Abstract 15311: Drivers Associated With Dense Fibrotic Regions Are Critical Targets in Extra-Pulmonary Vein Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan M Subr ◽  
Uma Mylavarapu ◽  
Lisa Hoenie ◽  
Allison Wilson ◽  
Katelynn M Helfrich ◽  
...  

Background: Multielectrode mapping (MEM) of extra-pulmonary vein (PV) targeted ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) drivers suffers from false positives. Early studies suggest that true AF drivers are anchored to arrhythmogenic fibrosis, which can be visualized with late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to distinguish them from false positive drivers on MEM. Hypothesis: Driver regions integral to AF correlate with high atrial fibrosis; therefore, ablation of MEM-defined drivers within fibrotic regions may lead to better outcomes than MEM-defined drivers outside fibrosis. Methods: Pre-ablation, 10 PsAF patients (Pts) (70% male; 65±11 y/o) underwent LGE-CMR at 3T (0.625x0.625x1.25mm 3 , 0.2mmol/kg gadolinium). During ablation, MEM (64-electrode basket catheter) was used to identify Pt-specific extra-PV drivers. Retrospectively, both left (LA) and right atria (RA) were analyzed with atria-specific fibrosis masks (voxels exceeding an intensity of 3-3.5 standard deviations above the mean intensity of nonfibrotic atrial wall). Ablated drivers were classified as fibrotic driver (dense or patchy) or nonfibrotic driver by LGE-CMR and MEM correlation. Results: 30 drivers were ablated in 10 PsAF Pts (2±1 LA drivers/Pt, 1±1 RA drivers/Pt) and were classified if anchored to dense (n=16, 45.4±31.7%, 2.6±1.8cm 2 ), patchy (n=11, 8.9±13.5%, 2.0±2.5cm 2 ), or no (n=3, 2.3±2.0%) fibrosis. At follow-up (13±7 mos), 7/10 Pts remained free from AF and atrial flutter, all of whom had at least one dense fibrosis driver ablated and all but 1 Pt had ablations limited to fibrotic drivers. 2/3 patients with failure at follow-up had a nonfibrotic driver ablated. Conclusion: Our results suggest that limiting ablation of AF drivers to those anchored to dense fibrotic substrate may improve long-term AF-free survival. Identification of Pt-specific fibrotic substrate by LGE-CMR may help specificity of MEM ablation targets for successful PsAF treatment.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seigo Yamashita ◽  
Michifumi Tokuda ◽  
Saagar Mahida ◽  
Hidenori Sato ◽  
Hirotsugu Ikewaki ◽  
...  

AbstractThe optimal ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) remains to be defined. We sought to compare very long-term outcomes between linear ablation and electrogram (EGM)-guided ablation for PsAF. In a retrospective analysis, long-term arrhythmia-free survival compared between two propensity-score matched cohorts, one with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and linear ablation including roof/mitral isthmus line (LINE-group, n = 52) and one with PVI and EGM-guided ablation (EGM-group; n = 52). Overall, 99% of patients underwent successful PVI. Complete block following linear ablation was achieved for 94% of roof lines and 81% of mitral lines (both lines blocked in 75%). AF termination by EGM-guided ablation was accomplished in 40% of patients. Non-PV foci were targeted in 7 (13%) in the LINE-group and 5 (10%) patients in the EGM-group (p = 0.76). During 100 ± 28 months of follow-up, linear ablation was associated with superior arrhythmia-free survival after the initial and last procedure (1.8 ± 0.9 procedures) compared with EGM-group (Logrank test: p = 0.0001 and p = 0.045, respectively). In multivariable analysis, longer AF duration and EGM-guided ablation remained as independent predictors of atrial arrhythmia recurrence. Linear ablation might be a more effective complementary technique to PVI than EGM-guided ablation for PsAF ablation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Musat ◽  
N Milstein ◽  
R Shaw ◽  
A Bhatt ◽  
M Preminger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cryoballoon (CB) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is increasingly being used in patients (pts) with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there are limited data about the pattern of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in these pts. Objective To assess, using an implantable loop recorder (ILR), the patterns of AF recurrence following CB PVI in pts with persistent atrial fibrillation. Methods We enrolled consecutive pts with persistent AF ablation undergoing their first CB ablation. Other cavotricuspid isthmus ablation when indicated, no other ablation was performed. A Reveal LINQ ILR (Medtronic) was implanted <3 months following ablation; all pts had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. The recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia was determined and adjudicated; 4 distinct AF patterns were characterized (Figure). Results We studied 64 pts (66±9 years; 50 [78%] male; CHA2DS2-VASc 2.6±1.9) with persistent AF; 52 (81%) pts were on an antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) peri-ablation. During 803±361 days of follow-up, 33 (52%) pts had their 1st AF recurrence 91–365 days post-ablation and another 17 (27%) pts had their 1st AF recurrence >365 days post-ablation. No AF was seen in 14 (31%) pts. Most pts (33 of 50, 66%) with AF recurrence presented with 1 of 3 distinct patterns of paroxysmal AF (Figure), which ranged from 22 min to 124 hours. In 2/3 of these pts, all AF recurrences lasted <24 hours. Only 17 (34%) pts recurred with persistent AF. Conclusion Following single CB PVI, most pts with persistent AF remained free of persistent AF during long-term follow-up. Most pts with recurrent AF have 1 of 3 distinct patterns with episodes commonly last <24 hours. These data suggest that CB PVI ablation may halt AF progression in pts initially presenting with persistent AF.


