Clopidogrel response variability and the advent of personalised antiplatelet therapy

2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (08) ◽  
pp. 265-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Gurbe ◽  
Udaya S. Tantry

SummaryPlatelet-mediated thrombosis is a dreaded clinical event and is the primary cause of acute coronary syndromes and post-percutaneous intervention (PCI) ischaemic events. There has been a long standing interest in the ex vivo quantification of platelet reactivity to assess the risk of thrombosis. Early studies demonstrated platelet activation and heightened platelet reactivity in acute coronary syndromes and after PCI. However, a demonstration that heightened reactivity actually precipitated the ischaemic event was lacking. Our knowledge of platelet receptor physiology and the advent of novel inhibitors have significantly advanced the field. The P2Y12 receptor has been shown to play a pivotal role in the amplification of platelet activation by multiple agonists and its inhibition has resulted in improved clinical outcomes. The most widely used drug to block P2Y12 receptor, clopidogrel is associated with resistance in selected patients and these patients have been shown to be at increased risk for post-PCI ischaemic event occurrence in multiple studies. Importantly, a threshold of high platelet reactivity has been demonstrated, and beyond this threshold ischaemic events occur precipitously. Based on the current evidence, it is rational to quantify the intensity of the ADP-P2Y12 interaction in the patient at the greatest risk for thrombosis-the PCI patient. However, there is only evidence from small clinical trials demonstrating the clinical efficacy of changing an antiplatelet regimen based on an ex vivo platelet function measurement. Moreover, there are numerous patients with vulnerable coronary anatomy that have not yet experienced plaque rupture; the prognostic role of a measurement of platelet reactivity in the latter group has never been studied. Large-scale trials are ongoing that will investigate the role of personalised antiplatelet therapy in the PCI patient.

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Cimmino ◽  
Emanuele Gallinoro ◽  
Luigi Di Serafino ◽  
Nicola De Luca ◽  
Plinio Cirillo

The key role of platelets in pathophysiology of Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) has been well recognized. Platelet activation and aggregation, together with tissue factor-pathway activation, lead to acute thrombus formation in the coronary vessels at sites of plaque rupture. Thus, antiplatelet therapy with drugs able to interfere with platelet activation/aggregation represents a cornerstone of ACS treatment in intensive care units and catheterisation labs. Several observational studies have described that residual high platelet reactivity, despite antiplatelet therapy, is associated with increased risk of nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), definite/probable stent thrombosis and cardiovascular mortality. Thus, assessment of platelet function with reliable and reproducible platelet function tests might be crucial to identify patients at high risk of thrombosis or not responding to ongoing antiplatelet strategies. However, despite this promising background, some randomized clinical trials have failed to demonstrate improvement in outcomes when using platelet function tests for clinical decision-making. This review, after describing platelet biology and pathophysiology of ACS, briefly considers the drugs currently approved for use in patients with ACS or treated by the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Finally, we provide an updated overview of the current methods to evaluate platelet reactivity in the clinical setting of ACS illustrating their potential advantages/limitations in current clinical practice.


2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 1839-1843
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Cavendish ◽  
Randolph V. Fugit ◽  
Michael Safani

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (02) ◽  
pp. 282-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinne Frere ◽  
Jacques Quilici ◽  
Pierre-Emmanuel Morange ◽  
Lyassine Nait-Saidi ◽  
Christopher Mielot ◽  
...  

SummaryHigh post-treatment platelet reactivity (HPPR= adenosine diphosphate [ADP] 10 µM-induced platelet aggregation > 70%) identifies low responders to dual antiplatelet therapy with increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular (CV) events after stenting for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS). This study was designed to compare the incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) after stenting for NSTEACS patients between non-responders to dual antiplatelet therapy defined by HPPR and normo-responders. One hundred ninety NSTE-ACS consecutive patients undergoing coronary stenting were included in this prospective study. They received 250 mg aspirin and a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel at least 12 hours (h) before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A single post-treatment blood sample was obtained before PCI to analyze maximal intensity of ADP-induced platelet aggregation, and troponin levels were analyzed before PCI, and 12 and 24 h after PCI. Troponin I was considered elevated if > 0.4 ng/ ml. HPPR was present in 22% of patients (n=42). Periprocedural MI occurred significantly more frequently in patients with HPPR than in the normo-responders (43% vs. 24%, p=0.014). After being correlated with recurrent ischemic events after stenting for NSTE-ACS, the HPPR seems to be also a marker of increased risk of periprocedural MI for NSTE-ACS patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document