Abstract 14576: Durability of Valve-sparing Tetralogy of Fallot Repair
Introduction: While valve-sparing repair is ideal for Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), it’s durability and which patients may benefit from a transannular patch remains unclear. To this end, we reviewed our experience with valve-sparing TOF repair. Methods: Retrospective review was performed of all primary TOF operations at our institution from 1/2008 to 12/2018. Standard demographic, operative, and echo data were collected, along with clinical outcomes. Transannular patch and valve-sparing repair groups were then compared. Results: Sixty-eight patients underwent TOF repair with a mean age of 4.1±2.2 months and weight of 5.7±1.8 kg. There was no difference in age or weight between patients who underwent a transannular patch repair and valve-sparing repair (Table). There was also no difference in the frequency of hypercyanotic spells or beta-blocker use. As expected the pre-operative pulmonary valve size and z-score were significantly different between groups. Bypass times were longer in the transannular patch group (176±40 vs. 144±40 minutes, p=0.005). There were no differences in post-operative complications. At last follow-up (median 41.5 months) there was a trend of a higher peak pulmonary valve gradient (p=0.07) in the valve-sparing group, but no difference in pulmonary valve annulus z-scores. Additionally, the pulmonary valve z-scores in the valve-sparing group decreased from -2.3±1.0 on pre-discharge echocardiogram to -1.2±1.6 on last follow-up, with the peak gradient on pre-discharge 20 (33) mmHg stable on last follow-up at 18 (29) mmHg and degree of pulmonary regurgitation stable. There was one reoperation in the cohort: a pulmonary valve replacement in a patient who had undergone a transannular patch repair 6 years prior. Conclusions: Valve-sparing TOF patients demonstrated stable repairs with pulmonary valve growth, acceptable gradients, minimal regurgitation, and high freedom from re-intervention during follow-up.