Abstract 12540: High-Dose Statins Reduce the Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Angiography: Meta-Analysis of 27 Randomized Controlled Trials

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Firas Rabbat ◽  
Shadi Al Halabi ◽  
Mehdi H Shishehbor
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Contrast Induced Nephropathy ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a common complication of contrast administration during angiography. Short-term high-dose statins have been suggested for the prevention of CIN in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Hypothesis: Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCT) have examined the role of statin in preventing CIN with conflicting results. We expanded on previous meta-analyses by including additional RCTs to provide a better outlook on the efficacy of statins in the prevention of CIN. Methods: We searched Pubmed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and conference abstracts for prospective RCTs that compared short-term high-dose statins to low-dose statins or placebo in patients undergoing CAG, PCI, computed tomography angiography, or peripheral angiography. High-dose statin was defined as Atorvastatin 40-80 mg, Simvastatin 40 mg, and Rosuvastatin 10-40 mg. Study quality was assessed using the Jadad score. Heterogeneity of the studies was analyzed by Cochran’s Q statistics. Mantel Haenszel relative risk was calculated using the random effect model. Results: Twenty seven trials (N=9559) were included in the analysis. Eight of the included trials enrolled patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) exclusively. High-dose statin was associated with statistically significant reduction in the incidence of CIN (RR=0.56; 95% CI 0.46, 0.69; P<001) compared to low-dose statin or placebo. This protective effect remained significant upon looking on trials that enrolled patients with ACS only (RR=0.40; 95% CI 0.29, 0.56; P<001). Subgroup analysis based on the type of statin showed no significant difference between simvastatin, atorvastatin, or rosuvastatin. No heterogeneity was detected among the studied outcomes (I2=0%). Conclusions: Peri-procedural Short-term high-dose statin administration significantly reduces the incidence of CIN in patients undergoing angiography.

scholarly journals Cemented versus uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Abdulkarim ◽  
Prasad Ellanti ◽  
Nicola Motterlini ◽  
Tom Fahey ◽  
John M. O’Byrne
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Implant Fixation ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Optimal Method ◽  
Radiographic Findings ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

The optimal method of fixation for primary total hip replacements (THR), particularly fixation with or without the use of cement is still controversial. In a systematic review and metaanalysis of all randomized controlled trials comparing cemented versus uncemented THRS available in the published literature, we found that there is no significant difference between cemented and uncemented THRs in terms of implant survival as measured by the revision rate. Better short-term clinical outcome, particularly an improved pain score can be obtained with cemented fixation. However, the results are unclear for the long-term clinical and functional outcome between the two groups. No difference was evident in the mortality and the post operative complication rate. On the other hand, the radiographic findings were variable and do not seem to correlate with clinical findings as differences in the surgical technique and prosthesis design might be associated with the incidence of osteolysis. We concluded in our review that cemented THR is similar if not superior to uncemented THR, and provides better short term clinical outcomes. Further research, improved methodology and longer follow up are necessary to better define specific subgroups of patients in whom the relative benefits of cemented and uncemented implant fixation can be clearly demonstrated.

scholarly journals The Effect of Virtual Reality on Preoperative Anxiety: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 3151
Author(s):  
Chang-Hoon Koo ◽  
Jin-Woo Park ◽  
Jung-Hee Ryu ◽  
Sung-Hee Han
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Preoperative Anxiety ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

Virtual reality (VR), a technology that provides a stimulated sensory experience, has recently been implemented in various fields of medicine. Several studies have investigated the efficacy of VR on preoperative anxiety. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to validate whether VR could relieve preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing surgery. Electronic databases were searched to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of VR on preoperative anxiety. The primary outcome was defined as the preoperative anxiety scores. We estimated the effect size using the standard mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random effect model. Ultimately, 10 RCTs, with a total of 813 patients, were included in the final analysis. Preoperative anxiety was significantly lower in the VR group than in the control group (SMD −0.64, 95% CI −1.08 to −0.20, p = 0.004). In a subgroup analysis, the preoperative anxiety scores were lower in the VR group than in the control group in pediatric patients (SMD −0.71, 95% CI −1.14 to −0.27, p = 0.002), whereas a significant difference was not observed between the two groups in adult patients (p = 0.226). The results of this meta-analysis indicated that VR could decrease preoperative anxiety, especially in pediatric patients.

scholarly journals Early aspirin discontinuation following acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Guedeney ◽  
J Mesnier ◽  
S Sorrentino ◽  
F Abcha ◽  
M Zeitouni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background The respective ischemic and bleeding risks of early aspirin discontinuation following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain. Objectives To evaluate the safety and efficacy of early aspirin discontinuation in ACS or PCI patients treated with P2Y12 inhibitors with or without anticoagulants. Methods We performed a review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a P2Y12 inhibitor-based single antiplatelet strategy following early aspirin discontinuation to a strategy of sustained dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in ACS or PCI patients requiring or not anticoagulation for another indication. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding while non-major bleeding and all bleeding were secondary safety endpoints. The primary efficacy endpoint was all-cause mortality while secondary efficacy endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), myocardial infarction (MI), definite stent thrombosis (ST) or any stroke. We estimated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effect models. The study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019139576). Results We included 9 RCTs comprising 40,621 patients.Compared to prolonged DAPT, major bleeding (2.2% vs. 2.8%; RR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.87; p=0.002; I2: 63%), non-major bleeding (5.0% vs. 6.1%; RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.94; p=0.02; I2:87%) and all bleeding (7.4% vs. 9.9%; RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.79; p&lt;0.0001; I2: 88%) were significantly reduced with early aspirin discontinuation (Figure 1), without significant difference for all-cause death (p=0.60), MACCE (p=0.60), MI (p=0.77), definite ST (p=0.63), and any stroke (p=0.59). Results were consistent in patients with or without anticoagulation, without significant interaction for any outcomes but MI (p=0.04). Conclusions In patients on DAPT after an ACS or a PCI, early aspirin discontinuation prevents bleeding events with no effect on the ischemic risk or mortality. Figure 1. Central illustration Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document