Abstract 12649: A Faster and Safe Way to Initiate Sotalol Therapy for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
John Somberg ◽  
Alexander A Vinks ◽  
Min Dong ◽  
janos molnar

Sotalol drug therapy is frequently employed to prevent the recurrence of highly symptomatic atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF, AFb). Sotalol can cause QTc prolongation that is proportional to blood concentration. Excessive concentration can cause Torsade de Pointes ventricular tachycardia (TdP). Because the risk of TdP, initiation of oral sotalol therapy is mandated by FDA to be in-hospital for a minimum of three days under ECG monitoring with facilities and personnel able to provide cardiac resuscitation. With oral administration (bid), 3 days are needed to reach maximal steady-state blood concentrations (Cmax ss) and thus maximal QTc prolongation. Three hospital days in a telemetry bed is costly and considerable expenditure of time and resources. Availability of IV sotalol makes it possible to reduce the loading time from 3 days to 1 day. The IV to oral loading regimen has been developed by model informed drug development. Serum sotalol concentrations and corresponding QTc were obtained from a previously performed bioequivalence study in healthy volunteers who received a single dose of oral and IV sotalol. NONMEM software package was used for population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation. First Order Conditional Estimation method with Interaction (FOCE-INTER) was used for computation. We chose to administer IV sotalol over 1 hour to obtain Cmax ss target in a timeframe convenient for medical staff to supervise. The simulation for loading to the Cmax target produced by 80 mg PO bid is shown in the Figure; 60 mg IV sotalol is administered over 1 hour followed by 80 mg oral sotalol at 5 hours from start of infusion end then a second oral dose of 80 mg at 12 hours. One can target 120 mg maintenance dose by loading 90 mg IV over 1 hr followed by 120 mg oral dosing. Sotalol concentration will peak in 2-4 hours following each oral administration, thus in 21 hour there will be 3 sotalol peak concentrations. This permits evaluation of QTc response and risk of TdP all within a 1 day admission.

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
John C Somberg ◽  
Alexander A Vinks ◽  
Min Dong ◽  
janos molnar

Sotalol is frequently employed to prevent the recurrence of highly symptomatic atrial fibrillation or flutter, but recurrence is not unusual and may require dose escalation. Sotalol can cause QTc prolongation proportional to blood concentration and at times may cause Torsade de Pointes ventricular tachycardia (TdP). Because the risk of TdP, dose escalation of oral sotalol therapy is mandated by FDA to be in-hospital for a minimum of 3 days under ECG monitoring with facilities and personnel able to provide cardiac resuscitation. With oral administration (bid), 3 days are needed to reach the new maximal steady-state blood concentrations (Cmax ss) and thus maximal QTc . Three hospital days in a telemetry bed is costly of time and resources. IV sotalol makes it possible to reduce the escalation time from 3 days to 1 day. The IV to oral dose escalation has been developed by model informed drug development. Serum sotalol concentrations and corresponding QTc were obtained from a bioequivalence study in healthy volunteers who received a single dose of oral and IV sotalol. NONMEM software package was used for population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation. First Order Conditional Estimation method with Interaction (FOCE-INTER) was used for computation. We chose to administer IV sotalol over 1 hour to obtain the new Cmax ss target in a timeframe convenient for medical staff to supervise. Simulation for dose escalation from 80 to 120 mg bid is shown in the Figure; 75 mg IV sotalol is administered over 1 hour followed by 120 mg oral sotalol at 5 hours from start of infusion, then a second oral dose of 120 mg at 12 hours. One can target escalation from 120 to 160 mg by loading 90 mg IV over 1 hr followed by 160 mg oral dosing. Sotalol concentration will peak in 2-4 hours following each oral administration, thus in 21 hour there will be 3 sotalol peak concentrations. This permits evaluation of QTc response and risk of TdP all within a 1 day admission.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2522-2522
Author(s):  
D. Sonnichsen ◽  
S. Liao ◽  
A. Berkenblit ◽  
J. Boni

