Abstract 17235: Trends in Endocarditis Hospitalizations at US Children's Hospitals From 2003-2014: Impact of the 2007 American Heart Association Antibiotic Prophylaxis Guidelines

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine E Bates ◽  
Matthew Hall ◽  
Samir S Shah ◽  
Kevin D Hill ◽  
Sara K Pasquali

Introduction: Over the past decade, national organizations in several countries have released more restrictive guidelines for infective endocarditis (IE) prophylaxis, including the American Heart Association (AHA) 2007 guidelines. Multiple initial studies demonstrated no change in IE rates over time following release of these guidelines, however a more recent analysis over a longer time period in the UK suggested an increase in IE. This prior study primarily included adults. Current IE trends in the pediatric population are unknown. Methods: Children (<18 years) hospitalized with IE at 29 US centers participating in the Pediatric Health Information Systems Database from 2003-2014 were eligible for inclusion. Our primary analysis focused on IE most directly related to the change in the AHA guidelines, and included community-acquired IE cases (antibiotics covering oral streptococcal species started within 7 days of admission) in those >5 years of age (most likely to be receiving dental care). Interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate IE rates over time indexed to total hospital admissions. Results: A total of 841 IE cases were identified. Median age was 13 years (interquartile range 9-15 years). In the pre-guideline period, the IE rate increased slightly over time (+0.013 IE cases/1000 hospitalizations per 6-month period, see Figure). In the post-guideline period there was a similar trend in IE rates (+0.012 IE cases/1000 hospitalizations per 6-month period) with no significant difference in slope in the pre vs. post period (p=0.9). Additional analyses in those with congenital heart disease, and in those hospitalized with any type of IE (not limited to oral streptococci) at any age, revealed similar results. Conclusions: In contrast to a recent UK study, we found no evidence of a change in IE hospitalization rates associated with revised IE prophylaxis guidelines over an 11 year period across 29 US children’s hospitals.

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 686-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine E. Bates ◽  
Matthew Hall ◽  
Samir S. Shah ◽  
Kevin D. Hill ◽  
Sara K. Pasquali

AbstractObjectiveNational organisations in several countries have recently released more restrictive guidelines for infective endocarditis prophylaxis, including the American Heart Association 2007 guidelines. Initial studies demonstrated no change in infective endocarditis rates over time; however, a recent United Kingdom study suggested an increase; current paediatric trends are unknown.MethodsChildren (<18 years) hospitalised with infective endocarditis at 29 centres participating in the Pediatric Health Information Systems Database from 2003 to 2014 were eligible for inclusion. Our primary analysis focussed on infective endocarditis most directly related to the change in guidelines and included community-acquired cases in those >5 years of age. Interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate rates over time indexed to total hospitalisations.ResultsA total of 841 cases were identified. The median age was 13 years (interquartile range 9–15 years). In the pre-guideline period, there was a slight increase in the rate of infective endocarditis by 0.13 cases/10,000 hospitalisations per semi-annual period. In the post-guideline period, the rate of infective endocarditis increased by 0.12 cases/10,000 hospitalisations per semi-annual period. There was no significant difference in the rate of change in the pre- versus post-guidelines period (p=0.895). Secondary analyses in children >5 years of age with CHD and in children hospitalised with any type of infective endocarditis at any age revealed similar results.ConclusionsWe found no significant change in infective endocarditis hospitalisation rates associated with revised prophylaxis guidelines over 11 years across 29 United States children’s hospitals.


2012 ◽  
Vol 163 (5) ◽  
pp. 894-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara K. Pasquali ◽  
Xia He ◽  
Zeinab Mohamad ◽  
Brian W. McCrindle ◽  
Jane W. Newburger ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
William Pajerowski ◽  
Steven R Messe ◽  
Judy Jia ◽  
Michael Abboud ◽  
Guy David ◽  
...  