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Guhl ◽  
Donald Siddoway ◽  
Evan Adelstein ◽  
Samir Saba ◽  
Andrew Voigt ◽  
...  

Introduction: Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has emerged as an alternative to radiofrequency PVI for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The optimal ablation strategy for patients with persistent AF is unclear, as data on Cryoballoon PVI alone are limited. Methods: We analyzed a prospective registry of consecutive patients with persistent AF who underwent Cryoballoon PVI at a single center between 2011 and 2014. Patients were assessed for AF recurrence (including any atrial arrhythmia) after a 3 month blanking period at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and as needed for symptoms post PVI. Recurrence was based on typical symptoms or ECG/ event monitor evidence of AF. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate AF-free survival. Results: The 69 patients who underwent Cryoballoon PVI were aged 59 ± 8 years, 86% male, 54% HTN, had a CHADS2-VASC score 1.6 ± 1.2, and had a LA dimension 4.5 ± 0.6 cm. The AF recurrence-free rate at 1-year post-procedure was 59%. Overall, AF-free survival was 50% at the mean follow-up of 607 days. In comparing patients with persistent AF duration <1 year vs. >1 year, there was a trend toward greater AF recurrence-free rates in the <1 year group (66% vs 55%, p=0.09) Conclusions: Cryoballoon PVI appears to be an effective initial strategy in treating persistent AF, with an AF recurrence-free rate of 59% at 1 year.


EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Kettering

Abstract Background Catheter ablation has become the first line of therapy in patients with symptomatic, recurrent, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation. Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation is still the standard approach in these patients. However, the results are not very favourable and more complex ablation strategies are the subject of current controversy. Therefore, we have evaluated the effect of an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium on the long-term outcome. Methods A total of 220 patients (114 men, 106 women; mean age 69 years (SD ± 14 years)) with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation underwent a circumferential pulmonary vein ablation procedure in combination with an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium (group A). After discharge, patients were scheduled for repeated visits at the arrhythmia clinic at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and 102 months after the ablation procedure. The long-term follow-up data was compared to 220 patients who underwent circumferential pulmonary vein ablation without an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium (group B). Results The ablation procedure could be performed as planned in all patients. Fifty-one out of 220 patients (23.2 %) in group A and 53 out of 220 patients (24.1 %) in group B experienced an arrhythmia recurrence within the first 3 months after ablation requiring an electrical cardioversion. At 102-month follow-up, analysis of a 168-hour ECG recording revealed no evidence for an arrhythmia recurrence in 125/220 patients (56.8 %) in group A and in 103/220 patients (46.8 %) in group B. In 66/220 patients (30.0 %) in group A and 59/220 patients (26.8 %) in group B, only short episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were documented. In 29 patients (13.2 %) in group A, a recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation (&gt; 48 hours) was revealed by the long-term recordings (group B: 58 patients (26.4 %)). The lower arrhythmia recurrence rate in group A was partially due to a lower incidence of atypical atrial flutter after catheter ablation. The rate of repeat ablation procedures was significantly lower in group A than in group B. There were no major complications. Conclusions Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation comprising a circumferential pulmonary vein ablation and an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium provides more favourable results than circumferential pulmonary vein ablation alone. The effect is more pronounced during long-term than during short-term follow-up.


EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Hwang ◽  
M Kim ◽  
H Yu ◽  
T Kim ◽  
J Uhm ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by grants [HI18C0070] and [HI19C0114] from the Korea Health 21 R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, and a grant [NRF-2020R1A2B01001695] from the Basic Science Research Program run by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF). Background Although extra-pulmonary vein (PV) left atrial (LA) linear ablation has been performed during catheter ablation (CA) of persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), the long-term efficacy and safety of this procedure have not yet been verified. Purpose We investigated whether an anterior line (AL) and posterior box ablation (POBA) in addition to circumferential PV isolation (CPVI) improves the rhythm without worsening the LA function in PeAF patients. Methods We retrospectively compared the additional AL + POBA and CPVI alone groups in 604 patients with PeAF who underwent regular rhythm follow-ups (16.9%; males 79.3%, 58.5 ± 10.7 years of age) after propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was AF recurrence after single procedures and secondary endpoints were the cardioversion rate, response to anti arrhythmic drugs, LA changes, and re-conduction rates of the de-novo ablation lesion set. Results After a mean follow-up of 45.2 ± 33.6 months, the clinical recurrence rate did not significantly differ between the two groups (log-rank p = 0.554) despite longer procedure times in the AL + POBA group (p &lt; 0.001). Atrial tachycardia recurrences (p = 0.001) and the cardioversion rates after ablation (p &lt; 0.001) were higher in the AL + POBA group than CPVI group. AL + POBA was associated with better rhythm outcomes in patients with large anterior LA volume indices (p for interaction 0.037) and low mean LAA(left atrial appendage) voltages (p for interaction 0.019). In repeat procedures, the LA pulse pressure elevation was significant after the AL + POBA. Conclusion In patients with PeAF, an AL + POBA in addition to the CPVI did not improve the rhythm outcomes nor influence the long-term safety, and lead to more extended procedures. Procedure outcomes OverallAL + POBACPVIp-value(n = 604)(n = 302)(n = 302)Procedure time, min190.8 ± 62.6226.9 ± 49.4154.6 ± 52.8&lt;0.001Ablation time, sec5079 ± 19566420 ± 13723738± 1475&lt;0.001Overall complications24 (4.0)13 (4.3)11 (3.6)0.835Early recurrence, n (%)277 (45.9)129 (42.7)148 (49.0)0.142Recurrence type AT, n (% in early recur)77 (27.8)51 (39.5)26 (17.6)&lt;0.001Clinical recurrence within 1-year, n(%)116 (19.2)52 (17.2)65 (21.5)0.256Recurrence type AT, n (% in clinical recur)60 (23.1)46 (30.7)14 (12.7)0.001Cardioversion, n (% in total recur/ % overall)105 (40.4/17.4)74 (49.3/24.5)31 (28.1/10.3)&lt;0.001POBA, posterior box ablation; AL, anterior line; CPVI, circumferential pulmonary vein isolation; AT, atrial tachycardia;Abstract Figure. Long term ablation outcome


EP Europace ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1653-1662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hikmet Yorgun ◽  
Uğur Canpolat ◽  
Metin Okşul ◽  
Yusuf Ziya Şener ◽  
Ahmet Hakan Ateş ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is not as successful as in paroxysmal AF, and recent data indicate the key role of non-PV triggers. We aimed to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage isolation (LAAi) as an adjunct to PVI using cryoballoon (CB) in persistent AF. Methods and results We compared 144 persistent AF patients (59 ± 10 years, 51% females) who underwent PVI combined with LAAi with a propensity-score matched cohort of 138 persistent AF patients (59 ± 6 years, 52% female) in whom PVI-only was performed. Baseline and follow-up data including electrocardiography (ECG), 24-h Holter ECG’s, and echocardiography were recorded for all patients. Atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) recurrence was defined as detection of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia (≥30 s) after a 3-month blanking period. At a mean of 30.5 ± 5.6 months follow-up, 85 (61.6%) patients in the PVI-only group and 109 (75.7%) patients in the PVI+LAAi group were free of ATa after the index procedure (P = 0.008). Ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack was detected in 4 (2.9%) patients in PVI-only group and in 5 (3.5%) patients in the PVI+LAAi group (P = 0.784). Cox regression analysis revealed that the PVI-only strategy was found as a significant predictor for recurrence (hazard ratio 3.01, 95% confidence interval 1.81–5.03; P < 0.001). Conclusions Our findings indicated that CB-based LAAi+PVI was associated with a favourable efficacy compared to PVI-only strategy in patients with persistent AF. Although ischaemic event rates were similar between the groups, rigorous adherence to anticoagulation regime is paramount in order to prevent thrombo-embolic complications.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kettering

