Peak Oxygen Consumption and Resting Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Changes After Cardiomyoplasty at 6-Month Follow-up

Circulation ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 92 (9) ◽  
pp. 216-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edimar Alcides Bocchi ◽  
Guilherme Veiga Guimarães ◽  
Luiz Felipe P. Moreira ◽  
Fernando Bacal ◽  
Alvaro Vilela de Moraes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxygen Consumption ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Peak Oxygen Consumption ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract P232: Screening Past B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Values to Identify Candidates for Treatment of Systolic Dysfunction

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Parisa Gholami ◽  
Shoutzu Lin ◽  
Paul Heidenreich
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Background: BNP testing is now common though it is not clear if the test results are used to improve patient care. A high BNP may be an indicator that the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is low (<40%) such that the patient will benefit from life-prolonging therapy. Objective: To determine how often clinicians obtained a measure of LVEF (echocardiography, nuclear) following a high BNP value when the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was not known to be low (<40%). Methods and Results: We reviewed the medical records of 296 consecutive patients (inpatient or outpatient) with a BNP values of at least 200 pg/ml at a single medical center (tertiary hospital with 8 community clinics). A prior diagnosis of heart failure was made in 65%, while 42% had diabetes, 79% had hypertension, 59% had ischemic heart disease and 31% had chronic lung disease. The mean age was 73 ± 12 years, 75% were white, 10% black, 15% other and the mean BNP was 810 ± 814 pg/ml. The LVEF was known to be < 40% in 84 patients (28%, mean BNP value of 1094 ± 969 pg/ml). Of the remaining 212 patients without a known low LVEF, 161 (76%) had a prior LVEF >=40% ( mean BNP value of 673 ± 635 pg/ml), and 51 (24%) had no prior LVEF documented (mean BNP 775 ± 926 pg/ml). Following the high BNP, a measure of LVEF was obtained (including outside studies documented by the primary care provider) within 6 months in only 53% (113 of 212) of those with an LVEF not known to be low. Of those with a follow-up echocardiogram, the LVEF was <40% in 18/113 (16%) and >=40% in 95/113 (84%). There was no significant difference in mean initial BNP values between those with a follow-up LVEF <40% (872 ± 940pg/ml), >=40% (704 ± 737 pg/ml), or not done (661 ± 649 pg/ml, p=0.5). Conclusions: Follow-up measures of LVEF did not occur in almost 50% of patients with a high BNP where the information may have led to institution of life-prolonging therapy. Of those that did have a follow-up study a new diagnosis of depressesd LVEF was noted in 16%. Screening of existing BNP and LVEF data and may be an efficient strategy to identify patients that may benefit from life-prolonging therapy for heart failure.

Abstract 15436: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and MACE in Women With Signs and Symptoms of Ischemia: Data From the WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation)

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Wu ◽  
Marie Lauzon ◽  
Jenna Maughan ◽  
Leslee J Shaw ◽  
Sheryl F Kelsey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Relatively high left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (>65%) in women was recently associated with higher all-cause mortality over 6 years follow-up in the CONFIRM study. We sought to evaluate high EF and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. Methods: The WISE original cohort (enrolled 1996-2000) is a multicenter prospective study of women with suspected ischemic heart disease undergoing clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography. We investigated the relationship between high (>65%) and normal (55-65%) EF and MACE, defined as all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and heart failure (HF) hospitalization using Kaplan Meier (KM) and regression analyses. Results: A total of 653 women were included (298 high and 355 normal EF). Mean age was 58±11 years and mean EF was 68±7%. There was no significant difference in MACE by EF group over a 10-year follow-up period (log rank p=0.54, Figure ). When patients were stratified by the presence of obstructive CAD, MACE rates remained similar between high and normal EF. High EF was not associated with stroke or HF but had a lower MI risk (log rank p=0.03, Table ). EF was not associated with MACE in a multivariable regression model. Conclusions: Among women presenting with evidence of ischemia, there was no significant difference in MACE between high and normal EF groups. High EF was associated with a lower risk of myocardial infarction as an individual component of MACE.

