systemic treatment included GEM-P (19.6%), GEM + fluoropyrmidine (GEM-FU) (28.6%), fluoropyrmidine combination (FU-combo) (37.5%), and other consisting of chemotherapy or biotherapy monotherapy or combination (14.3%). Total median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI = 2.3 to 3.8). Disease control rate was 50% with a median OS of 13.8 months (95% CI = 12 to19.3). No significant difference in PFS or OS was identified between the four second line treatment groups. A higher CA 19-9 at the start of second line treatment correlated with a worse survival (p= <0.01). Conclusions: This retrospective study revealed a 50% disease control rate, median PFS of 2.7 months, and a potential for improvement in OS in patients who received second line systemic treatment. Agents that may be considered include GEM + FU, FU-combination therapy, or GEM-P if not given first line.


Chemotherapy ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Sasaki ◽  
Hiroyuki Isayama ◽  
Yousuke Nakai ◽  
Naminatsu Takahara ◽  
Dai Akiyama ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 1466-1470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean A. Fennell ◽  
Cliona McDowell ◽  
Sara Busacca ◽  
Glen Webb ◽  
Brian Moulton ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 1516-1523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Kostron ◽  
Martina Friess ◽  
Ornella Crameri ◽  
Ilhan Inci ◽  
Didier Schneiter ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15128-15128
Author(s):  
M. Gerolymos ◽  
A. Koutras ◽  
E. Kontogeorgou ◽  
G. Iconomou ◽  
G. Vourli ◽  
...  

15128 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) / leucovorin (LV) and irinotecan as first- or second-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods: Treatment consisted of irinotecan 80 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.), followed by LV 200 mg/m2 (i.v.) and 5- FU 450 mg/m2 as an i.v. bolus. Treatment was administered weekly for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period. Results: Thirty-one patients (23 chemo-naïve, 8 chemo-exposed) were enrolled. The overall response rate was 22.6% and the disease control rate was 38.7%. Among the patients who received the regimen as first-line treatment, objective response rate was 30.4% and the disease control rate was 52.1%. However, progression of the disease was recorded in all the patients receiving the combination as second-line chemotherapy. The median time to disease progression (TTP) was 4 months and the median duration of survival was 7 months. The median TTP was 6 months for patients treated with first-line chemotherapy and 2.5 for those who received study treatment as second line. Furthermore, the median survival duration was 8 months and 6 months, respectively. The most frequent grade 4 toxicity was febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities were rare. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: The combination of 5-FU/LV and irinotecan as first-line treatment was found to be well tolerated, with efficacy comparable to that of other regimens in advanced gastric cancer. Accordingly, this regimen can be regarded as one of first-line options, particularly in patients who can not tolerate aggressive chemotherapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document