Substaging of pT1 Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma Predicts Tumor Progression and Overall Survival

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Grobet-Jeandin ◽  
Gregory Johannes Wirth ◽  
Daniel Benamran ◽  
Amandine Dupont ◽  
Jean-Christophe Tille ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Limitations in tumor staging and the heterogeneous natural evolution of pT1 urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC) make the choice of treatment challenging. We evaluated if histopathological substaging (pT1a, pT1b, and pT1c) helps predict disease recurrence, progression, and overall survival following transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We included 239 consecutive patients diagnosed with pT1 UBC at TURB in a single institution since 2001. Each sample was interpreted by our specialized uropathologists trained to subclassify pT1 stage. Three groups were distinguished according to the degree of invasion: T1a (up to the muscularis mucosae [MM]), T1b (into the MM), and T1c (beyond the MM). <b><i>Results:</i></b> T1 substaging was possible in 217/239 (90%) patients. pT1a, b, and c occurred in 124 (57), 59 (27), and 34 (16%), respectively. The median follow-up was 3.1 years, with a cumulative recurrence rate of 52%, progression rate of 20%, and survival rate of 54%. Recurrence was not significantly associated with tumor substage (<i>p</i> = 0.61). However, the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a significantly higher progression rate among T1b (31) and T1c (26%) tumors than T1a (13%) (log-rank test: <i>p</i> = 0.001) stages. In a multivariable model including gender, age, ASA score, smoking, tumor grade, and presence of carcinoma in situ, T1 substage was the single variable significantly associated with progression-free survival (HR 1.7, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Nineteen patients (9%) needed radical cystectomy; among them, 12/19 (63%) had an invasive tumor. Overall survival was significantly associated with tumor substaging (<i>p</i> = 0.001). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Histopathological substaging of pT1 UBC is significantly associated with tumor progression and overall survival and therefore appears to be a useful prognostic tool to counsel patients about treatment options.

Author(s):  
Thara Tunthanathip ◽  
Tanan Bejrananda

Objective: This study aimed to assess the effect of anti-programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death-ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) agents compared with second-line therapy in patients with metastatic or locally advanced urothelial bladder carcinoma following previous platinum-containing chemotherapy.Material and Methods: We systematically searched three electronic databases. The protocol of the study was registered in Prospero (CRD42019142494). Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, the certainty of evidence (CoE) was estimated.Results: The search results initially found 8168 publications. For qualitative synthesis, two publications were included. Pooled results indicated that patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents had significantly prolonged overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7-0.9; I2 21.0%; moderate CoE). According to positive PD-L1 expression, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors had significantly more survival than chemotherapy (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.5-0.9, I2 57.0%, low CoE). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in adverse events (AE) between the anti-PD-1/PDL1 agents and second-line chemotherapy (risk ratio 0.68; 95% CI 0.3-1.4; I2 97.0%, low CoE).Conclusion: The present meta-analysis and systematic review provide strong evidence that anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents could improve overall survival and have similar results in AEs compared with second-line chemotherapy. Further studies will confirm the power of immunotherapy for the treatment of metastatic or locally advanced urothelial bladder carcinoma.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. e1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Jeandin ◽  
A. Dupont ◽  
J-C. Tille ◽  
J. Hauser ◽  
S-N. Tran ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 100 (11) ◽  
pp. 2367-2375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulette Mhawech ◽  
Vincent Greloz ◽  
Chantal Oppikofer ◽  
Idliko Szalay-Quinodoz ◽  
Francois Herrmann

1995 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-187
Author(s):  
◽  
V. Canzonieri ◽  
E. Bidoli ◽  
M. Francini ◽  
A. Carbone

From 1987 to 1993, 26 patients with superficial urothelial bladder carcinoma pT1G3 were observed consecutively at the Dept. of Urology of Pordenone City Hospital and the Division of Pathology of the Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (Italy). All patients were treated with TUR and then with a course of BCG-intravesical instillations. The complete immunoprophylaxis treatment consisted of a weekly instillation of BCG for 6 weeks; then cystoscopy and urinary cytologies or random biopsies were performed. An additional 1-monthly BCG treatment for 3 months was administered to 10 disease-free patients. In 6 cases of pT1G3 recurrences, a new complete cycle of BCG was performed whereas in 10 patients with local progression, defined as muscular infiltration, a cystoprostatectomy or RT therapy was advised. Follow-up examinations, planned every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 3 years, included cystoscopy and urinary cytologies in 19 patients and cystoscopy with randomized biopsies and washing in the remaining 7 patients. Ten patients were disease-free at a mean of 34 months follow-up (range 13-65 months); 6 patients experienced recurrence at a mean of 7 months follow-up (range 3-40 months) and 10 patients local progression at a mean of 13 months follow-up (range 3-44 months). The morphometric study demonstrated that cases with average nuclear area, in the deepest part of the histological section, more or equal to 40 μm2 have a threefold progression rate, compared to cases with average nuclear area less than 40 μm2 (p = 0.10). Our results would indicate the possible role of morphometric evaluation of prognostically important parameters, in the clinical management of patients with pT1G3 tumours.


Author(s):  
Ankita Gupta ◽  
Budhi Singh Yadav ◽  
Nagarjun Ballari ◽  
Namrata Das ◽  
Ngangom Robert

Abstract Background: Brain metastases (BM) are common in patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer. In this study we aim to report clinical outcomes with LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for BM in patients of breast cancer. Methods: Clinical and dosimetric records of breast cancer patients treated for BM at our institute between May, 2015 and December, 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients of previously treated or newly diagnosed breast cancer with at least a radiological diagnosis of BM; 1–4 in number, ≤3·5 cm in maximum dimension, with a Karnofsky Performance Score of ≥60 were taken up for treatment with SRS. SRT was generally considered if a tumour was >3·5 cm in diameter, near a critical or eloquent structure, or if the proximity of moderately sized tumours would lead to dose bridging in a single-fraction SRS plan. The median prescribed SRS dose was 15 Gy (range 7–24 Gy) and SRT dose was 27 Gy in 3 fractions. Clinical assessment and MR imaging was done at 6 weeks post-SRS and then every 3 months thereafter. Intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan–Meier method and subgroups were compared using log rank test. Results: Total, 40 tumours were treated in 31 patients. The median tumour diameter was 2·3 cm (range 1·0–4·6 cm). SRS and SRT were delivered in 27 and 4 patients, respectively. SRS/SRT was given as a boost to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in four patients and as salvage for progression after WBRT in six patients. In general, nine patients underwent prior surgery. The median follow-up was 7·9 months (0·2–34 months). Twenty (64·5%) patients developed local recurrence, 10 (32·3%) patients developed distant intracranial relapse and 7 patients had both local and distant intracranial relapse. The estimated local control at 6 months and 1 year was 48 and 35%, respectively. Median intracranial progression free survival (PFS) was 3·73 months (range 0·2–25 months). Median intracranial PFS was 3·02 months in patients who received SRS alone or as boost after WBRT, while it was 4·27 months in those who received SRS as salvage after WBRT (p = 0·793). No difference in intracranial PFS was observed with or without prior surgery (p = 0·410). Median overall survival (OS) was 21·7 months (range 0·2–34 months) for the entire cohort. Patients who received prior WBRT had a poor OS (13·31 months) as compared to SRS alone (21·4 months; p = 0·699). Conclusion: In patients with BM after breast cancer SRS alone, WBRT + SRS and surgery + SRS had comparable PFS and OS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document