Abstract 15934: Comparison of Atrial Fibrillation Burden Reduction in Patients With Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan L Musat ◽  
Nicolle S Milstein ◽  
Jacqueline Pimienta ◽  
Advay Bhatt ◽  
Tina C Sichrovsky ◽  
...  

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures to treat symptomatic AF. Ablation success is defined by absence of AF recurrence >30 seconds. However, reduction in AF burden (AFB) is also an important endpoint. Whether patients with paroxysmal (PAF) and persistent AF (PeAF) have similar reduction in AFB post-ablation is unknown. Objective: To compare the decrease in AFB following cryoballoon (CB) PVI in patients with PAF and PeAF. Methods: We enrolled consecutive pts with an implantable loop recorder (ILR) who subsequently underwent CB PVI. All patients were followed prospectively for at least one year, or until repeat ablation; we compared AFB pre and post-ablation. Results: The cohort included had 47 patients (66 ± 10 years; 32 [68%] male; PAF [n=23, 49%]; CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc 2.7 ± 1.7, 34 [72%] on AAD at the time of ablation). A median of 136 days [IQR 280, 73; minimum of 30 days] of ILR data pre-ablation were available. The median AFB for PAF was 4.7% [IQR 0.9, 14.8] and PeAF was 6.8% [IQR 1.1, 40.4]. After excluding a 3-month post-ablation blanking period, recurrent AF occurred in 12 (52%) PAF and 11 (46%) PeAF patients. The median AFB post-ablation for PAF and PeAF cohorts was 0.03%, [IQR 0, 0.3] and 0.04%, [IQR 0, 1.1], respectively. This represents a >99% reduction in AFB. Conclusion: Although 50% of patients undergoing CB PVI for PAF or PeAF had a recurrence of AF, there was >99% reduction in AFB in both groups. These data highlight the importance of using AFB burden as a marker of therapeutic efficacy post-AF ablation.

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Musat ◽  
N Milstein ◽  
R Shaw ◽  
A Bhatt ◽  
M Preminger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cryoballoon (CB) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is increasingly being used in patients (pts) with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there are limited data about the pattern of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in these pts. Objective To assess, using an implantable loop recorder (ILR), the patterns of AF recurrence following CB PVI in pts with persistent atrial fibrillation. Methods We enrolled consecutive pts with persistent AF ablation undergoing their first CB ablation. Other cavotricuspid isthmus ablation when indicated, no other ablation was performed. A Reveal LINQ ILR (Medtronic) was implanted <3 months following ablation; all pts had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. The recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia was determined and adjudicated; 4 distinct AF patterns were characterized (Figure). Results We studied 64 pts (66±9 years; 50 [78%] male; CHA2DS2-VASc 2.6±1.9) with persistent AF; 52 (81%) pts were on an antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) peri-ablation. During 803±361 days of follow-up, 33 (52%) pts had their 1st AF recurrence 91–365 days post-ablation and another 17 (27%) pts had their 1st AF recurrence >365 days post-ablation. No AF was seen in 14 (31%) pts. Most pts (33 of 50, 66%) with AF recurrence presented with 1 of 3 distinct patterns of paroxysmal AF (Figure), which ranged from 22 min to 124 hours. In 2/3 of these pts, all AF recurrences lasted <24 hours. Only 17 (34%) pts recurred with persistent AF. Conclusion Following single CB PVI, most pts with persistent AF remained free of persistent AF during long-term follow-up. Most pts with recurrent AF have 1 of 3 distinct patterns with episodes commonly last <24 hours. These data suggest that CB PVI ablation may halt AF progression in pts initially presenting with persistent AF.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Nascimento Matos ◽  
A.M Ferreira ◽  
A Sousa ◽  
G Rodrigues ◽  
J Carmo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Contemporary risk models to predict the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation have limited predictive ability. Models with high specificity seem particularly suited for the setting of AF ablation, where they could be used as gatekeepers to withhold intervention in patients with low likelihood of success. Machine learning (ML) has the potential to identify complex nonlinear patterns within datasets, improving the predictive power of models. This study sought to determine whether ML can be used to better identify patients who will relapse within one year of an AF ablation procedure. Methods We assessed 484 patients (294 men, mean age 61±12 years, 76% with paroxysmal AF) who underwent radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for symptomatic drug-refractory AF. Using this dataset, a machine-learning model based on Support Vector Machines (SVM) was developed to predict AF recurrence within one year of the procedure. The following variables were used to feed the model: type of AF (paroxysmal vs. non-paroxysmal), previous ablation procedure, left atrium (LA) volume, and epicardial fat volume (both derived from pre-ablation cardiac CT). The algorithm was trained in a random sample of 70% of the study population (n=339) and tested in the remainder 30% (n=145). Results A total of 130 patients (27%) suffered AF recurrence within one year of the procedure. The ML model predicted AF recurrence with 75% accuracy (95% CI 67–82%), yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 25% (95% CI 13–41%) and 94% (95% CI 88–98%), respectively. The corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 62% (95% CI 39–81%) and 77% (95% CI 67–82%), respectively. The relative weight of the variables in the ML model was: epicardial fat 56%, type of AF 23%, previous ablation 14%, and LA volume 7%. A high-risk subgroup representing 10.8% of patients was identified with the ML algorithm. In this subgroup, one-year recurrence was 62%, representing 24% of the total number of recurrences. Conclusion A machine-learning model showed high specificity in the identification of patients who relapse during the first year after AF ablation. In the future, these tools may be useful to improve patient selection. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Guhl ◽  
Donald Siddoway ◽  
Evan Adelstein ◽  
Samir Saba ◽  
Andrew Voigt ◽  
...  

