Does disease control rate (DCR) at 9 and 18 weeks predict overall survival (OS) in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM)? An individual patient data combined analysis of 10 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Lung Cancer Group (LCG) studies.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7025-7025
Author(s):  
L. Greillier ◽  
B. Hasan ◽  
P. Baas ◽  
J. J. Welch ◽  
J. P. Van Meerbeeck ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 1443-1448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni L. Ceresoli ◽  
Paolo A. Zucali ◽  
Adolfo G. Favaretto ◽  
Francesco Grossi ◽  
Paolo Bidoli ◽  
...  

Purpose This multicenter, phase II clinical study was conducted to evaluate the activity of the combination of pemetrexed and carboplatin in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Patients and Methods Chemotherapy-naive patients with measurable disease and adequate organ function, who were not eligible for curative surgery, received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the plasma concentration-time curve of 5 mg/mL/min, administered intravenously every 21 days. All patients received folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation. Pemetrexed was provided within the Expanded Access Program. Results A total of 102 patients were enrolled. An objective response was achieved in 19 patients (two complete and 17 partial responses), for a response rate of 18.6% (95% CI, 11.6% to 27.5%). Forty-eight patients (47.0%; 95% CI, 37.1% to 57.2%) had stable disease after treatment. Overall, 67 patients (65.7%) achieved disease control (95% CI, 55.6% to 74.8%). Median time to progression was 6.5 months; median overall survival time was 12.7 months. Compliance to treatment was excellent, with a relative dose-intensity of 97% for pemetrexed and 98% for carboplatin. Toxicity was mild, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 9.7% of total cycles and grade 3 or 4 anemia occurring in 3.5% of total cycles. Nonhematologic toxicity was negligible. Conclusion Treatment with pemetrexed and carboplatin was active and well tolerated in patients with MPM. Disease control rate, time to disease progression, and overall survival were similar to the results achieved with the standard regimen of pemetrexed and cisplatin, suggesting that the carboplatin combination could be an alternative option for these patients.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7584-7584
Author(s):  
Vanesa Gregorc ◽  
Alessandra Bulotta ◽  
Maria Grazia Viganò ◽  
Domenico Ghio ◽  
Gilda Rossoni ◽  
...  

Lung Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 83-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Remon ◽  
E. Nadal ◽  
M. Dómine ◽  
J. Ruffinelli ◽  
Y. García ◽  
...  

Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yuichi Koda ◽  
Kozo Kuribayashi ◽  
Hiroshi Doi ◽  
Kazuhiro Kitajima ◽  
Yasuhiro Nakajima ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Cisplatin-pemetrexed combination chemotherapy is the current standard primary treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). It was first approved for untreated and unresectable MPM in the 2003 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. However, to date, standard treatments for patients with MPM who previously underwent chemotherapy, as recommended by the NCCN Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma guidelines, have been inadequate. To explore treatment options for such patients, we performed this retrospective study of patients who received irinotecan plus gemcitabine as second-line therapy for MPM. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We investigated 62 patients diagnosed with unresectable MPM between January 2008 and October 2017 who experienced recurrence following cisplatin treatment (or carboplatin) plus pemetrexed or pemetrexed monotherapy as first-line treatment, and who underwent irinotecan plus gemcitabine combination therapy as second-line treatment. Irinotecan (60 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) and gemcitabine (800 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) were administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, including a 1-week washout period. Our endpoints were efficacy, survival period, and toxicity. <b><i>Results:</i></b> patients’ median age was 65 years (range 50–79), and the histological MPM types were epithelioid (<i>n</i> = 48), sarcomatoid (<i>n</i> = 6), biphasic (<i>n</i> = 6), and desmoplastic (<i>n</i> = 2). One patient experienced a partial response, 40 had stable disease, and 21 had progressive disease. The disease control rate was 66.1% and the response rate 2.1%. Additionally, the median progression-free and overall survival time were 5.7 and 11.3 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were neutropenia (32.2%), loss of appetite (16.1%), nausea/diarrhea (11.3%), and thrombocytopenia/phlebitis (9.7%). Grade 3 adverse events included neutropenia (12.9%) and thrombocytopenia/phlebitis (2.1%); however, all adverse events were managed with symptomatic therapy. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Despite the fact that second-line irinotecan plus gemcitabine combination therapy did not produce marked tumor shrinkage, it achieved a relatively high disease control rate of &#x3e;65% with an acceptable toxicity profile. Hence, the combination of irinotecan plus gemcitabine may be considered for MPM treatment, with consideration of combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a potential next step.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document