Abstract Background Catheter ablation has become the first line of therapy in patients with symptomatic, recurrent, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation. Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation is still the standard approach in these patients. However, the results are not very favourable and more complex ablation strategies are the subject of current controversy. Therefore, we have evaluated the effect of an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium on the long-term outcome. Methods A total of 240 patients (125 men, 115 women; mean age 70 years (SD ± 15 years)) with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation underwent a circumferential pulmonary vein ablation procedure in combination with an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium (group A). After discharge, patients were scheduled for repeated visits at the arrhythmia clinic at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 102 and 108 months after the ablation procedure. The long-term follow-up data was compared to 240 patients who underwent circumferential pulmonary vein ablation without an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium (group B). Results The ablation procedure could be performed as planned in all patients. Fifty-five out of 240 patients (22.9%) in group A and 58 out of 240 patients (24.2%) in group B experienced an arrhythmia recurrence within the first 3 months after ablation requiring an electrical cardioversion. At 108-month follow-up, analysis of a 168-hour ECG recording revealed no evidence for an arrhythmia recurrence in 135/240 patients (56.3%) in group A and in 111/220 patients (46.3%) in group B. In 73/240 patients (30.4%) in group A and 66/240 patients (27.5%) in group B, only short episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were documented. In 32 patients (13.3%) in group A, a recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation (&gt;48 hours) was revealed by the long-term recordings (group B: 63 patients (26.2%)). The lower arrhythmia recurrence rate in group A was partially due to a lower incidence of atypical atrial flutter after catheter ablation. The rate of repeat ablation procedures was significantly lower in group A than in group B. There were no major complications. Conclusions Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation comprising a circumferential pulmonary vein ablation and an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium provides more favourable results than circumferential pulmonary vein ablation alone. The effect is more pronounced during long-term than during short-term follow-up. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4S) ◽  
pp. 6-14
Author(s):  
T. Y. Chichkova ◽  
S. E. Mamchur ◽  
E. A. Khomenko

Aim. To estimate the clinical success of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).Methods.230 patients (males: 49.6%, mean age 57 (53; 62) with symptomatic paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) resistant to antiarrhythmic therapy were included in a single-center prospective study. The patients were randomized into 2 groups to undergo either cryoballoon ablation (n = 122) or radiofrequency (RF) (n = 108) ablation. Both groups were comparable in baseline parameters. The follow-up period was 12 months. Clinical outcomes were estimated with the use of a three-stage scale. The rates of cardiovascular rehospitalizations, direct-current cardioversions and repeated ablations during were estimated within the follow-up. The quality of life (QoL) in the cryoablation group was measured using the AFEQT scale.Results.77% (n = 94) of patients in the cryoballoon ablation group and 71.3% (n = 77) of patients in the RF group (р = 0.71) demonstrated reported the optimal clinical effects. Both groups, cryo ablation and RF ablation, had similar rates of cardiovascular hospitalizations (23.8 vs 28.7%, OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4–1.4; р = 0.39), direct-current cardioversions (12.3 vs 17.6%, OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3–1.4; р = 0.26) and repeated ablations (9.8–11.1%, OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.4–2.0; р = 0.75). The patients treated with cryoballoon as opposed to RF ablation had significantly more successful usage of “pill-in-pocket” strategy – 14.8 vs 6.5% (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.01–6.2; р = 0.04). Significant improvements of the QoL parameters with strong size effect have been found in the cryoablation group, i.e. global score (GS) increased by 8.9±6.9 (95% CI 6.6–10.1; dCohen 1.2; р<0.001), symptoms (S) – by 8.3±7.9 (95% CI 4.2–8.8; dCohen 1.5; р<0.001), daily activities (DA) – by 10.0±6.9 (95% CI = 6.4–10.6; dCohen 0.9; р<0.001), treatment concerns (TC) – by 5.5±6.0 (95% CI 6.3–9.2; dCohen 1.2; р<0.001) and treatment satisfaction (TS) – by 5.5±6.0 (95% CI 5.4–9.8; dCohen 0.9; р<0.001).Conclusion.The both catheter-based technologies had comparable clinical success. Cryoablation was characterized by improvement in all QoL parameters based on the AFEQT score.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document