scholarly journals Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Slow Progression of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Mouse Models

Author(s):  
James Phie ◽  
Shivshankar Thanigaimani ◽  
Jonathan Golledge

Objective: There are no current effective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) drug therapies. An important limitation of most preclinical studies is that they test the effect of drugs on AAA formation rather than AAA progression. The aim of this study was to systematically review AAA mouse model studies that have tested the effect of interventions in limiting the progression of preestablished AAA. Approach and Results: The literature search identified 35 studies meeting eligibility, and 30 (n=935 mice) contributed to the meta-analyses. AAAs were induced with angiotensin II (n=745 mice), calcium chloride (n=91 mice), or elastase (n=99 mice). Anti-inflammatory drugs (standardized mean difference [SMD], 1.62 [95% CI, 0.93–2.30]), protease inhibitors (SMD, 1.23 [95% CI, 0.52–1.95]), stem cells (SMD, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.05–2.24]), antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs (SMD, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.63–1.22]), and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (SMD, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.58–2.33]) reduced AAA diameter. Interventions initiated soon after model induction commenced were more likely to reduce AAA diameter (R 2 , 16%; P =0.007). Funnel plots suggested possible publication bias. Most studies did not report blinding or sample size calculations, and the risk of bias was considered medium or high in 20 (57%) of the 35 studies. Conclusions: There is low-quality evidence that a range of drugs are effective in limiting AAA progression when administered early after AAA induction in mouse models. Some of these drugs, such as antiplatelet and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, have been reported to be ineffective in clinical trials.

VASA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisato Takagi ◽  
Takuya Umemoto

Abstract. Both coronary and peripheral artery disease are representative atherosclerotic diseases, which are also known to be positively associated with presence of abdominal aortic aneurysm. It is still controversial, however, whether coronary and peripheral artery disease are positively associated with expansion and rupture as well as presence of abdominal aortic aneurysm. In the present article, we overviewed epidemiological evidence, i. e. meta-analyses, regarding the associations of coronary and peripheral artery disease with presence, expansion, and rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm through a systematic literature search. Our exhaustive search identified seven meta-analyses, which suggest that both coronary and peripheral artery disease are positively associated with presence of abdominal aortic aneurysm, may be negatively associated with expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysm, and might be unassociated with rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm.


2020 ◽  
Vol 199 (2) ◽  
pp. 513-526
Author(s):  
Tingting Chen ◽  
Hongliang Zhang ◽  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Mengqi Yang ◽  
Juntao Wu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document