Objective: In December 2003, the Joint Commission began certifying primary stroke centers (PSCs). Preferential routing of suspected stroke cases by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to PSCs is recommended by the American Heart Association and Philadelphia EMS officially enacted such a policy in October 2011. We assessed trends in hospital bypass over time and estimated the time cost of bypassing the nearest hospital. Methods: Data from the Philadelphia EMS database was used to identify patients with a prehospital impression of stroke, defined by EMS provider impression, between January 2004 and December 2013. PSC status and date of initial certification was determined for each of the 22 hospitals in the region. Travel distances and estimated transport times from the scene to all area hospitals were calculated. Results: The number of PSCs increased over time from 1 hospital in 2004 to 17 in 2013. There were a total of 15,034 cases. The proportion of cases arriving at PSCs increased from 6.3% in 2004 to 87.6% in 2013. There was an increase in the total proportion of cases in which EMS bypassed the closest hospital, 36.9% in 2004 to 41.4% in 2013, p=.006. As more hospitals became PSCs, bypass of the closest hospital to arrive at non-PSCs decreased while bypass of the closest hospital to arrive at PSCs increased (Figure 1). Hospitals that would eventually become certified as PSCs received 79.8% of stroke cases in 2004 and 87.6% in 2013, p<.001. Patients who bypassed the closest hospital for a PSC had longer mean transport times than patients transported to the closest, non-PSC, 9.0 vs. 5.0 minutes, p<0.001. Conclusions: EMS bypass of the closest hospital was common before there was an official destination policy and has only modestly increased over the study period. Increasing numbers of patients were treated at PSCs over time, primarily due to increasing numbers of PSCs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-110
Author(s):  
Payman Asadi ◽  
Seyyed Mahdi Zia Ziabari ◽  
Vahid Monsef-Kasmaei

Objective: Awareness of the changes concerning the clinical guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is essential for nurses. This study aimed at assessing the nurses’ knowledge of the 2015 American Heart Association basic life support guideline algorithm. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, the knowledge of 183 nurses working in emergency departments, intensive care unit (ICU) and coronary care unit (CCU) regarding the 2015 American Heart Association basic life support guideline algorithm was investigated. Data were collected by a 20-item questionnaire regarding the knowledge needed for resuscitation operations as well as the identification of the early stages of cardiac arrest. Nurses with a score of 10 and less were put in the poor group, 11-15 in the fair group, and score of more than 15 in the good group. Results: Results showed that the highest percentage of the right answer was observed in questions 20 (98.4%), 11 (93.4%), and 1 (88%), while the lowest percentage of the correct answer was found in questions 13 (30.6%), 2 (31.1%), and 3 (32.8%). Mean ± SD of knowledge score was 12.3±2.2. A statistically significant difference was observed between knowledge of ICU nurses with an experience of basic life support educational course and those with no experience of such education. The knowledge score of educated and non-educated nurses was 11.5±2.2 and 13.2±2.5, respectively. Conclusion: This study indicated that ICU nurses do not have enough knowledge about basic life support of the 2015 American Heart Association guideline. Development of knowledge is one of the important components of professional expansion in nursing education programs.


2003 ◽  
Vol 22 (05) ◽  
pp. 222-232
Author(s):  
H.-H. Eckstein

ZusammenfassungNach Durchführung prospektiv-randomisierter Studien liegen für die Karotis-Thrombendarteriektomie (KarotisTEA) höhergradiger Karotisstenosen gesicherte Indikationen auf dem Evidenzlevel Ia mit dem Empfehlungsgrad A vor. Dies betrifft sowohl >50%ige symptomatische als auch >60%ige asymptomatische Stenosen (NASCET-Kriterien). In Subgruppen-Analysen aus NASCET konnten klinische und morphologische Variablen identifiziert werden, die auf ein besonders hohes Risiko eines karotisbedingten Schlaganfalls im natürlichen Verlauf hinweisen. Patienten mit folgenden Variablen profitieren daher besonders von der Karotis-TEA: Stenosegrad >90%, schlechter Kollateralkreislauf, kontralateraler Karotisverschluss, Plaque-Ulzerationen, Tandemstenosen, intraluminale Thromben, nicht-lakunärer Hirninfarkt, Lebensalter >75 Jahre, komplexes klinisches Risikoprofil, Hemisphären-TIA (vs. Amaurosis fugax), männliches Geschlecht. Der präventive Effekt der Karotis-TEA kann jedoch nur unter Beachtung eines niedrigen perioperativen Schlaganfallbzw. Letalitätrisikos realisiert werden. Nach Empfehlungen der American Heart Association (AHA) darf das perioperative Risiko 3% bei asymptomatischen Stenosen ohne kontralaterale Stenose, 5% bei asymptomatischen Stenosen mit hochgradiger kontralateraler Stenose oder Verschluss und 6% bei symptomatischen >50%ige Stenosen (NASCET-Kriterien) nicht überschreiten. Die Ergebnisse der Qualitätssicherung Karotis-TEA der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gefäßchirurgie (DGG) zeigen, dass diese maximal akzeptablen Obergrenzen zum Teil deutlich unterschritten werden. Vor diesem Hintergrund stellt das Stenting von Karotisstenosen einen klinischen Heilversuch dar, der nur nach interdisziplinärem Konsil und/oder i. R. randomisierter Studien zulässig ist.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document