Abstract P035: Predictors of Diabetes Screening in an Ambulatory Clinical Population

Circulation ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 125 (suppl_10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukyung Chung ◽  
Eric C Wong ◽  
Kristen M Azar ◽  
Beinan Zhao ◽  
Diane Lauderdale ◽  
...  

Introduction Early screening for diabetes is the most cost effective way to prevent complications. Diabetes screening rates in a clinical population are unknown. There are well-known racial/ethnic differences in diabetes prevalence, with some Asian Americans racial/ethnic subgroups (e.g. Asian Indian and Filipino) having higher rates than Non Hispanic White (NHW) populations, and this may result in higher rates of diabetes screening for Asian Americans. Hypothesis We hypothesized that, after taking into account other risks factors suggested by national guidelines, Asian Americans may have higher preventive screening rates, given known higher risk for diabetes. Methods We used the electronic health records data from a large multi-specialty, mixed-payer, outpatient, group- practice organization in Northern California, to examine an observational prospective dataset during 1/1/2007-09/30/2010. Active primary care patients who were 35 years or older, not pregnant, identified as Asian (Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese) or non-Hispanic white (NHW), and were free from diabetes at baseline were included (N=110,477). Screening was defined as fasting glucose, oral glucose tolerance test, or HgBA1C. Racial/ethnic differences in screening rates were initially examined with age-sex standardization. We then estimated a Cox proportional hazard model, which adjusted for diabetes clinical risk factors (including age, sex, BMI, high blood pressure, high LDL, low HDL), family history of diabetes, insurance coverage, and frequency of primary care visits. Results Standardized preventive screening rates were higher for all Asian racial/ethnic subgroups (ranging from 82.2%: Japanese to 88.7%: Filipino) than NHW (78.6%)( P<0.05 ). The results were consistent in the fully adjusted Cox model where all the Asian racial/ethnic subgroups, except for Japanese (not significant), were more likely to be screened than NHWs (HR=Asian Indian: 1.29, Chinese: 1.20, Filipino: 1.22, Korean: 1.13, Vietnamese: 1.24; all P<0.01 ). Most clinical risk factors were significant positive predictors of screening, including age, female, high blood pressure, high LDL, low HDL, and family history of diabetes(all P<0.01 ). Conclusions Screening rates for diabetes in an insured, ambulatory care population is generally high (∼80%). Clinical risk factors and Asian race/ethnicity are predictors of appropriate diabetes screening.

Angiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 000331972110280
Author(s):  
Sukru Arslan ◽  
Ahmet Yildiz ◽  
Okay Abaci ◽  
Urfan Jafarov ◽  
Servet Batit ◽  
...  

The data with respect to stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) are mainly confined to main vessel disease. However, there is a lack of information and long-term outcomes regarding isolated side branch disease. This study aimed to evaluate long-term major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in patients with isolated side branch coronary artery disease (CAD). A total of 437 patients with isolated side branch SCAD were included. After a median follow-up of 38 months, the overall MACCE and all-cause mortality rates were 14.6% and 5.9%, respectively. Among angiographic features, 68.2% of patients had diagonal artery and 82.2% had ostial lesions. In 28.8% of patients, the vessel diameter was ≥2.75 mm. According to the American College of Cardiology lesion classification, 84.2% of patients had either class B or C lesions. Age, ostial lesions, glycated hemoglobin A1c, and neutrophil levels were independent predictors of MACCE. On the other hand, side branch location, vessel diameter, and lesion complexity did not affect outcomes. Clinical risk factors seem to have a greater impact on MACCE rather than lesion morphology. Therefore, the treatment of clinical risk factors is of paramount importance in these patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 296 ◽  
pp. 113665
Author(s):  
Gamze Gürcan ◽  
Şevin Hun Şenol ◽  
A. Elif Anıl Yağcıoğlu ◽  
Aygün Ertuğrul

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Smita Prakash ◽  
Amitabh Kumar ◽  
Shyam Bhandari ◽  
Parul Mullick ◽  
AnoopRaj Gogia ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document