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Recovery in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction Treated with Sacubitril/Valsartan

Cardiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (5) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Díez-Villanueva ◽  
Lourdes Vicent ◽  
Francisco de la Cuerda ◽  
Alberto Esteban-Fernández ◽  
Manuel Gómez-Bueno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Functional Class ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Background: A significant number of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) experience ventricular function recovery during follow-up. We studied the variables associated with LVEF recovery in patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan (SV) in clinical practice. Methods: We analyzed data from a prospective and multicenter registry including 249 HF outpatients with reduced LVEF who started SV between October 2016 and March 2017. The patients were classified into 2 groups according to LVEF at the end of follow-up (>35%: group R, or ≤35%: group NR). Results: After a mean follow-up of 7 ± 0.1 months, 62 patients (24.8%) had LVEF >35%. They were older (71.3 ± 10.8 vs. 67.5 ± 12.1 years, p = 0.025), and suffered more often from hypertension (83.9 vs. 73.8%, p = 0.096) and higher blood pressure before and after SV (both, p < 0.01). They took more often high doses of beta-blockers (30.6 vs. 27.8%, p = 0.002), with a smaller proportion undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (14.8 vs. 29.0%, p = 0.028) and fewer implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICD; 32.8 vs. 67.9%, p < 0.001), this being the only predictive variable of NR in the multivariate analysis (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13–0.47, p < 0.0001). At the end of follow-up, the mean LVEF in group R was 41.9 ± 8.1% (vs. 26.3 ± 4.7% in group NR, p < 0.001), with an improvement compared with the initial LVEF of 14.6 ± 10.8% (vs. 0.8 ± 4.5% in group NR, p < 0.0001). Functional class improved in both groups, mainly in group R (p = 0.035), with fewer visits to the emergency department (11.5 vs. 21.6%, p = 0.07). Conclusions: In patients with LVEF ≤35% treated with SV, not carrying an ICD was independently associated with LVEF recovery, which was related to greater improvement in functional class.

P4525Differential effect of CRT in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: longterm follow-up data from a single center cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P C Kahr ◽  
P Kaufmann ◽  
J Kuster ◽  
J Tonko ◽  
A Breitenstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Male Gender ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Background Cardiac-resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in selected symptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and wide QRS complex. However, some patients fail to benefit from CRT. Data on the differential role of baseline and follow-up left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on outcome in patients with ischemic compared to non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM, N-ICM) is controversial. Purpose To test, whether ICM and N-ICM patients differ in outcome after CRT during long-term follow-up and whether predictors for survival after CRT differ between the two groups. Methods All patients undergoing CRT implantation at our institution between November 2000 and January 2015 were evaluated (n=418). All ICM/N-ICM patients with follow-up echocardiography within 1 year after CRT implantation (FU1) and a second echocardiography >1 year after FU1 (FU2) were included in the analysis (n=253). Primary post-hoc defined study endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, heart transplantation or implantation of a ventricular assist device. Results Compared to patients with N-ICM (n=160, median age 64 years [IQR 54–71], 71% male), ICM patients (n=93, median age 70 years [IQR 61–75], 84% male) were significantly older and had a higher prevalence of male gender, concomitant diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension. There were no significant differences in pre-implantation echocardiographic features (LVEF, LVEDV, RV-FAC, severity of mitral regurgitation), QRS width and NT-proBNP levels between the groups. However, the hazard for reaching the primary endpoint was significantly higher in patients with ICM compared to N-ICM both on univariate analysis (HR 1.62 [95% CI 1.09–2.42], p=0.018) and after multivariate correction (aHR 2.13 [1.24–3.66], p=0.006). While higher NT-proBNP levels and greater right ventricular fractional area change were positively correlated with the hazard of death in both ICM and N-ICM (see Figure), lower LVEF at baseline was associated with an increased risk of death only in ICM but not in N-ICM (HR 0.95 [0.91–0.99], p=0.029 vs. HR 1.00 [0.96–1.04], p=0.945). Male gender, lower BMI and NYHA class ≥ III were positively correlated with the endpoint in N-ICM, but not in ICM. Importantly, LVEF at FU1 (median 4.7 months after implantation) and FU2 (median 47.1 months after implantation) were found to correlate signficantly with the endpoint in both ICM and N-ICM. Conclusion Our findings highlight important differences in ischemic and non-ischemic patient populations undergoing CRT. While overall survival of patients with N-ICM exceeds survival in ICM, several other factors (including LVEF) have differential effects on response to CRT in these two patient groups.