Introduction: Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has emerged as an alternative to radiofrequency PVI for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The optimal ablation strategy for patients with persistent AF is unclear, as data on Cryoballoon PVI alone are limited. Methods: We analyzed a prospective registry of consecutive patients with persistent AF who underwent Cryoballoon PVI at a single center between 2011 and 2014. Patients were assessed for AF recurrence (including any atrial arrhythmia) after a 3 month blanking period at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and as needed for symptoms post PVI. Recurrence was based on typical symptoms or ECG/ event monitor evidence of AF. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate AF-free survival. Results: The 69 patients who underwent Cryoballoon PVI were aged 59 ± 8 years, 86% male, 54% HTN, had a CHADS2-VASC score 1.6 ± 1.2, and had a LA dimension 4.5 ± 0.6 cm. The AF recurrence-free rate at 1-year post-procedure was 59%. Overall, AF-free survival was 50% at the mean follow-up of 607 days. In comparing patients with persistent AF duration <1 year vs. >1 year, there was a trend toward greater AF recurrence-free rates in the <1 year group (66% vs 55%, p=0.09) Conclusions: Cryoballoon PVI appears to be an effective initial strategy in treating persistent AF, with an AF recurrence-free rate of 59% at 1 year.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ikechukwu Ifedili ◽  
Kristina Mouksian ◽  
David Jones ◽  
Ibrahim El Masri ◽  
Mark Heckle ◽  
...  

: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of electrical disturbance of the heart and contributes to significant patient morbidity and mortality. With better understanding of the mechanisms of atrial fibrillation and improvements in mapping and ablation technologies, ablation has become a preferred therapy for patients with symptomatic AF. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone for AF ablation therapy, but particularly in patients with AF occurring for longer than 7 days (persistent AF), identifying clinically significant non pulmonary vein targets and achieving durability of ablation lesions remain an important challenge.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Milstein ◽  
M Saberito ◽  
A Bhatt ◽  
M Habibi ◽  
T Sichrovsky ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cryoballoon (CB) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an approved method for ablation in patients with paroxysmal (PAF) or persistent (PeAF) atrial fibrillation (AF). Although the first 90 days post-ablation are considered within the blanking period (BP), the optimal duration of the BP remains undefined. Purpose To objectively define the BP duration in pts undergoing CB PVI by evaluating a cohort never treated with an antiarrhythmic drug (AAD). Methods We enrolled consecutive pts with either PAF or PeAF who underwent initial CB PVI; all pts had an implantable loop recorder (ILR) for long-term ECG monitoring. No pt received an AAD either before or after ablation. We determined the time to last AF episode within the first 90 days of ablation. We then correlated this to the likelihood a patient had recurrent AF between 91 and 365 days of ablation. Results There were 45 pts (67±8 years; 26 [58%] male; 40 [89%] PAF; CHA2DS2-VASc 2.6±1.3). We defined 4 distinct groups post ablation based on whether or not they had AF in the BP: (1) no AF days 0–90 (n=19 [42%]), (2) last AF days 0–30 (n=11 [24%]), (3) last AF days 31–60 (n=3 [7%]), and (4) last AF days 61–90 (n=12 [27%]). After the 90-day BP, 15 (33%) pts had AF recurrence. Pts with no AF and those with AF only within 30 days of ablation had similar long-term outcome; however, recurrent AF more than 32 days after ablation predicted long-term ablation failure (Figure). Conclusion The post CB PVI blanking period is just a month. AF recurrences beyond a month in patients not on an AAD are associated with AF recurrence in the majority of pts. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Blanking Group by AF Recurrence


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document