2522 Background: Temsirolimus (TEMSR) is an mTOR inhibitor approved for treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, and under development for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In MCL, TEMSR showed a dose-related increase in median progression-free survival [4.8 vs. 3.4 mo] and objective response rate [22% vs 6%] for 175 mg x 3 wks then 75 or 25 mg weekly regimens (175/75-mg and 175/25-mg), respectively. We aim to characterize the population pharmacokinetic exposure, covariate influence, and differences afforded by these regimens. Methods: Nonlinear mixed-effects models of TEMSR and sirolimus (SIR; major active metabolite) blood concentrations were defined in healthy subjects and patients. Modeling for TEMSR employed a 4-compartment model with saturable distribution to red cells and peripheral tissue, and modeling for SIR utilized a linear 2- compartment model with factor for dose. Covariates included demographic factors, clinical labs, and disease condition. Following validation, simulations with variability were used to evaluate effects of covariates on exposure. Results: Final datasets comprised 1342 observations from 150 subjects (TEMSR) and 1648 observations from 279 subjects (SIR). In a typical patient (56-year-old male weighing 76.5 kg), disease affected TEMSR clearance (62.4 L/h in MCL, 92.1 L/h in breast cancer vs. 112 L/h for other subjects). Dose, single vs. multiple, and body weight affected SIR apparent clearance. Simulations for the 175/75-mg regimen indicate that significant covariates yield only modest differences on blood exposures. For MCL (175/75-mg regimen), TEMSR Cmax (week 3) was 2574 ng/mL and SIR Ctrough (week 6) was 10.7 ng/mL. AUC for the 75-mg maintenance arm was ∼2.3-fold (TEMSR) and ∼3.5-fold higher (SIR) than respective values of the 25-mg arm. Correlation of average AUC to clinical response was not apparent. Conclusions: No significant differential effects were observed for age, gender, race, or hepatic and renal laboratory measures. Covariates of disease, while significant, have only modest effects on the exposure profile. Higher clinical responses observed with the 175/75-mg regimen as compared with the 175/25-mg regimen may critically derive from differences in exposure. [Table: see text]


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 1657-1670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maiara Cássia Pigatto ◽  
Bibiana Verlindo de Araujo ◽  
Bruna Gaelzer Silva Torres ◽  
Stephan Schmidt ◽  
Paolo Magni ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (15) ◽  
pp. 8031
Author(s):  
Iris G. M. Schouten ◽  
Richard A. Mumford ◽  
Dirk Jan A. R. Moes ◽  
Pieter S. Hiemstra ◽  
Jan Stolk

In alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD), neutrophil serine proteases such as elastase and proteinase 3 (PR3) are insufficiently inhibited. A previous study in AATD patients showed a higher plasma level of the specific PR3-generated fibrinogen-derived peptide AαVal541, compared with healthy controls. Here, we analyzed the course of AαVal541 plasma levels during 4 weeks after a single iv dose of 240 mg/kg AAT in ten patients with genotype Z/Rare or Rare/Rare. To this end, we developed an immunoassay to measure AαVal541 in plasma and applied population pharmacokinetic modeling for AAT. The median AαVal541 plasma level before treatment was 140.2 nM (IQR 51.5–234.8 nM)). In five patients who received AAT for the first time, AαVal541 levels decreased to 20.6 nM (IQR 5.8–88.9 nM), and in five patients who already had received multiple infusions before, it decreased to 26.2 nM (IQR 22.31–35.0 nM). In 9 of 10 patients, AαVal541 levels were reduced to the median level of healthy controls (21.4 nM; IQR 16.7–30.1 nM). At 7–14 days after treatment, AαVal541 levels started to increase again in all patients. Our results show that fibrinopeptide AαVal541 may serve as a biochemical footprint to assess the efficacy of in vivo inhibition of PR3 activity in patients receiving intravenous AAT augmentation therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document