P942Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with critical limb ischemia: from I-PAD registry

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Fujimori ◽  
A Nagae ◽  
T Miura ◽  
T Katoh ◽  
M Hirabayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Critical Limb Ischemia ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
End Point

Abstract Introduction In patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) it is known that malnutrition, low BMI, inflammation and so on are prognostic factors. But, it is unclear whether left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) affects prognosis of CLI patients. So we investigated that LVEF affects prognosis of CLI patients. Methods From July 2015 to July 2016, 371 consecutive peripheral artery disease patients who performed endovascular treatment (EVT) were enrolled in I-PAD registry. 179 of them were patients with CLI. We could conduct follow up survey about 126 (age 75.5±11.1, men 63.5%) and divided two groups according to their LVEF (group with LVEF≤40%, n=13, group without LVEF≤40%, n=113). The primary end point was major adverse limb events (MALE: TLR, TVR, major amputations) and secondary end point was all-cause death. Results The median follow-up period was 11.5±6.7 months. The 18 months MALE rate was significant higher in the group with low LVEF than group without low LVEF (76.9% vs 37.2% p<0.05). The 18months all-cause death tended to be higher in the group with low LVEF, however there was not statistical significance in the two groups (53.8% vs 24.8% p=0.09). Conclusion LVEF was associated with MALE in patients with CLI.

scholarly journals Sequential cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction for prediction of subsequent events in a large multicenter STEMI registry

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Gavara ◽  
V Marcos-Garces ◽  
C Rios-Navarro ◽  
MP Lopez-Lereu ◽  
JV Monmeneu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
P Value ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by “Instituto de Salud Carlos III” and “Fondos Europeos de Desarrollo Regional FEDER” Background. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the best tool for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) quantification, but as yet the prognostic value of sequential LVEF assessment for major adverse cardiac event (MACE) prediction after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is uncertain. Purpose. We explored the prognostic impact of sequential assessment of CMR-derived LVEF after STEMI to predict subsequent MACE. Methods. We recruited 1036 STEMI patients in a large multicenter registry. LVEF (reduced [r]: &lt;40%; mid-range [mr]: 40-49%; preserved [p]: ≥50%) was sequentially quantified by CMR at 1 week and after &gt;3 months of follow-up. MACE was regarded as cardiovascular death or re-admission for acute heart failure after follow-up CMR. Results. During a 5.7-year mean follow-up, 82 MACE (8%) were registered. The MACE rate was higher only in patients with LVEF &lt; 40% at follow-up CMR (r-LVEF 22%, mr-LVEF 7%, p-LVEF 6%; p-value &lt; 0.001). Based on LVEF dynamics from 1-week to follow-up CMR, incidence of MACE was 5% for sustained LVEF³40% (n = 783), 13% for improved LVEF (from &lt;40 to ³40%, n = 96), 21% for worsened LVEF (from ³40% to &lt;40%, n = 34) and 22% for sustained LVEF &lt;40% (n = 100), p-value &lt; 0.001. Using a Markov approach that considered all studies performed, transitions towards improved LVEF predominated and only r-LVEF (at any time assessed) was significantly related to higher incidence of subsequent MACE. Conclusions. LVEF constitutes a pivotal CMR index for simple and dynamic post-STEMI risk stratification. Detection of reduced LVEF (&lt;40%) by CMR at any time during follow-up identifies a small subset of patients at high risk of subsequent events.

