scholarly journals Platelet turnover predicts outcome after coronary intervention

2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (05) ◽  
pp. 923-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liana Iliev ◽  
Veronika Bruno ◽  
Miklos Rohla ◽  
Florian Egger ◽  
Thomas Weiss ◽  
...  

SummaryElevated platelet turnover contributes to high platelet reactivity. High platelet reactivity after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of platelet turnover and function with regard to MACE after PCI with stent implantation. In this prospective observational study, 486 consecutive patients after PCI on aspirin and clopidogrel were included to determine platelet turnover (mean platelet volume (MPV), reticulated platelet fraction (RPF)) and platelet function (multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein-phosphorylation (VASP-P) assay). At six-months follow-up, MACE occurred in 10.7 % of patients. RPF (odds ratio [OR]=1.173 (95% confidence interval [CI 95 %] 1.040–1.324), p=0.009) and MPV (OR=1.459 (CI 95 % 1.059–2.008), p=0.021) were univariable predictors of MACE, whereas VASP-P (OR=1.016 (CI 95 % 1.000–1.032), p=0.052) and MEA (OR=0.999 (CI 95 % 0.980–1.017), p=0.895) failed to predict MACE. RPF remained the only platelet variable independently associated with MACE. The best model to predict MACE included: troponin I (OR=1.007 (CI 95 % 1.002–1.012), p=0.009), RPF (OR=1.136 (CI 95 % 1.001–1.288), p=0.048), CRP (OR=1.008 (CI 95 % 1.001–1.014), p=0.023) and history of myocardial infarction (OR=2.039 (CI 95 % 1.093–3.806), p=0.025). RPF (OR=1.211 (CI 95 % 1.042–1.406), p=0.012) was also independently associated with in-hospital bleedings. In conclusion, RPF as index of platelet turnover is an independent predictor of MACE and bleeding events in PCI patients on dual antiplatelet therapy. Since RPF can reliably be quantified along with routine haemograms, RPF might easily be applied in the setting of cardiovascular risk prediction.

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Mangiacapra ◽  
Luca Paolucci ◽  
Michele Mattia Viscusi ◽  
Roberto Mangiacapra ◽  
Pietro Manuel Ferraro ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims High platelet reactivity (HPR) on clopidogrel and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are recognized as potent risk factors for adverse outcomes in patients suffering coronary artery disease (CAD) and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, conclusive evidence regarding their reciprocal interaction and the consequent impact on clinical events is still lacking. We performed a meta-analysis with the aim to evaluate the prevalence of HPR in patients with and without CKD and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) according to the renal and platelet function status in current literature (co-primary endpoints). Secondary endpoints were myocardial infarction (MI), all cause death and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST). Methods and results We searched on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library studies investigating CKD and HPR on clopidogrel in patients suffering CAD who underwent PCI and their related outcomes. Overall, 13 studies including 22.464 patients were selected. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects model with the Mantel–Haenszel method. Patients with CKD presented significantly higher odds of HPR compared with those without CKD [OR: 1.51 (95% CI: 1.29–1.76)]. In patients without CKD, HPR was associated with increased odds of MACE [OR: 1.31 (95% CI: 1.01–1.72)], MI [OR: 1.48 (95% CI: 1.17–1.86)] and definite/probable ST [OR: 2.45 (95% CI: 1.08–5.60)]. In patients with CKD, HPR was associated with higher odds of both MACE [OR: 1.61 (95% CI: 1.14–2.27)] and MI [OR: 1.69 (95% CI: 1.11–2.59)], compared to those without HPR. Conclusions Our analysis shows that HPR on clopidogrel is more frequent in patients with CKD treated with PCI. Patients with HPR are exposed to a high risk of MACE after PCI, regardless of the renal function status.


Pharmacology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
David Naguib ◽  
Carolin Helten ◽  
Saif Zako ◽  
Philipp Mourikis ◽  
René M’Pembele ◽  
...  

Additional loading dose of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) despite permanent oral ASA medication is frequently applicated. The impact on platelet reactivity and clinical events is not known. In this pilot study, we aimed to analyze high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) to aspirin in patients undergoing elective PCI. Platelet reactivity was measured using light-transmission aggregometry in 100 patients on permanent low-dose ASA medication undergoing elective PCI. Platelet reactivity measured by arachidonic acid-induced maximum of aggregation (MoA) in patients with versus without additional peri-procedural ASA loading (500 mg i.v.) was compared. HTPR was defined as MoA &#x3e;20% for ASA. Major adverse cerebro- and cardiovascular events (MACCEs) and bleeding events were evaluated during hospital course. HTPR rate was similar in both groups (HTPR to ASA: loading vs. control 6% vs. 16%, odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08–1.35, <i>p</i> = 0.12). In-hospital MACCEs were not different between groups (MACCE: loading vs. control: 0 vs. 0 patient, OR = 1.32, 95% CI 0.03–67.95, <i>p</i> = 0.89). Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction minimal bleedings were numerically higher in patients without ASA loading dose. In this pharmacodynamic pilot study, additional ASA loading did not reduce HTPR to ASA. Furthermore, ASA loading did not increase in-hospital MACCE and bleeding complications.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-175
Author(s):  
Jonathan Lazari ◽  
Andrew Money-Kyrle ◽  
Benjamin R Wakerley

Cardiac cephalalgia is a migraine-like headache that occurs during episodes of myocardial ischaemia. Clinical characteristics of the headache vary widely but are often severe in intensity, worsen with reduced myocardial perfusion and resolve with reperfusion. It can present along with typical symptoms of angina pectoris, although not always. We present a 64-year-old man with a 6-month history of severe, non-exertional headaches occurring with increasing frequency. A resting ECG showed ST elevation in the inferior leads. His serum troponin I was not elevated. Coronary angiography showed severe stenosis of his right coronary artery, which was successfully stented by percutaneous coronary intervention. He remains headache free at 2-year follow-up.


2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (12) ◽  
pp. 1227-1233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heli Lahtela ◽  
Pasi Karjalainen ◽  
Matti Niemelä ◽  
Saila Vikman ◽  
Kari Kervinen ◽  
...  

SummaryThe aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients on chronic warfarin therapy due to atrial fibrillation (AF).We analysed all consecutive AF patients (N = 377, mean age 70 years, male 71%) on warfarin therapy referred for PCI in seven centres. Major bleeding, access site complications and major adverse cardiovascular events were recorded during hospitalisation. A total of 111 patients (29%) received periprocedural GPIs with a wide inter-hospital variation in their use (range 3–68%).The use of GPIs increased with the severity of the disease presentation and 49% of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction received GPIs. Mean periprocedural international normalised ratio (INR) of patients who received GPIs was 1.89 (range 1.1–3.3). Major bleeding was more common in the patients treated with GPIs (9.0% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.001) than in those without GPIs, but there was no difference in major adverse cardiovascular events between the groups. In multivariable analysis, use of GPIs (odds ratio [OR]???????????5.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]???????????1.3–20.6, p = 0.02) and old age (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0–1.3, p = 0.02) remained as the only independent predictors of major bleeding. Also after adjusting for propensity score, GPIs remained as a significant predictor of major bleeding (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.03–14.1, p = 0.045). In the GPI group, major bleeding was not predicted by INR level or warfarin pause. GPIs increase the risk of major bleeding events irrespective of periprocedural INR levels and should be used with caution in this fragile patient group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document