Acute Coronary Syndrome follow up: Portuguese experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Santos ◽  
H Miranda ◽  
M Santos ◽  
I Almeida ◽  
C Sa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Aldosterone Antagonists ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Predictors Of Mortality ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. OnBehalf Portuguese Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes Background Acute coronary syndrome is a major health problem, with several acute and chronic complications. So, it is imperative identifying factors that can be associated with better and worse prognosis during the follow up these patients. Objective Evaluate predictors of mortality, cardiovascular readmission and all causes of readmission at 1 year follow up in ACS patients. Methods Multicenter retrospective study, based on the Portuguese Registry of ACS between 1/10/2010-4/09/2019. Logistic regression was performed to assess predictors of mortality, cardiovascular readmission and all causes of readmission at 1 year follow up in ACS patients. Results 1492 patients were included, 141 die during the first year. Age &gt; 75 years old (odds ratio (OR) 2.557, p &lt; 0.001, confidence interval (CI) 1.727-3.785), heart rate &lt; 60 (OR 2.686, p = 0.008, CI 1.296-5.569), cardiogenic shock (OR 6.726, p = 0.012, CI 1.512-29.915), creatinine &gt;2mg/dL (OR 1.956, p = 0.023, CI 1.099-3.480), left ventricular ejection fraction &lt;50% (OR 1.911, p = 0.001, CI 1.284-2.844), nitrate (OR 1.589, p = 0.020, CI 1.074-2.351), ivabradine (OR 1.831, p = 0.011, CI 1.146-2.924), aldosterone antagonists (OR 1.632, p = 0.020, CI 1.079-2.468), diuretic (OR 1.625, p = 0.023, CI 1.069-2.472) and mechanical complication d (OR 55.518, p &lt; 0.001, CI 11.516-267.655) were predictors of mortality of 1 year of follow up. Regarding cardiovascular readmission was registered in 291 patients, of a total 1412. Were predictors of cardiovascular readmission previous history of heart failure (OR 1.467, p = 0.003, CI 1.135-1.895), cardiogenic shock (OR 3.447, p = 0.039, CI 1.068-11.128), acetylsalicylic acid previous to ACS (OR 1.751, p = 0.008, CI 1.285-2.385), multivessel disease (OR 1.667, p = 0.002, CI 1.206-2.306), left ventricular ejection fraction &lt;50% (OR 1.489, p = 0.003, CI 1.145-1.938), nitrate (OR 1.812, p &lt; 0.001, CI 1.403-2.341), aldosterone antagonists (OR 1.572, p = 0.004, CI 1.155-2.140) and sustained ventricular tachycardia (OR 55.518, p &lt; 0.001, CI 11.516-267.655). On the other hand 411 patients was readmitted (all causes), in 1455 patients with follow up. Were predictors of all causes of readmission previous history of heart failure (OR 1.347, p = 0.025, CI 1.039-1.747), previous chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1.456, p = 0.041, CI 1.016-2.087), atrial fibrillation (OR 1.439, p = 0.027, CI 1.041-1.988), acetylsalicylic acid previous to ACS (OR 1.473, p = 0.001, CI 1.161-1.869), left ventricular ejection fraction &lt;50% (OR 1.456, p = 0.001, CI 1.166-1.819), nitrate (OR 1.478, p &lt; 0.001, CI 1.192-1.831), aldosterone antagonists (OR 1.493, p = 0.003, CI 1.148-1.943) and sustained ventricular tachycardia (OR 3.792, p = 0.004, CI 1.540-9.337). Conclusions: Left ventricular ejection fraction &lt;50%, nitrate as discharge therapeutic and aldosterone antagonists as discharge therapeutic were predictors of mortality, cardiovascular readmission and readmission for all causes at 1 year follow up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document